參考 參考 參考 參考文獻 文獻 文獻 文獻
Ahl, D. (1981). Computer games in mathematics education. Mathematics Teacher,
74(8), 653-656.
Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update of attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46, 293-311.
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2007). Assessing a modeling process of a linear pattern task.
Paper presented at the 13th conference of the International Community of Teachers of Mathematical Modeling and Applications, IN, USA.
Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). Rising to challenge: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM
Mathematics Education, 40, 111-129.
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Combining fading with prompting fosters learning.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774-783.
Australian Education Council. (1994). Mathematics: A curriculum profile for
Australian schools. Carlton. VIC: Curriculum Corporation.
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.),
Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135-146). Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Bahr, C., & Rieth, H. (1989). The effects of instructional computer games and drill and practice software on learning disabled students’ mathematics achievement.
Computers in the Schools, 6(3-4), 87-101.
Balacheff, N. (1987). Processus de preuve et situations de validation. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 18, 147–176.
Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2004). An investigation of beginning algebra students’
ability to generalize linear patterns. In M. J. Hoins, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, p. 286). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
Bell, A. (1979). The learning of process aspects of mathematics. Educational Studies
in Mathematics, 10, 361–387.
Betz, J. A. (1995). Computer games: increases learning in an interactive
multidisciplinary environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24, 195-205.
Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2000). Generalizing and progressively formalizing in a third-grade mathematics classroom: Conversations about even and odd numbers.
In M. L. Fernandez (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd
Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 115-119). Columbus, OH: The Eric Clearinghouse for
Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2002). Developing elementary teachers’ algebra “eyes and
ears”: Understanding characteristics of professional development that promote generative and self-understanding change in teacher practice. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Bodemer, D., Plo¨tzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning
and Instruction, 14, 325-341.
Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2002). Learning by producing hypertext from reader
perspectives: Cognitive flexibility theory reconsidered. In R. Bromme, & E. Stahl (Eds.), Writing hypertext and learning: Conceptual and empirical approaches (pp.
39-61). London: Pergamon.
Carpenter, T., & Franke, M. (2001). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school: Generalization and proof. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent.
(Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th
ICMI Study Conference: The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (pp. 155-162). Melbourne, Australia: The University of
Melbourne.Carpenter, T., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the
primary grades. Research Report #002. Madison, WI: National Center for
Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
Retrieved August 15, 2005 from http://www.wisc.wcer.edu/ncisla Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Lin, S. F. (2006). Computer-assisted learning for
mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education, 46, 140-151.
Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
24, 359-387.
Chen, C. H., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2007). The effect of web-based question prompts on Scaffolding knowledge integration and ill-structured problem solving. Journal of
Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359-375.
Chi, M. T., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),
Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 227-250). New York:
Freeman.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989).
Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven
guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco,
CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Coe, R., & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students. British Educational Research Journal, 2, 41–53.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship.
Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),
Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-493). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davis, R. B. (1986). Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to
mathematics education (2
nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive
reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91-142.
Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
Davydov, G. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological
problems in the structuring of school curricula. Soviet studies in mathematics, volume 2. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Department for Education and Skills. (2001). Frameworks for teaching mathematics:
Years 7, 8, and 9. London: DfEs Publiscaitons.
De Jong, T., Ainsworth, S., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., & Reimann, P.
(1998). Acquiring knowledge in science and mathematics: The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. In M. van Someren, P.
Reimann, H. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple
representations (pp. 9-41). Oxford: Elsevier Sciences.
Dienes, Z. P. (1961). On abstraction and generalization. Havard Educaitonal Review, 3, 289-301.
Din, F., & Caleo, J. (2000). Playing computer games versus better learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater, FL, USA.February 16-19.
Dochy, F., Moerkerke, G., & Marten, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning, and instruction: Assessment of domain-specific and domain-transcending prior knowledge and program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22, 309-339.
Doerfler, W. (1991). Forms and means of generalization in mathematics. In A. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematical knowledge: Its growth through teaching (pp. 63-85).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2005). Beyond edutainment: Exploring the education potential
of computer games. Ph. D. dissertation, IT University of Copenhagen.
Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education. (Published Online: May.
19, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11858-009-0184-6)
Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 38, 194–229.
Elshout, J. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hell, J. G. (1993). Using the computer as a help tool during learning by doing. Computers in Education, 21(1-2), 115-122.
English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes.
Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
English, L., &Warren, E. (1995). General reasoning processes and elementary algebraic understanding: Implications for instruction. Focus on Learning
Problems in Mathematics, 17(4), 1-19.
English, L. D., & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. The Mathematics Teacher, 91, 166-170.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics
achievement: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189-203.
Fitzgerald, G. (1991). Using the computer with student with emotional and behavioral
disorders. Reston, VA: Center for Special Education Technology.
Fogarty, R., Perkins, D. N., & Barell, J. (1992). How to teach for transfer. Palatine, IL:
Skylight Publishing.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. (1985). Metacogintion, cognitive monitoring and
mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163-175.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving process in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions.