• 沒有找到結果。

After much effort, we reached our research goals and contributed to the literature, but there are still a few limitations. First, the intensity of vividness is defined by the number of elements being included in the content, but there are many different ways to judge; for example, color is mostly intuitive and evocative, and it has been researched empirically. However, there is no effective tool for evaluating color; thus, if we can develop the ability to create evaluation criteria and thereby find an important relationship between color and customer engagement, we can provide stronger

contributions.

Second, although we have examined the intensity of rich information and attain its results, there are still several variables that may influence the consequence, such as the information resource,

acceptor of information, and type of information. Two studies have classified contents into

information and entertainment and examine, but they had adverse consequence against each other.

However, if entertainment really can receive plenty of reactions, what type of entertainment would get the best effort, e.g., fashion, celebrities, music or movies? To sum up, exploring customer engagement with social media still has meaning and value that are worthy of examining in the future.

5.2 Research Implication

Our research findings reveal significant implications to the academic and business area. We thoroughly studied and examined academic theory and research, which include customer

engagement and Use & Gratification theory; in addition, because we found that interactivity factors and emotiveness can positively affect customer engagement, brand managers can use this evidence to adjust their content strategy to attract their audience and enhance the relationship between them and their customers. Moreover, because we have verified the value of customer engagement, companies can refer to our research to consider whether they are making a suitable investment in social media and are appropriately evaluating its value. Thus, our research can provide further insight and be of value to someone who tends to conduct research or use social media.

24

5.3 Summary

Social media strategy for business is still a critical issue in academic and empirical arenas, and there are different portfolios for different purposes. We explored the common methods of verifying and analyzing the effects of social media use in practice. The results showed that interactivity, richness, and emotiveness have a positive impact on resonance and customer engagement but that a few factors negatively impact customer engagement.

Following technical trends and the behavior of people, social media has become the thing that most deeply influences our life and that brings huge opportunity and value to companies; hence,

companies would like to spend a lot of money and invest in research that effectively retrieves benefits from it. However, many obstacles and difficulties remain. To address these problems and provide further insight, we conducted our research and contributed our findings. First, we analyze and verify that some dimensions, which are commonly used in content, effectively influence the behavior of customer engagement. Second, we specify that the frequency of customer engagement behavior (likes, comments, and shares) is meaningful and valuable to the company. This finding eliminates any doubts that companies might have about investing in social media. Third, examining the analytic results revealed that different factors have different effects and meaning. Companies and researchers can refer to our research to create their own strategy or conduct further research on using different dimension effects.

25

Reference

1. Agresta, S. & Bough, B. B. (2011). Perspectives on social media marketing: the agency perspective, the brand perspective. Course Technology, Boston, MA.

2. Arnold, M. J. & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77-95.

3. Birkhoff, G. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

4. Bottles, K. & Sherlock, T. (2011). Who should manage your social media strategy? Physician

Executive, 37(2), 68-72.

5. Bagozzi, R. P. & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional Social Action in Virtual Communities.

Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2-21.

6. Blattberg, R. C. & Deighton, J. (1991). Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the age of Addressability. MIT Sloan Management Review, 33(1), 5-14.

7. Patrakosol, B. & Lee, S. M. (2013). Information richness on service business websites. Service

Business, 7(2), 329-346.

8. Balasubramanian, S., Konana, P. & Menon, N. M. (2003). Customer satisfaction in virtual environments: a study of online investing. Manage Science, 49(7), 871-889.

9. Dictionary, C. (2011). “Emotion”, available at: www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english (accessed 1 June 2012).

10. Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media.

Management Decision, 50(2), 253-272.

11. Cvijikj, I. P. & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages.

Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843-861.

12. Choi, Y. & Thorson, E. (1983). Memory for factual, emotional and balanced ads under two instructional sets. In Fletcher, A.D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1983 Conference of the American

Academy of Advertising, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

13. Constantinides, E., & Fountain, S. J. (2008). Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9, 231-244.

14. Eysenck, H. (1941). The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48(1), 83-92.

15. Sabate, F. & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2014). Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. European Management Journal, 32(6), 1001-1011.

16. Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons, 54(3), 193-207.

17. Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-396.

18. Fennis, B. M. & Stroebe, Wolfgang (2010). The Psychology of Advertising. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.

19. Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification

26

perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 702-722.

20. Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., Das, S., Dellarocas, C., Pfeiffer, B., Libai, B., Sen, S., Shi, M.

& Verlegh, P. (2005). The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3), 415-428.

21. Graber, D. A. (1989). Content and meaning. The American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 144-52.

22. Hennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S., Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A. &

Skiera, B. (2010). The impact of new media on customer relationships. Journal of Service

Research, 13(3), 311-330.

23. Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (2003). Most advanced, yet acceptable:

Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British

Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 111-124.

24. Abdi, H. (2003). Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression. The Universtiy of Texas at Dallas.

25. Hirschman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.

26. Iyer, A. & Leach, C. W. (2008). Emotion in inter-group relations. European Review of Social

Psychology, 19(1), 86-125.

27. Jahn, B. & Kunz, W. (2012). How to transform consumers into fans of your brand. Journal of

Service Management, 23(3), 344-361.

28. Gummerus, J. & Liljander, V. (2012). Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community.

Management Research Review, 35(9), 857-877.

29. Jiang, J. Y. (2004). The Influence of Advertising Slogans and Advertising Appeals on Advertising Effectiveness.

30. De Vries, L., Gensler, S. & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing. Journal of Interactive

Marketing, 26(2), 83-91.

31. Madupu, V. & Cooley, D. O. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of online brand community participation: A conceptual framework. Journal of Internet Commerce, 9(2), 127-147.

32. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment. Journal of

Retailing, 77(1), 39–56.

33. Mahlke, S. (2002). Factors influencing the experience of website usage. Extended abstracts of

the 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2002, 846-847.

34. Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). A task-based model of perceived website complexity.

Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(3), 501-524.

35. Nair, M. (2011). Understanding and measuring the value of social media. The Journal of

Corporate Accounting & Finance, 22(3), 45-51.

36. Michaelidou, N., Siamagka, N. T. & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Usage, barriers and

measurement of social media marketing: an exploratory investigation of small and medium B2B brands. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1153-1159.

27

37. Jane De Vries, N. & Carlson, J. (2014). Examining the drivers and brand performance

implications of customer engagement with brands in the social media environment. Journal of

Brand Management, 21(6), 495-515.

38. Kwon, O., Kim, C. R. & Kim, G. (2013). Factors affecting the intensity of emotional expressions in mobile Communications. Online Information Review, 37(1), 114-131.

39. Pandir, M. & Knight, J. (2006). Homepage aesthetics: The search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity. Interacting with Computers, 18(6), 1351-1370.

40. Phan, M. (2011). Do social media enhance consumer’s perception and purchase intentions of luxury fashion brands? The Journal for Decision Makers, 36(1), 81-84.

41. Phillips, C., & Chaparro, B. (2009). Visual appeal vs. usability: Which one influences user perceptionsof a website more. Usability News, 11(2), 1-9.

42. Page, T. J., Thorson, E. & Heide, M. P. (1990). The memory impact of commercials varying in emotional appeal and product involvement. In Stuart Agres, Julie A. Edell, and Tony M.

Dubitsky (Eds.), Emotion in Advertising: Theoretical and Practical Explorations. Westport, CT:

Quorum Books, 255-268.

43. Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. & Francis, M. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 863-71.

44. Davis, R., Lang, B., & Gautam, N. (2013). Modeling utilitarian-hedonic dual mediation (UHDM) in the purchase and use of games. Internet Research, 23(2), 229-256.

45. Fliess, S., Nadzeika, A., & Nesper, J. (2012). Understanding Patterns of Customer Engagement – How Companies Can Gain a Surplus from a Social Phenomenon. Journal of Marketing

Development and Competiveness, 6(2), 81-92.

46. Scissors, L. E., Gill, A. J., Geaghty, K. & Gergle, D. (2009). In CMC we trust: the role of similarity. Proceedings of CHI 2009, 527-536.

47. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Doree´n, P., Pirner, P. & Verhoef, P.C. (2010).

Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of

Service Research, 13(3), 253-66.

48. Verhoef, P.C., Reinartz, W. J. & Krafft, M. (2010). Customer engagement as a new perspective in customer management. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 247-52.

49. Verhoef, P. C., & Lemon, K. N. (2013). Successful customer value management: key lessons and emerging trends. European Management Journal, 31(1), 1-15.

50. Lohtia, R., Donthu, N. & Hershberger, E. K. (2003). The Impact of Content and Design Elements on Banner Advertising Click-through Rates. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 410-418.

51. Nihel, Z. (2013). The Effectiveness of Internet Advertising through Memorization and Click on a Banner. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(2), 93-101.

52. Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R. & Von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: social motives and social context. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 99-101.

28

53. Smith, C. (2013). Retailers say social media is having an impact on their bottom lines,

BusinessInsider, 21, June.

54. Ko, Y. J., Kim, K., Claussen, C. L., & Kim, T. H. (2008). The effects of sport involvement, sponsor, awareness and corporate image on intention to purchase sponsors’ products.

International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 9(2), 79-94.

55. Jeong, C. (2009). A dissertation presented to the graduate school of the university of Florida in

partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of doctor of philosophy. University of

Florida.

相關文件