• 沒有找到結果。

Traditional Chinese to English Word Search Puzzle

Chapter 3 System Design and Implementation

3.3 System Architecture

3.4.3 Traditional Chinese to English Word Search Puzzle

the corresponding meaning of the traditional Chinese character inside the puzzle which consists of English words. After the user completes the puzzle of finding the meaning from traditional Chinese to English characters, a congratulatory message is shown signaling that the user completed the puzzle successfully. if the user did not complete the puzzle, the puzzle must be done over for successful completion.

Figure 13: Traditional Chinese to English Word Search Puzzle.

3.5 Multiple Choice Quiz Engine

The last component of the system is the multiple choice quiz engines. This engine consists of two categories:

 English to Mandarin Multiple Choice Quiz Engine

 Mandarin to English Multiple Choice Quiz Engine.

Figure 14: Main Menu of Multiple Choice Engine.

3.5 .1 English to Mandarin Multiple Choice Quiz Engine

: When the user selects this mode from English to Mandarin to complete some multiple choice questions, the user must select what type of mode he or she wants to answer. The two types of mode used in the format of the quiz engine is either Easy or Difficult. When the user selects whatever mode he or she selected, the user starts to answer the following multiple choice questions. There are 10 questions in each lesson whereby the English characters are shown and the user must find the corresponding answers in Mandarin Characters which are shown as options that the user must complete. After the user completes the multiple choice questions, a congratulatory message is shown indicating that the user completed the multiple choice questions

successfully. If the user did not complete the multiple choice questions, it must be done over for successful completion.

Figure 15: English to Mandarin Multiple Choice Quiz Engine

3.5.2 Mandarin to English Multiple Choice Quiz Engine

: When the user selects this mode from Mandarin to English to complete some multiple choice questions, the user must select what type of mode he or she wants to answer. The two types of mode used in the format of the quiz engine is either Easy or Difficult. When the user selects whatever mode he or she selected, the user starts to answer the following multiple choice questions. There are 10 questions in each lesson whereby the Mandarin characters are shown and the user must find the corresponding answers in English characters which are shown as options that the user must complete. After the user completes the multiple choice questions, a

congratulatory message is shown indicating that the user completed the multiple choice questions successfully. If the user did not complete the multiple choice questions, it must be done over for successful completion.

Figure 16: Mandarin to English Multiple Choice Quiz Engine

CHAPTER 4: EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS

This chapter discusses the experiment methods and the final results. Furthermore, many steps during these experiments were conducted for 4 months to test the usability of the system. During the testing, there were some problems that occurred and solutions were made for continuous reliability and availability for the users.

4.1 Method

4.1.1 Participants

30 International Students, 10 females and 20 males at National Chiao Tung University were selected and participated in these experiments because they have a basic level of the Chinese language while some of these participants had beginner level of the Chinese Language.

4.1.2 Experiment Procedures

There were 2 experiments that were conducted. The first experiment was conducted for 6 weeks from March 11 to April 22 2011 while the system was still at its development and implementation stage. Majority of the international students at National Chiao Tung University selected for these experiments had a Nokia-based mobile phone at their possessions. During that period of 6 weeks, these international students used the mobile learning system for their everyday use of learning. Each of the students spent about 15-20 minutes solving the puzzles and answering the multiple choice questions. After the 6 weeks expired, they were given survey questions to evaluate the mobile learning system during its

implementation stage; furthermore, they also gave comments about the system and what modifications were needed.

The second experiments was conducted for another 6 weeks from April 29 to June 10 2011 with the full functionality of the system; furthermore, problems were solved by

comments made about the system from the international students. The main reason for the second phase of this experiment was to evaluate the usefulness of the system after it was fully developed and compare it to the first phase of the experiments. The students were also given survey questions after the experiment was finished.

4.2 Results

As aforementioned above, Survey Questionnaires and statistical analyses were used to get responses from the international students about the mobile learning system. These survey questionnaires were used to target the usability and effectiveness of the system.

4.2.1 Statistical Analyses for First Phase of Experiment (March 11 to April 22 2011)

Before the first phase of the experiment was conducted, international students were asked what their level of Chinese Proficiency was. Figure 18 shows the responses.

Figure 17: Level of Chinese Proficiency.

In Figure 18, it shows that 63% of the international students at National Chiao Tung University were at the beginner level of Chinese Proficiency while 37% were basic level.

The objective of this experiment was only to focus on the beginner and basic level students.

After the first phase of the experiment was completed, the participants were given survey questions to evaluate the system during its developmental stage. These survey questions were used from CSUQ (Computer System Usability Questionnaire (Lewis, 1995)) which was developed by IBM and was designed to evaluate the usability of a computer system. It contains 19 questions, each being a statement that the user has to rate on a (1-7) scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". The CSUQ were divided into categories of System Usefulness, Information Quality, Overall Satisfaction and Interface Quality. The corresponding questions that comprise the 4 categories of the CSUQ are shown in Table 1of appendix A .The likert scale for the survey questions is scored from 1 being the lowest to 7 as the highest.

Category Items Overall Satisfaction Questions 1-19

System Usefulness Questions 1-8 Information Quality Questions 9-15

Interface Quality Questions 16-18

Table 1: CSUQ Categories and Corresponding Questions

Overall Satisfaction means the overall perception of the system while System Usefulness defines the trend of the usefulness of the system. Information Quality means assessing the satisfaction with the quality of the information associated with the system while Interface Quality means assessing the satisfaction with the quality of interface associated with the system. Furthermore, the results for overall satisfaction, system usefulness, information quality and interface quality are shown in Table 2 for the first phase of the experiment.

Categories Average( Out of 7) Standard Deviation Overall Satisfaction 3.96 0.58

System Usefulness 3.99 0.46

Information Quality 3.92 0.47

Interface Quality 3.83 0.39

Table 2: Average and Standard Deviation of the First Phase of Experiment

In order for better readability, a percentage diagram was made to distinctly evaluate the numbers during the first phase of the experiment in Figure 18.

Figure 18: Percentile Usability Results for the First Phase of Experiment.

In the following diagram, it showed that during the developmental stages of the system, the highest category was System Usefulness at 57.1% indicated that the international students in the experiment believed that the system was useful. The second highest category was Overall Satisfaction at 56.5% indicated that the international students in the experiment believed that the interface of the system was clear.

Information Quality was registered at 56% indicated that the international students were satisfied with the information content of the system while Interface Quality was registered at 54.8% which the lowest category as indicated by the international students was believed that the interface was clear and precise. However, knowing that the results displayed at the first phase of the experiment was during the developmental stage of the system, a room

of improvement was needed as indicated that the average category should be at 70% and above for the system to be successful and beneficial for the international students as stated;

therefore, a second experiment was performed another 6 weeks after improvements.

4.3 Redesign Issues

After analyzing the statistical data during the first phase of the experiment, it was noted that the system needed to be improved while it was at its developmental stage. Some of the comments noted by the students after the first phase of the experiment was done was that the words in the menu buttons of the system were not identical to some parts of the

application, difficulty in using the system and installing the system, the translation engine does not convert the words whether it is from English to Chinese or Chinese to English.

4.4 Statistical Analyses for Second Phase of Experiment (April 29 to June 10 2011)

The system was improved and given to the international students to test for another six weeks. After the second phase of the experiment was completed, the participants were given survey questions to evaluate the system. Furthermore, after analyzing the statistical data for the second phase of the experiment, it showed some improvements in all categories of the system.

The results for overall satisfaction, system usefulness, information quality and interface quality are shown in Table 2 for the second phase of the experiment.

Categories Average ( Out of 7) Standard Deviation Overall Satisfaction 5.29 0.64

System Usefulness 5.36 0.58

Information Quality 5.44 0.74

Interface Quality 5.15 0.52

Table 3: Average and Standard Deviation of The Second Phase of Experiment.

In order for better readability, a percentage diagram was made to distinctly evaluate the numbers during the first phase of the experiment in Figure 19.

Figure 19: Percentile Usability Results for the Second Phase of Experiment

In the following diagram, it showed some improvements in all categories of the system. System Usefulness was registered at 76.7% which indicated that the international students in the experiment believed that the system was useful, effective and easy for them to learn. Interface Quality registered at 73.6% which indicated that the international students in the experiment believed that the interface of the system was clear and improved.

The overall satisfaction of the system was registered at 75.6% which indicated that the international students were satisfied with the system while Information Quality registered at 77.8 which indicated that the international students believed that the information of the system was clear and precise due to the improvements of adding more lessons contents. The difference between the statistical analysis of both the first and second phase of the

experiments showed that there was vast improvement in all aspects of the system. In the end, the main idea behind these experiments was to accomplish the percentile average of 70% and above for the system to be successful and beneficial for the international students as stated.

5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS

5.1 CONCLUSION

Mobile learning Systems in the educational development has continued to grow and evolve in Information and Communication Technologies; therefore, it continues to execute and accomplish the mounting demands for constant learning opportunities that facilitates learners especially students to “learn while you are on the go”.

The implementation and realization of a cross-platform mobile language learning system in a QT SDK Framework has shown vast signs in learning. Majority of the International Students at National Chiao University during this research showed positive and encouraging stance towards mobile learning and are keen to learn Chinese using their mobile phones.

Furthermore, results from this research showed that this QT-Based Mobile Language learning system could be also employed for learning other languages and Smart Mobile Phones could have a affirmative outcome in learning Chinese as a second language at all levels of Chinese learning for International Students in national Chiao Tung University.

This system provides International Students with effortless and resourceful access to translating any given word at any time; in addition, the different interactive learning games not only assist these International Students learn well but also entertaining. International Students can learn and occupy themselves on the system anytime and anywhere.

Finally, Mobile Chinese Learning is at its preeminent in Hybrid approach when enhanced with Traditional Chinese Learning; additionally, it has showed that this system with its ease and handiness features makes it ideal for International Students to learn.

5.2 FUTURE WORK

The experiments conducted and directed towards the International Students at National Chiao University by the implementation of the system showed great assurance for future alterations. Even though, there was a great reception of the system from the International Students at National Chiao Tung University, experiments shall be performed in other institutions for international students as well in using the system and examine their main attitude towards it.

This system will persist to grow and the future work will include improving the content of the system, creating more assortments of interactive learning options for the system to make it more knowledgeable, code optimization, and Performance enhancement of the system to continuously suit the learners’ needs and establishing different frameworks to implement the system. Furthermore, allowing teachers to send their own questions into the system is also considered for future works considering the fact that the experiments was mainly about the students' view of the system.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Ali Mostakhdemin-Hosseini, Jari Mustajarvi, “Framework for Mobile Learning System based on Education Component”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Applications of Mathematics and Informatics- ICTAMI 2003, Alba Lulia, pp.191-195.

[2] Jo Colley and Geoff Stead, “Take a Bite: Producing Accessible Learning materials For Mobile Devices”, Proceedings of MLEARN 2004, pp. 43-46.

[3] Danail Docher, Ivo Hristov, “Mobile Learning Applications – ubiquitous characteristics and Technological solutions”, Cybernetics and Information Technologies, volume 6, no.3, Sofia 2006.

[4] Ergeniya Georgieva, Angel Smrikarov, Tsvetozar Georgiev, “A General Classification of Mobile Learning Systems”, International Conference on Computer Systems and

Technologies- CompSysTech 2005.

[5] David parsons, Hokyoung Ryu, “ A Framework for assessing the Quality of Mobile learning”, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference for Process Improvement Research and Education(INSPIRE), Southampton Solent University, UK, 13 April 2006.

[6] Simon Starr, “Application of Mobile Technology in Learning and Teaching: M-Learning”, Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit (LTEU), Canterbury Christ Church University College, UK, September 2003.

[7] Parsons, D. 2007, “Mobile Learning”, in D.Taniar (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Mobile Computing and Commerce, IGI Global, pp.525-527.

[8] Google Translate API, Retrieved May 7, 2011, from http://code.google.com/intl/zh-TW/apis/language/

[9] Jasmin Blanchette, Mark Summerfield, “C++ GUI Programming with QT4, Second Edition”, Prentice Hall, printed February 4, 2008.

[10] Mark Summerfield, “Advanced QT Programming: Creating Great Software with C++

and QT4”, prentice Hall, printed July 2010.

[11] Sara Reina, Shelley S.C Young, “ Design and Implementation of a Mobile Game-based System to support Chinese Language speaking for International Students in a Chinese Environment”, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, S.L Wong et al.(Eds.) 2010, pp.427-431.

[12] Wong, L.H., and Chin, C.K, “Towards a new era of Chinese Language Learning with Mobile Learning”, Chinese Language Education, 8(2), pp.69-84.

[13] Chang- Chih Tseng, Chun- Hung Lin, Wen Lian Hsu, “A Mobile Environment for Chinese Language Learning”, Current Developments in Technology- Assisted Education (2006), pp.243-246.

[14] Tom Anderson,Wu-Yuin Hwang, Ching-Hua Hsieh, “The Study of a Mobile

Collaboration Learning System for Chinese Language Learning", published in Workshop Proceedings: supplementary proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education(ICCE) 2008.

[15] QT SDK 1.1, retrieved 5th may 2011, from http://www.forum.nokia.com/Develop/QT/.

[16] Cheng Chung, “Practical Chinese Audio Visual 2nd Edition Book 1”, published by Book CO. LTD.

[17] Cheng Chung, “Practical Chinese Audio Visual 2nd Edition Book 2”, published by Book CO. LTD.

[18] Cheng Chung, “Practical Chinese Audio Visual 2nd Edition Book 3”, published by Book CO. LTD.

[19] Cheng Chung, “Practical Chinese Audio Visual 2nd Edition Book 4”, published by Book CO. LTD.

[20] Nokia, “Qt- Cross Platform Application Framework Datasheet”, published July 29 2009.

[21] QT Framework, retrieved June 4 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(framework)

[22] QT Creator , retrieved May 22 2011 , from http://qt.nokia.com/products/developer-tools [23] Opera Ajax Platform , published October 16 2005, from

http://virtuelvis.com/archives/2005/11/opera-platform-sdk.

[24] Eclipse Mobile Tools for Java, retrieved April 22 2009, from   http://www.eclipse.org/mtj/

[25] Netbeans IDE Bundle for Java ME , published 27 November 2009 http://netbeans.org/kb/docs/javame/quickstart.html 

[26] Santally Mohammad Issack,Mussawir Hosany and Ramsawok Gianeshwar, “ A M-E(Mobile-Elearning) Adaptive Architecture to support Flexible Learning”, Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology(MOJIT) April 2006, vol 3, No.1, pp.19-28.

Appendix A: Questionnaire

Computer System Usability Questionnaire

This Questionnaire gives you an opportunity to tell us your reactions to the system you used.

Your responses will help us understand what aspects of the system you are particularly concerned about and the aspects that satisfy you.

To as great a degree as possible, think about all the tasks that you have done with the system while you answer these questions. Please read each statement and indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the statement by circling a number on the scale. If a statement does not apply to you, circle N/A.

As you complete the questionnaire, please do not hesitate to ask any Questions.

Thank you!

1. Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it is to use this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

2. It was simple to use this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

3. I could effectively complete the tasks and scenarios using this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

4. I was able to complete the tasks and scenarios quickly using this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

5. I was able to efficiently complete the tasks and scenarios using this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE 6. I felt comfortable using this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

7. It was easy to learn to use this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

8. I believe I could become productive quickly using this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

9. The system gave error messages that clearly told me how to fix problems.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

10. Whenever I made a mistake using the system, I could recover easily and quickly.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

11. The information such as on-line help, on-screen messages and other documentation provided with this system was clear.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

12. It was easy to find the information I needed.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

13. The information provided for the system was easy to understand.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

14. The information was effective in helping me complete the tasks and scenarios.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

15. The organization of information on the system screens was clear.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

Note: “The Interface” includes those items that you use to interact with the system. For example, some components of the interface are the keyboard, the mouse, the microphone, and the screens (including their use of graphics and language).

16. The interface of this system was pleasant.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

17. I liked using the interface of this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

18. This system has all the functions and capabilities I expect it to have.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

19. Overall, I am satisfied with this system.

STRONGLY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STRONGLY

AGREE DISAGREE

 

相關文件