1. In the Thomas-Fermi-von Weizs¨acker Theory of Atoms and Molecules [17], they introduce the energy functional
EpT F W(ρ) = Z
|∇ρ1/2(x)|2dx + 1 p
Z
ρp(x)dx − Z
V (x)ρ(x)dx + D(ρ, ρ) for 1 < p < ∞. They are concerned with the following problem
Min{EpT F W(ρ)|ρ ∈ L1∩ Lp, ρ(x) ≥ 0, ∇ρ1/2 ∈ L2, Z
ρdx = λ}. (1.4) The main result in [17] is the following:
Theorem 1.1 There is a critical value 0 < λc < ∞ depending only on p and V such that
(a) If λ ≤ λc, problem (1.4) has a unique solution, (b) If λ > λc, problem (1.4) has no solution, (c) When p ≥ 43, then λc ≥ Z ≡Pk
i=1zi,
(d) When p ≥ 53 and k=1(atomic case), then λc > Z.
2. In the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizs¨acker Theory [2], they introduce the en-ergy functional
EpT F DW(ρ) = A Z
|∇ρ1/2(x)|2dx + γ p
Z
ρp(x)dx −3Ce 4
Z
ρ4/3(x)dx
− Z
V (x)ρ(x)dx + D(ρ, ρ) + U
for p > 43. U is the repulsive electrostatic energy of the nuclei,
U = X
1≤i<j≤k
zizj|Ri− Rj|−1.
A > 0 is an adjustable constant. Originally, A was taken to be unity. γ = (6π2)2/3h2(2mq2/3)−1 where h = ~/2π, ~=Planck’s constant, and m is the elec-tron mass. q is the number of spin states (=2 for elecelec-trons). Ce is a positive constant. In the original theory (see Dirac, [18]), the value Ce = (6/πq)1/3 was used for reasons which will be explained in Lieb, E.H.[2].
The function space is
Gp = {ρ|ρ ∈ L3 ∩ Lp, ∇ρ1/2 ∈ L2, D(ρ, ρ) < ∞}.
The Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizs¨acker Theory[2] has not been as extensively studied as the above theory. They basically proved the existence of ground state solutions and discuss some properties of the solution by α method. The same technique will be used in our work.
2 Main Results
In this paper, we obtain the following lemmas and theorems. The proof of the lem-mas and theorems will be given in the next four sections. First, we prove two lemlem-mas which are useful in the proof of min{Eα(ρ)|ρ ∈ G}, the existence of ground state solution of (1.3).
Lemma 3.1 For every ε > 0, there is a constant Cε, depending on V and ε such that
Z
V (x)ρ(x)dx ≤ εkρk3+ CεD(ρ, ρ)1/2 for every ρ ≥ 0.
Lemma 3.2 There exist positive constants a0 and C0 such that Eα(ρ) ≥ a0(kρk3+ k∇ρ1/2 k22 +D(ρ, ρ)) +
Z
Jα(ρ)dx − C0.
Based on above two lemmas, we prove the existence of min{Eα(ρ)|ρ ∈ G}.
Theorem 4.1 There exists a minimizer ρ0 for Eα(ρ) on G. Every such ρ0 ∈ L1, and R ρ0 ≤ some constant which is independent of ρ0.
First, the proof of Theorem 4.1 is concerned with a minimizing sequence ρn ∈ G.
Such minimizing sequence make sense since E : G → ¯R is well defined where ¯R is the range of the mapping Eα.
Next, we derive the Euler equation satisfied by ρ0. Set ψ = ρ1/20 .
Theorem 4.2 ρ1/20 satisfies the Euler equation:
[−4 + W (x)]ψ = 0 where
W = −4
3ψ2/3−1
3 · ψ2/3
1 + ψ−2/3 +5
3ψ4/3ln(1 + ψ−2/3) + α − V + B(ψ2).
Now we prove the existence of ground state solution of (1.2). First, we prove one theorem which is useful in the proof of the existence of ground state solution of (1.2).
Theorem 5.1 If ψ ∈ ˜G satisfies the Euler equation and ψ(x) ≥ 0 for all x, then ψ is continuous. Moreover, ψ ∈ C0,µ for all µ < 1.
Based on the above theorem, we prove the existence of ground state solution of (1.2).
Theorem 5.2 The two functions E(λ), Eα(λ) are finite and satisfy E(λ) = Eα(λ) − αλ.
The solutions of (1.2) and (1.3) are the same. The following theorems discuss the properties of ψ in (1.3). In fact, the minimizer of (1.2) also have the same properties.
Theorem 6.1 If ψ ∈ ˜G satisfies the Euler equation and ψ(x) ≥ 0 for all x, ei-ther ψ ≡ 0 or ψ > 0 on R3\Sk
i=1{Ri}.
Define φ(g) to be φ(g) =
Z
|∇g|2dx − Z
g8/3dx + Z
g10/3ln(1 + g−23)dx + D(g2, g2).
Theorem 6.2 If V = 0 in φ, there are C∞ functions of compact support such that φ(g) < 0.
Theorem 6.3 ψ is bounded on R3 and ψ(x) → 0 as |x| → ∞. Also, ψ ∈ H2 (i.e., ψ, ∇ψ and 4ψ ∈ L2).
Theorem 6.4 Let ψ be the positive solution to Euler equation. Then for every 0 < t < α, there exists a constant M such that
ψ(x) ≤ M exp[−t1/2|x|].
3 Some Basic Properties of E
αThis section are concerned with some properties of Eα which are useful in the proof of min{Eα(ρ)|ρ ∈ G}.
Lemma 3.1 For every ε > 0, there is a constant Cε, depending on V and ε such that Z
V (x)ρ(x)dx ≤ εkρk3+ CεD(ρ, ρ)1/2 (3.1) for every ρ ≥ 0.
Proof: Let δ > 0 be a small constant and let ζ(x) be a smooth function such that 0 ≤ ζ ≤ 1 and On the other hand define the operator B to be
B(ρ)(x) =
|x−y|dy is the Newtonian potential in R3(see [19],p18),
−4B(ρ) = 4πρ. (3.4)
We deduce from (3.5) and Sobolev’s inequality(see [19],p148) that
k B(ρ)k6 ≤ CD(ρ, ρ)1/2. (3.6)
for some constant C. Consequently, by (3.4) and (3.6), Z
V2(x)ρ(x)dx = Z
V2(x) 1
4π(−4B(ρ)(x))dx
= 1
4π Z
∇B(ρ)(x)∇V2(x)dx
= − 1 4π
Z
4V2(x)B(ρ)(x)dx
≤ 1
4π||4V2||6/5||B(ρ)||6
≤ C1 k 4V2 k6/5 D(ρ, ρ)1/2 (3.7) where C1 = 4π1 C is a constant. Note that V (x) is the Green’s function for the Laplacian, we have
4V2(x) ∈ Co∞. Combining (3.3) and (3.7), we obtain
Z
V (x)ρ(x)dx = Z
V1(x)ρ(x)dx + Z
V2(x)ρ(x)dx ≤ εkρk3+ CεD(ρ, ρ)1/2.
Lemma 3.2 There exist positive constants a0 and C0 such that Eα(ρ) ≥ a0(kρk3+ k∇ρ1/2 k22 +D(ρ, ρ)) +
Z
Jα(ρ)dx − C0. (3.8)
Proof: Use (3.1), Young’s inequality and Sobolev’s inequality, Since ε can be arbitrary small and C is a fixed number, 1−εC2 and 1−εC2C are positive.
Choose
4 Minimization of E
α(ρ) with ρ ∈ G —The Euler Equation
Theorem 4.1 There exists a minimizer ρ0 for Eα(ρ) on G. Every such ρ0 ∈ L1, and R ρ0 ≤ some constant (independent of ρ0).
Proof: Let ρn ∈ G be a minimizing sequence. By Lemma 2.2, we have kρnk3 ≤ C, k∇ρ1/2n k2 ≤ C, D(ρn, ρn) ≤ C.
Therefore, we may extract a subsequence, still denoted by ρn, such that as n → ∞,
ρn → ρ0 weakly in L3, (4.1)
ρn → ρ0 a.e., (4.2)
∇ρ1/2n → ∇ρ1/20 weakly in L2. (4.3) ((4.2)relies on the fact that if Ω is a bounded smooth domain then H1(Ω) is relatively compact in L2(Ω). (4.1) and (4.3) imply that {ρ1/2n } is bounded in H1(Ω). Hence {ρ1/2n } has a subsequence converging in L2(Ω) and a.e.). Next, we prove that Eα is weakly lower semicontinuous at ρ0. Note that ∇ρ1/2n → ∇ρ1/20 weakly in L2, we have
lim inf
n→∞
Z
|∇ρ1/2n |2dx ≥ Z
|∇ρ1/20 |2dx.
Note that Jα(ρn) ≥ 0 and D(ρn, ρn) ≥ 0, by Fatou’s Lemma, we have lim inf
n→∞
Z
Jα(ρn)dx ≥ Z
Jα(ρ0)dx and
lim inf
n→∞ D(ρn, ρn) ≥ D(ρ0, ρ0).
We now prove that
Z
V (x)ρn(x)dx → Z
V (x)ρ0(x)dx.
We write V = V1+ V2 as in Lemma 3.1. By (3.2) and (4.1), as n → ∞, we have Z
V1(x)ρn(x)dx → Z
V1(x)ρ0(x)dx.
On the other hand
Therefore, we prove the existence of min{Eα(ρ)|ρ ∈ G}. It is easy to see from (3.8) that the bound onR ρ0 is independent of ρ0.
Next, we derive the Euler equation satisfied by ρ1/20 . Set ψ = ρ1/20 .
Theorem 4.2 ρ1/20 satisfies the Euler equation:
[−4 + W (x)]ψ = 0 (4.4)
Therefore, we find for every ζ ∈ ˜G
So
By (4.5)(4.6)(4.7)(4.8)(4.9)(4.10), we get ψ satisfies the Euler equation
− 4 − 4
3ψ2/3− 1
3· ψ2/3
1 + ψ−2/3 +5
3ψ4/3ln(1 + ψ−2/3) + α − V + B(ψ2)
ψ = 0.
5 Existence of Ground State Solution
By the definition, we also know that B(ψ2) ≥ 0. Therefore, we have
−4ψ ≤ f
where f = V ψ ∈ L2−εloc for any ε > 0 and in particular f ∈ Lsloc for some s > 32. By Lemma 3.2, ψ ∈ H1. We may, therefore, apply a result of Stampacchia (see [20], Theorem5.2) to conclude that ψ ∈ L∞loc. Going back to (4.4) and using the fact that ψ ∈ L∞loc, we now see that 4ψ ∈ L3−εloc (since ||V ψ||3−ε ≤ ||V ||3−ε||ψ||∞). By Sobolev imbedding theorem (see Adams, [21], p.98), we have ψ ∈ C0,µ for all µ < 1.
Theorem 5.2 The two functions E(λ), Eα(λ) are finite and satisfy E(λ) = Eα(λ) − αλ.
It is clear thatR |∇ρ1/2|2dx, R ρ4/3dx, and D(ρ, ρ) are finite (since ρ ∈ G). And Z
ρ5/3ln(1 + ρ−13)dx <
Z
ρ5/3dx + Z
ρ4/3dx < ∞.
Let Bδ(Ri) is the ball of radius δ and centered at Ri for i = 1, 2, ..., k. δ is chosen such that all the ball Bδ(Ri) are disjoint. It is clear thatR
Bδ(Ri)V (x)ρ(x)dx is finite(since ρ is continuous). On the other hand, R
R3\Bδ(Ri)V (x)ρ(x)dx is also finite. Therefore, E(ρ) and Eα(ρ) are finite.
Finally, choose any ρ(x) ∈ G such that R ρ(x)dx = λ. We have E(ρ) ≥ E(λ).
So
Eα(ρ) = E (ρ) + αλ ≥ E(λ) + αλ.
Hence,
Eα(λ) ≥ E(λ) + αλ. (5.1)
On the other hand, choose any ρ(x) ∈ G such that R ρ(x)dx = λ. We have Eα(λ) ≤ Eα(ρ) = E (ρ) + αλ.
So
Eα(λ) ≤ E(λ) + αλ. (5.2)
By (5.1) and (5.2), we have
E(λ) = Eα(λ) − αλ.
6 Properties of the minimizer ψ
i=1{Ri}. The conclusion follows from Harnack’s inequality (see Gilbarg, [19]).
Theorem 6.2 If V = 0, there are C∞ functions of compact support such that φ(g) <
0.
where
ln(1 + 1
b4/3f2/3(y)) = ln(1 + 1
f2/3(y)) − 2
3· f−5/3
1 + f−2/3(b4/3f2/3− f2/3) + ...
We find that the power of b in b11/3
Z
f10/3(y) ln
1 + 1
b4/3f2/3(y)
dy
is lager than b11/3. Therefore, the power of b in R g8/3dx is the smallest one. Hence, for some sufficiently small, but positive b, φ(g) < 0.
The next two proofs will use the idea that:
1. If G is the Green’s function of an operator L, then the solution for f of the equation Lf = h is given by f (x) =R h(s)G(x, s)ds.
2. (see [22] p.46)
Let k be a complex number such that Imk≥ 0. The function φ0(x, y) := 1
4π
eik|x−y|
|x − y| x, y ∈ R3 x 6= y is a solution to the Helmholtz equation
4φ + k2φ = 0
with respect to x for any fixed y. Because of polelike singularity at x 6= y, the function φ0 is called a fundamental solution to the Helmholtz equation.
Theorem 6.3 ψ is bounded on R3 and ψ(x) → 0 as |x| → ∞. Also, ψ ∈ H2 (i.e., ψ, ∇ψ and 4ψ ∈ L2).
Proof: It follows from Appendix that for ψ ≥ 0,
−4
3ψ2/3− 1
3 · ψ2/3
1 + ψ−2/3 + 5
3ψ4/3ln(1 + ψ−2/3) + α ≥ 0.
By the definition, we also know that B(ψ2) ≥ 0. Therefore, we have
−4ψ ≤ V ψ.
So
(−4 + 1)ψ ≤ (V + 1)ψ.
Since ψ is continuous (Theorem 5.1), it follows that (V+1)ψ ∈ L2 and thus ψ ≤ (−4 + 1)−1[(V + 1)ψ](By maximal principle, see [19] Chapter 3). Set F = (−4 + 1)−1[(V + 1)ψ]. Then
(−4 + 1)F = (V + 1)ψ ∈ L2. So
F = Γ0∗ (V + 1)ψ
where Γ0 is the Green’s function of −4 + 1. As it is well known, F is bounded and goes to zero as |x| → ∞. Therefore, ψ is bounded and goes to zero as |x| → ∞.
Finally, note that
ψ5/3
1 + ψ−2/3 < ψ5/3 f or ψ ≥ 0 and
ψ7/3ln(1 + ψ−2/3) < ψ7/3+ ψ5/3.
We know that ψ5/3 and ψ7/3≤ dψ for some constant d (since ψ(x) → 0 as |x| → ∞), and B(ψ2)ψ ∈ L2 (since ψ ∈ L3 and B(ψ2) ∈ L6). So
−4
3ψ5/3− 1 3
ψ5/3
1 + ψ−2/3 + 5
3ψ7/3ln(1 + ψ−2/3) + αψ − V ψ + B(ψ2)ψ ∈ L2. Therefore, we conclude that 4ψ ∈ L2 and so ψ ∈ H2.
Theorem 6.4 Let ψ be the positive solution to Euler equation(4.4). Then for every 0 < t < α, there exists a constant M such that
ψ(x) ≤ M exp[−t1/2|x|].
Proof: By (4.4) we have,
(−4 + W )ψ = 0.
So
ψ = −(−4 + t)−1(W − t)ψ.
As |x| → ∞, we know that V → 0 and B(ψ2) → 0 (since ψ(x) → 0 as |x| → ∞).
From Appendix equation(A.1), as |x| → ∞, we also know that
−4
3ψ2/3−1 3
ψ2/3
1 + ψ−2/3 +5
3ψ4/3ln(1 + ψ−2/3) + α → α.
Hence, as |x| → ∞, we have W → α. For |x| > some R, W − t > 0 (since 0 < t < α and W → α > 0 as |x| → ∞). We know that
Y (x − y) := e−
√t|x−y|
4π|x − y|
is the Green’s function of −4 + t (see [22] p.46). Therefore, since ψ > 0, ψ(x) = −
Z
Y (x − y)(W (y) − t)ψ(y)
= −
Z
|y|≤R
Y (x − y)[W (y) − t]ψ(y)dy + Z
|y|>R
Y (x − y)[W (y) − t]ψ(y)dy
≤ − Z
|y|≤R
Y (x − y)[W (y) − t]ψ(y)dy
= − Z
|y|≤R
e−
√ t|x−y|
4π|x − y|[W (y) − t]ψ(y)dy.
Hence,
ψ(x) ≤ M exp[−t1/2|x|].
A Appendix
On the other hand,
J0(ρ) = −4
A.2 Claim that J
α(ρ) and J
α0(ρ) ≥ 0 for α ≥
12is a constant
On the other hand,
ρ→∞lim Jα0(ρ) = lim