• 沒有找到結果。

Chapter 4 Resource Scheduling with Directional Antennas for Multi-hop Relay

4.4 Numerical Results

The parameters of the simulated system are set according to the OFDMA mode in the IEEE 802.16 standard [14], [70], which are summarized in Table 9. The required SINRs to achieve 10-6 bit-error-rate (BER) for the various MCSs considered are given in Table 10 [70]. The scheduling method for the system with omni-directional antennas is also simulated to serve as the base-line scheme for performance comparisons. A multi-cell setup with two-tier interfering cells is considered. The locations of BS and RSs are fixed, while users are uniformly distributed within each cell. The data traffic of each user is full-buffer traffic model. A fixed transmission power is used in the downlink, and the adaptive rate control is executed every frame to select an appropriate modulation and coding scheme based on the perfect channel state information.

Figure 39 shows the simulated CDFs of SINR for different scheduling methods. To emphasize on the capacity gain obtained from the new scheduling methods, the transmission power in our simulation of the onmi-directional antenna case is increased to offset the antenna gain obtained with the directional antennas. Clearly, the scheduling scheme with omni-directional antennas has the best SINR performance, while Method-2 has the worst because it reuses the frequency spectrum more aggressive.

Table 9. OFDMA parameters for system-level simulation.

Parameter Value

Carrier frequency 3.5 GHz

Bandwidth 6 MHz

FFT size 2048

Sub-carrier frequency spacing 3.348 kHz

OFDM symbol duration (including 1/8 cyclic-prefix)

336 µs

Duplexing TDD

Frame duration 20 ms

Permutation mode of each sector FUSC (full usage of sub-channels)

Number of sub-channels 32

Number of sub-carriers per sub-channel 48

Max. transmit power of BS /RS 100 mW

Table 10. The used MCS.

Modulation Coding rate Receiver SINR (dB)

to achieve 10-6 BER

BPSK 1/2 6.4

1/2 9.4

QPSK

3/4 11.2

1/2 16.4

16-QAM

3/4 18.2

2/3 22.7

64-QAM

3/4 24.4

Figure 39. The CDF of SINR for different scheduling methods.

The capacity simulation result is shown in Figure 40. The cell capacity is increased enormously with the proposed methods. The capacity gain is approximately 6 and 12 times for Method-1 and Method-2, respectively, as compared with the system with the omni-directional antennas. The reason of the capacity gain can be simply explained as follows. First, as shown in Figure 34 and Figure 37, Method-1 and Method-2 can achieve frequency reuse factor of 1, while in Figure 29, the reuse factor of at least 2 (here the case of reuse factor 2 is simulated) is required for the system with omni-directional antennas.

Hence, at least 2 times of capacity gain is obtained as compared to the omni-directional antenna case. Second, from Figure 32, only 2/3 of the transmission phases in a frame are used for the BS’s transmission. On the other hand, 2 and 4 BS’s transmissions in each phase are possible for Method-1 and Method-2 respectively, as shown in Figure 35 and Figure 38.

That results in another 3 and 6 times of capacity gain over the case of the omni-directional antennas. Table 11 summaries where the capacity gains come from for Method-1 and Method-2 as compared with the omni-directional antenna case. However, due to the higher interference level observed in Figure 39, the simulated capacity gain of Method-1 over the system with omni-directional antennas is slightly less than 6 times, as our simplified analysis predicts. On the other hand, the simulated capacity gain of Method-2 over Method-1 is larger than 2 because the former provides more higher-data-rate connections.

Figure 40. Comparisons of cell capacity between different scheduling methods.

Table 11. The analysis of the capacity gain.

Method Reuse

factor

Effective data frame transmitted in a frame

Anal sized capacity gain Omni-directional

antennas 2 2/3 1

Method-1 1 2 6

Method-2 1 4 12

4.5 Summary

Multi-hop relay (Relay-assisted) cell architecture is a promising candidate for the next generation wireless communication systems. It has been adopted as an amendment to IEEE 802.16e standard for cell coverage extension, user throughput improvement and/or system capacity enhancement. In this chapter, we investigate the important issue of resource scheduling for Relay-assisted networks in a Manhattan-like environment. The new resource scheduling methods are proposed for the Relay-assisted networks with directional antennas equipped at both the BSs and the RSs. By taking advantage of the effect of high degree shadowing in the Manhattan-like environment, the system throughput can be increased to nearly 6 and 12 times by the proposed Method-1 and Method-2, respectively, as compared to the system with omni-directional antennas.

Chapter 5 Conclusions

In this dissertation, the design and optimization of relay-assisted cellular networks are investigated from both theoretic and practical points of view.

We comprehensively evaluate the downlink theoretical performance of relay-assisted cellular networks in the multi-cell environment with various system configurations in the first part. A genetic algorithm (GA) based method is proposed for joint multi-cell optimization of system parameters including RS’s positions, path selection, frequency-reuse pattern and resource allocation so as to maximize system SE. Numerical results show that (i) RSs provide significant improvement with respect to system SE and user throughput over the traditional cellular networks. (ii) Uniformity of user data rate comes at the expense of a large loss in system SE when FTA is employed. (iii) Somewhat surprising, the low-complexity SINR-based path selection performs nearly as good as the SE-based one for the no-reuse case while achieving slightly better performance in the frequency-reuse case.

In the second part, the uplink performance of relay-assisted cellular networks is investigated with optimized system parameters. The optimal RSs’ positions, reuse pattern, path selection and bandwidth allocation are searched to achieve two goals: one is to minimize the MS’s average transmit power to achieve a specified throughput, and the other is to maximize the uplink system SE by given a fixed MS transmit power. The advance formulation of each objective function is contributed. Genetic algorithm approach along with a multiple access interference estimation method designed for uplink performance evaluations are adopted to resolve the issues. Numerical results conclude that given a fixed allocated bandwidth to each MS, the average MS’s transmit power is significantly reduced for a targeted throughput, and the user throughput as well as the system SE are largely enhanced for a fixed uplink transmit power with the assistance of RSs as compared to the conventional cellular systems.

In the third part, we investigate the important issue of resource scheduling for Relay-assisted networks in the Manhattan-like environment. New resource scheduling methods are proposed for the Relay-assisted networks with directional antennas equipped at both the base station and relay stations. By taking advantage of the effect of high degree shadowing in the Manhattan-like environment, the system throughput can be increased to nearly 6 and 12 times by the proposed Method-1 and Method-2, respectively, as compared to the system with omni-directional antennas.

In this dissertation, the theoretical performance in both downlink and uplink with general configurations in relay-assisted cellular networks is presented. The practical issues of resource scheduling of relay-assisted cellular networks in the Manhattan-like

the benefits to improve the system capacity and the user throughput, to save transmit power of an MS in the uplink, and to provide better coverage in the Manhattan-like environment with the optimized system parameters.

References

[1] V. H. MacDonald, “The Cellular Concept,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 58, no.

1, January 1979.

[2] Bell Labs, “High capacity Mobile Telephone System Technical Report,” submitted to FCC, Dec. 1971.

[3] J. S. Engle, “The Early History of Cellular Telephone,” IEEE Communication Magazine, pp. 27-29, August 2008.

[4] T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications Principles and Practices, Prentice Hall, 2002.

[5] J. Z. Sun, J. Sauvola, and D. Howie, “Features in Future: 4G Visions from a Technical Perspective,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 6, pp. 3533-3537, 2001.

[6] ITU-R M.816, “Framework for Services Supported on International Mobile Telecommunications-2000 (IMT-2000),” 1997.

[7] ITU-R M.1645, “Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT-2000 and Systems beyond IMT-2000,” 2003.

[8] ITU-R M.2134, “Requirements Related to Technical Performance for IMT-Advanced Radio Interface(s),” 2008.

[9] IEEE P802.16m/D4,” Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems,” February 2010.

[10] 3GPP TR36.814 V1.5.0, “Further Advancements for E-UTRA Physical Layer Aspects (Release 9),” November 2009.

[12] G. J. Foschini, “Layered Space-time Architecture for Wireless Communication in a Fading Environment When Using Multi-element Antennas,” Bell Lab Technical Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 41-59, 1996.

[13] M. Nohara et al, “IEEE 802.16 Tutorial: 802.16 Mobile Multihop Relay,” Official Document of IEEE 802.16 Mobile Multihop Relay Study Group: IEEE 802.16mmr-06/006, March 2006.

[14] “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Part 16: Air interface for fixed and mobile broadband wireless access systems, amendment for physical and medium access control layers for combined fixed and mobile operation in licensed bands,” IEEE 802.16e-2005, Feb. 2006.

[15] A. Host-Madsen and J. Zhang, “Capacity Bounds and Power Allocation for Wireless Relay Channel,” IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. 51, pp. 2020-2040, June 2005.

[16] A. Host-Madsen, “On the Capacity of Wireless Relaying,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicle Technology Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1333-1337, September 2002.

[17] A. Ribeiro, X. Cai and G. B. Giannakis, “Symbol Error Probabilities for General Cooperative Links,” IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication, vol. 4, pp.

1264-1273, May 2005.

[18] E. C. van der Meulen, “Three-terminal Communication Channels,” Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 3, pp. 120-154, 1971.

[19] H. Ochiai, P. Mitran and V. Tarokh, “Variable Rate Two Phase Collaborative Communication Protocols for Wireless Networks,” IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. 52, pp. 4299-4313, September. 2006.

[20] J. N. Laneman, D. N. C. Tse, and G. W. Wornell, “Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks: Efficient Protocols and Outage Behavior,” IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. 50, pp. 3062- 3080, December 2004.

[21] N. Ahmed, and B. Aazhang, “Throughput Gains Using Rate and Power Control in Cooperative Relay Networks,” IEEE Transaction on Communication, vol. 55, pp. 656 - 660, April 2007.

[22] R. U. Nabar, H. Bolcskei, and F.W. Kneubuhler, “Fading Relay Channels:

Performance Limits and Space-time Signal Design,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 22, pp. 1099-1109, August 2004.

[23] T. M. Cover and A. El Gamal, “Capacity Theorems for the Relay Channel,” IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. 25, pp. 572-584, September 1979.

[24] W. Su, A. K. Sadek, and K. J. Ray Liu, “Cooperative Communication Protocols in Wireless Networks: Performance Analysis and Optimum Power Allocation,” Wireless Personal Communication, vol. 44, pp. 181-217, January 2008.

[25] D. R. Basgeet and Y. C. Chow, “Uplink Performance Analysis for a Relay Based Cellular System,” in Proc. IEEE VTC-2006 Spring, pp. 132-136, May 2006.

[26] R. Pabst et al., “Relay-based Deployment Concepts for Wireless and Mobile Broadband Radio,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, issue 9, pp. 80- 89, September 2004.

[27] N. Esseling, B. Walke, and R. Pabst, “Performance Evaluation of A Fixed Relay Concept for Next Generation Wireless Systems,” Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 2, pp.744- 751, September 2004.

[28] A. Adinoyi and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Cooperative Relaying in Multi-antenna Fixed Relay Networks,” IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication, vol. 6, pp. 533-544, February 2007.

[29] A. Adinoyi et al, “Description of Identified New Relay Based Radio Network Deployment Concepts and First Assessment by Comparison Against Benchmarks of Well Known Deployment Concepts Using Enhanced Radio Interface Technologies,”

IST-2003-507581 WINNER D3.2 V.1 , Feb. 2005.

[30] A. Nosratinia, T.E. Hunter and A. Hedayat, “Cooperative Communication in Wireless Networks,” IEEE Communication Magazine, pp. 74-80, October 2004.

[32] A. Sendonaris, E. Erkip, and B. Aazhang, “User Cooperation Diversity - Part II:

Implementation Aspects and Performance Analysis,” IEEE Transaction on Communication, vol. 51, pp. 1939-1948, November 2003.

[33] D. Soldani and S. Dixit, “Wireless Relays for Broadband Access,” IEEE Communication Magazine, pp. 58-66, March 2008.

[34] https://www.ist-winner.org

[35] O. Oyman, J.N. Laneman, and S. Sandhu, “Multihop Relaying for Broadband Wireless Mesh Networks: from Theory to Practice,” IEEE Communication Magazine, pp.116-122, November 2007.

[36] Y. Yu, S. Murphy and L. Murphy, “Planning Base Station and Relay Station Locations in IEEE 802.16j Multi-hop Relay Networks,” in Proc. IEEE CCNC’2008, pp. 922-926, January 2008.

[37] H. Hu, H. Yanikomeroglu, D. D. Falconer and S. Periyalwar, “Range Extension without Capacity Penalty in Cellular Networks with Digital Fixed Relays,” in Proc.

IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pp. 3053-3057, November, 2004.

[38] P. Li, et al., “Spectrum Partitioning and Relay Positioning for Cellular System Enhanced with Two-hop Fixed Relay Nodes,” IEICE Transaction on Communication, vol. E90-B, pp. 3181-3188, November 2007.

[39] E. Weiss, S. Max, O. Klein, G. Hiertz and B. Walke, “Relay-based vs. Conventional Wireless Networks: Capacity and Spectrum Efficiency,” in Proc. IEEE PIMRC, pp.1-5, September 2007.

[40] H. Zeng and C. Zhu, “System-level Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Multi-hop 802.16j Systems,” in Proc. IEEE IWCMC, pp. 354-359, August 2008.

[41] S-J. Kim, et al., “Multi-hop Relay Based Coverage Extension in the IEEE 802.16j Based Mobile WiMAX Systems,” in Proc. IEEE Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, pp. 516-522, September 2008.

[42] C. Hoymann, M. Dittrich, and S. Goebbels, “Dimensioning Cellular Multihop WiMAX Networks,” in Proc. IEEE Mobile WiMAX Symposium, pp. 150-157, March

2007.

[43] J. Vidal, N. Marina and A. Host-Madsen, “Dimensioning Cellular Networks with Fixed Relay Stations,” in Proc. IEEE ICT, pp. 1-5, June 2008.

[44] B. Lin, et al, “Optimal Relay Station Placement in IEEE 802.16j Networks,” in Proc.

IEEE IWCMC, pp. 25-30, August 2007.

[45] I. K. Fu, W. H. Sheen and F. C. Ren, “Shadow-assisted Resource Reuse for Relay-augmented Cellular Systems in Manhattan-like Environment,” International Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 11-19, February 2007.

[46] J. Cho, and Z. J. Hass, “On the Throughput Enhancement of the Downstream Channel in Cellular Radio Networks through Multihop Relaying,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 1206-1219, September 2004.

[47] R. Pabst, D. Schultz and B. Walke, “Performance Evaluation of a Relay-based 4G Network Deployment with Combined SDMA/OFDMA and Resource Partitioning,” in Proc. IEEE VTC 2008-Spring, pp. 2001-2005, May 2008.

[48] S. J. Lin, W. H. Sheen, I K. Fu and C. C. Huang, “Resource Scheduling with Directional Antennas for Multi-hop Relay Networks in a Manhattan-like Environment,” in Mobile WiMAX, John Wiley & Sons, April 2008. (ISBN:

9780470519417)

[49] S. J. Lin, W. H. Sheen, and C. C. Huang, “Downlink Performance and Optimization of Relay-assisted Cellular Networks”, in Proc. IEEE WCNC, pp.1-6, April 2009.

[50] W. H. Sheen, and S. J. Lin, ”Performance and Optimization of Relay-Assisted OFDMA Networks,” in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, April 2010.

(ISBN: 9781420088243)

[51] W. H. Sheen, S. J. Lin, and C. C. Huang, “Downlink Optimization and Performance of Relay-assisted Cellular Networks in Multi-Cell Environments,” IEEE Transaction

Access Networks: an Overview,” IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 56-63, October 2008.

[53] S.W. Peters and R.W. Heath, “The Future of WiMAX: Multihop Relaying with IEEE 802.16j,” IEEE Communication Magazine, pp. 104-111, January 2009.

[54] S. Mukherjee and H. Viswanathan, “Analysis of Throughput Gains From Relays in Cellular Networks,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 6, 2005, pp. 3471–3476, December 2005.

[55] B. Walke, and R. Pabst, “Relay-based Deployment Concepts for Wireless and Mobile Broadband Cellular Radio,” WWRF/WG4 Relaying Subgroup White Paper, June 2003.

[56] B. Walke, H. Wijaya, and D. Schultz, “Layer-2 Relays in Cellular Mobile Radio Networks,” in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 81- 85, 2006.

[57] H. Viswanathan, and S. Mukherjee, “Performance of Cellular Networks with Relays and Centralized Scheduling,” IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, issue 5, pp. 2318- 2328, September 2005.

[58] J. Sydir, R. Taori, “An Evolved Cellular System Architecture Incorporating Relay Stations,” IEEE Communication Magazine, pp.115-121, June 2009.

[59] 3GPP TR 25.996 V6.1.0, “Spatial Channel Model for Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Simulations,” September 2003.

[60] D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[61] O. Oyman and S. Sandhu, “Non-Ergodic Power-Bandwidth Tradeoff in Linear Multi-hop Networks,” in Proc. IEEE ISIT, pp. 1514-1518, July 2006.

[62] D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning.

Addison-Wesley, 1989.

[63] R. L. Haupt and S. E. Haupt, Practical Genetic Algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, 2004.

[64] K. F. Man, K. S. Tang, and S. Kwong, “Genetic algorithms: concepts and applications,” IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, vol. 43, pp. 519-534, October 1996.

[65] E. K. P. Chong and S. H. Zak, An introduction to optimization. John Wiley and Sons, 2001.

[66] A. Nix, and M. D. Vose, “Modeling genetic algorithms with Markov chains,” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, pp. 79-88, March 1992.

[67] O. Francois, “An Evolutionary Strategy for Global Minimization and its Markov Chain Analysis,” IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, pp. 77-90, September 1998.

[68] E. Visotsky, J. Bae, R. Peterson, R. Berry and M. L. Honig, “On the Uplink Capacity of an 802.16j System,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC, pp. 2657-2662, March-April, 2008.

[69] “Baseline Document for Draft Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems:

Multihop Relay Specification”, IEEE 802.16j-06_026r3, April 2007.

[70] “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems,” IEEE 802.16-2004, October 2004.

[71] D. Schultz, R. Rabst and T. Irnich, “Multi-hop Radio Network Deployment for Efficient Broadband Radio Coverage,” in Proc. of WPMC, vol. 2, pp.377-381, October 2003.

[72] D. Schultz, B. Walke, R. Rabst and T. Irnich, “Fixed and Planned Based Radio Network Deployment Concepts,” in Proc. of WWRF, October 2003.

[73] T. Irnich, D. Schultz, R. Pabst, and P. Wienert, “Capacity of A Relaying Infrastructure for Broadband Radio Coverage of Urban Areas,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 5, pp. 2886- 2890, October 2003.

Appendix

In this appendix, we prove the following two lemmas which state the conditions for the best bandwidth allocation in a two-hop path.

Lemma 1: For the fixed-bandwidth allocation wt to each MS, the highest SE of a two-hop path is achieved with the following bandwidth allocation,

,

Proof: Recall that for the fixed-bandwidth allocation,

, ( ) , ( )

,

Lemma 2: For the fixed-throughput allocation, the highest SE of a two-hop path to achieve the target throughput tt is obtained with the following bandwidth allocation,

,

The proof follows immediately from (A.13) and (A.14).

Vita

Shiang-Jiun Lin was born in Taichung, Taiwan. She received the B.S. degree in computer science and information engineering and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in communication engineering from the National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, in 2000, 2002, and 2010, respectively.

In 2007, she was a summer intern in the Communication Networks (ComNets) Research Group at RWTH Aachen University in Germany. In 2008, she was a Visiting Scholar with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Her research interests include wireless communication networks, relaying communication technology, and optimizations for wireless communication systems.

相關文件