• 沒有找到結果。

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

10 Can assume there is another leaf outside E6, say n − 1.

2011 ICDMEC

Sketch of the Proof

1 We prove by induction on the number |VG | of vertices in the tree G .

2 If |VG | = 6, then G = E6 is non-degenerate and the assertion holds by Reeder’s result.

3 Suppose |VG | > 6 and u is a movable configuration in G .

4 Then there is a leaf of G not in the subgraph E6, say n.

5 By switching colors, can assume un= 0.

6 Use induction to settle the case when u is movable at some vertex i 6= n.

7 Can assume that n is the unique vertex that u is movable at n.

8 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is non-degenerate can be done by Reeder’s result.

9 The case that G = E6+ Pn−6+ e and G is degenerate can be done by using that 0 is the unique unmovable configuration in G − n.

2011 ICDMEC

n − 1 must be black. Applying the moves by selecting the vertices consecutively along the path from n to n − 1. The colors of n and n − 1 are switched, and a branch vertex z becomes movable, a contradiction.

2011 ICDMEC

Applying the moves by selecting the vertices consecutively along the path from n to n − 1. The colors of n and n − 1 are switched, and a branch vertex z becomes movable, a contradiction.

2011 ICDMEC are switched, and a branch vertex z becomes movable, a contradiction.

2011 ICDMEC

n − 1 must be black. Applying the moves by selecting the vertices

and a branch vertex z becomes movable, a contradiction.

2011 ICDMEC

'

&

$

%

c c c c c

c

5 4 3 2 1

6

· · · c c c c

· · ·

c s

n n − 1

z

2011 ICDMEC

n − 1 must be black. Applying the moves by selecting the vertices

2011 ICDMEC

Figure. The binary star P6,3,1.

相關文件