• 沒有找到結果。

Under limited time and resource, this paper undoubtedly isn’t able to cover all the related information, so here we would like to propose several directions for future researches.

Firstly, apart from stewardship, it will be interesting to discover what factor also influences succession decision. Secondly, this study takes compensation scheme as the internal factor for professional manager’s stewardship. It will be worth to investigate whether other internal factor like company’s reputation can trigger professional manager’s stewardship. Thirdly, in addition to industry dynamism, we believe it’s also helpful to detect other external factors that will motivate or depress professional manager’s stewardship. To encourage the consistency of academy and practice, we look forward to see future researches continue to explore succession issue and piece up a complete succession research with more powerful data.

Reference

Astrachan, J. H. & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: A closer look. Family business review, 16(3), 211-219

Bailey, E. E. & Helfat, C. E. (2003) External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4), 347-369

Barnett, T. & Kellermanns, F. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family?

Nonfamily employees' perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837-854

Cabrera-Suárez, K. (2005). Leadership transfer and the successor's development in the family firm. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 71-96

Cadieux, L. (2007). Succession in Small and Medium‐Sized Family Businesses: Toward a Typology of Predecessor Roles During and After Instatement of the Successor. Family Business Review, 20(2), 95-109

Chang, S.-J. & Shim, J. (2015) When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1297-1316

Chen, Y.-M., Liu, H.-H., Ni, Y.-T., & Wu, M.-F. (2015) A rational normative model of international expansion: Strategic intent perspective, market positions, and founder CEOs/family-successor CEOs. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1539-1543 Chng, D. H. M., Rodgers, M. S., Shih, E., & Song, X.-B. (2012) When does incentive

compensation motivate managerial behaviors? An experimental investigation of the fit between incentive compensation, executive core self-evaluation, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(12), 1343-1362

Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Bergiel, E. B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 355-372 Fernandez-Araoz, C., Iqbal, S., & Ritter, J. (2015). Leadership Lessons from Great Family

Businesses. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 83-97

Graefe-Anderson, R. (2009). CEO turnover and compensation: An empirical investigation. ETD Collection for Purdue University, AAI3379354

Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206

Hamel, G. (2012). What matters now. Strategic Direction, 28(9)

Hernandez, M. (2008) Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model.

Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121-128

Huang, S., Ding, D., & Chen, Z. (2014). Entrepreneurial Leadership and Performance in Chinese New Ventures: A Moderated Mediation Model of Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Environmental Dynamism. Creativity & Innovation Management, 23(4), 453-471

Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S. A., & Galán González, J. L. (2014). Strategic repertoire variety and new venture growth: The moderating effects of origin and industry dynamism.

Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 761-772. doi:10.1002/smj.2103

Ling, Y., Baldridge, D., & Craig, J. B. (2012). The impact of family structure on issue selling by successor generation members in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(4), 220-227

Martin, G. P., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (2013) Executive stock options as mixed gambles: Revisiting the behavioral agency model. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 451-472

Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance.

Journal of financial economics, 38(2), 163-184

Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78

Overbeke, K. K., Bilimoria, D., & Somers, T. (2015). Shared vision between fathers and daughters in family businesses: the determining factor that transforms daughters into successors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 625

Pepper, A. & Gore, J. (2015). Behavioral agency theory new foundations for theorizing about

executive compensation. Journal of management, 41(4), 1045-1068

Ramos, H. M., Man, T. Y., Mustafa, M., & Ng, Z. Z. (2014). Psychological ownership in small family firms: Family and non-family employees’ work attitudes and behaviours.

Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5300-311. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.04.001

Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134-139

Roth, K. & O'Donnell, S. (1996). Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Academy of management Journal, 39(3), 678-703

Sieger, P., Zellweger, T., & Aquino, K. (2013). Turning Agents into Psychological Principals:

Aligning Interests of Non-Owners through Psychological Ownership. Journal Of Management Studies, 50(3), 361-388. doi:10.1111/joms.12017

Wasserman, N. (2006) Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 960-976

Wiggins, R. R. & Ruefli, T. W. (2005) Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 887-911

Appendix

Questionnaire A-1 -

High Executive Compensation Scheme / Low Industry Dynamism

To whom it may concern:

This is a study concerning “manager’s decision behavior.” We wish you spend a little to provide valuable feedback. Your comments about this study will have a significant benefit. Your information will be used only for academic investigation, please feel ease to answer. Thank you for your enthusiastic participation

Department of Asia-Pacific Industrial and Business Management National University of Kaohsiung Adviser: Dr. Yi-Min Chen Student: Wei-Hua Chen

This questionnaire includes three sections. Please read the following content and answer the questions.

【Section One】Task Scenario

Nowadays, CEO succession becomes a serious issue for family firms. Second generations’ unwillingness or incompetency to succeed is the main factors of this phenomenon. Please imagine that you are the founder/incumbent CEO in a family firm which has been established for 30 years. Its market value reaches one billion Taiwan dollars and the net profit is about one hundred millions Taiwan dollars. However, you are not able to lead the company anymore, so making a succession decision becomes emergent. Since that your children or second generations in family are reluctant or incompetent to succeed, you need to make decision between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company. Pros and cons are as below.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder or other family members can unburden the managing pressure while you are still the owner f company.

2. Professional manager may be experienced and competent to lead company go thriving.

3. Share profits with professional manager by giving bonus/compensation may displease the other shareholders.

4. If professional manager perform not as well as expected, company may fall into crisis.

Sell the Company

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder can receive a considerable sum of money as return.

2. If selling your company to a successful enterprise, it may have more resources to grow.

3. You will lose your whole-life efforts, and your employees and shareholders may be affected in this change

4. .You will lose the ownership of company and give up the right to share profits.

※ Please answer the questions according to the scenario in 【Section One】.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

I. The degree of possibility that you choose hiring

professional managers as CEO successor. □ □ □ □ □

II. Please make your succession decision.

□ Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

□ Sell the Company

III. What’s your preference between hiring professional manager as CEO successor

IV. What are the reasons of your succession decision?

1.

2.

3.

【Section Two】 Please continue the following scenario.

Now you decide to consider the industrial situation before making decision. You notice that this company is in a developing industry. The technology is new and there are only a few competitors in this industry. Thus, this company seems potential to grow and earn profits.

Nevertheless, in this industry, market demand and risk is uncertain and difficult to predict.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor Advantages:

The founder has the ownership of company and has the right to receive 30 million - 50 million Taiwan dollars as annual bonus if company performs well.

Disadvantages:

(1) Professional manager should be paid with 3 million - 5 million Taiwan dollars as annual bonus (equal to 3% - 5% of company’s net profits).

(2) If professional manager doesn’t perform well, company may be in deficit or even close down.

Sell the Company

※ Please answer the questions according to the scenario in 【Section Two】.

Strongly Disagree Disagree Average Agree Strongly Agree

1. Under this industrial condition, the company is potential to

grow. □ □ □ □ □

2. The annual bonus for professional manager is sufficient and

attractive. □ □ □ □ □ 7. Professional manager will emphasize organizational interest

more than self-interest. □ □ □ □ □

8. Professional manager will allocate organizational resources

fairly. □ □ □ □ □

※ Please continue the following questions.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

I. The degree of possibility that you choose hiring

professional managers as CEO successor. □ □ □ □ □

II. Please make your succession decision.

□ Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

□ Sell the Company

III. What’s your preference between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company?

Sell the Company

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Hire Professional Manager as CEO

Successor

□ □ □ □ □ □ □

IV. What are the reasons of your succession decision?

1.

2.

3.

According to the advantages and disadvantages in 【Section Two】, please answer the following questions.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

1. How the expected benefits will be if hiring professional

manager as CEO successor? □ □ □ □ □

4. Industry You Work in: □ High-tech Manufacturing □ Traditional Manufacturing □ Other Manufacturing □ Finance & Insurance

Questionnaire A-2 -

High Executive Compensation Scheme / High Industry Dynamism

To whom it may concern:

This is a study concerning “manager’s decision behavior.” We wish you spend a little to provide valuable feedback. Your comments about this study will have a significant benefit. Your information will be used only for academic investigation, please feel ease to answer. Thank you for your enthusiastic participation

Department of Asia-Pacific Industrial and Business Management National University of Kaohsiung Adviser: Dr. Yi-Min Chen Student: Wei-Hua Chen

This questionnaire includes three sections. Please read the following content and answer the questions.

【Section One】Task Scenario

Nowadays, CEO succession becomes a serious issue for family firms. Second generations’ unwillingness or incompetency to succeed is the main factors of this phenomenon. Please imagine that you are the founder/incumbent CEO in a family firm which has been established for 30 years. Its market value reaches one billion Taiwan dollars and the net profit is about one hundred millions Taiwan dollars. However, you are not able to lead the company anymore, so making a succession decision becomes emergent. Since that your children or second generations in family are reluctant or incompetent to succeed, you need to make decision between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company. Pros and cons are as below.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder or other family members can unburden the managing pressure while you are still the owner f company.

2. Professional manager may be experienced and competent to lead company go thriving.

3. Share profits with professional manager by giving bonus/compensation may displease the other shareholders.

4. If professional manager perform not as well as expected, company may fall into crisis.

Sell the Company

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder can receive a considerable sum of money as return.

2. If selling your company to a successful enterprise, it may have more resources to grow.

3. You will lose your whole-life efforts, and your employees and shareholders may be affected in this change

4. .You will lose the ownership of company and give up the right to share profits.

※ Please answer the questions according to the scenario in 【Section One】.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

I. The degree of possibility that you choose hiring

professional managers as CEO successor. □ □ □ □ □

II. Please make your succession decision.

□ Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

□ Sell the Company

III. What’s your preference between hiring professional manager as CEO successor

IV. What are the reasons of your succession decision?

1.

2.

3.

【Section Two】 Please continue the following scenario.

Now you decide to consider the industrial situation before making decision. You notice that this company is in a mature industry. The technology is mature and the competition is intense in this industry. Thus, this company seems to have less potential to grow and earn profits. Fortunately, market demand and risk is clear and predictable in this industry.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor Advantages:

The founder has the ownership of company and has the right to receive 30 million - 50 million Taiwan dollars as annual bonus if company performs well.

Disadvantages:

(1) Professional manager should be paid with 3 million - 5 million Taiwan dollars as annual bonus (equal to 3% - 5% of company’s net profits).

(2) If professional manager doesn’t perform well, company may be in deficit or even close down.

Sell the Company

※ Please answer the questions according to the scenario in 【Section Two】.

Strongly Disagree Disagree Average Agree Strongly Agree

1. Under this industrial condition, the company is potential to

grow. □ □ □ □ □

2. The annual bonus for professional manager is sufficient and

attractive. □ □ □ □ □ 7. Professional manager will emphasize organizational interest

more than self-interest. □ □ □ □ □

8. Professional manager will allocate organizational resources

fairly. □ □ □ □ □

※ Please continue the following questions.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

I. The degree of possibility that you choose hiring

professional managers as CEO successor. □ □ □ □ □

II. Please make your succession decision.

□ Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

□ Sell the Company

III. What’s your preference between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company?

Sell the Company

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Hire Professional Manager as CEO

Successor

□ □ □ □ □ □ □

IV. What are the reasons of your succession decision?

1.

2.

3.

According to the advantages and disadvantages in 【Section Two】, please answer the following questions.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

1. How the expected benefits will be if hiring professional

manager as CEO successor? □ □ □ □ □

11. Industry You Work in: □ High-tech Manufacturing □ Traditional Manufacturing □ Other Manufacturing □ Finance & Insurance

Questionnaire A-3 -

Low Executive Compensation Scheme / Low Industry Dynamism

To whom it may concern:

This is a study concerning “manager’s decision behavior.” We wish you spend a little to provide valuable feedback. Your comments about this study will have a significant benefit. Your information will be used only for academic investigation, please feel ease to answer. Thank you for your enthusiastic participation

Department of Asia-Pacific Industrial and Business Management National University of Kaohsiung Adviser: Dr. Yi-Min Chen Student: Wei-Hua Chen

This questionnaire includes three sections. Please read the following content and answer the questions.

【Section One】Task Scenario

Nowadays, CEO succession becomes a serious issue for family firms. Second generations’ unwillingness or incompetency to succeed is the main factors of this phenomenon. Please imagine that you are the founder/incumbent CEO in a family firm which has been established for 30 years. Its market value reaches one billion Taiwan dollars and the net profit is about one hundred millions Taiwan dollars. However, you are not able to lead the company anymore, so making a succession decision becomes emergent. Since that your children or second generations in family are reluctant or incompetent to succeed, you need to make decision between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company. Pros and cons are as below.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder or other family members can unburden the managing pressure while you are still the owner f company.

2. Professional manager may be experienced and competent to lead company go thriving.

3. Share profits with professional manager by giving bonus/compensation may displease the other shareholders.

4. If professional manager perform not as well as expected, company may fall into crisis.

Sell the Company

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder can receive a considerable sum of money as return.

2. If selling your company to a successful enterprise, it may have more resources to grow.

3. You will lose your whole-life efforts, and your employees and shareholders may be affected in this change

4. .You will lose the ownership of company and give up the right to share profits.

※ Please answer the questions according to the scenario in 【Section One】.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

I. The degree of possibility that you choose hiring

professional managers as CEO successor. □ □ □ □ □

II. Please make your succession decision.

□ Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

□ Sell the Company

III. What’s your preference between hiring professional manager as CEO successor

IV. What are the reasons of your succession decision?

1.

2.

3.

【Section Two】 Please continue the following scenario.

Now you decide to consider the industrial situation before making decision. You notice that this company is in a developing industry. The technology is new and there are only a few competitors in this industry. Thus, this company seems potential to grow and earn profits.

Nevertheless, in this industry, market demand and risk is uncertain and difficult to predict.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor Advantages:

The founder has the ownership of company and has the right to receive 30 million - 50 million Taiwan dollars as annual bonus if company performs well.

Disadvantages:

(1) Professional manager should be paid with 5 hundred thousand - 1 million Taiwan dollars as annual bonus (equal to 0.5% - 1% of company’s net profits).

(2) If professional manager doesn’t perform well, company may be in deficit or even close down.

Sell the Company

※ Please answer the questions according to the scenario in 【Section Two】.

Strongly Disagree Disagree Average Agree Strongly Agree

1. Under this industrial condition, the company is potential to

grow. □ □ □ □ □

2. The annual bonus for professional manager is sufficient and

attractive. □ □ □ □ □ 7. Professional manager will emphasize organizational interest

more than self-interest. □ □ □ □ □

8. Professional manager will allocate organizational resources

fairly. □ □ □ □ □

※ Please continue the following questions.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

I. The degree of possibility that you choose hiring

professional managers as CEO successor. □ □ □ □ □

II. Please make your succession decision.

□ Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

□ Sell the Company

III. What’s your preference between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company?

Sell the Company

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Hire Professional Manager as CEO

Successor

□ □ □ □ □ □ □

IV. What are the reasons of your succession decision?

1.

2.

3.

According to the advantages and disadvantages in 【Section Two】, please answer the following questions.

Extremely Low Low Average High Extremely High

1. How the expected benefits will be if hiring professional

manager as CEO successor? □ □ □ □ □

18. Industry You Work in: □ High-tech Manufacturing □ Traditional Manufacturing □ Other Manufacturing □ Finance & Insurance

Questionnaire A-4 -

Low Executive Compensation Scheme / High Industry Dynamism

To whom it may concern:

This is a study concerning “manager’s decision behavior.” We wish you spend a little to provide valuable feedback. Your comments about this study will have a significant benefit. Your information will be used only for academic investigation, please feel ease to answer. Thank you for your enthusiastic participation

Department of Asia-Pacific Industrial and Business Management National University of Kaohsiung Adviser: Dr. Yi-Min Chen Student: Wei-Hua Chen

This questionnaire includes three sections. Please read the following content and answer the questions.

【Section One】Task Scenario

Nowadays, CEO succession becomes a serious issue for family firms. Second generations’ unwillingness or incompetency to succeed is the main factors of this phenomenon. Please imagine that you are the founder/incumbent CEO in a family firm which has been established for 30 years. Its market value reaches one billion Taiwan dollars and the net profit is about one hundred millions Taiwan dollars. However, you are not able to lead the company anymore, so making a succession decision becomes emergent. Since that your children or second generations in family are reluctant or incompetent to succeed, you need to make decision between hiring professional manager as CEO successor and selling the company. Pros and cons are as below.

Hire Professional Manager as CEO Successor

Pros and cons:

1. You as the founder or other family members can unburden the managing pressure while

1. You as the founder or other family members can unburden the managing pressure while

相關文件