• 沒有找到結果。

ᙯࢉ siRNA ࡕϩձܭ੝ۓϐಔձуΕ SDF-1 (50 ng/ml)Ǵ٠ܭᑻӀ ᡉ༾᜔Πᢀჸಒझࡕ 0ǵ12ǵ24ǵ36ǵ48 hǴmigration ϐ௃׎Ƕ Figure 20. ᡉҢ྽ಒझ୻Ꭶܭ Col-Au ਔ migration ૈΚᆶ Col Ϸ TCPS ϐ ಔձૈΚ࣬Кၨ٫ǴЪᙯࢉ VEGF siRNAϐಔձ migration ૈΚΠफ़Ǵ ՠऩబуӣ SDF-1 ਔ ߾ migration ૈΚቚуǶӢԜё຾΋؁௢ፕ

56

Col-Au ёፓ௓ಒझૻဦၡ৩ߦ຾ಒझ migration ϐૈΚǴ٠ЪЬा೸ၸ VEGF ϐૻ৲ࢲϯǴ຾Զߦ຾ಒझܭ Col-Au ΢ᎂ౽ޑૈΚቚуǶ

5. VEGF ୖୖᆶፓ௓ಒझ߄౜ϣҜ΋਼ϯේӝԋ䁙 (eNOS)

ஒ MSCs ᙯࢉ VEGF siRNA ࡕǴௗ๱୻Ꭶܭ ColǵCol-Au 48 λਔ ࡕаխࣝᑻӀࢉՅᢀჸ΋਼ϯේӝԋ䁙ϐ߄౜ໆ (eNOS)Ǵ่݀ᡉҢܭ Figure 21.Ƕ੃෧ VEGF ୷Ӣ߄౜ࡕǴ೷ԋ eNOS ߄౜ໆ෧১ǴᚐѦబ уΕ SDF-1 ࡕೈқ፦߄ໆ౜ڀԖӣൺਏ݀ǹӢԜ௢ፕ SDF-1 ཮Ӣࣁ VEGF ޑ ߄ ౜ Զ ቹ ៜ eNOS ߄ ౜ ໆ Ǵ ٠ ཮ ࿶ җ ಒ झ ૻ ဦ ၡ ৩ : NO-dependent pathways຾ԶቹៜಒޑቚғᆶғӸǶ

Ϥǵ୏ނჴᡍ

1. ಔᙃπำՈᆅ౽෌ނϐᇙഢၸำ

ಔᙃπำՈᆅ౽෌ނϐᇙഢၸำᡉҢܭ Figure 22.Ǵᓉે੮࿼ଞ߄य़ а฻ᚆηε਻ႝዀ೛ഢೀ౛ࡕǴҥջ੆ݰΕςଛᇙֹԋϐ ColǵCol-Au ྋన (37ʚ) ऊ 4 λਔǴڗрࡕܫ࿼ค๵ᏹբѠϣ࠻ྕޔԿ߄य़ྋనֹ

ӄଳᔿࣁЗǶڗҔ߻а 75% ଚᆒ੆ݰ 5 ϩដࡕǴа PBS ੆ݰ 15~30 ϩ ដǶFigure 22. (d,e,f) ᡉҢճҔ quantum dot ኱૶ MSCsǴᡏѦ୏ᄊ୻Ꭶ 48λਔࡕǴаᑻӀᡉ᜔ዴᇡǴё໩ճஒ MSCs ຠߕܭՈᆅ౽෌ނ߄य़Ǵ Ъа߄य़༡թ Col-Au ϐಔձǴಒझຠߕኧࣁനӭǶҗԜёޕ྽ catheter

57

߄य़࿶ၸ฻ᚆηε਻ႝዀೀ౛Ϸ Col-Au ༡թࡕёቚ຾ MSCs ຠߕܭځ ߄य़Ƕ

1.խխࣝಔᙃࢉՅϩ݋ (Immunohistochemistry staining)

MSCs аᡏѦ୏ᄊ୻ᎦޑБԄǴ୻Ꭶ MSCs ܭᓉે੮࿼ଞ߄य़48 λਔࡕǴ෌ΕεႵި୏ેύ (ࢬำـ Fig. 22,23)Ǵ٠Ӹ੮΋ঁДǶ឴࣊

εႵࡕǴஒѓୁ෌Ε catheter ϐި୏ેǴ຾ՉխࣝಔᙃࢉՅǴᢀჸڼԯ

୷׷ᆶ MSCs ჹܭڙཞՈᆅࢂցڀঅൺϣҜಒझޑфૈǶFigure 24. ᡉ ҢՈᆅಔᙃ߄౜Γᜪ CD31 ϐ௃׎ (a) ࣁ٬ҔDAB ࢉՅݤǴ(b) ߾ࣁ խࣝᑻӀࢉՅݤǴCol-Au ک Col (group 5~8) ޑಔձᡉҢǴ྽ MSCs ෌ Ε୏ނᡏϣࡕܭ༡թ Col-Au ޣ߄౜ CD31ޑໆࣁനӭǴЪ߄౜Γᜪ CD31 ϐಒझᄌᄌᎂ౽ԿՈᆅಔᙃϣǶҗԜёޕᡏѦ౽෗ MSCs ܭ Col-Au ༡թޑՈᆅಔᙃ౽෌ނǴځ΢ MSCs ཮ϩϯࣁϣҜಒझӢԶ߄

౜рΓᜪϣҜಒझޑ CD markersǺhCD31ǴЪࡼѺ VEGF ࡕёᡉ๱ߦ

຾ MSCs ϩϯࣁϣҜಒझǴ٠Ъಒझё໩ճ౽෌ΕՈᆅᏛύǴᙖаঅ ൺڙཞޑՈᆅϣҜǶ

2. ᝵Е๋-ҲआࢉՅ (Hematoxylin-enosin, H&E)

ஒՈᆅ౽෌ނ෌Εި୏ેࡕ΋ঁДࡕǴճҔ᝵Е๋-ҲआࢉՅݤᔠᡍǴ Ոᆅಔᙃঅൺ௃׎Ƕҗ Figure 25. ளޕ catheter ޑಔձڀՈਵޑ௃׎ౢ

58

ғ (ӵᗖᓐ܌Ң)ǹ༡թ Col ಔǴ߾Ԗ٤༾ՈਵℚೱܭՈᆅᏛ΢ϐ௃׎ǹ Զ Col-Au ϐಔձ٠คౢғಔᙃ౦தޑ߄౜Ǵ௢ෳࢂӢࣁ Col-Au ڀԖၨ

ӳޑғނ࣬৒܄Ǵёफ़եխࣝϸᔈǴЪ MSCs ϩϯࣁϣҜಒझǴёҥջ অံՈᆅϣҜफ़եӆԛਵ༞ޑ௃׎ǴࡺՈᆅಔᙃ҅தคՈਵޑ௃׎ౢ

ғǶ

5. ఘఘғΟՅࢉՅ (Masson trichrome staining)

ஒՈᆅ౽෌ނ෌Εި୏ેࡕ΋ঁДࡕǴճҔఘғΟՅࢉՅǴᢀჸՈ ᆅϣҜಔᙃঅൺ௃׎Ǵҗࡰр྽Ոᆅᠼᆢϯ௃׎ౢғ཮ܭՈᆅѳྖԼೀ

ౢғጤচᠼᆢǴ߾߄ҢՈᆅᠼᆢϯϐౢғ [81]ǴࡺճҔఘғΟՅࢉՅǴ ᢀჸ୷׷לᠼᆢϯϐ௃׎Ƕҗ Figure 26. ளޕ catheter ޑಔձՈᆅϣҜ ϷѳྖԼಔᙃԖౢғᠼᆢϯޑ௃׎ (ӵᗖᓐ܌Ң)Ǵ༡թ Col ಔǴ߾ϣҜ ಔᙃڀԖ٤༾ᠼᆢϯౢғǴԶ Col-Au ϐಔձౢғ߾ࣁനϿǶ௢ෳࢂӢ ࣁ Col-Au ڀԖၨӳޑғނ࣬৒܄ǴЪԜᅿڼԯ୷׷ၨό཮೷ԋՈᆅౢ

ғಔᙃᠼᆢϯǴӢԶ፾ӝߏය࿼ܫܭᡏϣǴࡺ׳፾ӝᔈҔܭՈᆅЍࢎ༡ թύǶ

59

60 procyanidin ଺ࣁጤೱᏊᛙۓ collagen ϐ໔ޑᗖ่Ǵ٠࿶җ FTIR ௟ඔࡕ ܭ 3350 cm-1Ԗ֎ԏݢঢ়р౜ [67]ǴԶҁࣴزஒ collagen షӝڼԯߎಈ ηࡕҭԖԜݢঢ়р౜Ǵՠܭ Figure 3.ύว౜уΕڼԯߎಈηࡕ཮೷ԋ

61

׷Ϸ෧Ͽ Col ޑफ़ှำࡋǴӢԜቚуғނᛙۓ܄ (biostability) کғނ࣬

৒܄(biocompatibility)Ƕ

Ҟ߻ςޕǴҁࣴز܌٬Ҕϐ collagen type I ёၮҔܭՈᆅಔᙃπำ ύǴᇙ଺ԋಒझѦ୷፦Ǵऩஒ ECs Ϸ EPCs ёܭځ୷፦΢୻Ꭶ 7 ϺࡕǴ ё׎ԋ༾Ոᆅஏࡋ [74]ǹ٠ёၮҔܭᙴᕍ΢ׯ๓Ոనឲࢬ [68,73]Ƕՠ ԋዕϐϣҜಒझځቚ෗ૈΚԖज़ǴԶϷ EPCs ԖᛖܭڗளБय़ޑज़ڋǹ ӢԶ೷ԋӧಔᙃπำ (tissue engineering) ܈ಒझݯᕍ (cell therapy) ύ ڙډፏӭज़ڋ [75,70]Ǵߦ٬౜Ϟࣴزᖿӛ༸ಒझᕍݤǶӢԜҁჴᡍନ Αа collagen షӝڼԯߎ༾ಈǴᇙԋՈᆅ୷׷ѦǴ׳ଛӝ٬ҔڀԖԾך

׳ཥЪӭख़ϩϯфૈϷቚғૈΚ٫ϐ MSCs [64,65,69,76]Ƕ

62 ғᆶᎂ౽ૈΚǵNO-independent pathways (FAK/RhoA/MMP-2) ፓ࿯ಒझ ޑᎂ౽ϷຠߕՉࣁޑׯᡂ [50,54]ǶԶҁࣴزว౜ஒ MSCs ୻Ꭶܭ Col-Au (SDF-1) ёа୏঩ (mobilization) EPCsǴ٠ߦ຾ಒझ߄౜ eNOS ຾Զቹ ៜಒझϩϯࣁ ECs ຾Զ೷ԋՈᆅཥғ [64,78,79]ǶЪ VEGF ёаڈᐟ༸

ಒझౢғӣᘜਏᔈ (homming) ԿՈᆅڙཞޑ೽ՏǴߦ٬ϣҜঅൺғߏ [64,78]Ƕܭࣴزύว౜ಒझ୻Ꭶܭ Col-Au ਔӆуΕӕғߏӢη (VEGF

܈ SDF-1) ࡕǴ ёᡉ๱ගϲ CXCR4ǵα5β3 аϷ eNOS ޑ߄౜ (Fig. 14,

63

64

CD31 Ъ҂ԖՈਵϷวݹޕ௃ݩౢғ (Fig.24, Fig.25)ǶҗԜёޕߎڼԯ ಈηዴჴёᇨᏤ༸ಒझϩϯࣁϣҜಒझǴ຾ԶঅൺՈᆅϣҜಔᙃǶനࡕ ךॺޑࣴز่݀ᡉҢǴCol-Au ёቚம MSCs ܭڙཞ೽ՏёϩϯࣁϣҜ ಒझ (Fig.24 )ǴЪ෌Εޑ MSCs ёᑼӝΕՈᆅϣҜಒझಔᙃύ [74]ǴӢ Զ׎ԋᜪ՟ޑচғՈᆅಔᙃǶӢԜךॺ೛ीр MSCs ୻Ꭶܭ Col-Au

΢ޑڼԯ༡թ୷׷Ǵё෧ϿӆԛՈਵޑᐒ཮ǶԜࣁ΋ᅿٰஒࡐԖ߻೼ޑ БݤǴٮ΋ᅿཥޑБԄࣁᔈҔᖏ׉ޑ೛࿼Ǵගϲ౛གྷޑՈᆅ౽෌ނǶ

65 NO-dependent pathways ᆶ NO-independent pathways ޕૻ৲ၡ৩ፓ௓ಒ झຠߕǵቚғᆶᎂ౽ՉࣁǶԜѦճҔᙯࢉ VEGF siRNA ຓჴǹVEGF ࣁ SDF-1 ΢ෞૻ৲ፓ௓ӢηǴё཮ፓ࿯ SDF-1 ޑϩݜǴ࣬ϕڐӕ຾Զу ԋ MSCs ғߏܭ Col-Au ΢ϐૈΚǴቹៜΠෞೈқ፦ϐ߄౜ (p-FAK, p-RhoA, p-eNOS, p-Akt, MMP-2, CXCR4, α5β3)Ǵ೷ԋಒझܭ Col-Au ΢ ϐᎂ౽ᆶቚғૈΚޑቚуǶ

ӧ୏ނჴᡍБय़Ǵஒ܌ᇙԋϐ Col-Au ౽෌ނǴ෌ΕεႵި୏ેύ 1 ঁДࡕǴځғނ࣬৒܄٫Ǵό཮ౢғՈ༧ℚೱаϷځдޑխࣝϸᔈౢ

ғǴЪ౽෌ܭ Col-Au ࡕ MSCs ёᅌᅌϩϯࣁϣҜಒझ߄౜ CD31Ǵ٠ᎂ

66

౽ΕՈᆅᏛύǴঅൺڙཞϐՈᆅϣҜಔᙃǴߦ຾ՈᆅϣҜಒझཥғϷঅ ൺǴᗉխՈਵޑӆԛวғǴЪаఘғΟՅࢉՅݤ᛾ܴǴ٬ҔԜᅿڼԯፄ ӝ୷׷ၨό཮ЇଆಔᙃᠼᆢϯǴ፾ӝӸܫܭᡏϣǴԶၲډүғਏ݀ǶӢ Ԝҁჴᡍϐ Col-Au ڼԯፄӝ୷׷਑ёගٮ౜Ϟᖏ׉բࣁՈᆅғނ׷਑

༡թނ፦ϐୖԵǶ

67

ୖԵЎ᝘

1. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/zh/index.html

2. M.H. Ross, L.J.Romrell, 1996ǴHistology : a text and atlasǴӝीрހ ޗǶ

3. Corti, R., Hutter, R., Badimon, J.J. & Fuster, V. Evolving concepts in the triad of atherosclerosis, inflammation and thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 17, 35-44 (2004).

4. http://www. mre. vghtpe. gov. tw/laboratory/Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease/index. html.

5. Hanke, H., Lenz, C. & Finking, G. The discovery of the pathophysiological aspects of atherosclerosis--a review. Acta Chir Belg 101, 162-169 (2001).

6. Dzau, V.J., Braun-Dullaeus, R.C. & Sedding, D.G. Vascular proliferation and atherosclerosis: new perspectives and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med 8, 1249-1256 (2002).

7. Ross, R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340, 115-126 (1999).

8. Abraham L. Kierszenbaumচ๱/ᙁ୷Ꮶ฻ጓ᝿Ǵ2005ǴಔᙃᏢϷಒझ ғނᏢ:ੰ౛ᏢΕߐǴಃ΋ހǴ᛬ଈკਜрހޗǶ

68

9. ቅύѳǴᛰނញܫࠠЍࢎܭ߷ރ୏ે੯ੰϐᖏ׉ᔈҔ ଯ໢ᙴৣ཮ᇞ 58Ǵ 2008Ǵ҇ 97.01Ǵ। 8-13Ƕ

10. Kereiakes, D.J. Safety of drug-eluting stents. Rev Cardiovasc Med 11, 187-199; quiz 200 (2010).

11. ࡼߪণǴՈᆅЍࢎᙁϟǴᖏ׉ᙴᏢǴ2008Ǵ26Ǵ। 454-470

12. ֆᒴ᭷ǴಔᙃπำϐՈᆅ౽෌ඹжނǴᆵ᡼εᏢǺ93 ԃǴᙴᏢπำ Ꮲࣴز܌Ǵ

13. Chen, Y.H., et al. Electron microscopic studies of phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells in coronary arteries of patients with unstable angina pectoris and postangioplasty restenosis. Circulation 95, 1169-1175 (1997).

14. ጰරసǴڼԯߎӧڼԯғނמೌᆶڼԯᙴᏢ΢ޑᔈҔǴ୯ҥԋфε ᏢǺ95 ԃǴ୷ᘵᙴᏢࣴز܌Ƕ

15. Khang, D., Carpenter, J., Chun, Y.W., Pareta, R. & Webster, T.J.

Nanotechnology for regenerative medicine. Biomed Microdevices 12, 575-587 (2010).

16. Price, R.L., Gutwein, L.G., Kaledin, L., Tepper, F. & Webster, T.J.

Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. J Biomed Mater Res A 67, 1284-1293 (2003).

69

17. Webster (ed.), Nanotechnology for the regeneration of hard and soft tissues World Scientific, Danvers, MA, (2007).

18. Sato, T.J. Webster, Nanobiotechnology: implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications Expert. Rev. Med. Devices 1(1), 105–114 (2004).

19. Mirkin CA, Letsinger RL, Mucic RC, Storhoff JJ. A DNA-based method for rationally assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials.

Nature;382:607–9. (1996)

20. Tsai, C.Y., et al. Amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis in rats by nanogold. Arthritis Rheum 56, 544-554 (2007).

21. ᝄᗶϘǵ৪๓ችǴڼԯߎᆶሌޑ֮ҔǴࣽᏢว৖යтǴ2008Ǵ431 යǴ। 28~32ǴǶ

22. von der Mark, K., Park, J., Bauer, S. & Schmuki, P. Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix.

Cell Tissue Res 339, 131-153 (2010).

23. Shekaran, A. & Garcia, A.J. Nanoscale engineering of extracellular matrix-mimetic bioadhesive surfaces and implants for tissue engineering.

Biochim Biophys Acta 1810, 350-360 (2011).

24. Hung, H.S. & Hsu, S.H. The response of endothelial cells to polymer surface composed of nanometric micelles. N Biotechnol 25, 235-243

70

(2009).

25. Hung, H.S., Wu, C.C., Chien, S. & Hsu, S.H. The behavior of endothelial cells on polyurethane nanocomposites and the associated signaling pathways. Biomaterials 30, 1502-1511 (2009).

26. Alivisatos,A.P., Johnsson,K.P., Peng,X., Wilson,T.E., Loweth,C.J., Bruchez,M.P., Jr., and Schultz,P.G. Organization of ‘nanocrystal molecules’ using DNA. Nature 382, 609-611. (1996).

27. Kirton, J.P. & Xu, Q. Endothelial precursors in vascular repair.

Microvasc Res 79, 193-199 (2010).

28. Ming-Yan Chen, Pu-Chang Lie, Zhi-Ling Li, and Xing Wei, Endothelial differentiation of Wharton’s jelly–derived mesenchymal stem cells in comparison with bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Experimental Hematology 37:629–640 (2009).

29. Levenberg, S., et al. Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue.

Nat Biotechnol 23, 879-884 (2005).

30. Karsten Lenk, Madlen Uhlemann, Gerhard Schuler, Volker Adams.

Role of endothelial progenitor cells in the beneficial effects of physical exercise on atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Articles in PresS.

J Appl Physiol .February 24, (2011).

31. ໳࢙ᏌǵഋᆬЎǵ݅۩ᄪ,ϣҜ߻᙮༸ಒझӧЈՈᆅ੯ੰϐفՅ ᖏ

71

׉ᙴᏢǴ2009Ǵ234 යǶ

32. Pittenger, M.F., et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143-147 (1999).

33. Lee, O.K., et al. Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood 103, 1669-1675 (2004).

34. Oswald J, Boxberger S, Jorgensen B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells can be differentiated into endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells.22:377–384(2004)

35. Belbachir, K., Noreen, R., Gouspillou, G. & Petibois, C. Collagen types analysis and differentiation by FTIR spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 395, 829-837 (2009).

36. Lee, K.Y. & Mooney, D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101, 1869-1879 (2001).

37. He, L., et al. Modification of collagen with a natural cross-linker, procyanidin. Int J Biol Macromol 48, 354-359 (2011)

38. ഋऍዠǵഋߪֻǵֺߞЎ, ጤচೈқϷځܭғᙴ׷਑΢ޑᔈҔǴ2007Ǵ 11ǹ15 ڔǴ11 යǶ

39. Khor, E. Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Biomaterials 18, 95-105 (1997).

40. Boccafoschi, F., Habermehl, J., Vesentini, S. & Mantovani, D.

72

Biological performances of collagen-based scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26, 7410-7417 (2005).

41. Ravi, S. & Chaikof, E.L. Biomaterials for vascular tissue engineering.

Regen Med 5, 107-120 (2010).

42. Goissis, G., et al. Biocompatibility studies of anionic collagen membranes with different degree of glutaraldehyde cross-linking.

Biomaterials 20, 27-34 (1999)

43. Twardowski, T., Fertala, A., Orgel, J.P. & San Antonio, J.D. Type I collagen and collagen mimetics as angiogenesis promoting superpolymers. Curr Pharm Des 13, 3608-3621 (2007).

44. Weinberg, C.B. & Bell, E. A blood vessel model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells. Science 231, 397-400 (1986).

45. Grassl, E.D., Oegema, T.R. & Tranquillo, R.T. A fibrin-based arterial media equivalent. J Biomed Mater Res A 66, 550-561 (2003).

46. Mironov, V., Kasyanov, V. & Markwald, R.R. Nanotechnology in vascular tissue engineering: from nanoscaffolding towards rapid vessel biofabrication. Trends Biotechnol 26, 338-344 (2008).

47. Hung, H.S., Chen, H.C., Tsai, C.H. & Lin, S.Z. Novel approach by nanobiomaterials in vascular tissue engineering. Cell Transplant 20, 63-70 (2011).

73

48. Alobaid, N., et al. Nanocomposite containing bioactive peptides promote endothelialisation by circulating progenitor cells: an in vitro evaluation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32, 76-83 (2006).

49. Prasad, C.K. & Krishnan, L.K. Regulation of endothelial cell phenotype by biomimetic matrix coated on biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 4, 182-191 (2008).

50. Nimeri, G., Ohman, L., Elwing, H., Wettero, J. & Bengtsson, T. The influence of plasma proteins and platelets on oxygen radical production and F-actin distribution in neutrophils adhering to polymer surfaces.

Biomaterials 23, 1785-1795 (2002).

51. eixeira, A.I., et al. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography.

Biomaterials 27, 3945-3954 (2006)

52. Hsu, S.H., et al. Cell migration rate on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/poly(ethylene glycol) diblock copolymers and correlation with the material sliding angle. Macromol Biosci 7, 482-490 (2007).

53. Tang, J.M., et al. VEGF/SDF-1 promotes cardiac stem cell mobilization and myocardial repair in the infarcted heart. Cardiovasc Res (2011).

54. Petit, I., Jin, D. & Rafii, S. The SDF-1-CXCR4 signaling pathway: a

74

molecular hub modulating neo-angiogenesis. Trends Immunol 28, 299-307 (2007).

55. Romagnani, P., Lasagni, L., Annunziato, F., Serio, M. & Romagnani, S.

CXC chemokines: the regulatory link between inflammation and angiogenesis. Trends Immunol 25, 201-209 (2004).

56. J L Jones, R A Walker. Integrins: a role as cell signalling molecules. J Clin Pathol: Mol Pathol 52:208–213(1999)

57. Zaidel-Bar, R., Itzkovitz, S., Ma'ayan, A., Iyengar, R. & Geiger, B.

Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat Cell Biol 9, 858-867 (2007).

58. Khan, O.F. & Sefton, M.V. Endothelialized biomaterials for tissue engineering applications in vivo. Trends Biotechnol (2011).

59. Hsu, S.H., Tang, C.M. & Tseng, H.J. Biocompatibility of poly(ether)urethane-gold nanocomposites. J Biomed Mater Res A 79, 759-770 (2006).

60. Hsu, S.H., Tang, C.M. & Tseng, H.J. Biostability and biocompatibility of poly(ester urethane)–gold nanocomposites

61. Helen Hong , Janp. Stegemann. 2D and 3D collagen and fibrin biopolymers promote specific ECM and integrin gene expression by vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 19(10):1279-93

75

(2009)

62. Seandel M, Noack-Kunnmann K, Zhu D, Aimes RT, Quigley JP. Growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vivo requires specific cleavage of fibrillar type I collagen. Blood. 97, 2323-32 (2001).

63. Boccafoschi F, Habermehl J, Vesentini S, Mantovani D. Biological performances of collagen-based scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering.

Biomaterials. 26, 7410-7(2005).

64. Tang JM, Wang JN, Zhang L, Zheng F, Yang JY, Kong X, Guo LY, Chen L, Huang YZ, Wan Y, Chen SY. VEGF/SDF-1 promotes cardiac stem cell mobilization and myocardial repair in the infarcted heart.

Cardiovasc Res. 18 (2011).

65. Liao W, Zhong J, Yu J, Xie J, Liu Y, Du L, Yang S, Liu P, Xu J, Wang J, Han Z, Han ZC. Therapeutic benefit of human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stromal cells in intracerebral hemorrhage rat: implications of anti-inflammation and angiogenesis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 24, 307-16.(2009).

66. Doyle BB, Bendit EG, Blout ER. Infrared spectroscopy of collagen and collagen-like polypeptides. Biopolymers. 14(5):937-57.(1975).

67. He L, Mu C, Shi J, Zhang Q, Shi B, Lin W. Modification of collagen with a natural cross-linker, procyanidin. Int J Biol Macromol.

76

1;48(2):354-9.(2011).

68. Levenberg, J. Rouwkema and M. Macdonald, Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue, Nat Biotechnol 23, 879–884. (2005).

69. H.S. Goodwin, A.R. Bicknese, S.N. Chien, B.D. Bogucki, C.O. Quinn and D.A. Wall, Multilineage differentiation activity by cells isolated from umbilical cord blood: expression of bone, fat, and neural markers, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 7, 581–588 (2001).

70. Hsu S, Chou C, Tseng S. Enhanced thermal and mechanical properties in polyurethane/Au nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 289 1096–1101 (2004)

71. Hsu S, Tang C, Tseng H. Biocompatibility of poly(ether) urethane-gold nanocomposites. J Biomed Mater Res A 79 759–770.(2006)

72. Chih-Wei Chou, Shan-hui Hsu, Pey-Hwa Wang Biostability and biocompatibility of poly(ether)urethane containing gold or silver nanoparticles in a porcine model J Biomed Mater Res A. Mar 1;84(3) 785-94. (2008)

73. Shan-hui Hsu , Hsiang-Jung Tseng , Yu-Chun Lin Endothelial differentiation of Wharton's jelly–derived mesenchymal stem cells in comparison with bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells Exp Hematol. 37(5):629-40. (2009)

77

74. Allen P, Melero-Martin J, Bischoff J. Type I collagen, fibrin and PuraMatrix matrices provide permissive environments for human endothelial and mesenchymal progenitor cells to form neovascular networks. J Tissue Eng Regen Med.5(4) (2011)

75. Chen MY, Lie PC, Li ZL, Wei X. Endothelial differentiation of Wharton's jelly–derived mesenchymal stem cells in comparison with bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells Exp Hematol.37(5), 629-40. (2009)

76. L.L. Hou, M. Zheng and D.M. Wang.Migration and differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in the rat brain, Sheng Li Xue Bao 25,153–159 (2003).

77. Ferrara N. Napoleone Ferrara Pathways mediating VEGF-independent tumor angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 21(1), 21-6 (2010) 78. Vandervelde S, van Luyn MJ, Tio RA, Harmsen MC. Signaling factors

in stem cell-mediated repair of infarcted myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 39(2), 363-76 (2005).

79. Petit I, Jin D, Rafii S. The SDF-1–CXCR4 signaling pathway: a molecular hub modulating neo-angiogenesis. Trends Immunol, 28(7), 299-307 (2007)

80. Zheng, Hao PhD; Fu, Guosheng PhD; Dai, Tao PhD; Huang, He MD.

78

Migration of endothelial progenitor cells mediated by stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha/CXCR4 via PI3K/Akt/eNOS signal transduction pathway.

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 50 (3)3, 274-280 (2007)

81. Makoto Katoh, Kensuke Egashira, Chu Kataoka, Makoto Usui, Masamichi, Koyanagi, Shiro Kitamoto, Yasushi Ohmachi, Akira Takeshita and Hiroshi Narita. Regression by ACE inhibition of arteriosclerotic changes induced by chronic blockade of NO synthesis in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.280 (5):H2306-12 (2001).

!

79

კ კ߄!

(a) Col

(b) Col-Au

Figure 1. AFM images of surface topography. (left) and phase (right) for (a) pure Col, (b) Col–Au nanocomposites containing 43.5 ppm of gold nanoparticles,

Topography Phase

Topography Phase

80

Figure 2. UV-Vis spectrophotomiter spectra of Col and Col-Au nanocomposites. The pure Col, and Col-Au nanocomposites containing 43.5 ppm of Au nanoparticles were analyzed the absorbance wavelength by UV-Vis spectrophotometer

81

Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of the Col and Col-Au nanocomposites. The pure Col, and Col-Au nanocomposites containing 43.5 ppm, of Au nanoparticles were analyzed by the ATR-FTIR.

82

!!

Figure 4. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). (a) Cell morphology of human umbilical cord MSCs by optical microscope. (b) Detection of MSCs specific makers expression by flow cytometry analysis.

An open area represents an antibody isotype control for background fluorescence and a shaded area shows signal from MSCs surface maker.

MSCs was stained with PE or FITC-conjugated antibody against the indicated makers烉CD105-PE, CD90-PE, CD44-PE, CD73-PE, CD29-PE, CD34-PE, CD45-FITC and CD14-FITC. MSCs at passages 8-9. Scale bars = 100 μm.

(b) (a)

MSCs, P9

83

Figure 5. MSCs proliferation was promoted by materials of various Au concentrations, where representative growth on different substrates was shown. MSCs proliferation on the surface of TCPS, Col and Col-Au containing 43.5 various concentration of Au nanoparticles Data are mean ± SD. 炵: p < 0.05, greater than Col for 24h , # p < 0.05: greater than Col for 48h . * p < 0.05: greater than Col for 72h .

! !

24h 48h 72h

84

Figure 6. MSCs proliferation was promoted by substrates of Col-Au nanocomposites, (a) MSCs proliferation on the various materials for 24h, 48h, 72h .and (b) treatment with VEGF or SDF-1 respectively. Data are mean ± SD. *: p < 0.05, greater than TCPS for 24h , 48h, 72h .

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

85

Materials Number of adhered platelets (×103)

Average degree of activation(0.0-1.0)

TCPS 3.00 0.91 ²² 0.2

Col (0.5mg/ml) 2.34 0.63 ²!0.1 Col-Au (43.5ppm) 0.07 0.19 ² 0.01

Figure 7. Platelet activation test. SEM images of platelets adhered onto various materials.

TCPS

Col

Col-A

86

Materials The number of monocytes(×103)

The number of macrophages (×103)

Conversion yield (%)

TCPS 2.18²²1/4 0.94²1/3 43.4 ± 0.7 Col (0.5mg/ml) 2.26²1/6 0.24²1/13 10.95 ± 0.8 Col-Au (43.5ppm) 2.46²1/6 0.28²1/16 7.48 ± 0.6

Figure 8. Human monocytes adhered and activated on TCPS, Col and Col-Au after 96 h culture. Col–Au 43.5 ppm had the lowest percentage conversion were comparable in the extent of activation for monocytes *: p <

0.05, greater than TCPS.

87

Figure 9. Cell morphology and adhesion ability. Adhesion ability of MSCs on the different materials. (a) The rhodamine phalloidin staining of actin fiber and (b) SEM images was showed. Yellow arrow: filopodia, Green arrow : lamellipodia , blue color: Nucleus, Red color: Actin

88

Figure 10. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) level detected by 2’7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein of flow cytometry in MSCs culture on the TCPS, Col, Col-Au. Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 : greater than TCPS

89

(a) (a)

90

Figure 11. The expressions of (a) p-Akt and p-eNOS proteins of MSCs cultured on the TCPS, Col, Col-Au for 48 h . (b,c) Semi-quantitative measurement of Western blots for MSCs cultured on Col–Au showed significantly increased p-Akt and p-eNOS expressions compared with TCPS.

Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 : greater than TCPS.

p-Akt

p-eNOS (b)

(c)

91

(b) (a)

p-RhoA

92

Figure 12. The expressions of (a) p-FAK, p-Cdc42 and p-RhoA proteins of MSCs cultured on the TCPS, Col, Col-Au for 48 h . (b,c,d) Semi-quantitative measurement of Western blots for MSCs cultured on Col–Au showed significantly increased p-FAK, p-Cdc42 and p-RhoA expressions compared with TCPS. Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 : greater than TCPS.

(c)

(d)

p-FAK

p-Cdc42

93

Figure 13. The MMP enzymatic activity of MSCs on various materials after VEGF or SDF-1 treatment for 48h. Gelatin zymography analysis of MMP-2 activity that was specificity on Col-Au. Data are mean ± SD. * p <

0.05 : greater than TCPS.

94

Figure 14. eNOS expression of MSCs on various materials after VEGF or SDF-1 stimulation for (a) 24 h and (b) 48 h that were visualized by fluorescent microscopy. Cells were incubated with primary anti-eNOS antibody followed by stained with FITC-conjugated immunoglobulin (green color fluorescence). Bar = 100 μm.

(a)

(b) (b)

(a)

95

Figure 15. α5β3 and CXCR4 expression of MSCs on various materials by using VEGF or SDF-1 treatment for 48h that were visualized by fluorescent microscopy. Cells were incubated with primary anti-α5β3 and anti-CXCR4 antibody followed by stained with FUTC-conjugated (α5β3) and Cy5.5 (CXCR4) immunoglobulin . scale bar = 100um.

96

Figure 16. Concentration of transfected siRNA. The optimal concentration of transfected siRNA labelled with fluorescence. (a) The cell viability of MSCs after treated with different concentrations of scrable siRNA for 24, 48 and 72 hr by MTT assay. Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 : greater than control (b) scramble siRNA expression were analyzed by a flow cytometry.

scramble siRNA FITC-conjugated immunoglobulin (c)The efficacy of MSCs transfected with siRNA by fluorescence labeling (siRNA/FITC, F-actin/phalloidin, Nuclei/DAPI). (scale bar烌100μm)

(b)

ɀ ɀ

( )

(c) (a)

97

(a) )

CXCR4

98

Figure 17. SDF-1 stimulated migration of MSCs on Col-Au throughα5β3 and CXCR4. Pretreatment with VEGF siRNA of MSCs and stimulated with or without SDF-1 (50 ng/mL) for 48h. (a) α5β3 and CXCR4 expression of MSCs on Col and Col-Au by immunofluorescence. (b) α5β3 and CXCR4 expression were analyzed by a flow cytometry α5β3 and CXCR4:

FITC-conjugated immunoglobulin (green color fluorescence), F-actin烉 rhodamine phalloidin staining (red color staining), cell nuclear烉DAPI (blue color staining) (scale bar烌50μm).

(b)

α5β3

99

(a) (a)

100

Figure 18. The expressions of (a) eNOS, p-RhoA, p-Akt, p-FAK and p-Cdc42 proteins were induced by Col-Au. Pretreatment with VEGF siRNA of MSCs and stimulated with or without SDF-1 (50 ng/mL) for 48h. (b) Semi-quantitative measurement of Western blots for MSCs cultured on Col–Au showed significantly increased eNOS, p-Akt, p-FAK and p-RhoA expressions compared with Col . Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 : greater than control.

(b)

101

Figure 19. The MMP-2 enzymatic activity of MSCs culture on the Col and Col-Au.(a) Transfect VEGF siRNA and treatment with or without SDF-1 (50 ng/mL) to analyze VEGF stimulated MMP-2 expression. (b) Semi-quantitative measurement of Gelatin zymography analysis for MSCs cultured on Col–Au. Data are mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 : greater than control.

(a)

(b) ( ) (a)

102

(a)

0h 12h

24h 36h

48h

103

Figure 20. The average cell migration distance of MSCs on different substrates in a period of 48 h. MSCs transfected with VEGF siRNA and stimulated with or without SDF-1 (50 ng/mL) for (a) 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h by using immunofluorescence microscopy. (b) Columns, mean of three separate experiments. p<0.05: greater than control (TCPS).

(b)

104

Figure 21. The expressions of eNOS proteins were induced by Col-Au.

Pretreatment with VEGF siRNA of MSCs and stimulated with or without SDF-1 (50 ng/mL) for (a) 24hr (b) 48h that were visualized by fluorescent microscopy. Cells were incubated with primary anti-eNOS antibody followed by stained with FITC-conjugated immunoglobulin (green color fluorescence). Bar = 100 μm.

(b) ) (a)

105

Figure 22. Preparation of vascular graft .Construction and examination of tissue-engineered blood vessel graft in vitro. (a) longitudinal view of the catheter (22G needle, 30mm)ˤ(b,c) The Col and Col-Au coating on catheters, the outer surface of the catheters was first activated by air plasma (d)(e) Dynamic culture of MSCs on vascular graft the for 48h . (f) quantum dot label of MSCs indicating that most of the seeded cells (culture for 48 h) were distributed on the surface of vascular graft.

106

Figure 23. Transplantation nanocomposites of pure catheterˣColˣ Col-Au vascular graft in vivo. (a) Animals were randomly assigned to either the control or 1 of 8 experimental groups consisting ,n=4ˤ(b,c) SD Rat fixed on the operating table after anesthesia. Then (d,e) incision of groin and find the femoral artery (f) Implanted vascular graft (about 1cm)ˤ(g) The blood vessel ligation (hˣi) Suture and disinfection of woundˤ(j) Recovery roomˤ

(a) ( )

b c d

e f g

h i j

107

(a)

108

Figure 24. Col-Au nanocomposites promoted MSCs to differentiate into ECs after repairing SD rar femoral artery injured by wire. MSCs were incubated with Col-Au for 48 hr and implantation into femoral artery. The femoral artery were separated from rat and immunostainined with anti-CD31 antibody. cells followed by stained with (a) 3,3-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) and stained with (b) CyTM5-conjugated immunoglobulin (red color fluorescence), cell nuclear staining was performed by 4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue color staining) (scale bar烌50μm)

! !

hCD31 / nucleus (b)

109

Figure 25. Cell organization and anti-thrombogenic property after 30 day for MSCs implantation on various composites vascular graft in vivo. The samples were stained with Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining was shown.

(scale bar烌50μm)

110

Figure 26. Cell organization and anti-fibrosis property after 30 day for MSCs implantation on various composites vascular graft in vivo. The samples were stained with Masson trichrome staining was shown. (scale bar 烌50μm)

相關文件