4.3.1 The Roles of Major Shareholders and Foreign Investment Institution Ownership in Overseeing Managerial Entrenchment Behavior
This paper aims to examine the effect of mandatory compensation disclosure on the perfonnance-compensation relationship. Offering employee stock bonus increases the level of managerial ownership. Managers used to have a great deal of power over compensation policy making before compensation infonnation disclosure became mandatory. Under the entrenchment of managers,
106 The Jmpact 01 Employee Compensation Disclosure on Corporate Governance S,的lcture
managerial ownership exerts a negative effect on the performance-compensation relationship. Unexpectedly, this negative effect does not decrease after compensation information disc10sure is made mandatory even though the governance ability of information disc10sure is supposed to increase. We then investigate whether managerial ownership, in the presence of ownersl叩 by major shareholders or foreign investment institutions, reduces its negative effect on the performance-compensation relationshi p6. Model (4) is formed by adding major shareholders ownership to Model (3), and Model (5) by adding foreign investment institution ownership
STOC4 =.Â.v + À,.P E
l?t
+ 也Blq+ Â.3CEQ + λ'4PEl?t *Blq +在PEI?, 牢 Blq 牢 DIS +λ'6PERit *CEOit + λ7PERit *CEOit 牢DlS+ λgSlZEit +~B V;t+λ10BETA iI +ε (4)
STOC4
=
00 +~P E1fr
+02FOI\
+B3CEQ+禹PE~*FO~+冉PE~ *
FO~*
DlS+θ'6
PERit
*CEOit+ θ'7PERit *
CEOit*
DlS+ θ'gSlZE
it+ θ'cþ1VBV
it+θ10
BETA
iI+
& i (5)The regression results of model (4) with ROA as proxy for firm performance is displayed in Table 9. The coefficient of ROA旬的 (435.03) is positive and significant (t-stat 4.44). The coefficient of ROA *BIG*DIS (-348.44) is negative and significant (t-stat = -5.43). The results are similar to those of Model (1). Before compensation information disclosure is made mandatory, managerial ownership has a negative effect on the performance-compensation relationship (coefficient
=
-892 .3 8 ,的tat = -4.90 ),6 Multi-collinearity problem was found among the variables of major shareholder宮,ownership, foreign investment institutions' ownership, and managerial ownership in 血emodel.
Chiao Da Management Review Vol. 30 No. 1, 2010 107
which supports the entrenchment hypothesis. After mandatory compensation information discIosure, managerial ownership exerts a positive effect on the performance-compensation relationship (coefficient二325.87, t-stat = 2.02). The results, while supporting H8, are divergent from the empirical result ofModel (3). We suspect that information discIosure can reduce managers' self-interested behavior because major shareholders possess great incentive to monitor compensation plans 弘1andatory disclosure of bonus information facilitates major shareholders' job of overseeing compensation plans and thus improves the governance function of information disclosure. Similar empirical results are achieved either by using ROE or by using ROA as the proxy for firm performance.
Table 0 presents the regression results of model (5) with ROA as the proxy for firm performance. Before mandatory compensation information disclosure, foreign investment institution ownership has a positive effect on the performance-compensation relationship (ROA可OR coefficient = 849.87, 的tat= 15.48). The mandatory compensation information disclosure reduces the importance of foreign investment institution in monitoring the performance-compensation relationship (ROA *FOR *DIS coefficient = -4500.85, t-stat = -4.41). The results are similar to those of model (2). Moreover, managerial ownership has a negative effect on the performance-compensation relationship (ROA *CEO coefficient = -632.46, t-stat = -3.72) before mandatory compensation information discIosure and a positive effect (ROA *CEO*DIS coefficient = 306.07, t-stat =1.8月 after mandatory discIosure. The results of model (5) are different from those of model (3). We suspect that foreign investment institutions have greater incentive to monitor managers' self-interested behavior. Mandatory discIosure makes the job of compensation oversight easier for foreign investment institutions. Mandatory disclosure thus improves the governance function of compensation information disclosure and decreases the negative effect of managerial ownership on the performance-compensation relationship
108 η'1e Jmpact of l!.ìnployee Compel1satiol1 Disclosure
011 Corporate GOl'ernal1Ce Structure
Table 9
The Effect of Major Shareholders Ownership
,
Manager Ownership and Employee Bonus information Disclosure 00 the Performance-Compensatioo Relationship:Using Return on Assets (ROA) 的 Proxyfor Firm Performance STOCKit = 九+人RO~t +~BIGit +À-;CEOit +À.4RO~t *BIGit +À-;RO~t *BIGit *DIS +λ6ROA íI *CEO it + λ7ROA íI *CEO it*
DIS + λ8SIZE íI + λ9W官VíI+λABETA. + G.
Variables Sigo Coefficient t-statistíc
JNTERCEPT -1144997.00*** -17.14
ROA 5892.31 3.50
BIG -990.14 -0.78
CEO 6324.79** 2.19
ROA*BJG + 435.03*** 4.44
ROA*BJG 呵)JS -348.44*** -5.43
ROA*CEO ? -892.38*** -4.90
ROA *CEO *DIS ? 325.87** 2.02
SJZE 73098.00*** 16.51
λ1VBV -4358.14 。 96
BETA 20376.00 0.91
Adjk 0.25
F-value 48.66***
Variable defmitions 剖-egiven in Table 2. DIS,個 indicatorvariable, equals 0 if observations are from 1998-2001 (p時-mandatorydisclosure) and equals 1 iffrom 2002-2005 (post-mandatory disclosure). (*), (**), and (***) represent being statistically significant at (0.1), (0.05), and (0.01) levels, respectively. 甘le(-statistics are based on White (1980) standard errors
Chiao Da Management Review Vol. 30 No. 1, 2010 109
Table 10
The Effect of Foreign Institutional Ownership
,
Manager Ownership,
and Employee Bonus information Disclosure on the Performance-Compensation Relationship:Using Return on Assets (ROA) 的 Proxyfor Firm PerformanceSTOCKi, = θ。 +θlROAiI + θ2FORi' + B)CEOil + θ'4ROAi' * FORi, + θ5ROAsr*FOR', *DIS +θ6ROA il * CEO il + θ7 ROA it * CEO il * DIS it + θgSIZE it + θgW官 Vit
+θloBETA il + ε
Variables Sign Coefficient t-statistic
JNTERCEPT -813024.00*** -13.36
ROA -3429 日** 2.50
FOR -7610.34*** -8.01
CEO 4257.59* 1.65
ROA*FOR + 849.87*** 15.48
ROA *FOR *DJS -4500.85*** -4.41
ROA*CEO ? -632.46*** -3.72
ROA *CEO*D1S ? 306.07* 1.85
SJZE 54763.00*** 12.80
MVBV -7658.27* -1.87
BETA 27169.00 1.39
AdjK 0.40
F-value 94.06***
Variable defmitions are given in Table 2. D時,an indicator variable, equals 0 if observations 3I它
from 1998-2∞ 1 (pre-mandatory disclosure) and equals 1 iffrom 2002-2005 (post-mandatory disclosure). (*), (**), and (***) represent being statisticaUy significant at (0.1), (0.05), and (0.01) levels, respectively. The t-statistics are based on White (1980) standard errors.
4.3.2 Adding Employee Bonus Information Disclosure and Firm Performance of Previous Year as Independent Variables
1n Models (1), (2) and (3), we use the dummy variable of employee bonus infonnation disclosure and its interaction term with ownership structure to test the
110 口1elmpact of Employee Compensation Discfosure
011 Corporate Governance Structure
effect of bonus information disclosure on c。中orate governance. The dummy variable of employee bonus information disclosure is not treated as an independent variable in any of the three regression models. We then add the dummy variable of employee bonus information disclosure and firm performance of the previous year into models (l), (2) and (3) because firm performance of the previous year can impact the amount and type of employee bonus of the current year. We use ROA as the proxy for firm performance and present the regression resuIts in Table 11. The F-value of 48.68 has a significance level of 0.01 and the adjusted R2 is 0.24. The coefficient of ROA*BIG (514.29) is positive and significant (的tat 4.68). After the mandatory compensation information disclosure, the coefficient of ROA *BIG*DIS (-340.55) is negative and significant (t-stat = -4.22). These resuIts are similar those resuIts of modeJ (1), providing further support for Hypotheses 1 and 2.
Table 12 displays the effect of foreign investment institution and compensation information disclosure on the performance-compensation relationship. The F-value of 105.86 has a significance level of 0.01 and the adjusted R2 is 0.41. The coefficient of ROA*FOR (1096.92) is positive and significant (的tat 16.20). After the mandatory compensation information disclosure, the coefficient of ROA *FOR *DIS (-265.95) is negative and significant (t-stat = -4.72). These resuIts are similar those of Model (2), also supporting Hypotheses 3 and 4
Table 13 shows the effect of managerial ownership and compensation information disclosure on the performance-compensation relationship. The F-value of 48.77 in this model has a significance level ofO.Ol and the adjusted R2 is 0.24. The coefficient of ROA *CEO (-764.34) is negative and significant (t-stat
= -4.6) after the mandatory compensation information disclosure. The coefficient of ROA *CEO*DIS (59.05) is positive but non-significant (t-stat = 0.36). These resuIts are also similar to those ofModel (3), supporting H5 but not H6
As indicated by the above analysis, adding the dummy variable of employee bonus information disclosure and co叩oration performance of the previous year as independent variables does not change the regression resuIts Major shareholders and foreign institutional investors can supervise the
Cσ'hiωaoDσ Maωnagement Rel'叩w~均台1. 30No. 1,2010 111
perfonnance-compensation relationship before infonnation disclosure is mandatory. Mandatory information disclosure helps improve the governance function of accounting information, which then reduces the governing roles of major shareholders and foreign investment institutions. Before compensation infonnation disclosure is made mandatory, the negative effect of managerial ownership on the performance-compensation relationship suppo此s the entrenchment hypothesis. Mter mandatory, information disclosure still fails to perfonn its governance function to reduce managers' self-interested behavior
Table 11
The EfTect of Major Shareholders Ownership and Employee Bonus Information Disclosure on the Performance-Compensation Relationship:
Adding Employee Bonus Information Disclosure and Corporation Performance ofPrevious Year as Independent Variables from 1998-2001 (pre-mandatory disclosure) and equals 1 if from 2002-泊的(post-mandatory
disclosure). (勻, (**), and (料*) represent being statistically significant at (0.1), (0.05), and
112 The Jmpact
01
Employee Compensation Disclosure on Corporate GOl'ernance Structure (0.01) levels, respectively. The l-statistics are based on White (1980) standard errorsTable 12
The Effect of Foreign Institutional Investors Ownership and Employee Bonus Information Disclosure on the Performance-Compensation Relationship:
Adding Employee Bonus Information Disclosure and Corporation Performance of Previous Year as Independent Variables
STOCK;r = α。+α, ROA ;r +α2FORit +α3D1S;r + α4ROAit * FOR;r +αsROAit * FOR;r * DIS
Variable definitions aJ芯 givenin Table 2. D時,an indicator variable, equals 0 if observations are from 1998-2001 (pre-mandatoI)' disclosure) aod equals 1 if from 2002-2∞5 (post-mandatoI)' disclosu記). (*), (料),and (林*)represent being statistically significant at (0.1), (0.05), and (0.01) levels, respectively. The l-statistics are based 00 White (1980) st扭曲吋 errors
Chiao Da A1anagement Review r令1. 30 No. 1, 2010 113
Table 13
The Effect of Manager Ownership and Employee Bonus Information Disclosure on the Performance-Compensation Relationship:Adding Employee Bonus Information Disclosure and Corporation Performance of Previous Year
as Independent Variables
STOCKu = α。 +αlROAi/+α2CEOit +α3D1Su + α4ROAit *CEOi/ +αjROAit *CEOi/ * DIS +α ROÆ.Ît-.+ α SIZE. l ' '-^'71V....~A....J it + α MVB V. + α BETÆ. ' """"'8 +&
Variables Sign Coefficient t-statistic
1NTERCEPT -1144630*** -16.92
ROA 9160.93*** 7.37
CEO 6641.27** 2.20
D1S -35561 ** -2.22
ROA*CEO ? -764.34*** -4.6
ROA *CEO *D1S ? 59.05 0.36
ROA ιI -710.31 。 82
S1ZE 74603*** 16.20
MVBV -4859.29 -1.01
BETA 10981 0.48
Adj J?1 0.24
F-value 48.77***
Variable def1lÚtions are given in Table 2. D店,an indicator variable, equals 0 if observations are from 1998-2∞ 1 (pre-mandatory disclosure) and equals 1 江 from2002-泊的(post-mandatory
disclosure). (*), (艸), and (***) represent being statisticaUy significant at (0.1), (0.05), and (0.01)
levels, respectively. The (-statistics are based on White (1980) standard errors
114 η'1e Jmpact 01 Employee Compel1satiol1 Disclosure
011 C。中orateGovernal1ce Structure