We have discussed about whether X is a compensated Poisson process in the model
Xt= Mt+ Z t
0
Zsds.
We will transform the above integral to an integral with respect to the compensated Poisson process which is independent of M and characterize those cases where X is again a compensated Poisson process. Since the jump size of Poisson process is equal to 1, we will extend the discussion to the compensated compound Poisson process which has random jump sizes.
3.1. Construction of a New Compensated Poisson Process We consider the process X which is given by
Xt = Mt+ Z t
0
f (s) d ˜Ms, (3.1)
where M is a compensated Poisson process with intensity λ, ˜M is another compensated Poisson process with intensity ˜λ is independent of M and f is a deterministic differentiable function. We want to know the form of the moment generating function of Xt, for t ≥ 0, so that we can see in which cases the process X given by (3.1) is again a compensated Poisson process. The moment generating function of Xt, for t ≥ 0 is given by
ϕXt(u) = E [exp {uMt}] · E
exp
u
Z t 0
f (s) d ˜Ms
.
15
In Shreve [14] we have known that the moment generating function for the compensated Poisson process Mt is given by
E [exp {uMt}] = exp {λt (eu− u − 1)} . So we only need to focus on the expectation
E
Lemma 1. Consider the process Z t
0
f (s) d ˜Ms,
where ˜M is a compensated Poisson process with intensity ˜λ and f is a nonrandom differ-entiable function. Then it’s moment generating function is given by
E
Proof. We will apply the Itˆo’s formula to exp
3.1. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED POISSON PROCESS 17
Since Yscis the continuous part of Ys, we can change the integrand Zswhich is in the second term of (3.2) to Zs−. When the Poisson process ˜N jumps at time s, Zs = Zs− × euf (s).
Hence, we obtain
E Moreover, we have that the moment generating function of Xt is given by
ϕXt(u) = exp {λt (eu− u − 1)} · exp
Next, we use (3.3) to see in which cases the process X is a compensated Poisson process.
If f ≡ 0, then it is obvious that Xt= Mt. In the following proposition we set f 6= 0.
Proposition 2. Let the stochastic process (Xt) satisfy (3.1). Then (Xt) is a compen-sated Poisson process if and only if f ≡ 1. Moreover, (Xt) has the intensity λ + ˜λ.
Proof. “ =⇒ ” : The moment generating function for compensated Poisson process must be as the form
expnˆλt (eu− u − 1)o
, for some constant ˆλ. Suppose that (Xt) is a compensated Poisson process with intensity ˆλ. We let the moment generating function of Xt equal to
expnˆλt (eu− u − 1)o
, i.e.
exp
λt (eu− u − 1) + ˜λ Z t
0
euf (s)− 1 ds − ˜λu Z t
0
f (s) ds
= expnˆλt (eu− u − 1)o .
Then we get the equation
λt (eu− u − 1) + ˜λ Z t
0
euf (s)− 1 ds − ˜λu Z t
0
f (s) ds = ˆλt (eu− u − 1) . (3.4)
We differentiate with respect to t on both sides of (3.4)
λ (eu − u − 1) + ˜λ euf (t)− 1 − ˜λuf (t) = ˆλ (eu− u − 1) .
We differentiate with respect to t again
λue˜ uf (t)f0(t) − ˜λuf0(t) = 0 .
Then we get
λuf˜ 0(t) euf (t)− 1 = 0 .
This implies that f0(t) = 0 or euf (t) − 1 = 0. So we have that f (t) is a constant. Set f ≡ C, where C is a positive constant. From (3.1), we have
Xt= Mt+ C ˜Mt.
The moment generating function of Xt is given by
ϕX(u) = expn
λt (eu − u − 1) + ˜λt euC − uC − Co .
3.1. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED POISSON PROCESS 19
Suppose the following equation holds expn
λt (eu− u − 1) + ˜λt euC − uC − Co
= expnˆλt (eu− u − 1)o . Then we have
λt (eu− u − 1) + ˜λt euC − uC − C = ˆλt (eu− u − 1) . We differentiate with respect to u twice, then we get
λeu+ ˜λC2euC = ˆλeu. We multiply e−u on both sides of the above formula
λ + ˜λC2eu(C−1) = ˆλ . Then
eu(C−1) = λ − λˆ
˜λC2 . Hence, we obtain C = 1 and then ˆλ = λ + ˜λ .
“ ⇐= ” : Since f ≡ 1, we have Xt = Mt+ ˜Mt. We will show that the law of X agrees with the law of a compensated Poisson process which has intensity λ + ˜λ. Denote by
FtM, ˜M the filtration generated by M and ˜M . Let
Zt= exp {uMt− λt (eu− u − 1)} .
By the proof of Lemma 1, we have that the process (Zt) is a martingale with respect to
FtM, ˜M . Let
Z˜t= exp n
u ˜Mt− ˜λt (eu− u − 1)o . ( ˜Zt) is also a martingale with respect to
FtM, ˜M
. The two processes (Zt) and ( ˜Zt) are independent and they are all martingales with respect to the filtration
FtM, ˜M
. From (3.3), we know that the moment generating function of Xt is
ϕXt(u) = expn
λ + ˜λ
t (eu− u − 1)o .
For fixed u ∈ R, the process Vt(u) is defined by
is a martingale with respect to the filtration
FtM, ˜M
So the process Vt(u)
is a martingale with respect to
FtM, ˜M
3.1. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED POISSON PROCESS 21
Now we use the martingale property of Vt(u1) and we take expectation of both sides of the above formula So we obtain
E [exp {u1Xt1 + u2(Xt2 − Xt1)}] Since the above joint moment generating function factors into the product of moment generating functions, Xt1 and Xt2 − Xt1 must be independent. We also know that the moment generating function of Xt2 − Xt1 is
ϕXt2−Xt1(u) = expn
λ + ˜λ
(t2− t1) (eu− u − 1)o .
Next, we computer the joint moment generating function of the random variables Xt1, Xt2, · · · , Xtn, for 0 < t1 < t2 < · · · < tn, so that we can know whether X is a compensated
Poisson process. For 0 < t1 < t2 < · · · < tn, the joint moment generating function of the random variables Xt1, Xt2, · · · , Xtn is given by
ϕXt1,Xt2,··· ,Xtn(u1, u2, · · · , un)
= Eexp unXtn+ un−1Xtn−1+ · · · + u1Xt1
= Eexp un Xtn − Xtn−1 + (un−1+ un) Xtn−1− Xtn−2 + · · · + (u1+ u2+ · · · un) Xt1
= Eexp un Xtn − Xtn−1 · E exp (un−1+ un) Xtn−1− Xtn−2 ·
· · · E [exp {(u1+ u2+ · · · un) Xt1}] .
We have known the form of the moment generating function of increments of X, then we obtain
ϕXt1,Xt2,··· ,Xtn (u1, u2, · · · , un)
= expn
λ + ˜λ
(tn− tn−1) (eun− un− 1)o
· expn
λ + ˜λ
(tn−1− tn−2) e(un−1+un)+ (un−1+ un) − 1o
·
· · · expn
λ + ˜λ
t1 e(u1+u2+···+un)− (u1+ u2+ · · · + un) − 1o .
This is the moment generating function for a compensated Poisson process with intensity
λ + ˜λ. This completes the proof.
3.2. Compensated Compound Poisson Process
Let (Nt) be a Poisson process with intensity λ and let Y1, Y2, . . . be a sequence of independent, identically distributed random variables with mean β, where β = E [Yi].
The random variables Y1, Y2, . . . are independent of the Poisson process (Nt).
Definition 3. The stochastic process (Qt) defined by Qt=
Nt
X
i=1
Yi, t ≥ 0
3.3. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED COMPOUND POISSON PROCESS 23
is called the compound Poisson process.
The compound Poisson process (Qt) jumps at the same time as the Poisson process (Nt) jumps. The jump sizes of the compound Poisson process are random. The com-pensated compound Poisson process (Qt− βλt) is a martingale. In this chapter, we only regard the compound Poisson process which has finitely many possible jump sizes on finite interval. The following theorem says that a compound Poisson process can be regarded as a sum of independent Poisson processes each has fixed jump-size.
Theorem 4 (Shreve [14] Theorem 11.3.3.). Let y1, y2, . . . , yM be a finite set of nonzero numbers and let p(y1), p(y2),. . . , p(yM) be positive numbers that sum to 1. Let Y1, Y2, . . . be a sequence of independent, identically distributed random variables with P (Yi = ym) = p(ym), m = 1, . . . , M . Let (Nt) be a Poisson process with intensity λ and define the compound Poisson process
Qt=
Nt
X
i=1
Yi.
For m = 1, . . . , M , let Nt(m) denote the number of jumps in Q of size ym in [0, t]. Then
Nt=
M
X
m=1
Nt(m) and Qt=
M
X
m=1
ymNt(m),
where the process N(1), . . . , N(M ) are independent Poisson processes and each N(m) has intensity λp(ym).
The theorem tells us the fact that a compound Poisson process can be represented by some independent Poisson processes each has fixed jump-size. We will use this theorem to construct a new compensated compound Poisson process.
3.3. Construction of a New Compensated Compound Poisson Process We consider two independent compound Poisson process which have some conditions as follows. Let y1, y2, . . . , yM be a finite set of nonzero numbers and let p(y1), p(y2),
. . . , p(yM) be positive numbers whose summation is identical to 1. Let Y1, Y2, . . . be a sequence of independent, identically distributed random variables with P (Yi = ym) = p(ym), m = 1, . . . , M and E [Yi] = β. Let (Nt) be a Poisson process with intensity λ and define the compound Poisson process
Qt=
Nt
X
i=1
Yi. (3.5)
For m = 1, . . . , M , let Nt(m) denote the number of jumps in Q of size ym in [0, t]. Then we have
Qt=
M
X
m=1
ymNt(m),
where the process N(1), . . . , N(M ) are independent Poisson process, and each N(m) has intensity λp(ym).
Let ˜y1, ˜y2, . . . , ˜yMˆ be another finite set of nonzero numbers and let ˜p(˜y1), ˜p(˜y2), . . . , ˜p(˜yMˆ) be positive numbers that sum to 1. Let ˜Y1, ˜Y2, . . . be another sequence of independent, identically distributed random variables with P ˜Yi = ˜ym
= ˜p(˜ym), m = 1, . . . , ˜M , E[ ˜Yi] = ˜β and ˜Y1, ˜Y2, . . . are independent of the sequence Y1, Y2, . . .. Let ( ˜Nt) be a Poisson process with intensity ˜λ and it is independent of (Nt). Define another compound Poisson process
Q˜t=
N˜t
X
i=1
Y˜i. (3.6)
For m = 1, . . . , ˜M , let ˜Nt(m) denote the number of jumps in ˜Q of size ˜ym in [0, t]. Then we have
Q˜t=
M˜
X
m=1
˜
ymN˜t(m),
where the process ˜N(1), . . . , ˜N( ˜M ) are independent Poisson process, and each ˜N(m) has intensity ˜λ˜p(˜ym).
Consider the stochastic process X which is given by Xt = (Qt− βλt) +
Z t 0
f (s) d ˜Qs− ˜β ˜λs
, (3.7)
3.3. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED COMPOUND POISSON PROCESS 25
where f is a nonrandom differentiable function and f 6= 0. We use the similar method in Section 3.1 to see that in which cases X is again a compound Poisson process. First, we want to know the form of the moment generating function of Xt, for t ≥ 0. The moment generating function of Xt, for t ≥ 0 is given by
ϕXt(u) = E [exp {u (Qt− βλt)}] · E
exp
u
Z t 0
f (s) d ˜Qs− ˜β ˜λs
. (3.8)
The following theorem tells us the form of the moment generating function for a compound Poisson process, so that we can get the form of the moment generating function of Xt.
Theorem 5 (Shreve [14] Section 11.3.2). The moment generating function for the compound Poisson process (Qt) defined as (3.5) is given by
ϕQt(u) = exp {λt (ϕY1(u) − 1)} .
By the above theorem, we know that the moment generating function of (Qt− βλt) is given by
ϕ(Qt−βλt)(u) = exp (
λt
M
X
m=1
p(ym) (euym − 1) − uβλt )
. (3.9)
We remain to obtain the form of the moment generating function of Z t
0
f (s) d ˜Qs− ˜β ˜λs , so that we can get the form of the moment generating function of Xt.
Theorem 6. Consider the process
Z t 0
f (s) d ˜Qs− ˜β ˜λs
,
where ( ˜Qt) is given by (3.6) with intensity ˜λ, ˜β = E[ ˜Yi], and f is a nonrandom differen-tiable function. Then its moment generating function is given by
E Poisson processes, we know that
E
This completes the proof.
3.3. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED COMPOUND POISSON PROCESS 27
From (3.8), (3.9) and Theorem 6, we obtain that the moment generating function of Xt is given by Next, we want to see in which cases the process X is a compensated compound Poisson process.
Proposition 7. Let the stochastic process (Xt) satisfy (3.7). Then (Xt) is a com-pensated compound Poisson process if and only if f ≡ C. Moreover, (Xt) has intensity
λ + ˜λ .
Proof. “ =⇒ ” : Suppose that (Xt) is a compensated compound Poisson process with intensity ˆλ. We let the moment generating function of Xt be equal to
exp
Then we have the equation
We differentiate with respect to t on both sides of the above equation
λ
If we differentiate with respect to t again, then we obtain
u˜λf0(t)
We differentiate with respect to t on both sides of (3.15), then we have
uf0(t)
3.3. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED COMPOUND POISSON PROCESS 29
The moment generating function of Xt is given by
ϕXt(u) = exp
This implies that X is a compensated Poisson process with intensity
λ + ˜λ
and the distribution for finitely many jump sizes of X is given by
P ˆYi = ym the law of X agrees with the law of a compensated compound Poisson process which has intensity λ + ˜λ. Set Then we have
Zt= exp
Set second term of (3.16) to Zs−. When the compound Poisson process Q jumps at time s, the jump size of Q at time s must be equal to one of y1, y2,· · · , yM. If the jump size of Q process with intensity λp(ym) and M(m) is a martingale. We have
Zt = 1 +
3.3. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED COMPOUND POISSON PROCESS 31
Since M(m)is a martingale and Zs−(euym− 1) is left continuous in s, Z t
0
Zs−(euym− 1) dMs(m) is also a martingale. The sum of finitely many martingales is a martingale, so the pro-cess (Zt) is a martingale. Denote by
FtN(1),··· , N(M ), ˜N(1),··· , ˜N( ˜M )
the filtration generated by N(1), · · · , N(M ), ˜N(1), · · · , ˜N( ˜M ). The process (Zt) is a martingale with respect to
By the similar method, we have that ˜Zt is also a martingale with respect to
FtN(1),··· , N(M ), ˜N(1),··· , ˜N( ˜M )
. The two processes (Zt) and ( ˜Zt) are independent and they are all martingales with respect to the filtration
FtN(1),··· , N(M ), ˜N(1),··· , ˜N( ˜M )
. From (3.13), we know that the moment generating function of Xt is given by
ϕXt(u) = exp
For the sake of simplicity, we let
ηt(u) = exp
Since Zt− Zs, ˜Zt− ˜Zs are independent of FsN(1),··· , N(M ), ˜N(1),··· , ˜N( ˜M ) and Zs, ˜Zsare adapted
Now we use the martingale property of Vt(u1). We take expectation of both sides of the above formula
So we obtain
E [exp {u1Xt1 + u2(Xt2 − Xt1)}] = ηt1(u1) · ηt2−t1(u2).
Since the above joint moment generating function factors into the product of moment generating functions, Xt1 and Xt2 − Xt1 must be independent. We also know that the moment generating function of Xt2 − Xt1 is
3.3. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMPENSATED COMPOUND POISSON PROCESS 33
This is the moment generating function for a compensated compound Poisson process
with intensity λ + ˜λ. This completes the proof.
CHAPTER 4