• 沒有找到結果。

Current Matching Using CdSe Quantum Dots to Enhance the Power

Chapter 1 Introduction

1.3 Research Motivation and Literature Review

1.3.3 Current Matching Using CdSe Quantum Dots to Enhance the Power

The past few years have witnessed an explosive growth in research that addresses different aspects of the use of semiconductor materials in varied configurations for photovoltaic applications. Among them, III-V compound tandem solar cells, which take

advantage of the bandgap tunability by elemental multi-junction compositions and of the high optical absorption by direct bandgap materials, have attracted increasing attention for their extremely high conversion efficiency [1.43]-[1.46]. Ideally, a calculated power conversion efficiency as high as η=50.1% (under AM1.5G, 1000 sun) is achievable for a series-connected InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cell, which is far beyond the theoretical limit of a single-junction solar cell estimated by the Shockley-Queisser’s calculation scheme [1.47], [1.48]. In practice, an appropriate alignment of the bandgap energy of multi-stacking layers that provides current matching between each subcell is the most challenging issue in this tandem architecture, which restricts the maximum power conversion efficiency of the device and the potential applications in the photovoltaic industry. More specifically, the GaAs middle subcell generally limits the overall photocurrent of a InGaP/GaAs/Ge tandem solar cell.

To overcome the issue of current mismatching, several approaches, such as the use of a quaternary AlGaInP top subcell and the substitution of the middle subcell with an InGaAs material,have been widely investigated [1.49]. However, an introduction of Al content into the InGaP top subcell causes a significant photocurrent droop due to the associated oxygen contamination on minority-carrier properties [1.50]. In addition, the substitution of a fraction of the gallium atoms with indium in the middle subcell accompanies a lattice mismatch and requires a complicated growth scheme such as the graded buffer layers to avoid a large dislocation density that also reduces the photocurrent of the device [1.51]. Hence, for InGaP/GaAs/Ge tandem solar cells, an approach that does not adversely affect the device’s performance and that is capable of resolving the current-mismatching issue is necessary. Recently, semiconductor nanoparticles, known as quantum dots (QDs), have been intensively studied and utilized to generate multiple carrier excitations from one incident photon by the

so-called impact ionization [1.52]-[1.54]. Such a nonlinear phenomenon can cause a solar cell’s quantum efficiency to be greater than 100%, primarily due to the discrete carrier density of states and the strong quantum confinement effect [1.55]. Additionally, as the electronic energy levels and the optical spectrum strongly depend on the QD’s dimension, its effective bandgap energy can be tunable. For the same reason, the semiconductor QDs are also adopted as downconverter materials to help harvest the ultraviolet regime of solar energy in silicon solar cells [1.56]. In this study, we recognize the photon conversion aspect of nanocrystal QDs and explore a novel strategy using CdSe QDs to tailor the incident spectrum of solar light to enhance the photocurrent of a limited subcell in InGaP/GaAs/Ge tandem solar cells and to enhance the overall power conversion efficiency of the cell. We demonstrate the ability of CdSe QDs to enhance the performance of the device, not only by theoretical calculations based on the fundamental of material optics but also by directly measuring the device’s electrical characteristic. The device exhibits an enhancement of 10.39% in the power conversion efficiency compared to the device’s counterpart without integrating QDs.

The theoretical and experimental results validate that the CdSe QDs have promising potential for efficient solar spectrum utilization in InGaP/GaAs/Ge tandem solar cells.

References

[1.1] M. Asif and T. Muneer, “Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1388–1413 (2007).

[1.2] G. P. Smestad, Optoelectronics of Solar Cells (SPIE Press, 2002).

[1.3] “Total surface area required to fuel the world with solar,” http://landartgenerator.

org/blagi/archives/127 (2009).

[1.4] John A. Turner, “A realizable renewable energy future,” Science, 285(5428), 687-689 (1999).

[1.5] “Classification of solar cell technologies,”

http://sovoxglobal.com/cell_

classification.html (SOVOX Solar Power Development).

[1.6] “Solar markets,” http://solarcellcentral.com/markets_page.html (Solar Cell Central, Four Peaks Technologies, Inc. Sottsdale, AZ).

[1.7] “Best research-cell efficiencies,” http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/images/efficiency_

chart.jpg (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL).

[1.8] “Record-breaking solar cell points the way to cheaper power,” http://www.tech-

nologyreview.com/news/528351/record-breaking-solar-cell-points-the-way-to-chea per-power/ (2014).

[1.9] David Appleyard, “Utility-scale thin-film: three new plants in germany total almost 50 MW,” Renewable Energy World Magazine, March 11 (2009).

[1.10] “First Solar builds the highest efficiency thin film PV cell on record,” http://

investor .firstsolar.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=864426 (2014).

[1.11] Mathias, “Solar cell efficiency world record set by Sharp — 44.4%,” http://

cleantechnica.com/2013/06/23/solar-cell-efficiency-world-record-set-by-sharp-44-4/ (2013).

[1.12] Eric Wesoff, “Sharp hits record 44.4% efficiency for triple-junction solar cell,”

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Sharp-Hits-Record-44.4-Effi- ciency-For-Triple-Junction-Solar-Cell (2013).

[1.13] “NREL Reports 31.1% Efficiency for III-V Solar Cell,” http://www.

nrel.gov/news/press/2013/2226.html (News Release NR-3913, NREL, 2013).

[1.14] Nam-Gyu Park, “Perovskite solar cells: an emerging photovoltaic technology,” Materials Today, in press (2014).

[1.15] L. Tsakalakos, “Nanostructures for photovoltaics,” Mater. Sci. Eng., 62(6), 175–189 (2008).

[1.16] C. A. Wolden, J. Kurtin, J. B. Baxter, I. Repins, S. E. Shaheen, J. T. Torvik, A.

A. Rockett, V. M. Fthenakis, and E. S. Aydil, “Photovoltaic manufacturing: Present status, future prospects, and research needs,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 29(3), 030801 (2011).

[1.17] A. Fujisaka, S. Kang, L. Tian, Y. L. Chow, and A. Belyaev, “Implant-cleave process enables ultra-thin wafers without kerf loss,” Photovoltaics World, pp.

21–24, Issue: May/Jun (2011).

[1.18] J. Zhu, C.-M. Hsu, Z. Yu, S. Fan, and Y. Cui, “Nanodome solar cells with efficient light management and self-cleaning,” Nano Lett., 10(6), 1979–1984 (2010).

[1.19] O. Gunawan, K. Wang, B. Fallahazad, Y. Zhang, E. Tutuc, and S. Guha,

“High performance wire-array silicon solar cells,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl., 19(3), 307–312 (2011).

[1.20] K. Hadobás, S. Kirsch, A. Carl, M. Acet, and E. F. Wassermann, “Reflection properties of nanostructure-arrayed silicon surfaces,” Nanotechnology, 11(3),

161–164 (2000).

[1.21] K. Peng, Y. Xu, Y. Wu, Y. Yan, S. T. Lee, and J. Zhu, “Aligned single-crystalline Si nanowire arrays for photovoltaic applications,” Small, 1(11), 1062–1067 (2005).

[1.22] V. V. Iyengar, B. K. Nayak, and M. C. Gupta, “Optical properties of silicon light trapping structures for photovoltaics,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 94(12), 2251–2257 (2010).

[1.23] J. Li, H. Yu, S. M. Wong, G. Zhang, X. Sun, P. G.-Q. Lo, and D.-L. Kwong,

“S nanopillar array optimization on Si thin films for solar energy harvesting,” Appl.

Phys. Lett., 95(3), 033102 (2009).

[1.24] L. Tsakalakos, J. Balch, J. Fronheiser, B. A. Korevaar, O. Sulima, and J. Rand,

“Silicon nanowire solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(23), 233117 (2007).

[1.25] E. C. Garnett and P. Yang, “Silicon nanowire radial p-n junction solar cells,” J.

Am. Chem. Soc., 130(29), 9224–9225 (2008).

[1.26] S. Perraud, S. Poncet, S. Noël, M. Levis, P. Faucherand, E. Rouvière, P.

Thony, C. Jaussaud, and R. Delsol, “Full process for integrating silicon nanowire arrays into solar cells,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 93(9), 1568–1571 (2009).

[1.27] T. Stelzner, M. Pietsch, G. Andrä, F. Falk, E. Ose, and S. Christiansen,

“Silicon nanowire-based solar cells,” Nanotechnology, 19(29), 295203 (2008).

[1.28] S. M. Wong, H. Y. Yu, J. S. Li, G. Zhang, G. Q. Lo, and D. L. Kwong,

“Design high-efficiency Si nanopillar-array-textured thin-film solar cell,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., 31(4), 335–337 (2010).

[1.29] K. Rasool, M. A. Rafiq, C. B. Li, E. Krali, Z. A. K. Durrani, and M. M.

Hasan, “Enhanced electrical and dielectric properties of polymer covered silicon nanowire arrays,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 101(2), 023114 (2012).

[1.30] O. Jani, I. Ferguson, C. Honsberg, and S. Kurtz, “Design and characterization of GaN/InGaN solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91(13), 132117 (2007).

[1.31] J.-K. Sheu, C.-C. Yang, S.-J. Tu, K.-H. Chang, M.-L. Lee, W.-C. Lai, and L.-C. Peng, “Demonstration of GaN-based solar cells with GaN/InGaN superlattice absorption layers,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., 30(3), 225-227 (2009).

[1.32] Z. Ren, L. Chao, X. Chen, B. Zhao, X. Wang, J. Tong, J. Zhang, X. Zhuo, D.

Li, H. Yi, and S. Li, “Enhanced performance of InGaN/GaN based solar cells with an In0.05Ga0.95N ultra-thin inserting layer between GaN barrier and In0.2Ga0.8N well,” Opt. Express, 21(6), 7118-7124 (2013).

[1.33] Y.-A. Chang, F.-M. Chen, Y.-L. Tsai, C.-W. Chang, K.-J. Chen, S.-R. Li, T.-C.

Lu, H.-C. Kuo, Y.-K. Kuo, P. Yu, C.-C. Lin, and L.-W. Tu, “Fabrication and characterization of back-side illuminated InGaN/GaN solar cells with periodic via-holes etching and Bragg mirror processes,” Opt. Express, 22(S5), A1334- A1342 (2014).

[1.34] Y.-J. Lee, M.-H. Lee, C.-M. Cheng, C.-H. Yang, “Enhanced conversion efficiency of InGaN multiple quantum well solar cells grown on a patterned sapphire substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 98(26), 263504 (2011).

[1.35] Y.-C. Yao, M.-T. Tsai, C.-Y. Huang, T.-Y. Lin, J.-K. Sheu, Y.-J. Lee,

“Efficient collection of photogenerated carriers by inserting double tunnel junctions in III-nitride p-i-n solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 103(19), 193503 (2013).

[1.36] Y.-J. Lee, Z.-P. Yang, F.-Y. Lo, J.-J. Siao, Z.-H. Xie, Y.-L. Chuang, T.-Y. Lin, and J.-K. Sheu, “Slanted n-ZnO/p-GaN nanorod arrays light-emitting diodes grown by oblique-angle deposition,” APL Mat., 2(5), 056101 (2014).

[1.37] J. J. Wierer, A. J. Fischer, and D. D. Koleske, “The impact of piezoelectric polarization and nonradiative recombination on the performance of (0001) face

GaN/InGaN photovoltaic devices,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 96(5), 051107 (2010).

[1.38] C. J. Neufeld, S. Cruz, R. M. Farrell, M. Iza, J. R. Lang, S. Keller, S.

Nakamura, S. P. DenBaars, J. S. Speck, and U. K. Mishra, “Effect of doping and polarization on carrier collection in InGaN quantum well solar cells,” Appl. Phys.

Lett., 98(24), 243507 (2011).

[1.39] H. Xing, D. S. Green, H. Yu, T. Mates, P. Kozodoy, S. Keller, S. P. Denbaars, and U. K. Mishra, “Memory effect and redistribution of Mg into sequentially regrown GaN layer by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 42(1), 50-53 (2003).

[1.40] J. Simon, V. Protasenko, C. Lian, H. Xing, and D. Jena, “Polarization-induced hole doping in wide-band-gap uniaxial semiconductor heterostructures,” Science, 327(5961), 60-64 (2010).

[1.41] S. D. Carnevale, T. F. Kent, P. J. Phillips, M. J. Mills, S. Rajan, and R. C.

Myers, “Polarization-induced pn diodes in wide-band-gap nanowires with ultraviolet electroluminescence,” Nano Lett., 12(2), 915-920 (2012).

[1.42] S. Li, M. Ware, J. Wu, P. Minor, Z. Wang, Z. Wu, Y. Jiang, and G. J. Salamo,

“Polarization induced pn-junction without dopant in graded AlGaN coherently strained on GaN,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 101(12), 122103 (2012).

[1.43] M. S. Leite, R. L. Woo, J. N. Munday, W. D. Hong, S. Mesropian, D. C. Law, and H. A. Atwater, “Towards an optimized all lattice-matched InAlAs/InGaAsP/InGaAs multijunction solar cell with efficiency >50%,” Appl.

Phys. Lett., 102(3), 033901 (2013).

[1.44] “Sharp Develops Concentrator Solar Cell with World's Highest Conversion Efficiency of 44.4%,” http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/130614.html (2013).

[1.45] J. Geisz, D. Friedman, J. Ward, A. Duda, W. Olavarria, T. Moriarty, J. Kiehl,

M. Romero, A. Norman, K. Jones, “40.8% efficient inverted triple-junction solar cell with two independently metamorphic junctions,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 93(12), 123505 (2008).

[1.46] K. Tanabe, “A review of ultrahigh efficiency III-V semiconductor compound solar cells: multijunction tandem, lower dimensional, photonic up/down conversion and plasmonic nanometallic structures,” Energies, 2(3), 504–530 (2009).

[1.47] L. A. Kosyachenko, Solar Cells-Silicon Wafer-Based Technologies (InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011), p. 335-337.

[1.48] W. Shockley and H. J. Queisser, “Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells,” J. Appl. Phys., 32(3), 510 (1961).

[1.49] M. W. Wanlass, S. P. Ahrenkiel, R. K. Ahrenkiel, D. S. Albin, J. J. Carapella, A. Duda, J. F. Geisz, S. Kurtz, T. Moriarty, R. J. Wehrer, and B. Wernsman,

“Lattice-mismatched approaches for high-performance, III-V photovoltaic energy converters,” in Proceedings of the 31th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 2005), pp. 530–535.

[1.50] R. R. King, M. Haddad, T. Isshiki, P. Colter, J. Ermer, H. Yoon, D. E. Joslin, and N. H. Karam, “Next-generation, high-efficiency III-V multijunction solar cells,” in Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 2000), pp. 998–1001.

[1.51] F. Dimroth, U. Schubert, and A. W. Bett, “25.5% efficient Ga0.35In0.65P/Ga0.83In0.17 as tandem solar cells grown on GaAs substrates,” IEEE Electron Dev., 21(5), 209–211 (2000).

[1.52] A. J. Nozik, “Quantum dot solar cells,” Physica E 14(1-2), 115–120 (2002).

[1.53] R. D. Schaller and V. I. Klimov, “High efficiency carrier multiplication in PbSe nanocrystals: Implications for solar energy conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.,

92(18), 186601 (2004).

[1.54] A. Franceschetti, J. M. An, and A. Zunger, “Impact ionization can explain carrier multiplication in PbSe quantum dots,” Nano Lett., 6(10), 2191–2195 (2006).

[1.55] M. Wolf, R. Brendel, J. H. Werner, and H. J. Queisser, “Solar cell efficiency and carrier multiplication in Si1-xGex alloys,” J. Appl. Phys., 83(8), 4213–4221(1998).

[1.56] C. -Y. Huang, D. -Y. Wang, C. -H. Wang, Y. -T. Chen, Y. -T. Wang, Y. -T.

Jiang, Y. -J. Yang, C. -C. Chen, and Y. -F. Chen, “Efficient light harvesting by photon downconversion and light trapping in hybrid ZnS nanoparticles/Si nanotips solar cells,” ACS Nano, 4(10), 5849–5854 (2010).