• 沒有找到結果。

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS

5.2 F UTURE WORKS

The following are recommendations for future investigation:

1. This study was conducted at one senior high schools to examine the proposed team-teaching PBL approach. Future research may target the research setting to other senior high schools and other learning topics, which will yield a whole picture and understanding of this new model.

2. The future research may address student’s learning behavior and high-order thinking skills.

References

Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24, 201-216.

Albanese, M.A., and Mitchell, S. (1993). Project-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 52-81.

Anderson, D. R. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love. Journal of

Education, 183(1), 33-48.

Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in

human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Andrews, K., & Wooten, B. (2005). Closing the gap: Helping students identify the skills employers want. NACE Journal, 64(4), 41-44.

Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology:

effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers & Education,

45, 383–398.

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2002). Building sustainable science curriculum:

Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation, Science Education, 87(4), 454-467.

Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2004). Enhancing undergraduate student’s chemistry understanding through Project based learning in an IT environment. Science

Education, 89(1), 117-149.

Barron, B. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 7 (3&4), 271-311.

Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998).

Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 271-311.

Belland, B. R., Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Perceptions of the value of

problem-based learning among students with special needs and their teachers. The

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learing, 1(2), 1-18.

Blumentfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A.

(1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.

Booth M, Chey T, Wake M, Norton K, Hesketh K, Dollman J & Robertson I 2003.

Change in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among young Australians, 1969–1997. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 77:29–36.

Bosley, C., & Moon, S. (2003). Review of existing literature on the use of information

and communication technology within an educational context. Derby: Centre for

Guidance Studies, University of Derby.

Bradley, G., & Russell, G. (1997). Computer experience. School support and computer anxieties. Educational Psychology, 17, 267–284.

Brinkerhoff, R.O. (2006). Telling training’s story: Evaluation made simple, credible, and

effective. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2008). The effects of multimedia-supported problem-based inquiry on student engagement, empathy, and assumptions about history. The

Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learing, 2(1), 21-56.

Buck Institute for Education (2003). Project Based Learning Handbook: A Guide to

Standards-Focused Project Based Learning for Middle and High School Teachers.

Retrieved October 12, 2009, Introduction chapter free to download at:

http://www.bie.org/tools/handbook

Buck Institute for Education (2009). PBL Starter Kit: To-the-Point Advice, Tools and

Tips for Your First Project. Introduction chapter free to download at:

http://www.bie.org/tools/toolkit/starter

Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., & Clark, D. C. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,

19, 57–73.

Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 8(2), 22–28.

Chai, C. S., & Tan, S. C. (2009). Professional development of teachers for computer-supported collaborative learning: A knowledge-building approach.

Teachers College Record, 111(5), 1296-1327.

Challenge 2000 (2000). Challenge 2000 Project-Based Learning & Multimedia web site.

Retrieved October 18, 2002, from http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/

Chang, L. C., & Lee, G. C. (2010). A team-teaching model for practicing project-based learning in high school: Collaboration between computer and subject teachers.

Computers & Education, 55, 961-969

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing,

learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1996). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices.

In E. Meyen, G. Vergason, & R. Whelan (Eds.), Strategies for teaching

exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 155–182). Denver: Love.

Cuban, L. (1999). The technology puzzle. Education Week, 18(43).

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational

Research Journal, 38, 813–834.

Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of

Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 303–329.

Dawson, K., Pringle, R., & Adams, T. L. (2003). Providing links between technology integration, methods courses, and school-based field experiences: a curriculum-based and technology-enhanced microteaching. Journal of Computing

in Teacher Education, 20(1), 41–47.

Demirci, A.(2009). How do Teachers Approach New Technologies: Geography Teachers’

Attitudes towards Geographic Information Systems (GIS). European Journal of

Educational Studies, 1(1), 43-53

Denis, H., Harald, K., Hermann, M., Nick, S. (2005). Enabling Project-Based Learning in WBT Systems. International Journal on ELearning, 4(4), 445-462.

Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainly. Minton, New York.

Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research in Education, 35(3), 342–361.

Ebersole, S., & Vorndam, M. (2002). Adoption of computer-base instructional methodologies: A case study. In Presented at world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, Denver, Colorado.

Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D.N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning

Sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450.

Edward, L. D. (1995). The design and analysis of a mathematical micro-world. Journal of

Educational Computing Research, 12, 77-94.

Eick, C., & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89(3), 470-491.

Eick, C., Ware, F., & Williams, P. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 74–85.

Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of

Education, 33, 403–422.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 54–72.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development,

47(4), 47–61.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development,

53(4), 25–39.

Evertson, Carolyn M. (2006). Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice,

and Contemporary Issues. Edited by Carol Simon Weinstein. Mahwah, New

Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Fabry, D., & Higgs, J. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education.

Journal of Educational Computing, 17, 385–395.

Faison, C. (1996). Modeling instructional technology use in teacher preparation: Why we can't wait. Educational Technology, 36, 57-59

Finn, C. E. (1991). We must take charge: Our schools and our future. New York: Free Press.

Foulger, T.S. & Jimenez-Silva, M. (2007). Enhancing the writing development of English learners: Teacher perceptions of common technology in project-based learning.

Journal of Research on Childhood Education, 22(2), 109-124.

George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2001, November 1). Project-based learning

research.

Goldenkoff, R. (2004). ―Using Focus Groups‖ in Handbook of Practical Program

Evaluation, 2nd edition, edited by Wholey, Hatry and Newcomer (eds.). 340-362.

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

Guillaume, A. M., & Rudney, G. L. (1993). Student teachers’ growth toward independence: An analysis of their changing concerns. Teaching and Teacher

Education, 9, 65–80.

Hafner, W., & Ellis, J. T. (2004). Project-Based, Asynchronous Collaborative learning. In

Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS). Big Island, Hawaii. January

Handler, M. G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers & Education, 20(2), 147–156.

Harel & S. Papert (1991). Constructionism (pp. 141-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Harris, J. (1998). Virtual architecture: Designing and directing curriculum-based telecomputing. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education

(ISTE)

Harris, J. H., & Katz, L. G. (2001). Young investigators: The project approach in the

early years. New York

Harrison, J., Lawson, T., & Wortley, A. (2005). Mentoring the beginning teacher:

Developing professional autonomy through critical reflection on practice.

Reflective Practice, 6, 419–441.

Hartenian, L. S., Schellenger, M., &Frederickson, P. (2001) .Creation and Assessment of an Integrated Business Course. Journal of Education for Business, 76(3), 149-159.

Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M.,&Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60(1), 27-36.

Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers.

Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning:

current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational

Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252.

Hickey, D. T., Honeyford, M. A., Clinton, K. A., & McWilliams, J. (2010). Participatory assessment of 21st Century proficiencies. In V. J. Schute and B. Becker (Eds.),

Innovative assessment in the 21st century: Supporting educational needs.

Springer.

Intel® TWT Program(2011). Retrieved October 18, 2011, from http://www.intel.com/education/teach/

Jang, S. J. (2002). The inquiry for models of team teaching. Educational Research and

Information, 9(4), 66–82.

Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education,

28(6), 615–632.

Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.

Jang, S. J. (2008b). Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 646-659.

John F. & Rebecca T. (2013) "Integrating project-based learning into an undergraduate programmer using Web 2.0 and videoconferencing", Journal of Applied Research

in Higher Education, 5(1), pp.129 - 140

Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy frame work for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and continuing Education,

2003(100), 31-44.

Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mind tools for critical thinking.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and

learning in a digital world. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kay, K. S., Rosalyn, T. & Debra, P.(2008). Creating a Ripple Effect: Incorporating Multimedia-Assisted Project-Based Learning in Teacher Education, Theory Into

Practice, 47, 259-265.

Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method, Teachers College Record, 19(4), 319-335.

Kong, S. C. (2007). Information technology and project-based learning: Activating and

facilitating. Hong Kong: Education and manpower Bureau.

Kozma, R.B. & Schank, P. (1998). Connecting with the twenty-first century: Technology in support of educational reform. In D. Palumbo & C. Dede (Eds.), Association for

Supervision and Curriculum Development 1998 Yearbook: Learning and Technology, pp. 3-27. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum

Development.

Lam, S. f., Yim, P. s., & Lam, T. (2002). Transforming school culture: can true collaboration be initiated? Educational Research, 44, 181-195.

Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and

Development, 48(1), 45-66.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lebow, D. (1995) Constructivist values for instructional systems design: five principles toward a new mindset. In B. Seels (Ed. ) Instructional design fundamentals: A

reconsideration. (pp. 175-185). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology

Publications.

Lewis, P. S., Alacaci, C., & O’Brien, E. G. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ use of mathematics in a project-based science approach. PreQuest Education Journals,

102(4), 172.

Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591–596.

Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review,

Computers and Education, 37(3-4), 377-386.

Little, J. W. (1993). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’

professional relations. Teachers’ College Record, 91, 509–536.

Marina, P. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science

education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers

& Education, 52(1), 1–12

Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide

to standards focused project based learning (2nd Ed.). Novato, Califonia: Buck

Institute for Education.

Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M.L. (1998). Creating and Sustaining the Constructivist

Classroom. California : Corwin Press.

Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. Elementary School

Journal, 97, 341-358.

Mayer, R.E. (1982). Instructional variables in text processing. In A. Flammer & W.

Kintsch (eds) Discourse processing, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.

Mayer, R.E., & Greeno, J.G. (1972). Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods. Journal of Educational Psychology,

63, 165-173.

McCombs, B. L. (2003). A framework for the redesign of K-12 education in the context of current educational reform. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 93-101

Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117-125.

Moursund, D. (2003). Project-based learning using information technology (2nd ed.).

Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Moursund, D., Bielefeldt, T., & Underwood, S. (1997). Foundations for The Road Ahead:

Project-based learning and information technologies. Washington, DC: National

Foundation for the Improvement of Education. Retrieved July 10, 2002, from http://www.iste.org/research/roadahead/pbl.html

Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for

Teacher Education, 9, 319–341.

Newell, Ronald. Passion for Learning: how project-based learning meets the needs of

21st-century students. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2003.

Norman, G.T., Schmidt, H.G. (1992). The Psychological basis of problem based learning:

A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67, 557-572

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.

Memory and Cognition, 17(4), 398-422.

Prensky, M. 2000. Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw Hill.

Preston, C., Cox, M., & Cox, K. (2000). Teachers as innovators: An evaluation of the

motivation of teachers to use information and communications technology.

MirandaNet.

Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and leaning.

Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 14-20.

Pringle, R., Dawson, K., & Marshall, S. (2002). Technology, science, and preservice teachers: Creating a culture of technology-savvy elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Society for information Technology.

Pulkkinen, J. (2007). Cultural globalization and integration of ICT in education. In K.

Kumpulainen (Ed.), Educational technology: Opportunities and challenges (pp.

13–23). Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.

Quinn, S. L., & Kanter, S. B. (1984, December). Team Teaching: An Alternative to Lecture Fatigue. In Innovation Abstracts (Vol. 6, No. 34, p. n34).

Railsback, J. (2002). Project-based instruction: Creating excitement for learning.

Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Roblyer, M.D. (2005). Educational Technology Research That Makes a Difference:

Series Introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,

5(2), 192-201. AACE.

Roblyer, M. D., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M. A. (1997). Integrating educational

technology into teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Rooij, S. W. (2009). Scaffolding project-based learning with the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 210-219.

Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: an activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 253–282.

Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R.

C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition

of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Samuel, K. W. C., Tse, S. K. & Ken, C.(2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2),

132-143

Sandholtz, J. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39-50.

Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Project based learning: A constructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2004). Scaffolding problem-based teaching in a traditional social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 32, 349 -378.

Schmidt, H.G. (1983). Project-based learning: rationale and description. Medical

Education, 17, 11-16.

Schmidt, H.G. (1993). Foundations of project-based learning: Some explanatory notes.

Medical Education, 27, 422-432.

Schneider, Daniel K. Project-based Learning. 2005. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Project-based_learning.

Seo, K. K., Templeton, R., & Pellegrino, D. (2008). Creating a Ripple Effect:

Incorporating Multimedia-Assisted Project-Based Learning in Teacher Education.

Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 259-265.

Shapiro, E. J., & Dempsey, C. J. (2008). Conflict resolution in team teaching: A case study in interdisciplinary teaching. College Teaching, 56(3), 157-162.

Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. C. Berliner & R.

C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726-764).

Simkins, M., Cole, K., Tavalin, F. & Means, B. (2002) Increasing student learning

through multimedia projects. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision

and Curriculum Development.

Smith, B. N., Hornsby, J. S., & Kite, M. (2000). Broadening the business curriculum via a cross-disciplinary approach: A mobile unit on cultural diversity. Education,

120(4), 713–722.

Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. (2001). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond.

Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 85–111.

Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology & Learning, 23 (6), 20.

SRI International. (2000, January). Silicon valley challenge 2000: Year 4 Report. San Jose, CA: Joint Venture, Silicon Valley Network.

Steelman, J. D.(2005). Multimedia Makes Its Mark. Learning and Leading with

Technology, 33(1), 16-18.

Stites, R. (1998). Adult learning theory: An argument for technology. In C. E. Hopey (Ed.), Technology, basic skills, and adult education: Getting ready and moving

forward (pp. 51-58). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, &

Vocational Education.

Synteta, P., & Schneider, D. (2002). EVA_pm: How XML can Scaffold Project-Based Learning. In Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on New Educational

Environments (ICNEE'02), Lugano, Switzerland.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive

Science, 12, 257-285 (1988).

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.

Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.

The Buck Institute for Education and Boise State University, Department of Educational Technology. Project Based Learning: The Onine Resource for PBL. 2005.

http://www.pbl-online.org/

Thomas, J.W. (1998). Project-based learning: Overview. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA:

Autodesk. Retrieved July 20, 2003,

from http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research*

Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003). Technology collaborative for

simultaneous renewal in teacher education.

Tobin, K., Roth, W.-N., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 941–964.

Tse, S. K., Lam, W. I., Lam, Y. H., & Loh, E. K. Y. (2005). Learn to read: The

performance of Hong Kong primary 4 pupils in PIRLS2001. Hong Kong: Hong

Kong University Press.

Uden, L., & Beaumont, C. (2006). Technology and Problem-Based Learning. London:

Information Science.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walther-Thomas, C. S., Bryant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective co-teaching:

The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17(4), 255-264.

EJ 527 660

Ward, Lisa S. and David H. Lee, 2002, ―Practical Application of the Risk-Adjusted Return on Capital Framework‖, CAS Forum Summer 2002, Dynamic Financial Analysis Discussion Papers; Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.casact.org/pubs/forum/02sforum/02sftoc.htm.

Welch, M., & Sheridan, S. M. (1995). Educational partnerships: Serving students at risk.

Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

Wenger, Etienne; McDermott, Richard; Snyder, William M. (2002). Cultivating

Communities of Practice (Hardcover)

Wepner, S. B., Ziomek, N., & Tao L. (2003). Three teacher educators’ perspectives about the shifting responsibilities of infusing technology into the curriculum. Action in

Teacher Education, 24(4), 53-63.

Wertsch, J. V.(1984). The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. In B.

Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal

development” (pp. 7-18). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Wild, M. (1996). Technology refusal: Rationalizing the failure of student and beginning teachers to use computers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 134–143.

Wilson, E. K. (2003). Preservice secondary social studies teachers and technology integration: what do they think and do in their field experiences. Journal of

Computing in Teacher Education, 20(1), 29–39

Wood, D. (1995). Theory, training, and technology: Part I. Education and Training, 37(1), 12–16.

Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational Psychology, 9th edn., Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.

Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal

of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 365–382.

Appendices

APPENDIX A. Phase II English achievement test

APPENDIX B. Phase II geography achievement test

APPENDIX C. Phase III English achievement test

APPENDIX D. Phase III geography achievement test

APPENDIX E. Student progress and weekly project reports

專題式學習工作報告

班級:____年__班

組名:_______

組員:_______

_______

_______

_______

題目:____________________________

組員及職掌分工:

職稱 座號 姓名 工作內容

為什麼要選這個題目?有何動機引發你們想做此題目?

專題研究大綱 (請畫出網站架構圖)

第一週上課交

各週工作內容記實 第一週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第二週上課交

---

各週工作內容記實 第二週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第三週上課交

---

各週工作內容記實 第三週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第四週上課交

---

各週工作內容記實 第四週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第五週上課交

---

各週工作內容記實 第五週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第六週上課交

---

各週工作內容記實 第六週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第七週上課交

---

各週工作內容記實 第七週

組員姓名

職稱 工作內容

還需要特別注意什麼?有什麼需要老師支援?

第八週上課交

---

此次專題的參考資料來源列表:

內容 來源(http://……….,某書本、雜誌第幾頁)

要準備成果展示囉!選出本組主講者為________________

想要如何呈現你們的成果?

此次分組合作進行專題,有何感想?你們自己認為作的好不好?

如果再進行一次,有什麼需要改進的地方?請列出。

APPENDIX F. Website assessment form