• 沒有找到結果。

Grant support was provided by the National Science Council of the Republic of China (Grant No. 102-2314-B-039-029-MY3) and grants CMU101-S-17 and

CMU103-BC-6 from China Medical University.

References

1. Harris AL. Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nature reviews 489

490 491 492 493 494

495 496 497 498 499

500 501 502 503 504 505

506 507 508

Cancer. 2002;2:38-47.

2. Dewhirst MW, Cao Y, Moeller B. Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate

angiogenesis and radiotherapy response. Nature reviews Cancer. 2008;8:425-37.

3. Hockel M, Vaupel P. Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic,

and molecular aspects. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001;93:266-76.

4. Ruan K, Song G, Ouyang G. Role of hypoxia in the hallmarks of human cancer.

Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2009;107:1053-62.

5. Oliver L, Olivier C, Marhuenda FB, Campone M, Vallette FM. Hypoxia and the malignant glioma microenvironment: regulation and implications for therapy. Current

molecular pharmacology. 2009;2:263-84.

6. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57-70.

7. Igney FH, Krammer PH. Death and anti-death: tumour resistance to apoptosis.

Nature reviews Cancer. 2002;2:277-88.

8. Fulda S. Tumor resistance to apoptosis. International journal of cancer Journal

international du cancer. 2009;124:511-5.

9. Deveraux QL, Reed JC. IAP family proteins--suppressors of apoptosis. Genes &

development. 1999;13:239-52.

10. Wei Y, Fan T, Yu M. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins and apoptosis. Acta

biochimica et biophysica Sinica. 2008;40:278-88.

11. Vucic D, Stennicke HR, Pisabarro MT, Salvesen GS, Dixit VM. ML-IAP, a 509

510

511 512

513 514

515 516 517

518 519 520

521 522

523 524

525 526 527 528

novel inhibitor of apoptosis that is preferentially expressed in human melanomas.

Current biology : CB. 2000;10:1359-66.

12. Lin JH, Deng G, Huang Q, Morser J. KIAP, a novel member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family. Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

2000;279:820-31.

13. Kasof GM, Gomes BC. Livin, a novel inhibitor of apoptosis protein family

member. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:3238-46.

14. Liu B, Han M, Wen JK, Wang L. Livin/ML-IAP as a new target for cancer

treatment. Cancer letters. 2007;250:168-76.

15. Sarkaria JN, Carlson BL, Schroeder MA, Grogan P, Brown PD, Giannini C, et al. Use of an orthotopic xenograft model for assessing the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification on glioblastoma radiation response. Clin Cancer Res.

2006;12:2264-71.

16. Hsieh CH, Shyu WC, Chiang CY, Kuo JW, Shen WC, Liu RS. NADPH oxidase subunit 4-mediated reactive oxygen species contribute to cycling hypoxia-promoted

tumor progression in glioblastoma multiforme. PloS one. 2011;6:e23945.

17. Hsieh CH, Wu CP, Lee HT, Liang JA, Yu CY, Lin YJ. NADPH oxidase subunit 4 mediates cycling hypoxia-promoted radiation resistance in glioblastoma multiforme.

Free radical biology & medicine. 2012;53:649-58.

18. Chou CW, Wang CC, Wu CP, Lin YJ, Lee YC, Cheng YW, et al. Tumor cycling 529

530 531 532

533 534

535 536

537 538 539 540

541 542 543

544 545 546 547 548

hypoxia induces chemoresistance in glioblastoma multiforme by upregulating the

expression and function of ABCB1. Neuro-oncology. 2012;14:1227-38.

19. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al.

Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. The

New England journal of medicine. 2005;352:987-96.

20. Crnkovic-Mertens I, Bulkescher J, Mensger C, Hoppe-Seyler F, Hoppe-Seyler K.

Isolation of peptides blocking the function of anti-apoptotic Livin protein. Cellular

and molecular life sciences : CMLS. 2010;67:1895-905.

21. Hsieh CH, Chang HT, Shen WC, Shyu WC, Liu RS. Imaging the impact of Nox4 in cycling hypoxia-mediated U87 glioblastoma invasion and infiltration.

Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of

Molecular Imaging. 2012;14:489-99.

22. Amberger-Murphy V. Hypoxia helps glioma to fight therapy. Current cancer

drug targets. 2009;9:381-90.

23. Wagenknecht B, Glaser T, Naumann U, Kugler S, Isenmann S, Bahr M, et al.

Expression and biological activity of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) in human

malignant glioma. Cell death and differentiation. 1999;6:370-6.

24. Chen Z, Naito M, Hori S, Mashima T, Yamori T, Tsuruo T. A human IAP-family gene, apollon, expressed in human brain cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1999;264:847-54.

549

550 551 552

553 554 555

556 557 558 559

560 561

562 563 564

565 566 567 568

25. Chakravarti A, Noll E, Black PM, Finkelstein DF, Finkelstein DM, Dyson NJ, et al. Quantitatively determined survivin expression levels are of prognostic value in human gliomas. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society

of Clinical Oncology. 2002;20:1063-8.

26. Jin F, Zhao L, Zhao HY, Guo SG, Feng J, Jiang XB, et al. Comparison between cells and cancer stem-like cells isolated from glioblastoma and astrocytoma on expression of anti-apoptotic and multidrug resistance-associated protein genes.

Neuroscience. 2008;154:541-50.

27. Jin F, Zhao L, Guo YJ, Zhao WJ, Zhang H, Wang HT, et al. Influence of Etoposide on anti-apoptotic and multidrug resistance-associated protein genes in CD133 positive U251 glioblastoma stem-like cells. Brain research.

2010;1336:103-11.

28. Yan B. Research progress on Livin protein: an inhibitor of apoptosis. Molecular

and cellular biochemistry. 2011;357:39-45.

29. Dong Z, Venkatachalam MA, Wang J, Patel Y, Saikumar P, Semenza GL, et al.

Up-regulation of apoptosis inhibitory protein IAP-2 by hypoxia. Hif-1-independent

mechanisms. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276:18702-9.

30. Chen YQ, Zhao CL, Li W. Effect of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha on transcription of survivin in non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of experimental &

clinical cancer research : CR. 2009;28:29.

569 570 571

572 573 574 575

576 577 578 579

580 581

582 583 584

585 586 587 588

31. Li F1, Yin X, Luo X, Li HY, Su X, Wang XY, et al. Livin promotes progression of breast cancer through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and activation

of AKT signaling. Cellular Signalling. 2013;25:1413-22.

32. Crnkovic-Mertens I, Hoppe-Seyler F, Butz K. Induction of apoptosis in tumor cells by siRNA-mediated silencing of the livin/ML-IAP/KIAP gene. Oncogene.

2003;22:8330-6.

33. Yuan B, Ran B, Wang S, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Chen H. siRNA directed against Livin inhibits tumor growth and induces apoptosis in human glioma cells. Journal of

neuro-oncology. 2012;107:81-7.

34. Chen SH, Zhaori G. Potential clinical applications of siRNA technique: benefits

and limitations. European journal of clinical investigation. 2011;41:221-32.

35. Dubrez L, Berthelet J, Glorian V. IAP proteins as targets for drug development

in oncology. OncoTargets and therapy. 2013;9:1285-304.

36. Darding M, Feltham R, Tenev T, Bianchi K, Benetatos C, Silke J, et al.

Molecular determinants of Smac mimetic induced degradation of cIAP1 and cIAP2.

Cell death and differentiation. 2011;18:1376-86.

Figure legends

589 590

591 592 593

594 595 596

597 598

599 600

601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608

Figure 1. Tumor hypoxia induces Livin expression. (A) Time course of Livin mRNA expression after exposure of GBM8401 cells to <1% O2. Livin mRNA (B) and protein (C) levels in U251, U87 and GBM8401 cells at 24 hours after normoxic (N.) and hypoxic (H.) treatment (<1% O2). (D) Representative images of microscopic

GBM8401/hif-1-r. Top left, fluorescence overlay image of perfusion marker, Hoechst 33342 (blue), and HIF-1 activation labeling, GFP reporter (green), indicating areas with normoxia (Hoechst 33342+ and GFP-), chronic hypoxia (Hoechst 33342- and GFP+) and cycling hypoxia (Hoechst 33342+ and GFP+). Top right, fluorescence overlay image of Hoechst 33342 (blue), GFP reporter (green), and Livin (red). White box 1 and 2 indicate cycling hypoxic area and chronic hypoxic area, respectively.

Bottom left and right, magnification of white box 1 and 2. While color indicates the localization of Hoechst 33342, GFP and Livin. Yellow color represents the co-localization of GFP and Livin. (Magnification: Upper, 100X; Lower, 200X) (E) Livin and VEGF mRNA levels in normoxic cells (Hoechst 3342+ and GFP-), chronic

hypoxic cells (Hoechst 3342- and GFP+) and cycling hypoxic cells (Hoechst 3342+ and GFP+) isolated from disaggregated GBM8401/hif-1-r and U87/hif-1-r xenografts.

Error bars denote the standard deviation within triplicate experiments. *P < 0.01 compared to normoxia. # P <0.01 compared to chronic hypoxia (F)

Immunofluorescence imaging of Livin and HIF-1α expression in primary GBMs.

609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627

Upper panels show the staining of DAPI (blue), HIF-1α (green), and Livin (red).

Lower panels demonstrate the overlay image of DAPI (blue), HIF-1α (green), and Livin (red) and indicate the magnification of while boxes. Yellow color indicates the co-localization of HIF-1α and Livin. (Magnification: Upper, 100X; Lower, 100X, 200X and 400X)

Figure 2. Hypoxia-induced Livin expression is dependent on HIF-1α. (A)

Verification of HIF-1α or HIF-2α knockdown by HIF-1α or HIF-2α shRNAs. Livin mRNA (B) and protein (C) levels in GBM8401 and U87 with or without HIF-1α or HIF-2α knockdown at 24 hours after hypoxic treatment (<1% O2). (D) Luciferase reporter assay shows that HIF-1α shRNA inhibited the hypoxia-induced

transcriptional activation of Livin in U251, U87 and GBM8401 glioblastoma cells.

Error bars denote the standard deviation within triplicate experiments. *P < 0.001 compared to normoxia. # P <0.001 compared to scramble (Scr.) shRNA.

Figure 3. HIF-1α binds directly to the Livin promoter to regulate its expression. (A) Graphic representation of the putative Livin promoter. Two putative hypoxia response elements (HREs) were identified. (B) Luciferase reporter plasmids carrying the wild type or mutant Livin promoter regions were co-transfected with the Renilla luciferase 628

629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646

reporter plasmid into GBM8401 cells; and the cells were treated with or without hypoxia (<1% O2) for 24 hours. (C and D) Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by real-time PCR (ChIP-qPCR) assay of HIF-1α binding in Livin promoter in

response to hypoxia (<1% O2) for 24 hours. Results are expressed as percentage of input. Error bars denote the standard deviation among triplicate experiments. *P <

0.001 compared to control or normoxia. # P <0.001 compared to vehicle or wild type.

Figure 4. Hypoxia-mediated Livin expression results in antiapoptosis. Verification of Livin knockdown by Tet-regulatable lentiviral knockdown system in mRNA (A) and protein (B) levels. The lentiviral infected cells were treated for 48 hours with Dox (0.04 μg/mL) to induce Livin knockdown. Error bars denote the standard deviation among triplicate experiments. *P < 0.001 compared to no Dox treatment. Caspase-3 activities (C) and percent of apoptotic cells (D) in GBM8401 and U87 cells cultured in normoxia, non-interrupted (Ni.) hypoxia (<1% O2) and cycling (Cy.) hypoxia (<1%

O2) with or without Livin knockdown in response to staurosporine (STA) treatment.

Cells were pretreated for 48 hours with Dox (0.04 μg/ml) to induce Livin knockdown and exposed to hypoxic stresses before STA treatment. Error bars denote the standard deviation among triplicate experiments. *P < 0.01 compared to control. # P <0.05 compared to normoxia with STA treatment.

647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665

Figure 5. Hypoxia-mediated Livin expression promotes radioresistance and

chemoresistance. (A) Radiation cell survival curves for GBM8401 cells. Cells were pretreated for 48 hours with Dox to induce Livin knockdown and exposed to hypoxic stress (<1% O2), either non-interrupted (Ni.) or cycling (Cy.) hypoxia, before

irradiation. (B) Cytotoxicity assay of Livin knockdown revealed increased

cytotoxicity of cells to TMZ and suppressed hypoxia-mediated TMZ resistance in GBM8401 and U251 glioblastoma cells. *P < 0.01 compared to normoxia. # P <0.01 compared to untreated Dox groups. (C) Sequences of TAT-Lp15 amino acids and K22 control peptide. (D) Visualization of intracellular accumulation of TAT-Lp15-dansyl or TAT-K22-dansyl (10 μM) at 60 minutes after incubation to

GBM8401 cells. (E) Time course of TAT-Lp15-dansyl (10 μM) fluorescence after incubation to GBM8401 cells. Fluorescence intensities were determined by flow cytometry. Surviving fraction (F) and cell viability (G) for U251, U87 and GBM8401 cells with or without TAT-K22 or TAT-Lp15 (30μM) and receiving hypoxic stress (H) (<1% O2) followed by 4-Gy irradiation (R) or 100-μM TMZ (T). Error bars denote the standard deviation among triplicate experiments. *P < 0.001 compared to control. # P <0.001 compared to radiation or TMZ alone. P <0.001 compared to hypoxia combined radiation or TMZ groups.

666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684

Figure 6. Livin blockage enhances the efficiency of radiation plus TMZ treatment in glioblastoma xenografts. (A) Detection of TAT-Lp15-dansyl and TAT-K22-dansyl in the cortex of nude mouse brain 1 hour after intravenous injection. Bars=100 μm (B) Bioluminescent images from control and treated animals including the TAT-K22 or TAT-Lp15 treatment, combination of TMZ (T) and radiation (R) treatment,

pretreatment of TAT-K22 plus the combination of TMZ and radiation treatment and pretreatment of TAT-Lp15 plus the combination of TMZ and radiation treatment on day 20 after tumor implantation. (C) The mean normalized BLI values associated with longitudinal monitoring of intracranial tumor growth for each treatment group. Error bars denote the standard deviation among 9 mice per group. (D) The corresponding survival curves of GBM8401 xenograft-bearing mice for each treatment group. (E) Representative sections showing apoptotic cells measured by the TUNEL assay of GBM8401 xenografts at 2 days after treatments. Each mean is based on 15

measurements (5 measurements for each of three tumors).

(F) The percentages of apoptotic cells on cross-sections. *P < 0.01 compared to control. #P <0.001 compared to control TAT-K22 peptide. (G) The percentages of apoptotic cells in tumor hypoxic cells within GBM8401 xenografts determined by pimonidazole/annexin V doubling staining flow cytometry assay. *P < 0.001 685

686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698

699 700 701 702 703

compared to control. #P <0.01 compared to control TAT-K22 peptide. Surviving fraction (H) and colony images (I) in excised GBM8401 and U251 xenografts after treatments. Error bars denote the standard deviation among triplicate experiments. *P

< 0.001 compared to combination of TMZ and radiation treatment.

704 705 706 707

相關文件