DOI:10.6814/NCCU201900010
7 Read an article or news and answer
5.5 Limitation of this study and suggestions for future research and educational practices
In accordance with the results, insights, and conclusion above, this study put forward some suggestions, hoping that there will be more phase of research development in the future.
The courses in this study were limited to total of 90 hours session and total of 7 students for 2 classes, the teacher-researcher suggested more number of learning sessions in the future as case study to get more and further data or to be done in class with more number of students. With more students in classroom or more hours in courses, the researcher would be able to acquire more information, both qualitative and quantitative, to be studied and analyzed.
Should other research in the future employs the action research method as well, the teacher-researcher propounded class observation also done by other teachers as observers periodically and gathered feedback from them. Furthermore, recording every session would be better to make sure the more complete data collection, in addition of researcher’s notes, observation, and students’ feedback.
Students told the teacher-researcher that they had different learning styles.
Future teachers need to assess this and provide adaptive teaching carefully.
The instructional design created by the teacher-researcher, as shown in Appendix E would be developed with more explanation, examples, and translated into English version as well. After it’s compiled and completed, it would be expected organized into an Indonesian textbook that hoped to be beneficial for language learning classroom, specifically Indonesian language learning.
The Indonesian – Chinese translation by Google or other platforms are not completely accurate. There are mistakes on translation of words or phrase and even more mistakes on translation of sentences. The teacher-researcher would continue the work of online Indonesian – Chinese dictionary creation, and instead of using Google
DOI:10.6814/NCCU201900010
‧
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
74
Spreadsheet, for future development, could be created into the form of website or smartphone application. For further development, the dictionary also would be developed into Indonesian – Chinese – English dictionary and supplemented with word categories, word classes, and examples of how to use the word in a sentence.
When it’s completed, the online dictionary would be published so learners that interested in learning Indonesian language could use this dictionary as their learning resource. Furthermore, learners would also able to know the English translation of the words. As for Indonesian people, they could use this dictionary to learn Chinese and English. Generally, through this dictionary, people would be able to learn Indonesian, Chinese, and English vocabulary.
DOI:10.6814/NCCU201900010
Allwright, D. & Bailey, K.M. (1991). Focus on classrooms. An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Republik Indonesia. (2012, June 25). Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA). Retrieved from
http://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/lamanbahasa/info_bipa
Borgia, Eileen T, Schuler, Dorothy. (2003). Action Research in Early Childhood Education. ERIC Digest [ED401047].
Bums, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English teachers. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Chun, D. M., & Brandl, K. K. (1992). Beyond form‐based drill and practice:
Meaning‐enhancing CALL on the Macintosh. Foreign Language Annals, 25(3), 255–267.
Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade?
Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63.
Galavis, B. (1998). Computers and the EFL class: Their advantages and a possible outcome, the autonomous learner. English Teaching Forum, 36(4), 27–28.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research:
Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Glanz, G. (2003). Action Research: An educational leader’s guide to school improvement. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.
Higgins, C. (1993). Computer-assisted language learning: Current programs and projects. ERIC Digest [ED355835].
Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., and Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12-17.
DOI:10.6814/NCCU201900010
Jee, M., & Park, M. (2009). Livemocha as an online language-learning community. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 448-456. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.26.2.448
Johnson, R.T., & Johnson, D.W. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Journal of Science and Children, 24(2), 31-32.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Republik Indonesia. (2018, July 24).
Badan Bahasa petakan 652 bahasa daerah di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/07/badan-bahasa-petakan-652-bahasa-daerah-di-indonesia
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Geelong, Victoria.: Deakin University Press.
Kusmiatun, A., Suyitno, I., Widodo, H.S., & Basuki, I.A. (2017). Identifying features of Indonesian for speakers of other languages (Bipa) learning for academic purposes. International Journal of Social Sciences &
Educational Studies, 3(4), 197-207.
Lai, C. C., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of computer technology in second language acquisition. National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research, 3(1).
Lembaga Bahasa Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia (n.d.). Indonesian proficiency tests (Tes Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Bahasa Asing/TIBA). Retreived from
http://lbifib.ui.ac.id/beta/archives/category/bipa/indonesian-proficiency-test
Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273.
Mann, S. (2005). The language teacher’s development. Language Teaching, 38(3), 103–118.
DOI:10.6814/NCCU201900010
Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345-368.
O’Donoghue, T., & Punch, K. (2003). Qualitative educational research in action.
London, UK: Routledge.
O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ovando, C., Collier, V., & Combs, M. (2003). Bilingual and ESL classrooms:
Teaching multicultural contexts (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Office of Trade Negotiations, Executive Yuan. (2016, September 5). "New Southbound Policy" Guidelines and Action Plan. Retrieved from
https://www.ey.gov.tw/otnen/64C34DCA8893B06/9c560855-1ecd-4f58-9c3f-c065d9e58f89
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Ed.) (2001). Handbook of action research:
Participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.) (1999). Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K.E. (2012). Technology in language
education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25–30.
Richey, R. C., Silber, K., & Ely, D. (2008). Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. TechTrends, 52(1), 24–25.
Rowland, G. (2008). Design and research: Partners for educational innovation.
Educational Technology, 48(6), 3–9.
Saddhono, K. (2016). Teaching Indonesian as foreign language in Indonesia:
Impact of professional managerial on process and student outcomes.
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 14, 263-266.
Shyamlee, S. D., & Phil, M. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, 33, 150-159.
DOI:10.6814/NCCU201900010
‧
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
78
Smith, L. C. (2005). The impact of action research on teacher collaboration and professional growth. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education international perspectives (pp. 199-215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Suparsa, I. N., Mantra, I. B. N., & Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2017). Developing learning methods of Indonesian as a foreign language. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 51-57.
Totten, S. (1991). Cooperative Learning: A Guide to Research. Sills, T., Digby, A. & Ross, P. (Eds.), New York; USA, Garland Publishing.
Vesselinov, R. & J. Grego, 2012, Duolingo Effectiveness Study, http://static.duolingo.com/s3/DuolingoReport_Final.pdf
Walker, L. (2015). The impact of using Memrise on student perceptions of learning Latin vocabulary and on long-term memory of words. Journal of Classics Teaching, 16(32), 14-20.