Chapter 6 conclusion
6.3 To need, or not to need, that is the question
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
6.3 To need, or not to need, that is the question
The need to use an innovation was highlighted in the qualitative research of this study. In the case of Uber, the need was privacy or transportation. In the case of other innovations, the need could be something else. A product meeting the strong needs of potential consumers would cause them to adopt, regardless of their personality traits. Although the study had included personality and PAI in its discussion, it covered only the surface of innovation adoption research.
The reasoning of the human mind in adoption behavior is much more complicated than what the research can offer, and this too deserves future research.
‧
1. Anic, G. (2007). The association between personality and risk taking.
(Unpublished master’s thesis). University of South Florida, Florida.
2. Alemi, F., Circella, G., Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. (2018). What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 88-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.06.002
3. Ahmad, P.A., Ganaie, M.Y., & Suhial, A. (2015). Neuroticism of Physically Challenged Viz. Hearing Impaired and Speech Impaired Secondary
School Students of Kashmir Division. Journal of Pharmacy and Alternative Medicine,7. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/
4. Aslan, S. & Cheung-Blunden, V. (2012). Where does self-control fit in the Five-Factor Model? Examining personality structure in children and adults.
Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 670-674. doi:
10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.006
5. Bansal, G. (2010). Continuing E-book use: role of environmental consciousness, personality and past usage. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Lima, Peru.
6. Barnett, T., Pearson, A.W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F.W. (2015).
Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 374–390. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.10
7. Berkeley Personality Lab. (2007). Retrieved from https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~johnlab/index.htm
8. Central News Agency. (2019, June 18). Hundreds in Taipei take special exam for multipurpose taxi drivers. Retrieved from
http://focustaiwan.tw/news/asoc/201906180024.aspx
9. Chatterjee, S., Singh, N.P., Goyal, D.P., & Gupta, N. (Eds.). (2015).
Managing in Recovering Markets. India: Springer
10. Chen, X. & Zhang, X. (2016). How Environmental Uncertainty Moderates the Effect of Relative Advantage and Perceived Credibility on the Adoption of Mobile Health Services by Chinese Organizations in the Big Data Era.
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. doi:
10.1155/2016/3618402
11. Ciavarella, M.A., Buchholtz, A.K., Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D., &
Stokes, G.S. (2003). The Big Five and venture survival: Is there a linkage?
‧
Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (4), 465-483. doi:
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.03.001
12. Cisternas-Godoy, E. (2016). Exploring individual differences in early adoption behavior of innovation. (Master’s thesis), Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
13. Daniels, J. (2018, December 12). Los Angeles passes regulation targeting Airbnb and other short-term rental services. CNBC. Retrieved from
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/12/los-angeles-passes-regulation-targeting-airbnb-rental-hosts.html
14. Davis, C.K. (Ed.). (2003). Technologies & Methodologies for Evaluating Information Technology in Business. Hershey, PA: IRM Press.
15. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
16. Duda, M.D. & Nobile, J.L. (2010). Fallacy of online surveys: no data are better than bad data. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15 (1). doi:
10.1080/10871200903244250
17. Ercis, A. & Unalan, M. (2017). Relationship Among Big Five Personality Traits, Compulsive Buying and Variety Seeking. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics, 4 (3), 217-223. doi:
10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.483
18. Flight, R. L., D’Souza, G., & Allaway, A.W. (2011). Characteristics-based innovation adoption: scale and model validation. Journal of Product &
Brand Management, 20(5), 343–355. doi: 10.1108/10610421111157874 19. Griffith, E. (2014, September 25). Why startups fail, according to their
founders. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2014/09/25/why-startups-fail-according-to-their-founders/
20. Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the Effects of Computer Self-Efficacy and System Complexity on Technology Acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(3), 76-88. doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2007070106 21. Hurley, J.R. (2010). Constructive Thinking and Firm Disagreement Versus
Neuroticism and Mild Agreement: Asymmetric Correlations of Content and Response Measures. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied 130(4):461-475. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1996.9915032
22. Ioannou, F. (2019, March 21). SF Supervisor wants to ban Amazon Go, other cashless stores. San Francisco Gate. Retrieved from
https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/san-francisco-cashless-stores-‧
23. Khan, M.R.F., Iahad, N.A., & Miskon, S., (2014). Exploring the Influence of Big Five Personality Traits towards Computer Based Learning (CBL) Adoption. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation.
Retrieved from https://seminar.utmspace.edu.my/jisri/
24. Kokalitcheva, K. (2016, October 20). Uber Now Has 40 Million Monthly Riders Worldwide. Fortune. Retrieved from
http://fortune.com/2016/10/20/uber-app-riders/
25. Kolb, S.M. & Griffith, A.C.S. (2009). “I'll Repeat Myself, Again?!”:
Empowering Students through Assertive Communication Strategies.
Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(3), 32-36. doi:
10.1177/004005990904100304
26. Konduri, N., Gupchup, G.V., Borrego, M.E., & Worley-Louis, M. (2006).
Assessment of the reliability and validity of a stress questionnaire for pharmacy administration graduate students. College Student Journal, 40 (1), 78-90.
27. Kras, S.G. (2018). The influence of personality on adoption of innovations:
the case of Amazon Go. (Master's thesis), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
28. Lahti, M., Räikkönen, K., Lemola, S., Lahti, J., Heinonen, K., Kajantie, E., Pesonen, A.K., Osmond, C., Barker, D.J.P., & Eriksson, J.G. (2013).
Trajectories of Physical Growth and Personality Dimensions of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1). doi:
10.1037/a0032300
29. Larsen, T.J. (2001). The Phenomenon of Diffusion. Paper presented at the TDIT: Working Conference on Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations, Canada.
30. Lee, D.K. (2019, April 27). AIT Deems Taiwan “Unfriendly for Innovators”
Due to Uber Controversy. The News Lens. Retrieved from https://international.thenewslens.com/article/117994
31. Li, L. & Cheng, T.F. (2019, March 27). Uber spat with Taiwan could force exit from market. Nikkei Asian Review. Retrieved from
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Uber-spat-with-Taiwan-could-force-exit-from-market
32. Lin, T.C. & Li., L. (2014). Perceived characteristics, perceived popularity, and playfulness: Youth adoption of mobile instant messaging in China.
China Media Research, 10 (2), 60-71.
33. Linton, J. & Walsh, S., (2013). The effect of technology on learning during the acquisition and development of competencies in technology‐intensive
‧
small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(2). doi: 10.1108/13552551311310365
34. Luo, Y. (2011). Strategic responses to perceived corruption in an emerging market: lessons from MNEs investing in China. Business & Society 50(2), 350-387. doi: 10.1177/0007650307313362
35. Lynch, J. & De Chernatony, L., (2007). Winning Hearts and Minds:
Business-to-Business Branding and the Role of the Salesperson. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(1-2), 123-135. doi:
10.1362/026725707X178594
36. Matzler, K. & Mueller, J., (2011). Antecedents of knowledge sharing – Examining the influence of learning and performance orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 317-329. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.12.006 37. McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of
Personality. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality:
Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
38. Michikyan, M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Dennis, J. (2014). Can you tell who I am? Neuroticism, extraversion, and online self-presentation among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 179-183. doi:
10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.010
39. Min, S., So, K.K.F., & Jeong, M. (2018). Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and
technology acceptance model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. doi:
10.1080/10548408.2018.1507866
40. Mohr, J.J., Sengupta, S., & Slater, S.F. (2009). Marketing of
High-technology Products and Innovations Third Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
41. Moore, G.C. & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. doi:
10.1287/isre.2.3.192
42. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Tsaousis, I. (2006). Is the relationship between intelligence and trait Neuroticism mediated by test anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 40 (3), 587-597.
doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.004
43. Ng, S. (2016). Uber Technologies Inc. as a Disruptive Innovation.
Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/31782167/Uber_Technologies_Inc._as_a_Disr
‧
44. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24 (2), 43-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
45. Panitz, C., Sperl, M.F.J., Hennig, J., Klucken, T., Hermann, C., & Mueller, E.M. (2018). Fearfulness, neuroticism/anxiety, and COMT Val158Met in long-term fear conditioning and extinction. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 55, 7-20. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.06.001
46. Rauschnabel, P.A., Brem, A., & Ivens, B.S. (2015). Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 635-647.
doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.003
47. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (Third ed.). New York: Free Press.
48. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Attributes of Innovations and Their Rate of Adoption.
In Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed., pp. 212-244). New York: The Free Press
49. Sánchez, V.B. & Sahuquillo, C.A. (2016). Environmental Proactivity and Environmental and Economic Performance: Evidence from the Winery Sector. Sustainability, 8(10), 1014. doi: 10.3390/su8101014
50. Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A.M. (2011). Antecedents of
computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender.
Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1922-1936. doi:
10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017
51. Sanson-Fisher, R.W. (2004). Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical change. The Medical journal of Australia, 180(6 Suppl):S55-6
52. Schmitt, A., Rosing, K., Zhang, S.X., & Leatherbee, M. (2017). A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Business Opportunity
Identification: Exploration as a Mediator and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Moderator. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(6), 835–859.
doi: 10.1177/1042258717721482
53. Shan, S. (2019, May 29). Ministry to push ahead with ‘Uber clause.’ Taipei Times. Retrieved from
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2019/05/29/2003715991 54. Shihab, M.R., Meilatinova, N., Hidayanto, A.N., & Herkules, G. (2017).
Determinants of CAATT acceptance: Insights from public accounting firms in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 522-529. doi:
‧
55. The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail CB Insights. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.cbinsights.com/research/startup-failure-reasons-top/
56. Tornatzky, L.G., & Klein, K.J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28–45
57. Uber@UberTaiwan. (2019). Keep Moving Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/UberTaiwan/
58. Van Slyke, C., Belanger, F., & Comunale, C.L. (2004). Factors influencing the adoption of web-based shopping: the impact of trust. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(2), 32-49. doi: 10.1145/1007965.1007969
59. What you can research. (2018). Retrieved from
60. Wirtz, J. & Tang, C. (2016). Uber - Competing as Market Leader in the U.S. versus Being a Distant Second in China. In J. Wirtz & C.H. Lovelock, (Eds.) Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy (8th ed.). New Jersey: World Scientific
61. Yan, Z. (2012). Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior (Vol. 1). Hersey, PA:
Information Science Reference.
62. Yi, M.Y., Fiedler, K.D. & Park, J.S. (2006). Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT‐Based Innovations:
Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x
63. Zafar, M.K. & Rahman, U.H.F.B. (2018). Factors Influencing Adoption of Uber In Bangladesh And Pakistan. (Unpublished master’s thesis).
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norwegian.
64. Zhang, X., Yu, P., Yan, J., & Spil, I.T.A.M (2015). Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Services Research, 15(71). doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
75
‧
國立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
76
質化訪談問題
Q1: 你覺得 Uber 的一些特徵,例如說好不好用、叫車容不容易,或 APP 操作 困不困難,會不會影響人們使用與否?
Q1: Would the characteristics of an innovation, for example, its convenience or ease of use, affect whether people will use this innovation?
Q2: 什麼樣的人比較願意使用 Uber?
Q2: What kind of people, personality wise, are more willing to use Uber?
Q3: 什麼樣的人比較容易發現 Uber 相對於小黃的優點?
Q4: 什麼樣的人比較容易發現 Uber 跟小黃的相容之處?
Q3、O4: What kind of people, personality-wise, would discover the relative advantage or compatibility of Uber more easily?
can tell which car service saves more money.
Q5: 什麼樣的人比較願意試用 Uber?
Q5: What kind of people, personality wise, are more willing to try out an innovation?
Q6: 什麼樣的人比較不容易因為 Uber 使用複雜,而打退堂鼓?
Q6: What kind of people, personality wise, are less likely to be
intimidated by an innovation, because it is too difficult to understand?
‧
Q1: Would the characteristics of an innovation, for example, its convenience or ease of use, affect whether people will use this innovation?
People who are accustomed to dialing 55688 (a taxi service provided by Taiwan taxi ) might think Uber is as convenient as 55688, thus willing to adopt Uber. Convenient to use is very important.
非 Uber 使用者 K.J.:
The characteristics of Uber will influence whether or not I choose to adopt Uber. For example, I would consider credibility and safety issues. Whether the use of Uber is guaranteed by the government is very important. For women, safety is still the primarily concern. In the early days it was unsafe for females to take taxis, especially after Peng Wan-ru (彭婉如, a
prominent women movement figure in Taiwan) was killed while taking a taxi ride. It is terrifying. It is better for women to choose a taxi company
‧
that has earned government approval. But as to Uber, I would ask what it is? With doubts in my mind, I would not take risks and use Uber.
Q2: 什麼樣的人比較願意使用 Uber?
Q2: What kind of people, personality wise, are more willing to use Uber?
Personality-wise, those people who hold strong views about privacy would be more willing to use Uber, because people don’t have to hail a cab on the side of a road. Those who like to experience new stuff and those who are fashion-seekers are also more willing to take Uber. People who are highly paid may also tend to use Uber. They would wait for you like a private car chauffeur, instead of leaving once you are late.
非 Uber 使用者 K.J.:
It’s not necessarily about personality traits, it’s more about necessity.
Let’s say people who live in a rural area and have a certain need for transportation. It might be impossible for them to grab a taxi and go, and
‧
this is where Uber comes to mind. In fact, as long as Uber can be regulated, people of any personality traits would use Uber, even the conservative ones.
Uber 使用者 L.K.:
I think it must be like extraverts. They tend to have an open mind,
compared to other types of persons, because there are still some disputes about Uber in many countries. If you are not comfortable enough, you wouldn’t take Uber, if you look at past incidents. There are conflicts about licenses, especially with taxi drivers. Risk-taking people, something like that. Also, those people who are comfortable with sharing info with car company. You have to share with them your information and many things. You have to trust the company.
Uber 使用者 T.T.:
Firstly, it has to be people who are used to using mobile APPs. For example, when my mother first used Uber, she found the whole process annoying. She didn’t know how to locate the place where she wanted to go, and she typed addresses on the phone screen very slowly. But for
‧
someone who has gotten used to smartphone, things would get easier.
Secondly, people who want to save money are more likely to use Uber.
Uber offers discounts and promotions on a constant basis, and people who want to save would be attracted to these offers. Finally, those people who are comfortable with Internet finance are more likely to adopt Uber, because people need to give away credit card numbers.
Q3: 什麼樣的人比較容易發現 Uber 相對於小黃的優點?
Q4: 什麼樣的人比較容易發現 Uber 跟小黃的相容之處?
Q3、O4: What kind of people, personality-wise, would discover the relative advantage or compatibility of Uber more easily?
答:
People with high socio-economic status, people who have a special interest in transportation, and people who are fussy and attend to details are more likely to find out the relative advantage and compatibility of Uber, when compared with local taxis. Casual people don’t tend to recognize the differences between Uber and local taxis.
非 Uber 使用者 K.J.:
‧
People with a higher need for privacy might find out the differences (the relative advantage and compatibility) between a new service and existing ones since they are always searching for transportation tools that protect their privacy more. Take Han Bing, daughter of Kaohsiung mayor, was once caught off guard and taken pictures by someone as she got off a taxi car. She might want to find an alternative way to transport, rather than taking the local taxis.
Uber 使用者 L.K.:
對科技比較有研究的人,比較容易分辨一項新科技的優異與相容之處。
Uber user, L.K.:
Tech-savvy people. They feel comfortable using technology and can tell relative advantage and compatibility more easily than other people.
Uber 使用者 T.T.:
Those people who have a constant need to travel by taxi would notice the relative advantage/compatibility of Uber. People who only take a taxi once in the while would not recognize the differences between the two.
My mother, for example, is now an Uber user as she grew older and no longer rides a motorcycle. She noticed that Uber has lots of offers, and she can tell which car service saves more money.
Q5: 什麼樣的人比較願意試用 Uber?
Q5: What kind of people, personality wise, are more willing to try out an innovation?
答:
非 Uber 使用者 D.L.:
‧
The mobile phone generation, are more likely to try out Uber. People who have a habit of using APPs are also likely to give Uber a try. People who put great emphasis on their images may also want to try Uber. They may want to take Mercedes one day and BMW the other day.
I think that those who are good at planning ahead may want to try Uber more than other people. People who prefer things well-planned may not like to hail a taxi by the roadside. They are more likely to cooperate with certain taxi companies for a long period of time. In addition, people who are conservative, phobias, or having difficulty in facing strangers may also try Uber. They want to use only certain taxi services and not having to see new faces each time they take a taxi.
Must be people who are used to this type of services before. If you never use that, it would not be comfortable to use it. For example, I already used
‧
Uber before, when I traveled to the US. The company asked me to use Uber for every single travel I had to make within the US. So I am
comfortable to use it.
The first time I tried Uber was not because of necessity, but because I was interested in it. Just curious. I later found out that it was kind of
convenient, and then I grew to have a preference of it over other taxi services. Sometimes, you give an address to the driver and he still has no idea where it is. But with Uber, it would locate the destination for you. I don’t even need to describe how to get there.
Q6: 什麼樣的人比較不容易因為 Uber 使用複雜,而打退堂鼓?
Q6: What kind of people, personality wise, are less likely to be
Q6: What kind of people, personality wise, are less likely to be