Distributed Cognition and the Will. MIT Press
46. New York: Oxford University Press
Poundstone, W. 1992 Prisoner’s Dilemma. New York: Doubleday.
Prinz, J. J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pronin, E. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 11, 1: 37-43.
Pronin, E. (2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320, 5880: 1177-1180.
Pronin, E., & Kugler, M. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43: 565-578.
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 3: 369-381.
Quine, W. V., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief (2nd ed.). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Quine, W. V. O. (1994). Natural kinds. In H. Kornblith (Ed.), Naturalizing epistemology (pp. 57-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
!$+"
Railton, P. (2003). Facts, values, and norms: Essays toward a morality of consequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ramsoy, T. 2007 Methods for observing the living brain. In Baars, B. and N.
Gage, Eds. Cognition, Brain, and Consciousness. New York: Academic Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rechtschaffen, A. (1994). Sleep onset: Conceptual issues. In R. D. Ogilvie & J.
R. Harsh (Eds.), Sleep onset (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: American PsychologicalAssociation. Rechtschaffen, A., & Kales, A. (1968). A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring for sleep stages of human subjects.
Los Angeles: University ofCalifornia.
Ridderinkhof, K. et al. 2002 Perservative behavior in older adults:
performance-monitoring, rule-induction, and set shifting. Brain Cognition 49(3):
382-401.
Rosenthal, D.M. 2002. Explaining consciousness. In Philosophy of Mind, ed. D.J.
Chalmers, 406–21. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenthal, D.M. 2010. Consciousness, the self and bodily location. Analysis 70:
270–76. Sierra, M. and G. Berrios. 2000. The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale: a new instru-ment for the measurement of depersonalization. Psychiatry Research 93:
153–64. Wittgenstein, L. 1969. The Blue and the Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rosenthal, D.M. 1997. A theory of consciousness. In The Nature of Consciousness, eds N. Block, O. Flanagan, and G. Guzeldere, 729–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosenthal, D.M. 2002a. Explaining consciousness. In Philosophy of Mind, ed. D.
J. Chalmers, 406–421. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenthal, D.M. 2002b. Persons, minds, and consciousness. In The Philosophy of Marjorie Grene, eds R.E. Auxier and L.E. Hahn, 199–220. Chicago, Illinois: Open Court.
Rosenthal, D.M. 2004. Being conscious of ourselves. The Monist 87: 161–84.
Rosenthal, D.M. 2005. Consciousness and Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rowley, J. T., Stickgold, R., & Hobson, J. A. (1998). Eyelid movements and mental activity at sleep onset. Consciousness and Cognition, 7(1), 67–84.
Scanlon, T. J., Luben, R. N., Scanlon, F. L., & Singleton, N. (1993). Is Friday the 13th bad for your health? British Medical Journal, 307, 6919: 1584-1586.
!$'"
Schacter, D. L. (1976). The hypnagogic state: A critical review of the literature.
Psychological Bulletin, 83(3), 452–481.
Scott, D. J., Stohler, C. S., Egnatuk, C. M., Wang, H., Koeppe, R. A., & Zubieta, J. K. (2007). Individual differences in reward responding explain placebo-induced expectations and effects. Neuron, 55, 2: 325-336.
Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Searle, J. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sewitch, D. E. (1984). The perceptual uncertainty of having slept: The inability to discriminate electroencephalographic sleep from wakefulness.Psychophysiology, 21(3), 243–259.
Shah, N., & Velleman, J. (2005). Doxastic deliberation. ThePhilosophical Review, 114, 4: 497-534.
Shermer, M. (2002). Why people believe weird things:Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time(Rev. ed.). New York: Henry Holt.
Shoemaker, S. 1968. Self–reference and self–awareness. The Journal of Philosophy 65: 555–67.
Simon, C. W., & Emmons, W. H. (1956). Responses to material presented during various levels of sleep. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 89–97.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.). (2008). Moral psychology, Vols. 1-3. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sobel, D., & Copp, D. (2001). Against direction of fit accountsof belief and desire. Analysis, 61, 1: 44-53.
Stanovich, K. E. 2004 The robot’s rebellion: finding meaning in the age of
Darwin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Sterelny, K. 2004 Externalism, epistemic artifacts, and the extended mind. In Schantz, R. Ed. The Externalist Challenge: New Studies on Cognition and
Intentionality. New York: de Gruyter. Vellman, J. 2000 The Possibility of Practical Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockhorst, U., Enck, P., & Klosterhalfen, S. (2007). Role ofclassical conditioning in learning gastrointestinal symptoms.World Journal of Gastroenterology, 13, 25: 3430-3437.
Suhler, C., & Churchland, P. S. (2009). Control: Conscious and otherwise.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 341–347.
Talmont-Kaminski, K. (2008). In a mirror, darkly: Does superstition reflect rationality? Skeptical Inquirer, 32, 4: 48-51.
!$*"
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 2:
193-210.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited:
Separating fact from fiction.Psychological Bulletin, 116, 1: 21-27.
Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). The effects of mindseton positive illusions. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 69, 2: 213-226.
Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., Reed, G. M., Bower, J. E., &Gruenewald, T. L.
(2000). Psychological resources, positiveillusions, and health. American Psychologist, 55, 1: 99-109.
Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & McDowell, N. K.
(2003). Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 4: 605-615.
Tertullianus, Quintus Septimius Florens (2010). Tertullianproject: “De Carne Christi,” chapter 5, verse 4. RetrievedAugust 7, 2010, from http://www.tertullian.org/
Tiger, L. (1985). Optimism: The biology of hope (2nd ed.). New York:
Kodansha.
Tiger, L. (1999). Hope springs internal. Social Research, 66, 2:611-623.
Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings. Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory ofself-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,907: 114-131.
Tirgu-Mures, Rumania, and Basel, Switzerland: S. Kager. Wehr, T. A. (1990).
Effects of wakefulness and sleep on depression and mania. In J. Mountplaisir & R.
Godbout (Eds.), Sleep and biological rhythms: Basicmechanisms and applications to psychiatry (pp. 42–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsuno, N., Shigeta, M., Hyoki, K., Kinoshita, T., Ushijima, S., Faber, P. L., et al (2002). Spatial organization of EEG activity from alertness to sleep stage 2 in oldand younger subjects. Journal of Sleep Research, 11(1), 43–51.
Vallar, G. and R. Ronchi. 2009. Somatoparaphrenia: a body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research 192: 533–51.
Van Leeuwen, D. (2007). The spandrels of self-deception:Prospects for a biological theory of a mental phenomenon.Philosophical Psychology, 20, 3: 329-348.
Velleman, J. (1999). The possibility of practical reason. In R. JayWallace (Ed.), Reason, emotion, and will (pp. 185-218).
!%,"
Vogel, G., Barrowclough, B., & Giesler, D. (1972). Limited discriminability of REM and sleep onset reports and its psychiatric implications. Archives of GeneralPsychiatry, 26, 449–455.
Vogel, G., Foulkes, D., & Trosman, H. (1966). Ego functions and dreaming during sleep onset. Archives of General Psychiatry, 14, 238–248.
Vyse, S. (2000). Believing in magic: The psychology ofsuperstition. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Wackermann, J. (2006). Rationality, universality, and individuality in a functional conception of theory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62,411–
426.
Wackermann, J., Pütz, P., Büchi, S., Strauch, I., & Lehmann, D. (2002). Brain electrical activity and subjective experience during altered states ofconsciousness:
Ganzfeld and hypnagogic states. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 123–
146.
Webb, W. B. (1980). The natural onset of sleep. In B. A. L. Popoviciu & G.
Badia (Eds.), Sleep 1978. Fourth European congress on sleep research (pp. 19–23).
Wedgwood, R. (2002). The aim of belief. PhilosophicalPerspectives, 16:
267-297.
Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press.
Weigand, D., Michael, L., & Schulz, H. (2007). When sleep is perceived as wakefulness: An experimental study on state perception during physiological sleep.Journal of Sleep Research, 16(4), 346–353.
Wenger, A., & Fowers, B. (2008). Positive illusions in parenting:Every child is above average. Journal of Applied SocialPsychology, 38, 3: 611-634.
Wilkes, K.V. 1993. Real People: Personal Identity without Thought Experiments, New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the self. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay ingenealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wood, A. (2002). Unsettling obligations: Essays on reason, reality, and the ethics of belief. Stanford, CA: Center for theStudy of Language and Information.
!%!"
Wood, A. (2008). The duty to believe according to the evidence.In E. T. Long &
P. Horn (Eds.), Ethics of belief: Essays in tribute to D. Z. Phillips (pp. 7-24).
Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Yang, C.-M., Han, H. Y., Yang, M. H., Su, W. C., & Lane, T. (2010). What subjective experiences determine the perception of falling asleep during sleep onset
Zubieta, J., & Stohler, C. (2009). Neurobiological mechanismsof placebo responses. The New York Academy of Science, 1156: 198-210.
5. Self-evaluation of project outcome
G(íZ"[Ú67»\fl±]Œã^–M
_`67>a©b»\cdef%ıflgÛˆ˜ÈÍ%67fl±)$h8◊
§ij^k5lmfl±n1–)®o%ij%pq8ràs+,)Å;tf%~
uvw!$hÛx+–8y_[z%o5+{8Ãi”ùijx2£à|w^}EM
T~ _`67>a©b»\cdef%ıflgÛˆ˜ÈÍ£à|w^}M
M ıflˆ˜M
□ *ıflˆ˜^_h≥2µ TÄÄ ÅkÇfM
□ ≠zÉÑM
□ ÖÜ≠z:áM
□ ÃibÖM h≥¯M
M
&~ 67fl±!$hÛx+–8y_[zxÈà¯M â,¯M ä+–M ã*+–),åM ãçé:M ã“M [z¯ãäèêM ãy_:M ã“M
ëí¯ãäëíM ãìî:M ã“M Ãi¯^µ TÄÄ ÅkÇfM
M
M M M M _ï$hfl`%ëhñó%EípqxCò2^}67fl±)$h8◊
§ij^k5lmfl±n1–)®o%ij%pq8ràs+,)Å;tf^µ ôÄÄ ÅkÇföLSLM[M_KJ_eQaLMOKõIMaNLMúS_Ke_úQõ+MQõSLQJIMú`ùõ_cNLJ+MeOKaS_ù`a_OK5M
!%$"
M M M M !"#$%&'($)*+,-./0123$4567"#8"92:;
<=>?8@ABCDEFG3$4 HIJKLIM HNOLPQRLS ! TUVW 0XYZ[\]
^_PP`K_aIMaOMLSSOSMaNSO`bNMP_c_JLKa_d_eQa_OKfg$h2ijklZmgnkop2 q5<=>?rstuv%wvxsy'z2{|}~Zmg-s2ÄÅ;Ç ÉÑÖEÜálàâähãåçu-éè2mêëÄíìîïCZ{ñ-~ó-uvòôgöõ2HNOLPQRLS oúöùûÄ:ü†mê-ps'z2°é¢£§
•¶ß®É©™vstEM
}´2¨67<=≠ÆØÜ©≠z∞±2≤≥öùûë¥|}Eµ67Ø∂
∑∏kÜ2π∫Ø∂íªãå-ºp™kZiä-g2´Ωæop©®É'z-ø¿E¡Ü´¬2πØ∂ªãå-√ƒ™kõ≈∆2≠z«»… wÀÃ√ƒ2 lØ∂ÕŒtÃ√ƒ5ÕwÀé2œ–—ë“sv2q”l≠z‘ŒtœZõ≈
∆-√ƒ5ÕwÀ’g2Ø∂÷”wv…◊EöØÜh≥ÿ}Zmg~op2Ÿ
|⁄ª®É'z–€kZiä-g2÷;<=>?‹pzë›fistEM M
¨67µöfl‡·‚’„0µr‰kÂ- HNOLPQRLS $h^[\]f2jk Ã$h:;™kZÊhg2ë¥ÁËÈÍÎÏ;flÌE¨67Ó!µ"#$%&
'($x67CÔrz3$ÒÚ2ëÛÙıflµÎˆ˜¯˘T˙M <=Œt˚¸˝
æ˛∫ÒÚ◊ÕÒˇ2!"˝æ#’$Ø∂ÈÍ%˘&˙M «»≠z'mê#’$Zã mg%Z®É'zg©Z(pg)*-ùûEM
M
6. Appendix
Appendix 1Ď
• 1. Two dubious assumptions and a working hypothesis
• First, body ownership is uniquely determined by introspection.
• Second, the Wittgenstein-Shoemaker (1968) question is absurd—“there is no question of recognizing a person when I say I have tooth-ache. To ask ‘are you sure it is you who have pains?’ would be nonsensical.”
4 4
First Dubious Assumption
• E.G. Brewer (1995): “…how we experience our body as ours. Clearly this is not, and cannot be, an external perceptual
phenomenon. For when we perceive it from the outside, our body has no indelible stamp of ownership. It appears just as one object among many...”
5 5
Problem with First Dubious Assumption
• Although the “indelible stamp of ownership” is more likely associated with introspection than with external perception, this is contingent.
• What we introspect can feel alien, or fail to be represented as belonging to self: e.g.
depersonalization in florid schizophrenic episodes.
• When we perceive others experiencing mental states, those states can be
represented as belonging to self: e.g. vision-touch synesthesia.
6 6