• 沒有找到結果。

Traders’ sophistication and learning from experience

The final concern is which traders can better learn from experience. We test this by dividing traders into subsamples based on various characteristics that show their financial sophistication. In particular, we sort traders into quartiles by their wealth and the ratio of long positions. We use the subsamples to run the semiparametric regression model (1). We observe the difference in shapes across the figures to test whether learning across groups takes place at different rates.

Similar to Feng and Seasholes (2005), we measure wealth by calculating the average number of new contracts per month. We classify traders as wealthy if they are in the top quartile and poor if they are in the bottom quartile. Choe and Eom (2009) show that less sophisticated traders are more likely to suffer from the disposition effect, and this effect is significantly stronger in long positions than in short positions. Therefore, we also use the ratio of long positions taken by the traders as a measure of sophistication.

No prior trades Profitable traders Unprofitable traders Panel A: Percentage of trading volume

Full sample 11.234 30.461 58.305

2005 10.643 28.700 60.657

2006 11.094 32.786 56.121

2007 9.202 34.066 56.732

2008 12.612 27.958 59.430

Panel B: Percentage of Traders

Full sample 21.004 17.631 61.365

2005 20.058 19.013 60.930

2006 19.841 18.847 61.311

2007 20.170 19.454 60.377

2008 23.551 13.846 62.603

Figure 7 reports the relation between the cumulative number of trades and profits per contract for various levels of trader sophistication. Panel A shows that wealthy traders display a U-shape pattern for the performance-experience nexus, but poor traders display an inverse U-shape. These shapes indicate that wealthy traders are more likely to learn from trading in the long run than poor traders.

Panel B illustrates that traders with higher proportions of long contracts do not learn from trading in the long run. However, traders with lower long contract ratios have positive profits if their number of trades is large enough, although their initial performance is unstable.

Figure 8 reports the relation between months in the market and profits per wealthy and poor traders have negative returns in the first year they are in the futures market. Subsequently, they earn positive returns, but the positive returns do not persist forever. Wealthy traders have a longer run (until 40 months) and poor traders have a shorter run (until 22 months) of positive returns. This difference reflects that the number of months in the market might not be a good way to learn. In comparison, wealthy traders can learn more by observing prices and quantities. Panel B illustrates that traders with higher proportions of long contracts do not learn from observing prices and quantities in the long run.

Traders with a lower ratio of long contracts also show unstable performance when experience is measured by the number of months. Their performance initially improves, but deteriorates afterwards. However, they earn positive profits if they are in the market for as long as four years. This finding indicates that learning from trading is irritatingly slow. In sum, our results provide evidence that learning-from-doing mainly takes place among sophisticated traders like wealthy people and those who do not frequently put on long orders.

5. Conclusion

There are two specific ways in which traders can rationally learn. First, traders can improve their ability through trading (learning-by-doing); second, traders can realize that their inherent ability is inferior and decide to cease trading (learning-about-ability). This paper empirically investigates these two types of learning using individual traders’ complete records of TAIEX futures contracts.

Panel A: Wealth (wealthy for the left figure, and not wealthy for the right figure)

Panel B: Long contract ratios (high for the left figure, and low for the right figure)

Figure 7

Cumulative numbers of trades and profits per contract: By investor sophistication

This figure plots the estimated functional form of f (Exp) in the model:

ε δ

δ β δ

β it it it it it

t

i f Exp R StdR Vol

R, = 0+ 1 ( , )+ 1 , 1+ 2 , 1+ 3 , 1+ , , where 𝑅𝑅𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 is dollar profits per contract for investor i in month t; 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 is the log cumulative numbers of trades for investor i in month t. In the specification, controlling variables include average dollar profits per contract over the prior month (Ri,t1), standard deviation of dollar profits over the prior month (StdRi,t1), as well as log trading volume over the prior month (Voli,t1). The model is estimated using Yatchew’s (1998) differencing method.

Panel A: Wealth (wealthy for the left figure, and not wealthy for the right figure)

Panel B: Long contract ratios (high for the left figure, and low for the right figure)

Figure 8

Months in the market and profits per contract: By investor sophistication This figure plots the estimated functional form of f (Exp) in the model:

ε δ

δ β δ

β it it it it it

t

i f Exp R StdR Vol

R, = 0+ 1 ( , )+ 1 , 1+ 2 , 1+ 3 , 1+ , , where 𝑅𝑅𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 is dollar profits per contract for investor i in month t; 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑖𝑖,𝑡𝑡 is the number of months in the market for investor i in month t. In the specification, controlling variables include average dollar profits per contract over the prior month (Ri,t1), standard deviation of dollar profits over the prior month (StdRi,t1), as well as log trading volume over the prior month (Voli,t1). The model is estimated using Yatchew’s (1998) differencing method.

We find that the aggregate performance of individual traders is negative - that is, the majority of traders lose money; profitable traders do not exhibit persistence in performance; and traders’ performance does not consistently improve with experience. The above evidence provides strong evidence that, on average, TAIEX futures traders cannot learn by doing. On the other hand, although unprofitable traders represent the major proportion of the trading and the population, a large proportion of losing traders quickly learn about their inability and cease trading. This learning explains the high turnover in the trading population of the TAIEX futures market.

These results indicate that people have limited rationality, and a substantial part of learning occurs when traders stop trading after learning about their poor inherent ability. Our results only partially support the learning model of Mahani and Bernhardt (2007). Their model contends that losing traders learn quickly and leave the market, and good performers expand their trading and have persistent performance. Nevertheless, our results are consistent with Seru, Shumway, and Stoffman (2009) – namely, that a substantial part of learning by trading is explained by learning-about-ability.

Learning is a dynamic non-linear process. At the initial stage, those who earn profits regard themselves as skilled and expand their trading activities, which in turn reduces their profits. We show that their positive profits are not persistent until they accumulate abundant trading experience, such as more than 20,000 round-trip transactions. This evidence indicates that experience is a double-edged sword. While traders learn their ability from experience, those who survive in the TAIFEX market reinforce their overconfidence through self-attribution. However, as unprofitable traders accumulate plentiful trading experience, they discount their trading ability and reduce their trading intensities.

Finally, one question is why some losing traders remain in the market. The persistent and poor performance for those who continue to trade indicates that behavioral biases play an important role in trading. For example, they might trade, partly because they are overoptimistic about the prospect of their success, or obtain non-financial utility from gambling. In addition, due to the self-attribution bias, they attribute successes to their abilities and failures to bad luck. Hindsight bias also induces them to idealize their memory of what they believed or forecasted in the past. Confirmation bias, the tendency to search out

evidence consistent with one’s prior beliefs and ignore conflicting data, also contributes to limited rationality. These behavioral biases provide explanations as to why some losing traders cannot learn quickly about their abilities and leave the market.

The implication for a policy maker is that allowing unskilled traders to learn their inferior abilities without incurring considerable costs is more valuable than encouraging new entrants to become active traders. In such cases, the policy maker could devise a screening mechanism or test to reveal a person’s inherent trading ability.

References

Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.

Barber, B. M. and T. Odean (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.

Barber, B. M., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., and Odean, T. (2010). Do some individual investors have skill: Evidence from day trading.

Barber, B., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., and Odean, T. (2011). Do day traders rationally learn about their ability? Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.

Barberis, N. and Huang, M. (2004). Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

Barberis, N. and Thaler, R. (2002). A survey of behavioral finance. (NBER Paper No. 9222).

Brown, S. J. and Goetzmann, W. N. (1995). Performance persistence. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 679-698.

Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W. N., and Ibbotson, R. G. (1999). Offshore hedge funds: Survival and performance 1989-1995. Journal of Business, 72(1), 91-117.

Chakravarty, S. (2001). Stealth-trading: Which traders’ trades move stock prices?

Journal of Financial Economics, 61(2), 289-307.

Chan, S. J., Hsu, H. A., Lin, C. C., and Chen, C. I. (2007). Impact of spot trading

activity on the futures-spot relationship. Chiao Da Management Review, 27(1), 169-194.

Chang, C. H., Tsai, C. C., Huang, I. H., and Huang, H. H. (2012). Intraday evidence on relationships among great events, herding behavior, and investors. Chiao Da Management Review, 32(1), 61-106.

Chang, C. Y., Chen, H. L., and Yand, F. Y. (2015). The effect of herding behavior and the sentiments of investors on Taiwan stock index futures.

Chiao Da Management Review, 35(1) , 25-46.

Chen, C. P., Liu , Y. S., and Yang, J. W. (2010). Effect of transaction tax on the relationship between volatility and trading activities of Taiwan stock index futures. Chiao Da Management Review, 30(2) , 61-106.

Choe, H. and Eom, Y. (2009). The disposition effect and investment performance in the futures market. Journal of Futures Markets, 29(6), 496-522.

Collins, D. W., Gong, G., and Hribar, P. (2003). Investor sophistication and the mispricing of accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2-3), 251-276.

Coval, J. D., Hirshleifer, D. A., and Shumway, T. (2005). Can individual investors beat the market? (School of Finance Harvard University Working Paper No. 04-025) (Negotiation, Organization and Markets Harvard University Working Paper No. 02-45).

Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34(2), 187-220.

Dhar, R. and Zhu , N. (2006). Up close and personal: Investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Science, 52(5), 726-740.

Elsharkawy, A. and Garrod, N. (1996). The impact of investor sophistication on price responses to earnings news. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(2), 221-236.

Feng, L. and Seasholes, M. S. (2005). Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Review of Finance, 9(3), 305-351.

Gervais, S., Heaton, J. B., and Odean, T. (2001). Capital budgeting in the presence of managerial overconfidence and optimism. Berkeley, CA:

University of California, Berkeley.

Glaser, M. and Weber, M. (2007). Why inexperienced investors do not learn:

They do not know their past portfolio performance. Finance Research Letters, 4(4), 203-216.

Grossman, S. J., Kihlstrom, R. E., and Mirman, L. J. (1977). A bayesian approach to the production of information and learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 44(3), 533-547.

Hartzmark, M. L. (1991). Luck versus forecast ability: Determinant of trader performance in futures markets. Journal of Business, 64(1), 49-74.

Laih, Y. W. and Li, C. A. (2006), Price discovery in introducing exchange Trade fund (ETF) into Taiwan stock market. Chiao Da Management Review, 26(1), 119-141.

Lin, M. C. and Chiang, M. T. (2015). Trading patterns in the TAIEX futures markets: Information- or behavioral-based trades? Asia Pacific Management Review, 20 (3), 165-176.

Linnainmaa, J. T. (2011). Why do some households trade so much? Review of Financial Studies, 24(5), 1630-1666.

List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41-71.

Liu, Y. J., Wang, M. C., and Zhao, L. (2010). Narrow framing: Professions, sophistication, and experience. Journal of Futures Markets, 30(3), 203-229.

Mahani, R. and Bernhardt, D. (2007). Financial speculators’ underperformance:

learning, self-selection, and endogenous liquidity. Journal of Finance. 62(3), 1313-1340.

Nicolosi, G., Peng, L., and Zhu, N. (2009). Do individual investors learn from their trading experience? Journal of Financial Markets, 12(2), 317-336.

Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review, 89(5), 1279-1298.

Ross, R. L. (1975). Financial consequences of trading commodity futures contracts. Illinois Agricultural Economics, 15(2), 27-31.

Seru, A., Shumway, T., and Stoffman, N. (2010). Learning by trading. Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 705-739.

Strahilevitz, M. A., Odean, T., and Barber, B. M. (2011). Once burned, twice shy:

How naive learning, counterfactuals, and regret affect the repurchase of stocks previously sold. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 48, S102-S120. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S102

Teweles, R. J. and Jones, F. J. (1989). The futures game: Who wins, who loses, and why. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Wang, J. C. and Chueh, H. (2006). Stock price volatility, short sales restrictions, and price performance: Evidence from SGX-DT futures and TAIFEX futures. Chiao Da Management Review, 26(2), 91-122.

Yatchew, A. J. (1998). Nonparametric regression techniques in economics.

Journal of Economics Literature, 36(2), 669-721.

相關文件