Letter
Effectiveness of cupping
therapy for low back pain:
a systematic review
Cupping therapy has been used for
thousands of years in traditional
Chinese medicine for the treatment
of several chronic conditions,
such as low back pain, chronic
arth-ralgia, radiculopathy and respiratory
disease.
1Dry and wet cupping (with
controlled bleeding) are the two
main types of cupping therapy.
Other subtypes of the treatment are
cupping with retention (keeping
cups on the skin or acupuncture
points for 10–15 min);
moving-cupping (sliding cups over the skin
or acupuncture points with
lubri-cants); shaking-cupping (moving
cups up and down repeatedly on
skin or acupuncture points);
quick-cupping
(removing
cups
immediately
when the skin is sucked in); and
balance-cupping (composite
manipu-lation, each dose including cupping
with retention 6–8 min,
moving-cupping four times, shaking-moving-cupping
three times and quick-cupping
three times).
Nowadays, an increasing
number
of patients have shown an interest in
using cupping therapy for the
treat- ment of low back pain
owing to their belief that it is more
effective than Western therapeutics.
Although cupping therapy
is
considered a safe, non-invasive
procedure, the outcome does not
always fulfil the expectation of
therapists and patients. Moreover,
complications of cupping
therapy, such as anaemia and skin
pigmenta-tion,
have
also
been
reported.
2Since there is no consensus on
the role of cupping therapy in the
treatment of low back pain, we
reviewed the medical literature in
an attempt to test its effectiveness
in low back pain and to further
examine this method.
The systematic research started
with a thorough English and Chinese
language literature search of PubMed
from 1980 through 2013. The
keyword search terms in
combin-ation were ‘cupping therapy’, ‘low
back pain’, ‘lumbar sprain’, ‘lumbar
myofascitis’
and ‘lumbosacral
pain’. Articles with
laboratory
studies were excluded.
Three reviewers took part in the
study. One reviewer selected the
titles and abstracts for inclusion,
one extracted data from the full-text
articles and the third reviewer
con-firmed the reference lists of
poten- tially eligible studies.
Identified studies were assigned a
level of evi- dence according to
the Oxford Centre for
Evidence-Based Medicine
2011 levels of evidence.
3Table 1
The studies with levels I and II evidence
Studies (level of
evidence) Treatment (N) Dose and regimen Results ( p value) Kim et al4
(level I)
Intervention group
(21) Wet cupping 1. Brochures forexercise Bilateral BL23, BL24 and BL25,3 times weekly for 2 weeks 1. NRS scores >0.052. PPI scores <0.05 Control group (11) Waiting-list
2. General advice 3. Acetaminophen
500 mg
3. ODQ scores >0.05
Liu et al5 Intervention group Cupping with retention Bilateral at BL, 15 min daily 1. VAS <0.05 (level II) (25/25) Balance-cupping* Bilateral low back area, along BL and GV,
every 2 days 2. ODQ scores < 0.05
Control group (25) Diclofenac 50 mg, daily Xuan6
(level II) Interventiongroup (40)
Moving-cupping Bilateral at BL, 5–10 times (about 5 min), alternate days for 11 days
1. VAS <0.01 2. SF-36 <0.01 Control group (40) Dexibuprofen 0.15 g, T.I.D. for 12 days
Hong et al7
(level II) Interventiongroup (37) Moving-cupping Bilateral at BL, 5–10 times (about 5 min),alternate days for 11 days 1. VAS<0.012.2. SF-36 <0.01 Control group (33) Dexibuprofen 0.15 g, T.I.D. for 12 days
Lo and Ma8
(level II) Interventiongroup (33) Balance-cupping Bilateral low back area, along BL, GV and local tender points, every 2 days for 2 weeks VAS <0.05 Control group (31) Western medication 1 tablet of composite chlorzoxazone (chlorzoxazone
0.25 g+ acetaminophen 0.3 g), B.I.D. for 2 weeks Ma and Lo9
(level II) Interventiongroup (33) Balance-cupping Bilateral low back area, along BL and GV, every 2 days VAS <0.05 Control group (31) Western medication 1 tablet of composite chlorzoxazone (chlorzoxazone
0.25 g+ acetaminophen 0.3 g), B.I.D. Chen and Pan10
(level II) Interventiongroup (60) Moving-cupping and cuppingwith retention Bilateral at BL, Huatuoliaji points and local tender points,alternate days Recurrence rate <0.05
*Refer to text.
Control group (40) Western medication 1. 2% Local anaesthetics (novocaine or lidocaine) 4–6 mL+ vitamin B12 500 mg + dexamethasone 5–10 mg for point injection, every 2 days 2. Indometacin 25 mg for oral administration, T.I.D.
B.I.D., twice a day; NRS, numerical rating scale; ODQ, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire; PPI, McGill Pain Questionnaire for pain intensity; SF-36, 36-item Short Form; T.I.D., three times a day; VAS, visual analogue scale.
Letter
Through our electronic and
refer-ence search we identified 29
cita-tions (table 1): one randomised
controlled trial (RCT, level I
evi-dence),
4six non-RCTs (level II
evi-dence),
5–1020 case reports (level
IV evidence) and two
mechanism-based reasoning studies (level V
evidence).
In the RCT, the effective rate of
the wet-cupping group was similar
to that of the waiting-list
group ( p>0.05). Interventions in
both groups
decreased
pain,
disability and acetaminophen dosage,
but a signifi- cant decrease in pain
intensity accord- ing to the McGill
pain questionnaire ( p<0.01) and
reduced
consumption
of
acetaminophen ( p=0.09) were
seen in the wet-cupping group.
4Of the six non-RCTs, one showed
that the visual analogue scale
(VAS) score and the Oswestry
disability index in the
balance-cupping group were significantly
lower than in the group with
cupping with
retention and
diclofenac ( p<0.05), but there was
no difference between the cupping
with retention group and the
diclofenac-only group (
p>0.05).
5The other studies
indi-vidually showed that the
effective-ness of cupping in decreasing
VAS,
6–9reducing recurrence rate
10and improving quality of life
6 7was
better than Western medication.
Although evidence level I and II
studies on the effectiveness of
cupping treatment in low back pain
have been reported, aspects such as
manipulations, sites and dosage of
cupping and Western medication in
the comparison group are not
uniform. Although RCTs provide a
higher quality of evidence, we
included non-RCTs in this study
because the limited number of
RCTs did not provide convincing
evidence.
In this article, the research
results show that cupping therapy is
promis- ing for pain control and
improve- ment of quality of life, and
minimises the potential risks of
treatment. Therefore, further studies
are needed to determine the potential
role of cupping therapy in the
treatment of low back pain.
Chia-Yu Huang,1,2 Mun-Yau Choong,2,3 Tzong-Shiun Li2,3
1Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China 2School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
3Department of Plastic Surgery, Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China Correspondence to Dr Tzong-Shiun Li, Department of Plastic Surgery, Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital, No. 66, Sec. 2 Chang-He Rd, An-Nan District, Tainan City 70965, Taiwan, Republic of China; li.tsa2@m s a.hinet.net Contributors C-YH: conducted the experiment; wrote the article. M-YC: analysed and interpreted the data; provided materials. T-SL: designed the experiment; proofed and revised the article.
Competing interests None. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. ▸ Additional material is published online only. To view please visit the journal online (http: / /dx.doi.org/10.1136/ a cupmed-2013-010385).
To cite Huang C-Y, Choong M-Y, Li T-S. Acupunct Med 2013;31:336–337.
Received 25 April 2013 Accepted 8 July 2013
Published Online First 25 July 2013
REFERENCES
1 Cao H, Han M, Li X, et al. Clinical research evidence of cupping therapy in china: a systematic literature review. BMC Complement Altern Med 2010;10:70.
2 Kim KH, Kim TH, Hwangbo M, et al. Anaemia and skin pigmentation after excessive cupping therapy by an unqualified therapist in Korea: a case report. Acupunct Med 2012;30:227–8. 3 OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working
Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www. cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 4 Kim JI, Kim TH, Lee MS, et al.
Evaluation of wet-cupping therapy for persistent non-specific low back pain: a randomised, waiting-list controlled, open-label, parallel-group pilot trial. Trials 2011;12:146.
5 Liu BX, Xu M, Huang CG, et al. Therapeutic effect of balance cupping therapy on non-specific low back pain. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract 2008;14:572–3.
6 Xuan B. The effect of moving cupping therapy and dexibuprofen on nonspecific low back pain: clinically randomized controlled study. J Anhui Health Vocational Tech Coll 2010;9:19–21.
7 Hong YF, Wu JX, Wang B, et al. The effect of moving cupping therapy on nonspecific low back pain. Chin J Rehabil Med 2006;21:340–3. 8 Lo XX, Ma LS. Therapeutic effect of
balance cupping therapy on acute lumbar sprain. Chin J Infor TCM 2010;17:75–6.
9 Ma LS, Lo XX. Therapeutic effect and differentiation nursing on acute lumbar sprain. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med 2010;19:1394–5.
10 Chen CM, Pan HH. Therapeutic effect of moving cupping on 60 cases of acute lumbar sprain. Clin J Anhui Tradit Chin Med 2000;12:531.