• 沒有找到結果。

Statins ?藥物與認知功能障礙、失智症及阿茲海默症發生之相關性分析

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Statins ?藥物與認知功能障礙、失智症及阿茲海默症發生之相關性分析"

Copied!
1
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

MicroRNA-30a increases tight junction protein expression to suppress the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis by targeting Slug in breast cancer

Chia-Wei Chang1, Jyh-Cherng Yu2, Yi-Hsien Hsieh1, Chung-Chin Yao3, Jui-I Chao4, Po-Ming Chen1, Hsiao-Yen Hsieh1, Chia-Ni Hsiung5, Hou-Wei Chu5, Chen-Yang Shen5,6,*, Chun-Wen Cheng1,7,*

1 Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung;

2 Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei;

3 Department of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung;

4 Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu;

5 Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei; 6 College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung;

7 Clinical Laboratory, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

*Corresponding author:

Dr. Chun-Wen Cheng, Institute of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

(2)

Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung (40201), Taiwan. Tel: +886-4-2473-0022 ext 11677; Fax: +886-4-2324-8195. E-mail: [email protected]; or Dr. Chen-Yang Shen, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei (11529), Taiwan. Tel: +886-2-2789-9036; Fax: +886-2-2782-3047. E-mail: [email protected] 1

2 3 4

(3)

ABSTRACT

The epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition is a prerequisite for conferring

metastatic potential during tumor progression. microRNA-30a (miR-30a) expression was significantly lower in aggressive breast cancer cell lines compared with non-invasive breast cancer and non-malignant mammary epithelial cell lines. In contrast, miR-30a overexpression reversed the mesenchymal appearance of cancer cells to result in a cobblestone-like epithelial phenotype. To explore this, we identified Slug, one of the master regulators of EMT, as a target of miR-30a using in silico prediction. This was confirmed with reporter assays, showing that miR-30a could bind to the 3’-untranslted region of Slug mRNA. Furthermore, we linked miR-30a to increased expression of claudins, a family of tight junction transmembrane proteins. An interaction between Slug and E-box in the claudin promoter sequences was reduced upon miR-30a overexpression, further leading to reduction of filopodia formation and decreased invasiveness/metastasis capabilities of breast cancer cells. Consistently, delivery of miR-30a in xenografted mice decreased tumor invasion and migration. In patients with breast cancer, a significantly elevated risk of the miR-30alow/CLDN2low/FSCNhigh genotype was observed, linking to a phenotypic manifestation of larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage among patients. In conclusion, the miR-30a/Slug axis plays a central role in inhibiting mesenchymal tumor development by interfering with metastatic cancer cell 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(4)

programming and may be a potential target for therapy in breast cancer.

Key words: Breast cancer metastasis, EMT, miR-30a, Slug, Claudin. 1

(5)

INTRODUCTION

The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) enables tumor cells to transiently lose their epithelial features—including the loss of apico-basal polarity and disassembly of tight and adherent junctions—and acquire mesenchymal traits that lead to invasion, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy . Notably, EMT is characterized by frequent, temporal, and heterogeneous changes in cellular phenotype that cannot be exclusively attributed to rigid and irreversible genetic alterations . Instead, the disruption of normal epigenetic mechanisms certainly helps to provide such essential flexibility, and among epigenetic mechanisms within cancer cells, post-transcriptional mechanisms involving microRNAs (miRNAs) are important in this regard.

miRNAs, which are non-coding RNAs of an average length of 22 nt, are capable of modulating mRNA levels by binding to the 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR) with less-than-perfect complementarity, which results in degradation of the mRNA or repression of its translation . A growing body of research has indicated that cancer cells acquire the ability to invade and disseminate via the action of dysregulated miRNAs that enhance EMT progression and confer a selective advantage during clonal evolution . Our

previous breast cancer study revealed that miR-30a inhibits the invasion and migration of Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in vitro . Because these two cell lines are intrinsically deficient in expression of E-cadherin , which is a key protein contributing to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(6)

cell-cell adhesion, we hypothesized that miR-30a targets other mRNAs involved in regulating EMT.

The expansion of a tumor cell population upon overexpression of Snail family members is a prerequisite for EMT [2]. In addition, the regulator Snail (SNAI1), which mediates EMT activation for metastatic dissemination of cancer cells from the primary tumor, is targeted by miR-30a . Slug (Slug) belongs to the Snail family and also triggers EMT during tumor progression and perhaps provide some context for this finding. We thus hypothesized that miR-30a binds to the 3’-UTR of Slug mRNA to inhibit EMT-driven invasion and migration in breast cancer. To test this hypothesis, we used an in vitro model of the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) that is regulated by the miR-30a/Slug axis. The consequent decrease in Slug levels by miR-30a in invasive breast cancer cells resulted in a transformation to a cobblestone-like epithelial phenotype, and ectopic administration of miR-30a led to increased claudin expression, which is

transcriptionally inactivated by Slug . Furthermore, we proposed miR-30a/Slug is linked to reduced fascin (FSCN gene), an actin-bundling protein localizes to the tip of filopodia, to inhibit the development of the mesenchymal tumor phenotype in breast cancer. In addition, we used mouse xenotransplantation assays to demonstrate the effect of suppressing the miR-30a directed repression of Slug on cancer cell progression in vivo. Moreover, a trend toward risk elevation for the miR-30alow/CLDN2low/FSCNhigh genotype 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(7)

in association with advanced clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients was found to be significant.Our clinical analysis and experimental models demonstrate that the miR-30a/Slug axis is a potential therapeutic target in human breast cancer.

RESULTS

Decreased level of miR-30a expression is associated with invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines

We first assessed whether decreased level of miR-30a were significantly associated with breast cancer aggressiveness in different breast cancer cell lines. We found that miR-30a levels were significantly decreased in highly aggressive Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines as compared with the moderately decrease in non-invasive MCF-7 and BT-474 breast cancer cell lines and non-malignant mammary epithelial cell lines H184B5F5/M10 and MCF-10A (Figure 1A). To examine a causal link between miR-30a expression and invasiveness in Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 cells, we created a lentiviral vector that is based on plemiR; the vector contained a 551-bp fragment of the pre-miR-30a sequence (plemiR-30a) and was expressed in Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. The plemiR-30a–transfected cell lines had a ~4.0- to 10-fold higher level of miR-30a compared with plemiR-transfected control cells (Figure 1B).

Interestingly, although both breast cancer cell lines are intrinsically deficient in E-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(8)

cadherin (Figure 1C), indicating that they had lost an epithelial cell characteristic, the morphological change from an elongated and spindle-like fibroblastic shape to a cobblestone-like epithelial phenotype was observed when miR-30a was overexpressed (Figure 1D). In contrast, MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with inhibitor against miR-30a (anti-miR-miR-30a) had enhanced tumor cell motility (Figure 1E-1G), which is

considered a prerequisite for retaining metastatic potential. Taken together, these findings suggest that miR-30a has a tumor-suppressive function to inhibit the development of the mesenchymal phenotype during EMT via an E-cadherin-independent mechanism in aggressive breast cancer cells.

miR-30a directly targets the 3’-UTR of Slug mRNA

Our initial in silico analysis using computational prediction algorithm software, including miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do), miRWalk

(http://www.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk/), and TargetScan

(http://targetscan.org/)predicted that Slug mRNA may be a target of miR-30a, and Slug contains two evolutionarily conserved domains in its 3’-UTR that have complementarity with human miR-30a (Figure 2A). A dual-luciferase reporter assay showed that overexpression of miR-30a reduced the activity of the luciferase gene fused to the full-length Slug 3’-UTR (pGL4.13/Slug 3’-UTR/wt) by >30% as compared with the Hs578T-pcDNA3 cells (control 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(9)

group) (P < 0.01) (Figure 2B-2C). In addition, a significant reduction in luciferase activity was observed in the presence of pre-miR-30a using the reporter construct containing the Slug 3’-UTR/mut2 clone (Figure 2C). This reduction in luciferase activity was reversed by the presence of a pGL4.13 reporter construct containing mutations in the Slug 3’-UTR that affected either site 1 (mut1) or both site 1 and site 2 (mut3). Thus, the region from 13 to 20 is the crucial site within the 3’-UTR of the Slug gene that is required for miR-30a binding. Moreover, Slug protein was notably repressed by ~ 40% in plemiR-30a–transfected Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells compared with cells transfected with a control

construct (Figure 2D).

miR-30a represses Slug to increase claudins in conjunction with the MET reversion As we demonstrated, miR-30a induction led to a diminution of the elongated and spindle-like fibroblastic phenotype in Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 invasive breast cancer cell lines (Figure 1D), in which E-cadherin is intrinsically deficient (ref. and Figure 1C). We speculated that mesenchymal tumor cells may regain the cobblestone-like epithelial phenotype through activation of other Slug-regulated cellular transmembrane proteins for MET transversion, i.e., those other than E-cadherin. Because (a) claudin-based tight junction proteins are crucial for the barrier function of epithelial cell sheets in mammals and (b) the E-box motif (CANNTG) in the human CLDN1 promoter region (Figure 3A) is bound by 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(10)

Snail family members and Slug overexpression decreases CLDN1 mRNA and protein , we thus examined whether the repression of Slug through miR-30a overexpression could increase CLDN-1 expression. Based on chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with an antibody against Slug, capture of the CLDN1 fragment (Figure 3B) was reduced in MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing miR-30a as compared with cells containing the plemiR empty vector. In addition, the promoter regions of CLDN2 (nt −803 to –717) and CLDN3 (nt −462 to −363) share the E-box motifs for Slug binding (Figure 3A), and indeed the ChIP assay showed a similar decrease in the CLDN2– and CLDN3–captured fragments in cells overexpressing miR-30a (Figure 3B). At the protein level, we also found that the levels of CLDN-1, -2, and -3 were higher in MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with plemiR-30a

compared with controls (Figure 3C). In parallel, Slug expression was restored in conjunction with decreased levels of the CLDNs in plemiR-30a–transduced MD-MBA-231 cells upon transfection with an inhibitor against miR-30a (anti-miR-30a) compared with expression in the negative control (anti-miR(NC)) (Figure 3C).

Invasive cancer cells typically exhibit increased F-actin polymerization during EMT . We thus examined the effect of miR-30a overexpression on the blockage of F-actin

polymerization in invasive breast cancer. Labeling of MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated phalloidin revealed substantial disorganization of

microfilaments in cells overexpressing miR-30a (Figure 3D); notably, a lower number of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(11)

filopodia per cell was counted in miR-30a–expressing cells compared with expression of the vector alone (Figure 3E). In accordance with this phenotypic change, analysis of fluorescence images also revealed strong staining for claudins along the cell boundaries of both MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells stably expressing miR-30a (Figure 3F).

miR-30a represses Slug to inhibit invasiveness of breast cancer

Overexpression of Slug causes EMT, which leads to tumor aggressiveness by upregulation of the mesenchymal markers vimentin and fascin and down-regulation of epithelial markers E-cadherin, occludins, and claudins . We therefore examined the suppressive function of miR-30a in breast cancer progression in conjunction with

characteristic changes in EMT markers. As expected, we found that the number of invading cells was reduced in MD-MBA-231 cells lentivirally transduced with miR-30a by ~ 40% compared with control transduced cells (Figure 4A). It has been reported that Slug is required for transcription and protein synthesis of fascin . Hereby, the reduction of Slug and fascin protein levels in the miR-30a–transduced breast cancer cells was restored upon transfection with the miR-30a inhibitor (anti-miR-30a), which resulted in enhanced tumor cell invasion as compared with control oligonucleotide–transfected cells (Figure 4A-4B). In parallel,

knockdown of Slug in MDA-MB-231 cells increases claudin expression to inhibit cancer cell invasion (Figure 4A). Notably, this inhibition of invasion by sh-Slug treatment did not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(12)

change in the presence of miR-30a overexpression (or miR control) (Figure 4C), also, no changes in fascin or claudin expression were seen in sh-Slug cells overexpressing miR-30a (miR-30a-mimic) (Figure 4D); suggesting that miR-30a has no effect on inhibition of cancer cell invasion in the absence of Slug.

miR-30a overexpression inhibits lung colonization and tumor growth in xenograft transplantation models of human breast cancer

Given these findings in vitro, we next evaluated the in vivo effects of miR-30a on orthotopic tumor metastasis and outgrowth by carrying out an experiment in nude mice. We established a xenograft model of human breast cancer metastasis by injection of MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with empty vector (control) or the miR-30a

overexpression vector into the tail vein of 6-week-old mice. After 5 weeks, mice were sacrificed and their lungs dissected to evaluate tissue morphology by hematoxylin and eosin staining (Figure 5A). Tumors with high expression of miR-30a formed only a few pulmonary metastatic nodules on average (16.0 ± 10.8) in all mice analyzed and

significantly fewer than the number of nodules formed in the control group (139.2 ± 35.2, P = 0.0028) (Figure 5B). We also injected breast tumor cells into the mammary fat pads of mice to study the effect of miR-30a on inhibition of tumor outgrowth. After 4 weeks, the subsequent tumors in the mice injected with MDA-MB-231 cells that overexpressed miR-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(13)

30a were much smaller (Figure 5C) and grew more slowly than those in the control group (P < 0.001) (Figure 5D). Breast tumor tissues from mice were resected and then subjected to immunohistochemical staining. The resultant positive staining positive staining for CLDN-1, -2, and -3 that was associated with decreased expression of Slug and fascin differentiated the orthotopic tumor tissues with miR-30a overexpression from those carrying vector alone as assessed by immunohistochemistry (Figure 5E). This supported a suppressive function for miR-30 in breast cancer invasiveness and metastasis in vivo.

The miR-30alow/CLDNlow/FSCNhigh genotype in association with breast cancer

progression

Our results at the molecular and cellular levels were thus consistent with those from an animal model, all of which indicated that increased expression of CLDN-1, CLDN-2, and CLDN-3 and decreased expression of fascin are controlled by the miR-30a/Slug axis. We therefore determined whether there is an association between miR-30a/claudin/fascin and clinicopathological significance of breast cancer. We used laser capture microdissection to isolate tumor cells from specimens to avoid contamination with normal tissue and then measured the expression of individual genes by quantitative real-time PCR. In our breast cancer cohort (n = 86) (Table 1), CLDN2 mRNA transcripts were significantly and positively associated with miR-30a levels in cancerous tissues (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.375; P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(14)

= 0.0004) (Figure 6A). In contrast, FSCN mRNA had an opposite correlation with miR-30a (Pearson correlation coefficient, –0.424; P < 0.0001) (Figure 6B). In addition, a high level of

CLDN2 mRNA was correlated with a low level of FSCN mRNA (Pearson correlation

coefficient, –0.324; P = 0.0023) (Figure 6C).

To assess the prognostic prediction of the interaction between miR-30a and FSCN or between miR-30a and CLDN2 in breast cancer, we defined expression status as “high” (≥4.90-fold increase in FSCN mRNA compared with the median) or “low” (<2.40-fold decrease in CLDN2 mRNA) by comparing expression in cancer cells and adjacent non-cancerous cells. With miR-30ahigh/FSCNlow and miR-30ahigh/CLDN2high as the reference, there was a greater proportion of the miR-30alow/FSCNhigh and miR-30alow/CLDN2low genotype, respectively, in cancer patients with a large tumor size, advanced tumor stage, or lymph node involvement (P-trend < 0.05) at the time of diagnosis (Table 2).

We next addressed the question regarding joint effects of

miR-30alow/CLDN2low/FSCNhigh on prognostic assessment of breast cancer. A joint effect of higher risk associated with poor clinicopathological features of breast cancer (Table 3) was observed in patients who more closely adhered to the miR-30alow/CLDN2low/FSCNhigh genotype; shown the statistical significance for trend test with one additional risk genotype in tumors of large tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and advanced tumor stage measured by the β estimates from the regression model (P-trend < 0.05) (Table 3).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(15)

More specifically, the differences in the expression of the proteins encoded by these genes were validated by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer tissue specimens, and the results were stratified based on the miR-30a level (Figure 7A). In the immunohistochemical analysis (n = 10), tissues that expressed high levels of miR-30a (tumor-to-normal (T/N) ratio ≥ 0.50-fold as defined in ), had intense positive staining for the three claudin proteins, and had reduced or undetectable levels of Slug and fascin were from well-differentiated, lymph node metastasis (LNM)-negative, and non-invasive tumors. In contrast, the advanced breast tumor tissues (late stage, LNM-positive) with decreased (T/N ratio < 0.50-fold) or

undetectable miR-30a (T/N ratio < 0.10-fold) had low-intensity staining for claudins but strong intensity for Slug and fascin (Supplementary Table S1).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(16)

DISCUSSION

A growing body of research indicates that miR-30a inhibits EMT in different types of cancer, including gastric, liver, and lung cancer ; however, our survey of the literature suggests that there has been no investigation of the ability of miR-30a to counteract the aggressiveness and metastasis of cancer cells by increasing tight junction molecules— CLDN-1, CLDN-2, and CLDN-3—via targeting the 3’-UTR of Slug mRNA. This increased expression of claudins can affect tight junction function, which may regulate EMT and eventually prevent breast cancer progression (Figure 7B). Together, these findings may help to develop a candidate miRNA biomarker that could lead to prognostic assessment for breast cancer patients.

The in silico prediction, luciferase reporter assay, and western blotting all indicated that Slug mRNA is a direct target of miR-30a. According to data sorting of the mRNA sequences bound to miRNAs, miR-30 family members (miR-30a, -30b, -30c, -30d, and -30e) share the same seed sequence (Supplementary Figure S1), suggesting that other miR-30 family members may also suppress Snail or Slug. Indeed, decreased luciferase activity in a reporter assay showed that the 3’-UTR of Snail mRNA is a direct target of miR-30a in breast cancer cells (Supplementary Figure S2), and this is consistent with a previous report that miR-30a overexpression downregulates Snail and thereby inhibits invasion and

metastasis of lung carcinomas . Likewise, miR-30c is significantly downregulated in human 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(17)

renal cell carcinomas, in which miR-30c overexpression may suppress EMT by binding

Slug mRNA to increase E-cadherin production . The data for other miR-30 family members

provide information and support for our finding that miR-30a represses Slug expression to reduce breast cancer progression. To comprehensively understand the mechanism

underlying the ability of the miR-30 family to suppress EMT signaling, additional studies are needed to determine whether defects in miR-30 family members act independently or jointly to drive progression of breast cancer.

Slug can promote formation of filopodia-like bundles via transcriptional activation of

FSCN gene to sustain filopodial tips during the metastasis and invasion of cancer cells . In

the present study, we demonstrated that the miR-30a/Slug axis affects filopodial assembly during EMT in breast cancer cells, which resulted in reduced levels of mesenchymal proteins, e.g., vimentin and fascin. Recently, it has been reported that miR-30 family members, including miR-30a, are downregulated in estrogen receptor–negative and

progesterone receptor–negative breast tumors, suggesting that these hormones are involved in de novo synthesis of miR-30 family members . We are currently mapping the specific region that harbors the hormone-response elements in the miR-30 promoter and will attempt to identify the hormonal mechanism that may regulate miR-30 expression, which could help determine the clinical benefit of endocrine therapy in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(18)

Additional miR-30a–regulated targets have been identified and their functions defined, including involvement in tumor cell autophagy , mediating cis-platinum chemosensitivity , suppression of metastatic colorectal cancer by inactivating the

Akt/mTOR pathway , and inhibition of breast cancer metastasis by decreasing metadherin . Our present miRNA study demonstrates that Slug, as well as vimentin , is a miR-30a target that is particularly important in breast cancer progression. In addition, clinical observations, including our breast cancer cohort , showed that miR-30a reduction is associated with lymph node and lung metastases in patients with breast cancer. Importantly, miR-30a has been suggested to regulate the attachment-independent growth of breast tumor–initiating cells identified in a subset of tumors with unlimited self-renewal and differentiation heterogeneity . The exclusively tumor-suppressive effect of miR-30a in the regulation of multiple important tumorigenic genes/pathways involved in cancer cell heterogeneity may drive the development and evaluation of miR-30a as a therapeutic for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The tumor-suppressive function of miR-30a can lead to the reversal of EMT in breast cancer by directly targeting the 3’-UTR of Slug. In vitro binding of miR-30a to Slug mRNA increased the expression of the tight-junction proteins CLDN-1, -2, and -3 and decreased the metastatic capability of those cells owing to its effects on the reduction of F-actin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(19)

polymerization. Consequently, tumor progression was suppressed in mouse

xenotransplantation assays. Clinically, RNA expression profiles and immunohistochemical analyses confirmed that the miR-30alow/Claudinlow/Fascinhigh link correlated with poor prognosis for breast cancer. These findings provide insight into the potential utility of miR-30a as a therapeutic strategy for breast cancer treatment.

1 2 3 4 5

(20)

MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell culture

The human mammary epithelial cell line, MCF-10A, was a kind gift of Dr. Yung-Luen Yu at the Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. MCF-10A cells were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 0.1 mM sodium pyruvate, 5% horse serum, 10 μg/mL insulin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 500 ng/mL hydrocortisone, and 100 ng/mL cholera toxin in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. The breast cancer cell lines (Hs578T, MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and BT-474) and the non-malignant mammary epithelial cell line H184B5F5/M10 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies) containing 0.1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin.

Cell lysis and western blotting

A detailed procedure for western blotting is described elsewhere . Primary antibodies against human Slug and vimentin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); CLDN-1, -2, and -3 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA); and E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and fascin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) were used. The antibody against β-actin, which was used as the endogenous control to normalize the expression of proteins 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(21)

horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody was used, and the immunoreactive protein was visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence assay (Western Blotting Luminol Reagent; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The band intensities were quantified by densitometry (Digital Protein DNA Imagineware, Huntington Station, NY, USA). Wound healing assay

To determine the migratory behavior of MCF-7 cells, a bidirectional wound healing assay was performed . Briefly, cells were grown in medium to monolayer confluence in 24-well culture plates. Cells were treated with anti-miR-30a or anti-miR-mimic (NC), and after which a sterile 10-μL tip was used to scratch the monolayer of cells to form a

bi-directional wound. The plate was kept in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator overnight. Pictures of a representative field of the cell-free space were taken at 0- and 24-hr after the

scratch using a microscope, and the distance of cell migration was calculated with Image Pro plus software.

Dual luciferase reporter assay

The 3’-UTR sequence of human Slug was cloned into pGL4.13 (Promega) to produce the recombinant vector pGL4.13/Slug 3’-UTR wt, which also contains the firefly luciferase open reading frame under the control of the SV40 promoter. Two miR-30a sites

complementary to the GTTTAC sequence in the Slug 3’-UTR were mutated individually or in combination to remove complementarity to miR-30a using the QuikChange II XL site-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(22)

as the template. The mutants were named Slug UTR/mut1 (single mutant),

3’-UTR/mut2 (single mutant), and 3’-UTR/mut3 (double mutant). Supplementary Table S2 lists the primer sequences with mutated nucleotides underlined; also shown are the sequences of the mismatch primers used to generate the different Slug 3’-UTR mutants. MDA-MB-231 cells in 24-well plates were co-transfected with 100 ng Slug reporter construct containing wild-type or mutated 3’-UTR and pcDNA3 (control) or

pcDNA3/miR-30a.

Establishment of breast tumor cells stably expressing miR-30a

Lentivirus carrying hsa-miR-30a (plemiR-30a) or control (plemiR) was packaged with a lentivirus expression system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the Trans-LentiviralTM GIPZ Packaging System (Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL, USA). A puromycin-resistant selectable marker was used to select against non-transduced cells to amplify miR-30a from the Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 cells.

ChIP

Chromatin from cell lines was sonicated and immunoprecipitated with rabbit polyclonal antibody against Slug or with rabbit IgG (negative control). The chemical cross-links were reversed by overnight incubation at 65°C in the presence of 8 M NaCl, followed by the addition of proteinase K (10 mg/mL) for 1 h at 45°C and RNase (10 mg/mL) for 30 min at 37°C. After extraction and precipitation, DNA was dissolved in 30 mL of ddH2O. Primers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(23)

CLDN2, and CLDN3 promoter regions that contain the predicted Slug binding sites. The

PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide staining.

Invasion assay

The cells were trypsinized and collected from dishes via brief centrifugation. Samples consisting of 5  104 cells were seeded into 48-well modified Boyden chambers (Neuro Probe, Cabin John, MD, USA) with 8-mm pore size polycarbonate membrane filters with Matrigel for 12 h, and invading cells that were attached to the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol and stained with Gisema solution (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO, USA). Invading cells were quantified by counting five random high-power fields using an Olympus Ckx41 light microscope (Tokyo, Japan.).

Confocal microscopy

Cells were prepared for confocal laser scanning microscopy as described . Cells were incubated separately with mouse CLDN-1 (Invitrogen) or rabbit CLDN-2 or anti-CLDN-3 (Novus Biologicals). For F-actin staining, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen) diluted in a blocking solution (1:40) for 20 min. Nuclei were stained with 4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The samples were examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 META, Jena, Germany) equipped with a UV laser (351/364 nm), an argon laser (457/488/514 nm), and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(24)

Mouse xenotransplantation assay

All mice were housed in the animal facility at the Chung Shan Medical University Experimental Animal Center, Taichung, Taiwan. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chung Shan Medical University for the use of animals, and all experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal care of that committee. For the orthotopic implantation model, 6- to 8-week-old female BALB/c nude mice were used. The mice were injected through the mammary fat pad with MDA-MB-231breast tumor cells (1 × 106) suspended in Matrigel (20% v/v) (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in PBS. The detailed procedure for

measurement of tumor volume via an external caliper is described elsewhere . In this way, primary tumors were measured on the days indicated in Figure 5, and tumor volume was calculated using the formula 1/2 (length × width2). In addition, the breast cancer lung metastasis model was established by tail-vein injection of MDA-MB-231 cells (5 × 105 cells in 0.1 mL of PBS). After 5 weeks, mice were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation. The number of metastatic lung tumors was confirmed with hematoxylin and eosin staining under a dissecting microscope.

Laser-capture microdissection and quantitative real-time PCR

All frozen tissue specimens were confirmed to be primary breast invasive ductal carcinoma based on their pathological features, and all the participants provided their 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(25)

written informed consent to participate in this study. Considerations regarding

methodological issues in the present study, including research design, sampling scheme, and consent procedure, were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institutional Review Board at the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. A detailed procedure for RNA isolation from cells collected by laser-capture microdissection is described elsewhere . RNAs were extracted from laser-capture microdissection–

collected samples of the tumor and the adjacent non-tumor breast tissue of each patient using the mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX), and the RNA concentration in each sample was quantified on a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Waltham, MA). The single-tube TaqMan miRNA assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used to detect and quantify mRNA expression on an Applied Biosystems instrument. Appropriate probes and primer sets were used to detect expression of genes encoding hsa-miR-30a (AB assay ID: 000417), FSCN (Hs00362704_m1), and CLDN2 (Hs01549234_m1) according to the procedure described by Applied Biosystems. Results were normalized against GAPDH (for FACN and CLDN2) and RNU6B (for miR-30a). The relative expression of each mRNA, i.e., the Ct value, was calculated for the microdissected cells from the tumor and paired non-tumor tissues using the comparative CT method .

Immunohistochemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(26)

Detailed procedures for the immunohistochemical assays and scoring system are described elsewhere . Briefly, each tissue slide was reacted with monoclonal antibodies against Slug (Cell Signaling Technology); fascin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); or CLDN-1, -2, or -3 (Novus Biologicals) in a humidified chamber for 60 min at 37°C. Afterwards, the sections were washed with PBS and treated with an appropriate biotin-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min. The signal for each tissue section was detected using the avidin-biotin complex system and diaminobenzidine kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Immunohistochemical staining was quantified according to the coverage area and intensity for Slug as described . The scoring system for the CLDNs and fascin is described elsewhere , with the following modifications: –, no staining or membrane staining in <10% of tumor cells; +, faint, weakly perceptible positive staining of the membrane in <10% of tumor cells; ++, weak-to-moderate complete membrane staining observed in ≥10% of tumor cells; and +++, strong, complete membrane staining in ≥10% of tumor cells.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Student’s t-test to test any statistically significant difference in the results between the different test groups. Statistical significance of the experimental data grouped by one variable was assessed with an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test or a one-way ANOVA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(27)

followed by Dunnett's test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

FUNDING

This work was supported by research grant NSC 102-2628-B-040-002-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

(28)

REFERENCES

1. Jung HY, Fattet L, Yang J. Molecular Pathways: Linking Tumor Microenvironment to Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:962-968 2. Micalizzi DS, Farabaugh SM, Ford HL. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer:

parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2010;15:117-134.

3. Orlando FA, Brown KD. Unraveling breast cancer heterogeneity through transcriptomic and epigenomic analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2270-2279. 4. Polyak K. Breast cancer: origins and evolution. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3155-3163. 5. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell.

2004;116:281-297.

6. Ding X, Park SI, McCauley LK, Wang CY. Signaling between transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and transcription factor SNAI2 represses expression of microRNA miR-203 to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:10241-10253.

7. Vetter G, Saumet A, Moes M et al. miR-661 expression in SNAI1-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to breast cancer cell invasion by targeting Nectin-1 and StarD10 messengers. Oncogene. 2010;29:4436-4448.

8. Bullock MD, Sayan AE, Packham GK, Mirnezami AH. MicroRNAs: critical regulators of epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT) and mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) in cancer progression. Biol Cell. 2012;104: 3-12.

9. Katoh Y, Katoh M. Hedgehog signaling, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and miRNA (review). Int J Mol Med. 2008;22:271-275.

10. Cheng CW, Wang HW, Chang CW et al. MicroRNA-30a inhibits cell migration and invasion by downregulating vimentin expression and is a potential prognostic marker in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:1081-1093.

11. van Horssen R, Hollestelle A, Rens JA et al. E-cadherin promotor methylation and mutation are inversely related to motility capacity of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136:365-377.

12. Kumarswamy R, Mudduluru G, Ceppi P et al. MicroRNA-30a inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by targeting Snai1 and is downregulated in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:2044-2053.

13. Shih JY, Yang PC. The EMT regulator slug and lung carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

(29)

14. Dhasarathy A, Phadke D, Mav D, Shah RR, Wade PA. The transcription factors Snail and Slug activate the transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26514.

15. Runkle EA, Mu D. Tight junction proteins: from barrier to tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 2013;337:41-48.

16. Martinez-Estrada OM, Culleres A, Soriano FX et al. The transcription factors Slug and Snail act as repressors of Claudin-1 expression in epithelial cells. Biochem J.

2006;394:449-457.

17. Olson MF, Sahai E. The actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell motility. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26:273-287.

18. Li A, Morton JP, Ma Y et al. Fascin is regulated by slug, promotes progression of pancreatic cancer in mice, and is associated with patient outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1386-1396.

19. Tomaskovic-Crook E, Thompson EW, Thiery JP. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:213.

20. Liu Z, Chen L, Zhang X, Xu X, Xing H, Zhang Y, Li W, Yu H, Zeng J, Jia J. RUNX3 regulates vimentin expression via miR-30a during epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:610-623.

21. Liu Z, Tu K, Liu Q. Effects of microRNA-30a on migration, invasion and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:3089-3097.

22. Huang J, Yao X, Zhang J, Dong B, Chen Q, Xue W, Liu D, Huang Y. Hypoxia-induced downregulation of miR-30c promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1609-1617.

23. Zhang K, Chen D, Jiao X et al. Slug enhances invasion ability of pancreatic cancer cells through upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Lab Invest. 2011;91:426-438.

24. Machesky LM, Li A. Fascin: Invasive filopodia promoting metastasis. Commun Integr Biol. 2010;3:263-270.

25. Vignjevic D, Kojima S, Aratyn Y et al. Role of fascin in filopodial protrusion. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:863-875.

26. Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu CG et al. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7065-7070.

27. Nassa G, Tarallo R, Giurato G et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of human breast cancer cell proteome by unliganded estrogen receptor beta via microRNAs. Mol Cell 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

(30)

Proteomics. 2014;13:1076-1090.

28. Zhu H, Wu H, Liu X et al. Regulation of autophagy by a beclin 1-targeted microRNA, miR-30a, in cancer cells. Autophagy. 2009;5:816-823.

29. Zou Z, Wu L, Ding H et al. MicroRNA-30a sensitizes tumor cells to cis-platinum via suppressing beclin 1-mediated autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:4148-4156.

30. Zhong M, Bian Z, Wu Z. miR-30a suppresses cell migration and invasion through downregulation of PIK3CD in colorectal carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;31:209-218.

31. Zhang N, Wang X, Huo Q et al. MicroRNA-30a suppresses breast tumor growth and metastasis by targeting metadherin. Oncogene. 2014;33:3119-3128.

32. Ouzounova M, Vuong T, Ancey PB et al. MicroRNA miR-30 family regulates non-attachment growth of breast cancer cells. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:139.

33. Nichols LA, Grunz-Borgmann EA, Wang X, Parrish AR. A role for the age-dependent loss of alpha(E)-catenin in regulation of N-cadherin expression and cell migration. Physiol Rep 2014;2:pii,e12039.

34. Chu HW, Cheng CW, Chou WC et al. A novel estrogen receptor-microRNA 190a-PAR-1-pathway regulates breast cancer progression, a finding initially suggested by genome-wide analysis of loci associated with lymph-node metastasis. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:355-367.

35. Euhus DM, Hudd C, LaRegina MC, Johnson FE. Tumor measurement in the nude mouse. J Surg Oncol. 1986;31:229-234.

36. Cheng CW, Liu YF, Yu JC et al. Prognostic significance of cyclin D1, beta-catenin, and MTA1 in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4129-4139.

37. Cheng CW, Yu JC, Wang HW et al. The clinical implications of MMP-11 and CK-20 expression in human breast cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:234-241.

38. Hasan MR, Sharma R, Saraya A et al. Slug is a predictor of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82846. 39. Lee TK, Poon RT, Man K et al. Fascin over-expression is associated with

aggressiveness of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2007;254:308-315.

40. Singletary SE, Connolly JL. Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:37-47.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

(31)

FIGURE LEGENDS

Figure 1: Decreased miR-30a levels in metastatic breast cancer. (A) Comparison of miR-30a levels among normal breast epithelial cells (H184B5F5/M10 and MCF-10A) and breast cancer cell lines that are non-metastatic (BT-474 and MCF-7) or metastatic (Hs578T and MDA-MB-231). miR-30a was quantified by TaqMan real-time PCR, and the relative levels of miR-30a were normalized to RNU6B. (B) Lentiviral transduction with plemiR-30a and subsequent miR-30a overexpression in breast cancer cell lines. miR-30a levels are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. (C) Western blot showing protein expression of plemiR-30a in E-cadherin–deficient breast cancer cell lines in (B), with -actin as the loading control. (D) Representative images of the phenotypic change from mesenchymal to cobblestone-like epithelial cells in MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells transfected with plemiR-30a or plemiR (negative control). Scale bar = 50 μm. (E) Representative phenotypic change in MCF-7 cells transfected with an inhibitor against miR-30a (anti-miR-30a) and negative control (NC) (F) Representative scratch/wound healing assay images for MCF-7 cells were taken at 0 and 24 hr after scarification. (G) Quantification of wound healing area for MCF-7 cells as in (F). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD from triplicate experiments. ***P < 0.001 compared with the control group.

Figure 2: Identification of Slug as a downstream target for miR-30a. (A) Predicted 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(32)

binding sites for miR-30a within the 3’-UTR of Slug mRNA. The 3’-UTR of Slug contains two binding regions for miR-30a (in red) across different vertebrate species. (B) Schematic representation of the luciferase reporter constructs showing the

sequences at sites 1 and 2 of the three mutants (shown in red) with a mismatch of the miR-30a complementary sequence at site 1 (Slug UTR/mut1), site 2 (Slug 3’-UTR/mut2), or both sites (Slug 3’-UTR/mut3). The wild-type miR-30a-binding sequences are underlined. (C) Luciferase activity was evaluated in Hs578T cells expressing the constructs shown in (B). Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and compared with the expression in cells transfected with the pcDNA3 empty vector (control). Data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (D) Western blot showing Slug expression in breast cancer cell lines transfected with plemiR-30a. β-actin was used as the loading control.

Figure 3: Claudin expression is enhanced by the miR-30a/Slug axis. (A) Schematic of the E-boxes in the promoter regions of human CLDN1, CLDN2, and CLDN3 genes. The starting point (+1) indicates the transcription initiation in the open reading frame (ORF) of the gene. (B) Western blotting (anti-Slug) of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lysates after lentiviral transduction of miR-30a (left panel). PCR analysis of the genes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(33)

encoding CLDN-1, -2, and -3 after ChIP in the presence of anti-Slug or anti-IgG from control MDA-MB-231/plemiR cells (con) and MDA-MB-231/plemiR-30a cells (right panel). (C) Western blotting revealed that Slug and fascin expression in miR-30a– overexpressing cells following miR-30a knockdown (anti-miR-30a) was inversely correlated with claudin expression. NC, negative control. (D) Microfilaments in MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells expressing plemiR-30a or the control construct plemiR were detected with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated phalloidin (green) as indicated by red

arrows. (E) The number of filopodial tips per cell as averaged from 50 cells per condition was calculated. The data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ***P < 0.001. (F) Expression of CLDN-1, -2, or -3 (green) was distributed around the cell boundary (white arrowheads) in breast cancer cell clones stably

expressing miR-30a, but not in those expressing plemiR. Nuclei were counterstained in (D) and (F) with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 μm.

Figure 4: miR-30a decreases the invasiveness of breast cancer cells. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with plemiR or plemiR-30 and then treated with miR-30a inhibitor (anti-miR-30a) or underwent Slug knockdown with a Slug-specific short hairpin RNA (sh-Slug) or sh-Luc, a control shRNA. The cells were plated in modified Boyden chambers with polycarbonate membranes containing Matrigel and cultured for 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(34)

12 h. Cells were then fixed, stained with Gisema soluation, and photographed (×200). Upper panel: Images show cells that invaded through the pores onto the lower side of the filter. Lower panel: The invading cells were counted in eight randomly chosen microscope fields. Data are shown as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (B) Reduced Slug and fascin expression, but increased claudin levels, as determined by western blot analysis, in MDA-MB-231 cells expressing plemiR-30a or Slug, as compared with controls plemiR or shRNA-Luc, respectively. In addition, Slug and fascin protein levels were restored in plemiR-30a–expressing/MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with anti-miR-30a. β-actin was the loading control. (C) Knockdown of Slug notably decreases the invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells, whereas overexpression of miR-30a fails to abrogate the reduced frequency of invasion for sh-Slug/MDA-MB-231 cells. (D) The expression of Slug, fascin, and claudins was also analyzed by western blotting. β-actin was the loading control.

Figure 5: Ectopic expression of miR-30a inhibits tumor growth and metastatic lung colonization of breast cancer xenografts. (A) Representative lungs and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of metastatic tumor (M) and normal (N) lung tissues from mice 5 weeks after tail vein injection of MDA-MB-231 cells

overexpressing miR-30a or plemiR vector (control). (B) Number of metastatic nodules 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

(35)

in lungs of mice (n = 5 per group) as in (A). (C) Reduced tumor volumes in fat pads of nude mice injected with MDA-MB-231 cells stably overexpressing miR-30a or the control plemiR. The red arrows indicate tumors. (D) Xenograft tumor volumes from mice as in (C). Data represent the mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001. (E) Photographs of representative mice at 5 weeks post-xenotransplantation. Tumors were excised and sectioned and are shown with HE staining and specific staining for expression of Slug, fascin, and claudins, including CLDN-1, -2, and -3. Scale bar = 25 μm.

Figure 6: Correlation between miR-30a and EMT markers. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze mRNA expression data from 86 patients with breast cancer. (A) Positive correlation between miR-30a and epithelial marker gene CLDN2. (B) Inverse correlation between miR-30a and mesenchymal marker gene FSCN (C) Inverse correlation between CLDN2 and FSCN. The relative expression of each mRNA was calculated using the comparative CT method as in Materials and methods.

Figure 7: miR-30a inhibits EMT by targeting Slug. (A) The cellular phenotype of miR-30alow/Slughigh/Fascinhigh/Claudinlow correlates with poor clinicopathological features in breast cancer. Immunostaining results for paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue samples of negative early-stage tumors (stage I; columns a and b) and LNM-positive and advanced-stage tumors (stages III and IV; columns c and d). HE denotes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

(36)

hematoxylin and eosin staining. In addition, the T/N ratio for miR-30a was <0.50 in columns c and d and was ≥0.50 in columns a and b. Clinicopathological features of the tumors were determined according to the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual . (B) Schematic representation of the tumor-suppressor role of miR-30a relative to its inhibition of EMT. The targeting of Slug mRNA by miR-30 results in

downregulation of fascin and upregulation of the tight junction proteins CLDN-1, CLDN-2, and CLDN-3, which leads to downregulation of EMT and, ultimately, to a reduced rate of breast cancer progression.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(37)

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

Supplementary Figure S1: Prediction of the sequences within Snail mRNAs

targeted by 30 family members. Computational algorithm results show that miR-30 family members share the same seed sequence, which targets the 3’-UTRs of Snail and Slug.

Supplementary Figure S2: Snail as a downstream target of miR-30a. Three algorithms, miRanda, miRWalk, and TargetScan, were used to identify putative

interaction sites between Snail 3’-UTR and miR-30a. The consensus binding site in the

Snail mRNA is shown. Expression of miR-30a reduced the activity of the luciferase

gene fused to the Snail 3’-UTR by >20%, supporting the notion that miR-30a downregulates Snail levels by targeting the 3’-UTR of the mRNA. Snail 3’-UTR construct and pcDNA3 as control (Ctrl).

Supplementary Table S1: Immunohistochemical analysis of Slug, Fascin, and

Claudins stratified by miR-30a expression levels in association with clinicopathological features of breast cancer

Supplementary Table S2: Oligonucleotide primers used in this study 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

參考文獻

相關文件

神經性膀胱及腸道功能障礙之復健(Rehabilitation of the Neurogenic Bladder and Bowel

6 《中論·觀因緣品》,《佛藏要籍選刊》第 9 冊,上海古籍出版社 1994 年版,第 1

The first row shows the eyespot with white inner ring, black middle ring, and yellow outer ring in Bicyclus anynana.. The second row provides the eyespot with black inner ring

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise,

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or

An elementary energy method is introduced in [18] based on a macro-micro decomposition of the equation into macroscopic and microscopic components to analyze the

Figure 6 shows the relationship between the increment ∆y and the differential dy: ∆y represents the change in height of the curve y = f(x) and dy represents the change in height