www.nature.com/scientificreports
Plasmonic Gold Nanorods
Coverage Influence on
Enhancement of the
Photoluminescence of
Two-Dimensional MoS
2
Monolayer
Kevin C. J. Lee1, Yi-Huan Chen1, Hsiang-Yu Lin1,2, Chia-Chin Cheng3, Pei-Ying Chen5,
Ting-Yi Wu1,2, Min-Hsiung Shih1,2,6, Kung-Hwa Wei3, Lain-Jong Li4 & Chien-Wen Chang5
The 2-D transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductors, has received great attention due to its excellent optical and electronic properties and potential applications in field-effect transistors, light emitting and sensing devices. Recently surface plasmon enhanced photoluminescence (PL) of the weak 2-D TMD atomic layers was developed to realize the potential optoelectronic devices. However, we noticed that the enhancement would not increase monotonically with increasing of metal plasmonic objects and the emission drop after the certain coverage. This study presents the optimized PL enhancement of a monolayer MoS2 in the presence of gold (Au) nanorods. A localized
surface plasmon wave of Au nanorods that generated around the monolayer MoS2 can provide
resonance wavelength overlapping with that of the MoS2 gain spectrum. These spatial and spectral
overlapping between the localized surface plasmon polariton waves and that from MoS2 emission
drastically enhanced the light emission from the MoS2 monolayer. We gave a simple model and
physical interpretations to explain the phenomena. The plasmonic Au nanostructures approach provides a valuable avenue to enhancing the emitting efficiency of the 2-D nano-materials and their devices for the future optoelectronic devices and systems.
Two-dimensional materials have received considerable attention, mainly because of their unusual phys-ical properties compared with their 3-D bulk forms. Graphene, the most famous member of the 2-D material family, exhibits excellent optical, electronic and mechanical properties such as transparency, conductivity, thermal dissipation and elasticity, and has been used in various applications1–12. However,
the lack of a band gap in its pristine form has prompted a broad research for other 2-D semiconductor materials13. The 2-D transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductor with electronic properties
and a potential range of applications complementary to those of graphene, has recently attracted consid-erable attention14. Recently surface plasmon enhanced luminescence of the weak 2-D TMD atomic layers
was investigated and reported to realize the next generation ulra-thin, flexible photonic and electronic devices15–18. However, the enhancement would not increase monotonically with increasing of plasmonic
1Research Center of Applied Sciences (RCAS), Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. 2Department of Photonics,
National Chiao Tung University (NCTU), Hsinchu, 30010, Taiwan. 3Department of Materials Science & Engineering,
National Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, 30010, Taiwan. 4Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah
University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 5Department of
Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University (NTHU), Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan. 6Department of Photonics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, 804, Taiwan. Correspondence and
requests for materials should be addressed to M.H.S. (email: mhshih@gate.sinica.edu.tw) received: 08 July 2015
Accepted: 13 October 2015 Published: 17 November 2015
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
objects such as metal nanoparticles or resonators. Because overlapping between nanorods’ effective enhanced area and absorption of gold nanorods, the emission from the 2-D monolayers would decrease once the density of nanorods (or the number of nanorods within the pumping area) reaches the opti-mum value. In this study, we investigated metal coverage influence on PL of 2-D TMD monolayer, and achieve a high plasmon enhancement by optimizing the coverage of gold (Au) nanorods on the top of a molybdenum disulfide monolayer. The simple physical model was also illustrated to explain the behavior of plasmon enhancement in the 2-D TMD monolayer.
Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) crystals that form hexagonal lattices are composed of vertically stacked
weak van der Waals bonded S-Mo-S units. Because of low friction, the bulk form of MoS2 is widely used as
a solid lubricant in the industry19. Recently the MoS
2 crystal has been thinned to low-dimensional
nano-materials, and its novel physical phenomena and many potential applications were reported13,14,18,20–34.
Since the distinctive photoluminescence (PL) was observed in 2-D MoS2 nanosheets, it became a
poten-tial gain material for the ultrathin, flexible, and transparent optoelectronic devices. The PL emission efficiency of the MoS2 gradually increases as the layer thickness decreases. However, one main bottleneck
of low-dimensional MoS2 is their relatively lower light emission. The quantum yield of the monolayer
MoS2 was reported to be approximately 4 × 10−3. Furthermore, the quantum yield of MoS2 is no more
than the order of 10−5 when it possesses slightly over two layers, because of the behavior of their indirect
band gap25. Hence, light enhancement in the monolayer MoS
2 is critical for realizing the light emitters
with the MoS2 gain material. Previous research has shown that the main peak intensity during tri-layer
MoS2 PL spectra exhibits approximately two-fold enhancements through the application of a biaxial
com-pressive strain24. And also, manipulating the dielectric environment of 2D-materials to enhance emission
is proven to a viable method35. On the other hand, surface plasmonics owing to metal nanostructures
had received huge attentions from researchers and scientists in various fields36–49. The surface plasmon
wave, an electromagnetic wave generated in the interface between a dielectric medium and a metal layer upon irradiation, has the unique optical properties, because of the extremely strong light concentration in subwavelength metallic structures. The special optical waves had been applied to the advanced optical emitters, nanoscale optical antennas, ultra-compact plasmonic lasers, and optical trapping in a solar cell. Recent reports have shown numerous classic examples of surface plasmon enhanced PL in conventional luminescent materials such as ZnO46, GaN47, and InGaN48. In addition, recent studies utilizing silver
plasmonic nanodisc arrays to enhance the emission of MoS2 showed that SPR enhancement is a
promis-ing way16. However, they did not discuss the density of metallic plasmonic structures to the enhancement
of MoS2 emission. In the study, we demonstrated photoluminescence enhancement of monolayer MoS2
using plasmonic Gold (Au) nanorods. Figure 1 shows the schematic structure of a monolayer MoS2 and
an Au nanorod. Through a careful selection of a suitable Au nanorod with a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) frequency matched the direct band gap of MoS2 (1.86 eV), the localized surface plasmon wave
induced by the Au nanorod can spatially and spectrally be overlapped with the emission of a single-layer MoS2. This strong coupling leads to a large enhancement in the photoluminescence. As the density
increases, we observed a decaying phenomenon of SPR enhancement. Therefore the nanorod density have to be optimized to achieve the high optical emission from the 2-D TMDC nanosheet. In the end, we will give a simple physical explanation to the decaying process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing optical enhancement from the gold nanorods with strongly localized surface plasmon waves around the nanorod’s ends and MoS2 interface (White spots). The
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Results
The growth of the monolayer MoS2 is based on the vapor phase reaction between MoO3 and S as reported
by the previous studies21–23. Figure 2(a) shows the optical images of a monolayer MoS
2 placed on the
sapphire substrate. The size of the triangular MoS2 nanosheet is approximately 5 to 20 μ m.
We investigated the optical properties of single-layered MoS2 by Raman and PL, where the
measure-ments were performed in a Jobin-Yvon Horiba HR800 micro-Raman spectroscope at room temperature. Raman spectroscopy is a common tool for determining the precise number of layers in MoS2 sheets.
Figure 2(b) showed that two distinguished Raman peaks, in-plane (E1
2g approximately 385 cm−1) and
vertical-plane (A1g approximately 405 cm−1) vibrations of Mo-S bonds in MoS2. The frequency difference
Δ between these two modes was 20 cm−1. The photoluminescence of monolayer MoS
2 was also measured
with peak emission wavelength around 670 nm. Raman and PL signals of our MoS2 were both consistent
with literature values.
To achieve the emission enhancement of the MoS2 nanosheets, we incorporated Au nanorods that
have the local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) around 670 nm wavelength into the devices. The Au nanorods were synthesized with excellent dispersibility in various organic solvents, including tetrahydro-furan and chloroform. With the nanorod preparation procedure, the gold nanorods can be coated on the top surface of MoS2 nanosheets without aggregation, and prevent the decoration effect from the small
gold nanoparticles on the MoS2 monolayer50,51.
In the experiments, we used a toluene suspension of gold nanorods as an optical absorber, and the averaged size of these Au nanorods is 57 nm in length and 25 nm in diameter. Figure 3(a) shows the trans-mission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the high density Au nanorods in the solvant. To under-stand the optical absorption of the Au nanorods, the nanorods were spin coated on a double-polished sapphire substrate, and were then examined in a spectral range of 480–830 nm wavelength by using a tungsten–halogen source. The black curve in Fig. 3(b) shows the absorption spectrum of the Au nanorods measured by the monochromator. The broad longitudinal surface plasmon resonance of the nanorods mainly covers the wavelength from 600 to 800 nm. The red curve in Fig. 3(b) displays the PL spectrum of the monolayer MoS2 with an emission peak approximately 670 nm, which has an overlapping with the
LSPR spectrum of the Au nanorods. When the energy transfers from the excitons in the MoS2 material
to the metal nanorods through localized surface plasmon coupling, a fast luminescence decay produces an internal quantum efficiency enhancement49. The minor peak around 700 nm is the extra signal from
sapphire substrate22.
To understand the LSPR of the small gold nanorod, a finite-element method (FEM) was chosen to simulate the optical properties of the LSPR waves of the gold nanorod. Figure 3(c) shows the calculated spatial distribution of the electric field intensity around a gold nanorod on the sapphire substrate. The optical mapping showed that high enhancement occurs in the vicinity of the nanorod, and that strongly Figure 2. (a) Optical images of the MoS2 monolayer in the sapphire substrate. (b) Raman spectra for the
MoS2 monolayer grown on sapphire substrates (excitation laser: 488 nm). (c) PL spectrum of monolayer
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
localized optical modes propagated along the longitudinal direction at the interface of the Au and the substrate. Since the type local surface plasmonic resonances are very close to MoS2 monolayer, the
cou-pling of the local plasmonic waves and the MoS2 emission could be much stronger. The type high-Q,
long propagation length LSPR can enhance the optical emission within a small footprint, and had been applied in the ultra-compact surface plasmon nanolasers36,38,39. Therefore, the spectral and spatial
over-lapping between the gold nanorods LSPR waves and the MoS2 nanosheets’ emission lead to the strongly
enhancement in the spontaneous emission from the single-layer MoS2.
The gold nanorods in the toluene solvent with different concentrations were prepared, and then directly spin-coated on the top surface of the MoS2 monolayer. The aggregation of gold nanorods was
not observed thanks to the nanorod decoration procedure, and the nanorod area density on the MoS2
nanosheet was controlled from zero to 120 μ m−2 by varying the nanorod solution concentrations in the
experiment. Figure 4(a) shows the SEM images of the nanorods on the top of the MoS2 with the densities
of 25, 40, 60 and 90 μ m−2. The MoS
2 device with the gold nanorods was first characterized under the
same optical pumping conditions. Figure 4(b) shows the measured PL spectra from the MoS2 with the
different gold nanorod densities. These results indicate that the PL intensity of the MoS2 monolayer can
be gradually enhanced by increasing the density of gold nanorods within the range of 0 to 40 μ m−2. The
redshift in the PL spectra of the MoS2 is attributed to the slice mismatch in wavelength between MoS2
emission (~670 nm) and Au nanorod resonance (~695 nm). This could be reduced if nanorod plasmonic waves matched perfectly with MoS2 emission in wavelength. Figure 4(c) shows that the PL-enhanced
intensity as a function of the gold nanorod density on the top of the monolayer MoS2. However, the
trend of PL enhancement gradually declined as the density of gold nanorods exceeded 40 μ m−2. During
the experiment, the Au nanorods were always placed on the top of MoS2. Since the thickness of the MoS2
monolayer is only 0.7 nm, the MoS2 would form the wrinkled surface if we placed the MoS2 on top of
the Au nanorods (25 nm diameter and 57 nm length). The wrinkled MoS2 nanosheet would introduce
the defects and the non-uniform stress, which might lead to wavelength shift and degraded intensity26.
The enhancement and decline of PL enhancement can be explained by external quantum efficiency of MoS2. For convenience, we consider the enhancement factor of emission instead of the actual count
values of our experiments. First, we consider the internal quantum efficiency of our light emission Figure 3. (a) TEM image illustrating the gold nanorods with a 57-nm length and 25-nm width on average.
(b) The extinction spectra of gold nanorods on the sapphire substrate and the PL spectra of the MoS2
monolayer grown on the sapphire substrate. (c) Calculated near-field optical intensity map of a gold nanorod with a length of 57 nm and width of 25 nm laying on the sapphire substrate.
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
material, monolayer MoS2. We can write down the original internal quantum efficiency, ηint, without any
Au nanorods. η ω ω ω ω ( ) = ( ) ( ) + − ( ) ( ) k k k 1 int rad
rad non rad
krad and knon rad− are radiative and non-radiative recombination rates, respectively. The PL signal we
measured is proportional to the external quantum efficiency of the material. Therefore, we need to add another light-extraction efficiency term, Cext, into our equation in the following way.
ηext=Cext×ηint( )ω ( )2
When we dispersed Au nanorods onto the MoS2, two factors affect to the light emission. The first one is
the coupling between nanorod LSPR and the MoS2 emission. The second factor is the shielding effect
cause by the Au nanorods on the top of nanosheet. With a single nanorod LSPR coupling, we can modify the internal quantum efficiency with nanorods, ηint⁎, in this form.
η ω ω ω ω ω = ( ) + ′ ( ) ( ) + − ( ) + ( ) ( ) ⁎ k C k k k k 3
int rad ext LSPR
rad non rad LSPR
′
Cext is the probability of photon extraction from LSP’s energy, and it’s dependent on the roughness and structure of our plasmonic material. kLSPR is the coupling rate between MoS2 and Au nanorods. This
LSPR coupling results in an increase of spontaneous emission rate, and then further enhances the mate-rial’s internal quantum efficiency, η⁎
int48.
However, the enhancement begins to drop as the nanorods density exceeds 40 μ m−2. This phenomena
can be explained by a simple modification of the light extraction efficiency. We consider that there are “n” nanorods inside our pumping area, “A”. And the nanrod’s length and radius are “l” and “r”, respec-tively. Each nanorod at the surface of MoS2 would somehow block the light emission. As a consequence,
the modified light extraction efficiency should be written as Cext⁎ =Cext
(
1− n l× ×A 2r ×a)
. We define×
× ×
"n lA 2r a" as the correction term of light extraction efficiency. And " "a is defined as the correction factor of the enhanced area. We will explain this parameter in detail later. As we increase the density of Figure 4. (a) SEM images of the gold nanords on the monolayer MoS2 with different densities. (b) The
PL spectra of MoS2 with different gold nanorod densities. (c) The measured PL peak intensities of the
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
nanorods inside our pumping area, the internal quantum efficiency, η⁎⁎
int, would increase and eventually
saturate. So the overall effect from dispersing nanorods onto our MoS2 to the external quantum efficiency
can be summarized as following.
ηext⁎ =Cext⁎ ×ηint⁎⁎ ( )4
η ω ω ω ω ω = ( ) + ′ ( ) ( ) + − ( ) + ( ) ( ) ⁎⁎ k nC k k k nk 5
int rad ext LSPR
rad non rad LSPR
η η = ( ) ⁎ Enhancement factor 6 ext ext
When the density of Au nanorods is low, the η⁎⁎
int term would dominate the overall external quantum
efficiency. Therefore, the PL enhancement factor is increasing as the density increases. However, as the density has reached certain level, 40 μ m−2 in our experiment, the light extraction efficiency term starts
to take over the overall external quantum efficiency, which is blocking emission from MoS2. Since Au
metal itself will absorb the emission from MoS2, the same situation occurs when the density of Au
nano-rods is too high. We can imagine it is similar to deposit a gold film onto our device and shield all the light. And the outcome was that the enhancement is declining. Figure 5(a) is the fitting results of mon-olayer MoS2 based on previous equation. For convenience, we assume ′Cext, probability of photon
extrac-tion from LSP’s energy, to be 1. Although ′Cext cannot be 1 in the real case, it does not influence our final
results very much. The inset table of Fig. 5(a) is the fitting parameters. We can check these parameters are reasonable or not. First, we utilized the LSPR to enhance the light emission of MoS2. If we calculate
our results for number of nanorods, 15, the internal quantum efficiency is 0.0146, which is larger than the original reported value, 4 × 10−325.
Now we consider the correction factor of enhanced area, " "a . If we consider the light absorption of
gold nanorods, this factor should not exceed 1. Because the thickest part of nanorod is its diameter, Figure 5. (a) Simulation results of enhancement factor to gold nanorod’s density. Right hand side table
is the fitted parameters. (b) Configuration 1 is the situation that there is no overlapping of enhanced area between two gold nanorods. “W” and “L” are the enhanced area’s width and length, respectively. The equation on the bottom of the figure is the calculated external light extraction efficiency. (c) Configuration 2 is the extreme case that the two gold nanorods are just next to each other. “w” is the diameter of the gold nanorod.
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
25 nm. This value is still penetrable for visible light. Therefore, it should be a number between 0 and 1. From equation (1), we can easily observe that the decaying process is dominated by the light extraction efficiency, C⁎
ext. If the decaying process is not fast enough with respect to the density of nanorods, this
model cannot match our experimental results. We can give a physical interpretation as following. There are two possible physical phenomenon can be the primary causes of enhancement. First one has been mentioned in the previous paragraph, which is the increment of internal quantum efficiency. Second is the emitter characteristic of gold nanorod. In this case, the nanorod served as an antenna to concentrate output light from underneath material52. The combined effects will be an effective enhanced area
corre-sponding to each plasmonic structure.
Figure 5(b,c) show the schematic diagrams of enhanced area and nanorod. Blue rectangle represents the enhanced area of a nanorod. Configuration 1 shows the situation that there is no overlapping between enhanced area of two nanorods. Configuration 2 shows the extreme case that the two nanorods are next to each other. From extraction efficiency factors of both cases, we can see that it’s obvious the " "a factor
would exceed one in the configuration 2. If we divide the Configuration 2’s correction term,
+
wl WL wL2 , with
Configuration 1’s, wl
WL, we get =a WL wLWL+ >1
2 . Therefore, the overall effect of decaying process of
enhancement can be attributed to the overlapping between enhanced area of nanorods and the blocking by nanorods. The effective enhanced area of single nanorod would be .0 187 mµ 2. And our laser pumping
area is of diameter, 2 μ m. If we assume all the nanorods aligned properly and there is no enhanced area overlapping, about 16 nanorods would fill up the excitation area. And our decaying phenomena occurred at density of 40 μ m−2, which is larger than the calculated value, indicated that the excitation area is
over-whelmingly filled up with nanorods. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect a decaying in the enhancement factor. To confirm the metal object coverage effect in the MoS2 emission, we also prepared the MoS2
nanosheet coated with Au nanoparticles, which its LSPR wavelength is far away from the MoS2 emission
wavelength (see supplemental information). In the case, the MoS2 emission was degraded as the
nano-particle density increased due to the shielding effect cause by the Au nanonano-particles.
In our experiment, the nanorod area density was controlled between 5 to 120 μ m−2 . The Au nanorods
covered less than 20% of surface area, which is relatively low coverage. But it is worth to note that, under high nanorod density situation, the extra plasmonic waves could be generated due to the plasmonic wave coupling of the nanorods. The extra plasmonic waves might cause other effects for MoS2 emission. We
also observed the enhancement of the Raman signal of the MoS2 nanosheet with the Au nanorods (please
refer supplemental information).
Conclusion
In conclusion, we reported localized surface plasmon-enhanced PL of a monolayer MoS2 in the presence
of gold nanorods that can be synthesized in large quantities. The light emission from a monolayer MoS2
gradually increased with the area density of gold nanorods up to 40 μ m−2. However, the enhancement
decreased when the Au nanorod density was more than 40 μ m−2, because of the absorption of Au
nano-rods and overlapping of enhanced area. Therefore the nanorod density optimization is critical and nec-essary to obtain the maximum emission out from the 2-D TMDC nanosheet. A simple physical model was also illustrated to explain the optimum nanorod density for enhancing the emission from MoS2.
The maximal PL enhancement factor due to the presence of these gold nanorods was approximately 6.5-fold. We note that if the main emission peak position of MoS2 completely overlaps the longitudinal
resonant peak of gold nanorods, its intensity can be further enhanced. In addition, if the short axis of nanorod can be fine-tuned properly, we can match the short axis’ resonance to the excitation wavelength and enhance the absorption resulting in even more emission enhancement. Utilizing gold nanoparti-cles is a non-invasive and reliable way to enhance emission of MoS2. In comparison with traditional
lift-off method with evaporated metal nanostrutures, the synthesized gold nanorods have better plas-monic property. And dispersing gold nanorods is lithography free. Since dispersing gold nanorods onto MoS2 is a physical enhancing method, this method can be integrated with other platforms such as 2-D
materials-based LED and laser systems53,54. Our work gives an economic and easy way to enhance the
emission of the few layers transition metal dichalcogenides.
Methods
CVD Growth of MoS2 monolayer. The growth of the monolayer MoS2 is based on the vapor phase
reaction between MoO3 and S as reported in the previous studies21,22.
Gold nanorod preparation. The Au nanorods were synthesized using the seed-mediated method in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as the shape-directing agent. To render gold nanorods soluble in an organic environment, thiolated poly(ethylene glycol) was used to replace the protective CTAB bilayer on the surface of the gold nanorods. The gold nanorods were then centri-fuged at 15000 rpm for 20 min, and the free CTAB-containing supernatant was discarded. Gold nanorods pellets were re-dispersed in deionized water. Centrifugation or the washing step was repeated twice. To synthesize pegylated gold nanorods, mPEG5000-SH (2 mg/mL) was added to the gold nanorod solu-tion before it underwent sonicasolu-tion for 1.5 h at 50 °C. The reacsolu-tion was left at room temperature over-night. The as-synthesized PEGylated gold nanorods exhibited excellent dispersibility in various organic
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
solvents, including tetrahydrofuran and chloroform. The thickness of the PEG layer on the nanorods would be approximately 5 nm, which is the distance between nanorods and MoS2 monolayer. Therefore
the coupling between MoS2 emission and NR plasmonic waves is very strong, which leads to the strong
enhancement in PL.
Characterization. Raman spectra and photoluminescence measurement were performed in a Jobin-Yvon Horiba HR800 micro-Raman spectroscope at room temperature. All spectroscopy meas-urements were obtained with a confocal microscopy setup in a back-scattering geometry using a CW DPSS laser, at a wavelength of 488 nm (the spot size of the laser was approximately 2 μ m in diameter). To prevent sample overheating, an excitation power of 20 μ W below the microscope objective lens was normally injected on the MoS2.
References
1. Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 306, 666–669, doi: 10.1126/science.1102896 (2004).
2. He, Q. et al. Centimeter-Long and Large-Scale Micropatterns of Reduced Graphene Oxide Films: Fabrication and Sensing Applications. ACS Nano 4, 3201–3208, doi: 10.1021/nn100780v (2010).
3. Hong, T.-K., Lee, D. W., Choi, H. J., Shin, H. S. & Kim, B.-S. Transparent, Flexible Conducting Hybrid Multilayer Thin Films of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes with Graphene Nanosheets. ACS Nano 4, 3861–3868, doi: 10.1021/nn100897g (2010). 4. Zeng, M., Feng, Y. & Liang, G. Graphene-based Spin Caloritronics. Nano Letters 11, 1369–1373, doi: 10.1021/nl2000049 (2011). 5. Suk, J. W., Piner, R. D., An, J. & Ruoff, R. S. Mechanical Properties of Monolayer Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano 4, 6557–6564, doi:
10.1021/nn101781v (2010).
6. Zhang, Y. et al. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature 459, 820–823, doi: 10.1038/ nature08105 (2009).
7. Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T. & Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nat Photon 4, 611–622 (2010). 8. Lee, J., Novoselov, K. S. & Shin, H. S. Interaction between Metal and Graphene: Dependence on the Layer Number of Graphene.
ACS Nano 5, 608–612, doi: 10.1021/nn103004c (2010).
9. Tang, L., Ji, R., Li, X., Teng, K. S. & Lau, S. P. Size-Dependent Structural and Optical Characteristics of Glucose-Derived Graphene Quantum Dots. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 30, 523–531, doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201200131 (2013).
10. Liu, Z. et al. The Application of Highly Doped Single-Layer Graphene as the Top Electrodes of Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells. ACS Nano 6, 810–818, doi: 10.1021/nn204675r (2011).
11. Balandin, A. A. et al. Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene. Nano Letters 8, 902–907, doi: 10.1021/nl0731872 (2008).
12. Shih, M.-H. et al. Efficient Heat Dissipation of Photonic Crystal Microcavity by Monolayer Graphene. ACS Nano 7, 10818–10824, doi: 10.1021/nn404097s (2013).
13. Tongay, S. et al. Thermally Driven Crossover from Indirect toward Direct Bandgap in 2D Semiconductors: MoSe2 versus MoS2.
Nano Letters 12, 5576–5580, doi: 10.1021/nl302584w (2012).
14. Lopez-Sanchez, O. et al. Light Generation and Harvesting in a van der Waals Heterostructure. ACS Nano 8, 3042–3048, doi: 10.1021/nn500480u (2014).
15. Akselrod, G. M. et al. Leveraging Nanocavity Harmonics for Control of Optical Processes in 2D Semiconductors. Nano Lett 15, 3578–3584, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01062 (2015).
16. Butun, S., Tongay, S. & Aydin, K. Enhanced Light Emission from Large-Area Monolayer MoS2 Using Plasmonic Nanodisc Arrays. Nano Lett 15, 2700–2704, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00407 (2015).
17. Lee, B. et al. Fano Resonance and Spectrally Modified Photoluminescence Enhancement in Monolayer MoS2 Integrated with Plasmonic Nanoantenna Array. Nano Lett 15, 3646–3653, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01563 (2015).
18. Sobhani, A. et al. Enhancing the photocurrent and photoluminescence of single crystal monolayer MoS2 with resonant plasmonic nanoshells. Applied Physics Letters 104, 031112, doi: 10.1063/1.4862745 (2014).
19. Kim, Y., Huang, J. L. & Lieber, C. M. Characterization of nanometer scale wear and oxidation of transition metal dichalcogenide lubricants by atomic force microscopy. Applied Physics Letters 59, 3404–3406, doi: 10.1063/1.105689 (1991).
20. Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2. Nano Letters 10, 1271–1275, doi: 10.1021/nl903868w
(2010).
21. Lee, Y.-H. et al. Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition. Advanced Materials 24, 2320–2325, doi: 10.1002/adma.201104798 (2012).
22. Liu, K.-K. et al. Growth of Large-Area and Highly Crystalline MoS2 Thin Layers on Insulating Substrates. Nano Letters 12,
1538–1544, doi: 10.1021/nl2043612 (2012).
23. Liu, K.-K. et al. Growth of Large-Area and Highly Crystalline MoS2 Thin Layers on Insulating Substrates. Nano Letters 12,
1538–1544, doi: 10.1021/nl2043612 (2012).
24. Jariwala, D., Sangwan, V. K., Lauhon, L. J., Marks, T. J. & Hersam, M. C. Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 8, 1102–1120, doi: 10.1021/nn500064s (2014).
25. Mak, K., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Physical Review Letters
105, 136805 (2010).
26. Hui, Y. Y. et al. Exceptional tunability of band energy in a compressively strained trilayer MoS2 sheet. ACS Nano 7, 7126–7131,
doi: 10.1021/nn4024834 (2013).
27. Yin, Z. et al. Au Nanoparticle-Modified MoS2 Nanosheet-Based Photoelectrochemical Cells for Water Splitting. Small 10,
3537–3543, doi: 10.1002/smll.201400124 (2014).
28. Castellanos-Gomez, A. et al. Laser-Thinning of MoS2: On Demand Generation of a Single-Layer Semiconductor. Nano Letters
12, 3187–3192, doi: 10.1021/nl301164v (2012).
29. Zhang, W. et al. High-gain phototransistors based on a CVD MoS2 monolayer. Adv Mater 25, 3456–3461, doi: 10.1002/
adma.201301244 (2013).
30. Shi, Y. et al. van der Waals Epitaxy of MoS2 Layers Using Graphene As Growth Templates. Nano Letters 12, 2784–2791, doi:
10.1021/nl204562j (2012).
31. Lin, Y.-C. et al. Wafer-scale MoS2 thin layers prepared by MoO3 sulfurization. Nanoscale 4, 6637–6641, doi: 10.1039/C2NR31833D
(2012).
32. Zhu, C. et al. Single-Layer MoS2-Based Nanoprobes for Homogeneous Detection of Biomolecules. Journal of the American
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
33. Lin, J., Li, H., Zhang, H. & Chen, W. Plasmonic enhancement of photocurrent in MoS2 field-effect-transistor. Applied Physics
Letters 102, 203109, doi: 10.1063/1.4807658 (2013).
34. Sundaram, R. S. et al. Electroluminescence in single layer MoS2. Nano Lett 13, 1416–1421, doi: 10.1021/nl400516a (2013).
35. Lien, D. H. et al. Engineering light outcoupling in 2D materials. Nano Lett 15, 1356–1361, doi: 10.1021/nl504632u (2015). 36. Hill, M. T. et al. Lasing in metallic-coated nanocavities. Nature Photonics 1, 589–594, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.171 (2007). 37. Tanaka, K., Plum, E., Ou, J., Uchino, T. & Zheludev, N. Multifold Enhancement of Quantum Dot Luminescence in Plasmonic
Metamaterials. Physical Review Letters 105, 227403 (2010).
38. Oulton, R. F. et al. Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale. Nature 461, 629–632, doi: 10.1038/nature08364 (2009). 39. Noginov, M. A. et al. Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser. Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
40. Lassiter, J. B. et al. Fano resonances in plasmonic nanoclusters: geometrical and chemical tunability. Nano Lett 10, 3184–3189, doi: 10.1021/nl102108u (2010).
41. Fang, Z. et al. Graphene-Antenna Sandwich Photodetector. Nano Letters 12, 3808–3813, doi: 10.1021/nl301774e (2012). 42. Kaelberer, T., Fedotov, V. A., Papasimakis, N., Tsai, D. P. & Zheludev, N. I. Toroidal Dipolar Response in a Metamaterial. Science
330, 1510–1512, doi: 10.1126/science.1197172 (2010).
43. Chang, C. M. et al. Three-Dimensional Plasmonic Micro Projector for Light Manipulation. Advanced Materials 25, 1118–1123, doi: 10.1002/adma.201203308 (2013).
44. Cheng, C.-W. et al. Wide-angle polarization independent infrared broadband absorbers based on metallic multi-sized disk arrays.
Opt. Express 20, 10376–10381, doi: 10.1364/OE.20.010376 (2012).
45. Cheng, C.-W. et al. Angle-independent plasmonic infrared band-stop reflective filter based on the Ag/SiO2/Ag T-shaped array.
Opt. Lett. 36, 1440–1442, doi: 10.1364/OL.36.001440 (2011).
46. Saravanan, K., Panigrahi, B. K., Krishnan, R. & Nair, K. G. M. Surface plasmon enhanced photoluminescence and Raman scattering of ultra thin ZnO-Au hybrid nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Physics 113, 033512, doi: 10.1063/1.4776654 (2013). 47. Jang, L.-W. et al. Localized surface plasmon enhanced quantum efficiency of InGaN/GaN quantum wells by Ag/SiO2 nanoparticles.
Opt. Express 20, 2116–2123, doi: 10.1364/OE.20.002116 (2012).
48. Okamoto, K. et al. Surface-plasmon-enhanced light emitters based on InGaN quantum wells. Nat Mater 3, 601–605 (2004). 49. Khatua, S. et al. Resonant Plasmonic Enhancement of Single-Molecule Fluorescence by Individual Gold Nanorods. ACS Nano 8,
4440–4449, doi: 10.1021/nn406434y (2014).
50. Shi, Y. et al. Selective Decoration of Au Nanoparticles on Monolayer MoS2 Single Crystals. Sci. Rep. 3, doi: 10.1038/srep01839
(2013).
51. Bhanu, U., Islam, M. R., Tetard, L. & Khondaker, S. I. Photoluminescence quenching in gold - MoS2 hybrid nanoflakes. Scientific
Reports 4, 5575, doi: 10.1038/srep05575 (2014).
52. Gu, X., Qiu, T., Zhang, W. & Chu, P. K. Light-emitting diodes enhanced by localized surface plasmon resonance. Nanoscale Res
Lett 6, 199, doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-199 (2011).
53. Ross, J. S. et al. Electrically tunable excitonic light-emitting diodes based on monolayer WSe2 p-n junctions. Nat Nanotechnol 9,
268–272, doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.26 (2014).
54. Wu, S. et al. Monolayer semiconductor nanocavity lasers with ultralow thresholds. Nature 520, 69–72, doi: 10.1038/nature14290 (2015).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank to the Center for NanoScience and Technology in National Chiao Tung University (NCTU) for the fabrication facilities. This work was supported by the Nano-program of Academia Sinica and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under the contract numbers NSC 99-2112-M-001-033-MY3 and NSC 102-2112-M-001-019-MY3.
Author Contributions
M.H.S., K.C.J.L., Y.H.C., H.Y.L. and T.Y.W. designed and performed the experiments. C.C.C., L.J.L. and K.H.W. contributed to the 2-D material preparations. P.Y.C. and C.W.C. contributed to the gold nanoparticle and nanorod preparation. M.H.S. and L.J.L. planned and supervised the study. All authors wrote and reviewed the manuscript.
Additional Information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/srep Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. How to cite this article: Lee, K. C. J. et al. Plasmonic Gold Nanorods Coverage Influence on
Enhancement of the Photoluminescence of Two-Dimensional MoS2 Monolayer. Sci. Rep. 5, 16374; doi:
10.1038/srep16374 (2015).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Com-mons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
