華人面對自己或重要他人死亡威脅之後續因應 - 政大學術集成
全文
(2) x D. B. =·. d = =. E. u. =. B. 」」 E. B. S. B. =. 政 治= 大 =· BB. 立. &1 3 04(. ‧ 國. 學. <. io. y. al. D. [ =. n. S. < <. C<h B. B. <. <b. engchi. i <n U. v. <. <. <. <. <. B. < <. <. <. <. < .6&(. r B. b. r. =. =. u. BF. = <. S. < =. = <. B. er. =. <. ‧. b=. ) - ,. <. g. =. Nat. /1./.2 ,. B. sit. =. B. =. = I. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(3) ” b. b =. b. J. B x. b. b. =. J. =. S. b. =. b. x. 3. B. <. x2. b 119. = b. 政 治 b大. = b <. D =60. 3. <. M. io. al. b. n. =. b. er. Nat =. <. y. a. b. ‧. x3 ·. b. <. sit. b. =. 學. ‧ 國. a. 立b. Ch b. engchi <. i n U. v. b<. I. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(4) Abstract Terror Management Theory originated from the West which proposes that people manage their terror of death by defending their own cultural worldview. The present research employed two studies to examine how Chinese people manage the deathrelated anxiety of themselves and from their significant others. In Study 1, 119 participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (Manipulation: self mortality salience, mortality salience of significant other, or self toothache) x 2 (Comment of Chinese Culture: Praise or Criticism) factorial design. The dependent measure was how well an individual is defending the cultural values. The results indicated that participants who experienced the mortality salience of significant other had a significant tendency to. 政 治 大 experienced self mortality salience. In Study 2, we explored how Chinese people cope 立. defend the Chinese cultural values, and this tendency is higher than participants who with the mortality salience by employing three types of behavior: enjoy life,. ‧ 國. 學. maintaining important interpersonal relationships and doing good deeds. 60 Participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (Manipulation: self mortality salience,. ‧. mortality salience of significant other, or self toothache) x 3 (behavior type: enjoy life,. y. Nat. maintaining important interpersonal relationships or doing good deeds) mixed design.. sit. The experimental manipulation was a between-subjects variable, the behavioral type. er. io. was a within-subjects variable, and the dependent variable was the participant’s degree. al. v i n experienced Cthe salience of significant h emortality ngchi U n. of willingness to engage in different types behavior. As a result, it was found that participants who. other were. significantly less willing to do good deeds. These implications were also discussed. Keywords: motality salience, Chinese culture, significant other, Terror Management Theory. II. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(5) B. B. b b b. D. b. B. 立. [. ‧. ‧ 國. y. Nat. io. sit. M. 學. B. 政 治 大. n. al. er. D. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. III. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(6) 3. ”. ”. ”. ”. 政 治 大 ”. 立. ‧ 國. 學. ”. ‧ y. Nat. n. er. io. al. sit. ”. Ch. engchi. i n ”U. v. ”. ” C. FC. o. IV. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(7) q ” D. 立. 政 治 大. ”. ‧ 國. 學 ”. ‧. o. er. io. sit. y. Nat D. iv n U ”. n. al. Ch. engchi. a a. ” b b. ”. F ” F. V. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(8) ” M M. b b. ”. ”. ”. 立. 政 治 大 ”. ‧ 國. 學. 。 ”. y. Nat. sit. 。. er. io. 。. al. n 。. ‧. 。. 。. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 。. VI. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(9) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. VII. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(10) B. ·. b. <. B =. 》. b. B. =. S. b. x. = Terror Management Theory B. = = 政 J治 大. 立 =. ‧ 國. F ·. ‧ sit. y. =. = · b b. n. al. Ch. S. b. er. io. b x. ,. B. b. b. B. b. Nat. J. b. F. b= b. b. J. 學. 「. x. F b. J. x. b. engchi. i n Ub. v. b. u. b. = J. S. b. b. <a. S. B. =. E. b x b. =. J. b. B. b b. b · b b. 1. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(11) b b. = D. <. b. B. b. b. =. 立. 政 治 大. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. a. b. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(12) B B. b. b. b. =. B =B. S b. x. J. b. = D. b. B. t. x S. =. 政 治 大. 立. Greenberg, Pyszczynski. =. J. J. Ernest Becker. y. b. al. b. B. sit. J. n. 1989. b. ‧. J. io. =. B. 學. Becker 2007. Terror. b. Nat. =. ‧ 國. Management Theory. Solomon. B. er. 1986. Ch. i n U. S. engchi. v 、=. Rosenblatt<Greenberg<Solomon<Pyszczynski. Lyon. A. A. c. A=. B B. 。. q= B. b. “ =. b S. D b. S =. J. o =. J ·. 3. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(13) E [. S. = 1990. Greenberg. b. =·. culture worldview B. J. =. <. = J. J. 立J. ·. ‧ 國. e Greenberg et.al, 1990 E. u. Lambert et.al, 2014 = ·. b. n. al. sit. Greenberg, 1995. J. er. io. b. E. y. Nat. J. b. ‧. J. =. 學. J. 政 治 大. Ch. S. e= ngchi. i·v n U. J ·. S the Fear of Death Scale. = S. A. S. nx. A “. Rosenblatt et al., 1989. b. S. F · u. F. F 4. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(14) J. b. J. b. Arndt, Greenberg, Pyszczynski, & Solomon, 1997 = u. ·. S. = , Harihara, & Niiya, 2002. Heine,. b. S. S. Wakimoto, 2006 =. ·. M S Kökdemir,& Yeniçeri, 2010 =. M. 2010. = 治 政 大 164 Faucher. Burke<Martens. 立. 277. r = 0.26. ] J. ,. b r = 0.37 =u. y. sit. al. n Tam<Chiu. Ch. Lau. = B. i n U. b. engchi. b J. J. 、 b. J J. J. =. =. b b. Hui. B M. b b. b=. b. v. b. J B. t. er. io. 2007. ‧. r =0.35. Nat. =. 學. = 0.30. r. =. ‧ 國. ·. b. 2014. b=. 1259. l. x. =. l. b. 5. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(15) B l b B. =. B. b. J. E. ·. b. Hui, Chan, Lau, Cheung, & Mok, 2014 = S. = b. 2004. i. b. b. =. 政 治 大t. 立. ,. =. ‧ 國. S =. sit. y. B. al. n. A. Ch. S. A engchi U. A. v ni. = B. A. b. er. io. A. b. ‧. 2008 =. Nat. 2007. =. J. 學. =2008. i<. b. 。 J. A u. b. b. 2009 =. < b. J. =. M. b. M. b =. ·. =. M. S Yen, &. 6. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(16) Cheng, 2010 = PsycARTICLEs< 18. < 9. 4. <5. ] 24. b r. 0.055. 0. =. ]. r = 0.27. · r = -0.01; Yen, & Cheng, 2010 =. J. t. b. = b. 立. b. u. J =. sit. Ch. v. Rosenblatt et.al,1989 =. n. al. er. io. S. A b. b. y. MA. ‧. b<. Nat A. = <J. A. b. =. 學. i<. ‧ 國. b. 政 治 大 b ·. e n g=c h i. i n U. A. A. E 1984 =. S. b 1995 =. S d. b. b. b b. =. b b. B. M b. =. 7. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(17) b b. b. F. x. b. S. b. Kitayama (1991) b. b. =. b. =Markus. b. <. b M. b. bS. F b. b. =. 政 治 大1993. <. 立. =. b. ‧ 國. b. M. al. n b 1991. i n U. b. Ch. b. b. v. engchi b. b. b. =x b. b b. b. 2005 =. <. = < =. er. io. sit. y. Nat. b. b. b. b. 2005 =. FA. ‧. b. A. b. 學. ·. b. < b =1993. b. =. b. b s= B b. <. b. bA. 2011 =. A S. b b. Zhu Zhang Fan & Han 2007 =. B b b. =. b b. ]. b= =. 8. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(18) b b. bS. J Greenberg, Pyszczynski, Solomon,. Simon, & Breus, 1994. b b. b. J = b. 政 治 大 < Wang, 2014 =2016 Paudel. b. 立. ‧ 國. =. b. b. n. al. Ch. b. Hui. = b. b. sit. b. er. io. S. =. y. BMW. Nat. o. b. ‧. B. b. 學. BMW. =B. engchi. i n U. v. b. b 2014. <. B. <. r. l b. E. l= 2012. M. b b. b. b n. =. b. b b. J. b =. 9. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(19) D. b. b b. b. =. =. b. x. d. b. b. F. b. =. 7. ?. b. 治? S 政 」 大. a E. =. =. 立. b. Blascovich. b. Nat. a. a. n. al. Ch. b. <. er. io. sit. y. b. b. e n=g c h i U. v ni A. <. =. S. A. b. a 2014. M. ‧. Ma-Kellams. b. 學. 2012. A 1999. b =. A. =. ‧ 國. A. b. =. Wang. b Wang, 2014 = b. b a. b. ba =. d. a uS. b a. ·. 10. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(20) b. B. b. ─. =. 9.6. b. 23.8. J. ─. b. <. 1999 =. 2009. b 33. <. <. S. 45. =. <. <. b. 70. b <. b. 立. =. <. 政 治 大. Baumeister, & Leary, 1995. ‧ 國. <. b. Paudel, 2016 =. b b. J. b. S. n. al. b. =. Ch. b. engchi. b. E. er. io. b. sit. y. Nat. b. b. b. =. ‧. b. =. 學. b. B. i n U. v. <. b. b. = b. a. b. b = b b. b. = <. 2012 =. S. < 2002. <. <. 2014 =. 11. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(21) 2004. b. b bf. <. < B. =. b = b. b = 2014. <. S = b. b. F 2004 =. < b. 學. b. b. ‧. =. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. b. 立. 政 治 大b. ‧ 國. A. ?. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 12. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(22) b. x b. J. t. =. <. b. Tam, Chiu, & Mok, 2014. Lau, 2007. S. Hui, Chan, Lau, Cheung,. b. b. d. i. = b. u. b. J. d. ‧ 國. M n. b. sit. v ni. J. n. al. er. io. b. b. Ch. S. b. e n g c h i Ub. b b. F =. D. 2012. =. Wang, 2014; Paudel, 2016 b. <. y. Nat. b. S. b. b b. b. =. B. =. <. ‧. b. =. 學. b. b. 治 政 b b大. 立. b b. J. b. b. b a. =. < b. Wang, 2014 =S. b b Blascovich, 2012 = b. b. a S. Ma-Kellams, b. a. 13. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(23) 1999 = a. —. S. b. u b. b. =. B. b. E=. bS b. b. bFBJ. b. =. b. b. =. b b. b. =. B. b. b J 政 治 大 D. <. B. 。. = B. b. B. b. =. =. D. sit. y. Nat. B. n =. ‧. B. 學. ‧ 國. 立 b. b. b. io. b. n. al b. er. F. Ch. e n g c h ibU. J =. v ni. b. = <. b. n. q. b. = b. D. a. M. D. x. <. b =. 14. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(24) D. B. B<. B. ·B. ·. b. b. J. b. b b. i. J. b S. 。. b. b. 治 政 大 =. b. 立. 。. B. er. io. sit. y. Nat. =. B. ‧. B. ‧ 國. 1.. 學. <. =. =. n. al. Ch. 2.. engchi. <. b. i = n U. v. b=. 3. “. =. b. b. B. b b. b. S b b. =. b b. S =. b =” 15. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(25) b B. 9. bt. =B b S. c. B. c. b. b. S B. b. B. =. =. i. bB. =:. 4. 。 B. B =. B. 立=. 政 治 大. 8. <. ‧ 國. ‧ y. Nat. 7.55 SD=1.55. io. =. n. al. 9. 3.23 SD=1.65. 9. Ch. 5. engchi. i n U. v. S =. M=4.74, SD=2.59. S. M=5.84, SD=1.97, t=2.05, p = .05 t=2.39, p = .02 = <. 5. er. A. sit. =. 1=. =. 學. 5.. 9. S <. <. E. =. 16. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(26) 1. t. ”. 3. = <. <. Nat. =. n. er. io. sit. y. <. al. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 8. Ch. engchi. S 2. *. 政 治 大. 立. <. ). iv n U 2=. B. =. ”. ). *. 17. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(27) D<. 1. 3. <. b. x2. = S. b. = 2. 1. b. J. 立. 2:. b. ‧ 國. b. b. y. Nat. 36 b. io. =. n. al. 4.. Ch. engchi. 83 b=. sit. 119. b. ‧. 3.. =. 學. =. b. 政 治 大 b. 」. er. b. b. i n U. v. Greenberg et. = al.,1990; Harmon-Jones et al., 1997 =. b =. J. S. b =. FB F A. b. J. =1. 18. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(28) c. =2.. F. = b. A. b. =1.. F /. /. /. B. /. c. =2.. c. J. F. F = Greenberg et al., 1994 =. B B. B. ·. <. =1.. c. 政 治 大=. F. 立. n. ‧ 國. 學. Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Solomon, 1999 =. —. =. n. al. J. B. er. io. sit. y. b. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 。. =. F 3. q Tellegen, 1988 = 。. b. b. Nat =. b. ‧. F. =2.. PANAS; Watson, Clark, &. M Heine, Harihara, & Niiya, 2002 =. 。. n. A4. B. 3. n. E 4<. 5=. b B. 6=. 。. 19. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(29) 5.. 。. 。 2. 7. q 1.. ( 2. 7=. ; 1=. i (. / 7=. ; 1=. i. = 。. < 7=. 治 政 2009 大. 立. [. (·. )=。. B. ‧ 國. 學. =. 2009. [. ‧. B. =. n. a。l. Zhou, Lei, Marley,. Ch. =. Chen. er. io. 2009. sit. y. Nat. =. 2012. =. engchi. i n U. v. B. ·. [ =. 。 b. b. Cronbach’s α b. .69. i .88 <. 。. Cronbach’s α Cronbach’s α. i. Cronbach’s α D. b. .65. .72. .73. .85. .78 <. .74. 6. 6. 1 <y. 。. n. <. 1991. 2= 。. 20. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(30) = 。 b. b. 8. 9. 。. F 1<. 2<. 3<. 4<. 5<. 6<. 7<. 8<. b F. 政 治 大=. b. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. al. n. b. ·. D. B = B. Ch. b. 1990. b. sit. <. io. B. Greenberg. =. y. J. ‧. B. ·. er. 6.. engchi. iv n U =. 。. F. = F. 3. = F. n. B. B 9. q=. Bo. 。 =. 。 ·. =. 21. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(31) <. 1.. 3 <. x2. b. M 3<. 4. · 4. = 4. d=0.86. 立. =. · 政 治 大. ‧ 國. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. b. t=6.64, p < .00, Cohen’s. 學. 3. t. 4. Ch. e n g c h”i. i n U. v. ). *. 3. /. < 。 11=. M 22. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(32) 3 <. x2. b. F=15.68, p. M < 0.00. M. =. M. b. 5< 5. 立. ‧ 國. ‧ F. n. al. er. =. io. 6. i. y. i. sit. Nat. F. 政 治 大. 學. b. 6=. C”h. engchi. i n U. v. 5. 23. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(33) M <. =. 7. 政 治 大. ”. 立. ). *. ‧ 國. ‧ y. sit. n. al. er. io <. /. 學. Nat /. =. 3. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. M. b. =. 9. b. F. i. F. i. /. 24. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(34) ”. ). 2.. *. 3. M b. b <. ‧ 國. 學. x2. b. <. < i <. <. i. <. <. nx. er. al. <. sit. <. y. Analysis of Covariance,. n. x2. <. ‧. <. io. 3. =. 3. Nat. ANCOVA. <. 政 治 大. 立. f. /. Ch. e n gMc h i. i n U. v. =. M=7.00 M=5.76. F(1,119)=17.43, p < 0.00 =. 11. b. F. i. F. i. / 25. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(35) 12. ”. ). 3 x2. 立. <. 政 治 大 <. ‧ 國. io. n. Ch. y. sit. S M=4.19. M=2.48; ·. er. b. =. ANCOVA =. ‧. Nat. p = 0.01. <. u. M=3.59. al. b. < i <. 學. M. /. <. F(2,119)=4.561, p=0.01. p = 0.05 ;. 3. *. S. engchi U. M=2.82;. v ni. 13. b. F. i. F. i. /. 26. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(36) 14. ”. ). *. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 0.63 p < 0.01. i. 3. = x2. b. < i <. /. 政 治 大. 立. <. 3. <. < <. < i <. nx. f =. <. 3. x2 M. 27. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(37) M=6.08 M=5.29. F(1,119)=18.33, p = 0.00 =. 15. b. F. i. F. /. 立. 16. i. 政 治 大 ”. *. 3. /. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. ). n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. i n U. e<n g c h i. v. D Cronbach’s α. 0.90. i. =. 3. <. x2. b. < <. < i < <. < < i <. < 3. nx x2. = 17<. M. 18=. 28. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(38) 17. b. 政 治 大” ). 18. 立. *. ‧ 國. ‧ y. sit. n. al. er. io. ·. 19. Ch. C. = 20. /. 學. Nat. 3.. 3. engchi. =. i n U. v. F F. C. t. =. 29. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(39) 19. C. 政 治 大. /. = F. ‧. E =. /. 學. ‧ 國. 立. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 20. /. /. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. =. E. F =. C B. KMO. o. p<0.00 = F. 0.88 Bartlett. FC. b. C. Cronbach’s α. 0.78. = 30. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(40) 21. FC. o. o. b <. 立 <. 政 治 大. b. < i <. <. p = 0.13. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 F(2,62)=2.10. M. F(2,62)=2.62 p = 0.08. p = 0.04. n. al. 23. Ch. er. io E. ·. sit. M=6.25. y. Nat. M=5.11. b. =. engchi. i n U. v. q. b. q =F p<0.05=. 3.77 i. 2.33. 31. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(41) 24 ”. ). [<. b. 政 治 大 b t. b b =. 立. ‧ 國. 學 b. b. ‧. b b. Nat. al. u. n. =. b. Ch. =. engchi. sit. io b. S. b b. b. er. =. y. S. b. i n U. v. b b = E b. b. =. 32. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(42) B<. b a. D. <. b. b. b =. b. a. <. b. B b. b. ·. =. 政 治 大. <. 立. b. y. er. n. al. 24 b=. sit. 7b. <. io. 3.. <. =. Nat. 31. a. ‧. 2.. 。. 學. ‧ 國. 1.. Ch. e n g=c h i. i n UD. v. a. <. 6. b ·. A =. 7. 1. 7. a = 8=. D 4. D 7. D i. 4. 25=. 33. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(43) 25. D. a. a 《. 2/. b M. b. D<. 1.. 立. 政 治 大 <. 53. a. 學. ‧ 國. 3. <. =. =. sit er. al. n. a. io. 3:. y. Nat. 2.. b. ‧. ·. b. b. C= h. n U engchi. iv. u a. b =. 4. b. b. S. b. =. b b. =. b. b = 5. b. =. b. 34. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(44) b = 3. 60 1b. 3b. 56 b. b. 18 b. ·. 38 b=. 4.. B=. 立. 9. ‧ 國. 學. n. D 政 B治 大=. B=. io. sit. y. Nat. al. n. B=. er. 。. ‧. 5.. 。. Ch. engchi. 2008. i n U. v. < α=0.61. 6. 1. 6. 。. n. = 。. = 。 a. <. b. D 9. D. 35. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(45) q. i. 10=. F. 6.. B F. J B. =. D. B. <. b q= 。. n = 9. B =. Bo. 立. n. q. 政 。治 大 ·. 。 = =. 1.. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. <. 。. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat <. b. D 27=. F. Ch. i n U. v. e n g(F(2,53)=1.53, chi p = 0.23). t. 26<. M=4.86. 4 (t=5.23, p < 0.00, d=0.99) = 26. b. 36. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(46) 27. ). *. <. 3. /. b <. 。 7=. 立. ‧ 國. ‧. =. y. M=2.72. n. al. M=4.11. Ch. engchi. ps < 0.05. er. io 28. D. sit. M=4.68. b. <. F(2,53)=6.45, p=0.00. Nat. F. 學. b. 政 D 治 大F. i n U. v. b. F. /. 37. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(47) 29. ). *. M=2.23. b M=2.90. 立. M=3.06 p < 0.01 = 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. b. sit. y. Nat. /. io. n. al. er. F. Ch. engchi. i n U. ). v. ”. *. 3. /. F(2,56)=5.23, p = .01. M. M=2.10. /. F(2,56)=10.12, p < 0.00. M. b. 3. M=2.81 M=2.18; p < 0.05 =. 38. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(48) b. F. /. 立. ). *. ‧ 國. y. sit er. a9l. n. <. b. B. 《. spa<. M. Ch. engchi. i n U. <. v. = <. KMO. o. 0.61. Bartlett. 《. 9a spa: 9 r = 0.44. : 9M. : r = 0.42. a. :. 34. p < 0.00. =. 9. <. b. 0.50. 9. B. b< D. 9. /. ‧. io D. 3. 學. M. a. ”. Nat. 2.. 政 治 大. b b:<9. : Cronbach’s. :D 39. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(49) α = 0.83 =. 34. o 34. o. o a 《. 2/. M. b. 35. ‧ 國. M. 2/. b. 8 《 2/. ‧. a. 立. 學. a. 《. 35 政 治 大. 8. n. al. Ch. er. io. M. sit. y. Nat. 8 8. engchi. i n U. v. 8. b. 8 8. 3 x3. b. a. MANOVA =. <. <. < <. b. ·. <. 40. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(50) <. <. 3. nx = u. <. x3. M. M M=6.36. a M=5.89. p = .09 =. p = .10. M. b M=6.37. a M=5.19. D. u. p = .04 =. F. D. =. D. D = D. 立. b. a. Nat. /. io. n. al. sit. i. er. F. ”. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. b. 政 治 大. Ch. e n g) c h i. i n U. v. 3. /. /. a. a. 41. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(51) <. b <. <. <. <. <. <. a. nx =. F(2,56)=1.01, p = 0.37 =. M 38. a. b. 立. 39 a. 政 治 大 ” ). *. ‧ 國. ‧ y. sit. n. a lb Ch <. er. io. b. <. /. 學. Nat. b. 3. <. <. e< ngchi <. i n U. v. <. b. nx =. M. F(2,56)=.17,. p = .84 = 40. b. b. 42. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(52) 41. b. ”. ). 3. *. /. A B <. b <. 立. <. nx. 學. F(2,56)=1.54, p = .23 =. M. b. ‧. M=5.05. M=5.83. < <. =. ‧ 國. <. 政 治 大. <. = F. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 42. b. Ch. engchi. 43. i n U. v. ”. ). 3. /. A B <. b. 43. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(53) <. <. <. <. <. <. B nx. = F(2,56)=4.22, p = 0.02. M. b M=4.26. M=5.61 p = 0.03. M=5.95. p = .01 = 44. F. 立. 政 治 大. F. y. ‧. /. Nat. io. sit. ”. ). n. al. 3. Ch. engchi. i n U. M. v. bA B <. b <. <. <. <. <. <. M. b. nx M b. /. er. 45. 學. ‧ 國. b. B =. F(2,56)=1.52, p = .23 M=6.26 M M=7.11. u b. S p = .10 =. 44. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(54) 46. M. b. b. 47 M. b. ”. ). 政 治 大. 學. ‧ 國. 立. b<. io. n F(2,56)=3.19, p=.05. Ch. <. <. <. i n U. =. engchi. y. <. sit. Nat. al. /. D. ‧. <. er. M. 3. v. < nx M. b. M=5.19. M=6.19 M=6.30. p < 0.05 =. 48. b. F. /. i. 45. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(55) 49. ”. ). *. B. e. b. 政 治 大. 立. E. = B. =. ‧. al. β= .14, p = .40. n. e. 。. Ch. E. e= ngchi. e. i n U e. v. b. b. 。. e= 1. b e. sit. 。. er. io. β= -.35, p = .03. β=. y. D. Nat. -.03, p = .84. 0. B. β= -.33, p = .04. β= .17, p = .31. e 1. b e. =. 學. ‧ 國. e. e. =. 0 β= -.38, p = .02. B β= .52, p = .00. D. β= -.03, p = .84 β= -.31, p = .10. 。 =-.70 , p = .49 = e. Sobel test. e. β. z = -.69, p = .49. = 46. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(56) S. e. =. B 1. b e. e. =. 0 β=. B β= .39, p = .02. -.33, p = .04. β= -.24, p = .08. D. β= -.32, p = .07. 。 β=-.02 , p = .49 = z = -.14, p = .89. Sobel test e. e. =. e. b 0 政 治 β= -.38,大 p = .02. 1 B. D. β= -.24, p = .08. y. sit. io. E. S. e. n. al. Ch. b. er. =. β= -.24, p = .17 =. z = -1.27, p = 0.20. e. Nat. e. β= -.27, p = .12. 。. ‧. Sobel test. =. 學. ‧ 國. 立β= .45, p = .01. e. e n g=c h i. i n U. v. [<. b 。. B. b. E. bt. b. =. D. a. b. =u b. D E. =. 47. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(57) b E. 立. =. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 48. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(58) [ b b. J. x. =. B. b b. b. ·. =. b a. b <. b. b. D B. 政 治 b大. ‧ y. J. Yen, & Cheng, 2010. sit. 2004. J. n. al. S. b b. Ch. b. b. er. io. b. b. M. b. Nat. =. B. b. 學. ‧ 國. = 立. B. b. i n U. e< ngchi J b. v. B. = M. E. = b b. B. b. S Greenberg et.al,1990. Yen, & Cheng, 2010 =. b 49. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(59) S b. b E. b. = =. 。. b. J. E. =. b. St b. b. ‧ 國. ‧. J J. n. al. b. sit. =. b. y. b. io. S. 2008 =. =. Nat. b. d. 學. b. =. 政 治 大. 立. b. b. u. er. f. =. v. Greenberg, Pyszczynski, Solomon, Simon, & Breus, 1994 = b. b. i n Cbh e n g c h ibU b. b. =. b. b <. B. < b. 2015 =2009. b. Hui. Fung. b. u. b. E. = b. =. 50. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(60) b. b. b. b. b. b. b. u. = t. b. b b. b. A. b. 、 2017 b. b. <. =. =. ‧. ‧ 國. E. 學. b. 立. S. A. 政 治 大. n. u. x. Ch. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. i n U. b. engchi. v. i. b b =. E. bS b. = =. Lykins, Segerstrom, Averill, Evans. Kemeny b. 2007 = 2004. 2001. 911 B. 51. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(61) b. < J. =. F. 。. B. D. 。. = S. A. b. A. =. 。. <. < B. 。. S. ·. [. <. =. io. n. al. sit. ·. =. y. ‧. Nat. F. =. 49. er. [. N. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 治 x 政 =2016 大 7x7. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. n u. 。. F. B 2015 =2004. < Samboceti. f. Cozzolino. Staples. Meyers. A death reflection b. b =. B. B. 52. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(62) 20. 9. ……” A mortality salience. A A ·. b. F. A b. b. F. =S b. x. b. b. b. b S. b. J. 立. 。. b. b. ‧ 國. =S. b 。. < E. =. b. B=. n. al. u b. M C h. D. J. engchi. i b n U. t. b. <. S. er. io. sit. Nat. M. ‧. b. E. t. 學. M. =. 政 治 大. y. 。. =. bJ. = J. b. v. D. B. A. b. =. b E b. B. b. x. =. 53. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(63) i. b. J. b. N. 立. 學. ‧ 國. x. 政 治 大. b. H. ‧. b. b. y. Nat. io. i. al. n b. ?. sit. b. er. x. Ch. engchi. 9. bi n U. vb. :. b. b. p. 54. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(64) ?. =. b. b. b. b. B. ?. b. =. y. sit. n. al. =. b. er. io. b. o ?. Nat. ─. 立. i. ‧. b. b b 政 治 大 ?. 學. 。. ‧ 國. y. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 」 B H. b. b. 55. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(65) i B =. Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997). Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science, 8(5), 379-385. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for. 政 治 大. interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological. 立. bulletin, 117, 497.. ‧ 國. 學. Becker, E. (2007). The denial of death. Simon and Schuster.. Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality. ‧. and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-195.. y. Nat. Cozzolino, P. J., Staples, A. D., Meyers, L. S., & Samboceti, J. (2004). Greed, death,. sit. and values: From terror management to transcendence management theory.. er. io. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 278-292.. al. n. v i n C h management theory. of a need for self-esteem: A terror e n g c h i U Public self and private. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences self, 189, 189-212.. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(2), 308-318. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 627. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 627. 56. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(66) Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Harmon-Jones, E., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1995). Testing alternative explanations for mortality salience effects: Terror management, value accessibility, or worrisome thoughts?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 417-433. Heine, S. J., Harihara, M., & Niiya, Y. (2002). Terror management in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(3), 187-196. Hui, C. H., Chan, S. W., Lau, E. Y., Cheung, S. F., & Mok, D. S. Y. (2014). The role of religion in moderating the impact of life events on material life goals: Some evidence in support of terror management theory. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17(1), 52-61. Hui, V. K. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2008). Mortality anxiety as a function of intrinsic. 治 政 大in a Predominantly Muslim Kökdemir, D., & Yeniçeri, Z. (2010). Terror Management 立 Country. European Psychologist. religiosity and perceived purpose in life. Death Studies, 33(1), 30-50.. ‧ 國. 學. Lambert, A. J., Eadeh, F. R., Peak, S. A., Scherer, L. D., Schott, J. P., & Slochower, J. M. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the. ‧. mortality salience manipulation: Revisiting the “affect-free” claim of terror management research. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(5),. sit. y. Nat. 655.. er. io. Lykins, E. L., Segerstrom, S. C., Averill, A. J., Evans, D. R., & Kemeny, M. E. (2007). Goal shifts following reminders of mortality: Reconciling posttraumatic. n. al. Ch. i n U. v. growth and terror management theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1088-1099.. engchi. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224. Martin, I. M., & Kamins, M. A. (2010). An application of terror management theory in the design of social and health-related anti-smoking appeals. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 172-190. Ma-Kellams, C., & Blascovich, J. (2012). Enjoying life in the face of death: East– West differences in responses to mortality salience. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103(5), 773. Paudel, R. (2016). Mortality salience and product evaluation: role of self versus loved ones. Editorial review board members, 20(3), 100.. 57. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(67) Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. Psychological review, 106(4), 835. Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(4), 681. Tam, K. P., Chiu, C., & Lau, I. Y. (2007). Terror management among Chinese: Worldview defence and intergroup bias in resource allocation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 93-102. Wakimoto, R. (2006). Mortality salience effects on modesty and relative self-. 政 治 大 Wang, Y. (2014). The Divergent Effects of Mortality Salience of Self versus 立 Mortality Salience of a Loved One on Materialistic Consumption. Journal of Research for Consumers, 26, 106-130.. 學. ‧ 國. effacement. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 176-183.. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.. Nat. y. ‧. measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of. sit. Yen, C. L., & Cheng, C. P. (2010). Terror management among Taiwanese:. er. io. Worldview defence or resigning to fate? Asian Journal of Social. al. Psychology, 13(3), 185-194.. n. v i n Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, basis of cultural influence on C hS. (2007). Neural U i e h n c g1310-1316. self-representation. Neuroimage, 34(3), Zhou, X., Lei, Q., Marley, S. C., & Chen, J. (2009). Existential function of babies: Babies as a buffer of death-related anxiety. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 40-46.. 58. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(68) 1 b. B. B. x. B g. 9. =F =. b. B. =. b b b b. S. =. b =:. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. C. b hBe n g c h i. B b. b. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 9. S. b b. bS S B. i n U. v. bt. c. =B c. b. B. = bB. b. b =. b. ·. = i. =:. 59. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(69) b. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 60. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(70) b. x. B. g. 9 b. ·. =. b B. bt. B. bS. b. =F. c. S B. =B c. b. B. =. = bB. i. =:. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. b b. al. b. b. n. =. =. S. er. io. b b. B. sit. b. y. ‧. Nat. 9. b. Ch. b. b. e=n g c h i. i n U. v. S b =:. b. 61. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(71) 2. i. 。. 5 3. 5. 2. 7 b,. b. EF=. =. ,. B. =. 政 治 大 =. 立. c. =. y =. n. al. sit. E. er. io. b. ‧. =. Nat. B. 學. ‧ 國. bB. Ch. e n=g c h i. i n U. v. =. F,. o. bM. =. B. =. =. 62. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(72) ,. ,S. =. b. =. ,. S. b. B. o. 立. =. =. 政 治 大 b. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. =. io. n. a=l. sit. B. y. ‧. =. c. er. i. ,. 」. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. =. =. B. =. 63. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(73) 3. B. 4 7. 6 5. 1. F =. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 sit. y. Nat. io. n. al. er. =. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1<2 =. 64. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(74) 1<2 =. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 65. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(75) 4 7. FB. 7. 6. 5. 1. f. b F. E. /. b. 立. =. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 E. y. Nat. n. al. =. er. io. sit. /. b. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2<3 =. 66. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(76) 2<3. b. =. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 67. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(77) 4 7. 5. 7. 1. F. 立. =. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. =. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 1<2 =. 68. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(78) 1<2 =. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 69. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(79) 4. n. 。. 5. 2. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 70. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(80) 5. 3. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi U. v i n. 71. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(81) 6. 6. B. 6F 9. 6. B. A. i S. :. 6F. B 6. 6. A. F. :. A:6. F. 6. : B. 立. 政 治 大 :. ‧ 國. g. 學. :. g. ‧. :. N. 6. :. :. _. :. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U6. v. B :. A A. :. :. g :. :. g 72. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(82) :. :. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 73. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(83) 7 g. 9 S. ( (. 7 dS 9 6. S. S. S f6. (. (. (. (. ( (. S. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 74. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(84) S. S 42( ( S. )0( 51 (. 立. 治 政 ,3 ( 大. ‧ 國. 學. 4 (. ‧. 0 (. (. n. Ch. e( ngchi. y. sit. io. al. .. er. Nat. 51 (. i n U. v. ( ( (. 75. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(85) S 9. f. 6. S. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 76. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(86) 8 9. 8. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. spa. io. sit. y. Nat. M. al. n. M. D. 政 治 大. er. 6. D. 9. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 8. 8. E. 77. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(87) t. M M. 9. 學 ‧. t. 8. ‧ 國. 7. 立. 政 治 大. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. M M. 78. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(88) 9. D. a1 8. 3. 01. a. 5. 2 2. 9. 3. 3. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. p 5. 3. 1 1. B. 3. Ch. engchi. 2i. i n U. v. p. 7. N. ( 79. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(89) 1 1. 2i. a 7. :. N. a. 9. (. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 80. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(90) a1 8. 2. 3. 01. 2. 96. a. 9. 8. M. M/ 5. 3. 立. 3. 6. 學 ‧. 2 1. a3 l. 0. n. 0. Ch. engchi. 3i. y. p. sit. io. 3. B. M. er. Nat. 8. M/. 5. 2. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 1. i n U. v. p. 7. N. (. 81. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(91) 2. 3i. 1. M. a. 7. :. N. 9. a. (. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 82. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(92) a1 8. 3. 01. a. 3. 立. 9. 3. 政 治 大. ‧ 國. 學 p. 3. 3. 2. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 1 1. ‧. 5. 2. 9. 5. 1. 2. Ch. engchi. 2i. i n U. v. p. 7. N. (. 83. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(93) 1 1. 2i. a 7. :. N. a. 9. (. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 84. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(94) D 4 8. 3 0. 8 3. 8. 9 3 0. (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). y. (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). (. ). sit er. al. ‧ 國. n. p. ). 學. io. ). s. Nat. (. (. ‧. 立. 政 治 大. 7. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 85. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(95) 6g. dS. dS. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. S. M. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. S. 86. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(96) S. M. S. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 87. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(97) Dg 56. d. M. d. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. M. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 88. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(98) M. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 89. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01.
(99)
相關文件
• developing coherent short-term and long-term school development plan that aligns the school aims, the needs, interests and abilities of students in accordance with the
Microphone and 600 ohm line conduits shall be mechanically and electrically connected to receptacle boxes and electrically grounded to the audio system ground point.. Lines in
同學們,人與人之間相處必須學會尊重他人,當要表達自己的需求或感受
As to the effects of internet self-efficacy on information ethics, students who get high, middle, and low scores on basic computer operation also perform differently on
(ii) “The dismissal of any teacher who is employed in the school – (a) to occupy a teacher post in the establishment of staff provided for in the code of aid for primary
Wang, Solving pseudomonotone variational inequalities and pseudocon- vex optimization problems using the projection neural network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17
Define instead the imaginary.. potential, magnetic field, lattice…) Dirac-BdG Hamiltonian:. with small, and matrix
智利政府在十月初宣布地鐵漲價,大批學生因此發起抗議遊行,最終演變為反政府 流血示威,並造成 15 人死亡。流血示威經過一週後,在 10 月