Schwannoma is a benign neural sheath tumor, and it occurs as a single entity in many cases. It also occurs in overall body areas including the head and neck region. As a slowly-growing benign tumor, it has been reported to occur in the head and neck region in approximately 25-40% of total schwannoma cases.1It involves the cranial nerves such as V, VII, IV, X, XI, and XII or the sympathetic and peripheral nerves.2Schwannomas surround many kinds of cranial nerves or other nerves could occur in the head and neck region, it is known that most schwannomas occurring in the head and neck region generally originate from the
Schwannoma in Head and Neck: Preoperative Imaging Study and Intracapsular Enucleation
for Functional Nerve Preservation
Si Hong Kim, Na Hyun Kim, Kyung Rok Kim, Ja Hyun Lee, and Hong-Shik Choi
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Logopedics & Phoniatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Purpose:In treating schwannoma patients, it is critical to determine the origin of the tumor to preserve nerve function. We evaluated the validity of preoperative imaging studies in distinguishing the neurological origin of the schwannomas of the head and neck, and the efficacy of intracapsular enucleation in preserving nerve function.
Materials and Methods:In 7 cases of schwannomas in the head and neck region, we predicted whether the tumor originated from the vagus nerve or the cervical sympathetic chain through imaging studies including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were performed intracapsular enucleation, and the function of the vagus nerve and the sympathetic nerve was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Results:Preoperative imaging studies showed 6 cases where the tumor was located between the carotid artery and the internal jugular vein, and 1 case where the tumor was located posteriorly, displacing the carotid artery and the internal jugular vein anteriorly. At the time of operation, we confirmed schwannoma originating from the vagus nerve on the first 6 cases, and schwannoma originating from the sympathetic nervous system on the last case. All patients went through successful intracapsular enucleation, and of the seven schwan- noma cases, 6 patients maintained normal postoperative neurological function (85.7%). Conclusion:Preoperative imaging studies offer valuable information regarding the location and origination of the tumor, and intracapsular enucleation helped us to preserve the nerve function.
Key Words: Schwannoma, vagus nerve, sympathetic nerve, intracapsular enuclea- tion, nerve function
Received: March 3, 2010 Revised: April 28, 2010 Accepted: May 17, 2010
Corresponding author: Dr. Hong-Shik Choi, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Gangnam-gu, 712 Eonju-ro, Seoul 135-270, Korea.
Tel: 82-2-2019-3461, Fax: 82-2-3463-4750 E-mail: hschoi@yuhs.ac
∙The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
© Copyright:
Yonsei University College of Medicine 2010 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non- commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
INTRODUCTION
vagus nerve or sympathetic nervous system, and various preoperative image studies are used to distinguish its loca- tion and origin.3The accepted treatment of schwannoma is surgical resection, and several surgical modalities have been introduced to preserve the neurological functions.4-6
Recently, intracapsular enucleation has been introduced for the preservation of the neurological functions. In this study, we evaluated the validity of preoperative imaging studies in distinguishing the neurological origin of the schwannomas of the head and neck, and the efficacy of intracapsular enucleation in preserving the nerve function.
This study was conducted on seven patients who were suspected with schwannoma at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Gangnam Severance Hospital from March 2003 to September 2009. All the patients compl- ained of a neck mass as a major symptom. Six patients had normal nerve function, the other one complained of ptosis.
There were three men and four women, whose ages ranged between 46 and 71. Computed tomography (CT) and mag- netic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to examine the location of the tumor and its correlation with the carotid artery and the internal jugular vein. Whether the tumor displaced the internal jugular vein and carotid artery to the same direction or to the opposite directions was evaluated.
After informed consent, all patients underwent intra- capsular enucleation via the transcervical approach under general anesthesia. After exposing the tumor in the carotid sheath, a vertical incision parallel to the direction of the nerve was made on the capsule, after confirming that the nerve fibers surrounded the tumor. Then intracapsular enucleation was performed as the tumor was carefully dissected from the capsule without any damages given to the nerve fibers. Special attention was paid to preserve the lymphovascular structure within the nerve sheath. The function of the vagus nerve and the sympathetic nerve was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by examining vocal cord mobility with laryngoscope and symptoms of Hornor’s syndrome.
Preoperative imaging studies showed 6 cases where the tumor located between the carotid artery and the internal jugular vein, and 1 case where the tumor located posterio- rly displacing the carotid artery and the internal jugular vein anteriorly (Figs. 1 and 2). At the time of operation, we
confirmed schwannoma originating from the vagus nerve on the first 6 cases, and schwannoma originating from the sympathetic nervous system on the last case (Table 1). The tumor was surrounded by the nerve fibers in all 7 cases, and an incision was made on the capsule. The tumor was carefully dissected from the capsule while preserving the nerve fibers, and intracapsular enucleation was performed (Figs. 3 and 4). The preoperative and postoperative neurol- ogical functions were evaluated. Of the six vagal schwan- nomas, five cases maintained normal postoperative neurol- ogical function. In the case of sympathetic schwannoma, there were no aggravated neurological deficits except for the ptosis which was observed preoperatively (Table 2).
It is well-known that schwannoma occurring in the head and neck region mostly originates from the vagus nerve or sym- pathetic nervous system. It is also known that the incidence of vagal schwannoma is 2 to 3 times higher than that of sympathetic schawannoma.7Schwannoma can compress the maternal nerve fibers which go over the tumor capsule as its size is gradually increased. Therefore, nerve paralysis may occur preoperatively. Vagal schwannoma is typically characterized by dysphagia and hoarseness. Sympathetic schwannoma is characterized by Horner’s syndrome. In
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fig. 1. Neck CT image of a vagal schwannoma patient. Tumor (asterisk) is separating the common carotid artery (white arrow) anteriorly and internal jugular vein (arrow head) posteriorly.
Fig. 2. Neck CT image of a sympathetic schwannoma patient. Tumor (asterisk) is anteriorly displacing the common carotid artery (white arrow) and internal jugular vein (arrow head) together without separating them.
DISCUSSION
RESULTS
most cases, however, there are no symptoms, thus it is dif- ficult to identify the neurological origin based on the physi- cal examination.8,9
In making a differential diagnosis of the intracranial tumors, imaging studies play a key role. Particularly in cases in which schwannoma was suspected, CT is routinely
Fig. 3. Operative findings (A and B) and specimen (C) of a vagal schwannoma patient. (A) A vagal schwannoma that surrounded the capsule exposed. (B) After confirming that the nerve fibers surrounded the tumor, intracapsular enucleation was performed as the tumor was carefully dissected from the capsule without any damages given to the nerve fibers. (C) A photograph of the schwannoma specimen. About 1cm sized rounded mass without the capsule is observed.
A B C
Fig 4. Operative findings (A-C) and specimen (D) of a sympathetic schwannoma patient. (A) A sympathetic schwannoma that surrounded the capsule exposed. (B) A vertical incision parallel to the direction of the nerve was made on the capsule. (C) Tumor was enucleated by preserving the neural pathway using the microsurgical technique. (D) A photograph of multiple schwannoma specimens. About 6 cm sized yellowish mass like fat tissue without the capsule is observed.
A B C D
Table 1. Imaging Findings and Probable Nerves of Origin vs. Diagnosis (n = 7) (Schwannoma in Head and Neck Case at Gangnam Severance 2003 - 2009)
Patient
Imaging findings Probable nerve
Diagnosis
no. origin
1 2 3 6 cm Tumor separates the ICA and IJV Vagus Vagus
2 1 2 4 cm Tumor separates the ICA and IJV Vagus Vagus
3 3 3 4 cm Tumor separates the ICA and IJV Vagus Vagus
4 6 6 4 cm Tumor separates the ICA and IJV Vagus Vagus
5 2 3 6 cm Tumor displaces the ICA and IJV Sympathetic Sympathetic
anteriorly trunk trunk
6 3 3.5 5.5 cm Tumor separates the ICA and IJV Vagus Vagus
7 4 3 5.5 cm Tumor separates the ICA and IJV Vagus Vagus
ICA, internal carotid artery; IJV, internal jugular vein.
Table 2. Neural Function Outcome after Tumor Intracapsular Enucleation (n = 7) (Schwannoma in Head and Neck Case at Gangnam Severance 2003 - 2009)
Patient no. Nerve Preoperative status Postoperative status
1 Vagus Normal Normal
2 Vagus Normal Vocal fold paralysis
3 Vagus Normal Normal
4 Vagus Normal Normal
5 Sympahtic trunk Ptosis Ptosis (no interval change)
6 Vagus Normal Normal
7 Vagus Normal Normal
performed, and such imaging diagnostic modalities as MRI, Dyanimc MRI, and angiography may be performed additionally. Imaging diagnostic modalities like CT and MRI offer great help in identifying the tumor and its cor- relations with surrounding vascular structures, muscles, and nerves.3From an anatomical perspective, the carotid sheath contains the carotid artery, the internal jugular vein, and the vagus nerve. The carotid sympathetic ganglion descends medioposteiror aspect to the carotid sheath.
Accordingly, when a vagal schwannoma is enlarged, the internal jugular vein is displaced laterally, and the carotid artery is displaced medially, displaying each other. In contrast, when a sympathetic schwannoma is enlarged, the carotid sheath is displaced anteriolaterally, not displaying the internal jugular vein and the carotid artery.10-12
In 1996, Furukawa, et al. performed imaging studies on nine schwannoma patients, and suggested their neurologi- cal origin prior to surgery. These authors reported an ac- curate diagnostic rate of 100%.3In 2007, Saito, et al. also made an accurate diagnosis at a rate of 83% prior to surgery in 12 schwannoma patients.12In this study, with the criteria proposed by Furukawa, et al. imaging studies were per- formed on all seven cases, and an accurate diagnosis was made in all cases when confirmed with later surgeries.3 Preoperative diagnosis based on imaging studies offered better understanding of the anatomical correlation between the nerve and vascular structures intraoperatively. We were also able to explain to the patients each complication of vagal schwannoma and sympathetic schwannoma which may follow the surgery preoperatively. As the authors had just experienced only one case of the schwan- noma of sympathetic origin, the follow-up studies are needed for the accuracy of this study.
Schwannoma is a benign tumor that originates from the neural sheath of Schwann cells. Previously, to prevent the recurrence of tumors, radical dissection including the neuro- progenitor cells was performed. Even in cases in which recovery was achieved following the nerve transplantation or primary anastomosis, preservation of the neurological function was not to be expected. Most of the neuropro- genitor fibers do not run through schwannoma and they pass over the tumor capsule.13,14
Most schwannomas are encapsulated. In cases where the nerve fibers surround the surface of tumors, the intracap- sular enucleation can be performed while preserving the nerve fibers. According to the study by Valentino, et al., intracapsular enucleation while preserving the nerve fibers preserved its function by more than 30% when compared to tumor resection with primary anastomsosis.15The neurol- ogical functions can also be monitored using a nerve stimulator or under a microscope in performing the intraca- psular enucleation.15-18
Previous studies reported the preservation rate of the neurological functions following the intracapsular enuclea- tion to be 30-80%. In our series, the neurological function was preserved in 6 out of 7 cases. Only a minimum longi- tudinal incision in the capsule was made during the opera- tion and the capsule was not connected to the nerve fibers.
When the tumor was removed after making an incision, additional damages around the capsule did not occur. Mo- reover, when the tumor was not isolated from the capsule, we used our fingers to remove the tumor from the capsule.
These cautious intracapsular enucleations could have led to the maintaining of 86% of their nerve function after the operation. In the case of patient #2, intracapsular enuclea- tion was performed routinely; however, multiple schwan- nomas directly connected to the nerve fiber were observed intraoperatively. This suggests the possibility of perineu- rium or endoneurium origin schwannoma, and it may have caused the vocal cord paralysis examined postoperatively.
Many controversies exist regarding the recurrence rate between the total tumor resection including nerve fibers and the intracapsular enucleation. According to Zbären, et al., there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the total tumor resection including nerve fibers and the intracapsular enucleation. In cases where partial removal of the tumor was performed, however, the recurrence rate has been reported to rise.19In this study, the mean follow-up period after the surgery was 3.42 years, and no recurrence has yet been noted. However, further long-term regular follow-up imaging studies are needed in this series.
In conclusion, in cases of schwannoma arising in the head and neck region, surgical resection may cause fatal nerve damage unlike other tumors. Therefore, treatments assuring the preservation of neurological functions are needed. In the current study, the neurological origins of schwannomas were predicted through preoperative imag- ing studies, before the surgical procedure, and we were able to explain the possible nerve damages to patients.
Intracapsular enucleation was performed in all cases, and the postoperative neurological functions were preserved in most cases without recurrence. Thus, we report our treat- ment outcomes with a review of literature that preoperative imaging studies were effective for making an accurate diagnosis, and intracapsular enucleation was effective for preserving the neurological functions.
1. Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinico- pathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 1986;57:2006-21.
REFERENCES
2. Colreavy MP, Lacy PD, Hughes J, Bouchier-Hayes D, Brennan P, O’Dwyer AJ, et al. Head and neck schwannomas: a 10 year review. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:119-24.
3. Furukawa M, Furukawa MK, Katoh K, Tsukuda M. Differen- tiation between schwannoma of the vagus nerve and schwan- noma of the cervical sympathetic chain by imaging diagnosis.
Laryngoscope 1996;106:1548-52.
4. Fujino K, Shinohara K, Aoki M, Hashimoto K, Omori K. Intracap- sular enucleation of vagus nerve-originated tumors for preserva- tion of neural function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:
334-6.
5. Fornaro R, Frascio M, Stabilini C. Excision of a schwannoma of the head and neck: surgical technique. G Chir 2006;27:428-32.
6. Moukarbel RV, Sabri AN. Current management of head and neck schwannomas. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13:
117-22.
7. Wax MK, Shiley SG, Robinson JL, Weissman JL. Cervical sympathetic chain schwannoma. Laryngoscope 2004;114:2210-3.
8. Gilmer-Hill HS, Kline DG. Neurogenic tumors of the cervical vagus nerve: report of four cases and review of the literature.
Neurosurgery 2000;46:1498-503.
9. de Araujo CE, Ramos DM, Moyses RA, Durazzo MD, Cernea CR, Ferraz AR. Neck nerve trunks schwannomas: clinical fea- tures and postoperative neurologic outcome. Laryngoscope 2008;
118:1579-82.
10. Wang CP, Hsiao JK, Ko JY. Splaying of the carotid bifurcation caused by a cervical sympathetic chain schwannoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2004;113:696-9.
11. Miller FR, Wanamaker JR, Lavertu P, Wood BG. Magnetic reso-
nance imaging and the management of parapharyngeal space tumors. Head Neck 1996;18:67-77.
12. Saito DM, Glastonbury CM, El-Sayed IH, Eisele DW. Parap- haryngeal space schwannomas: preoperative imaging determina- tion of the nerve of origin. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:662-7.
13. Chang SC, Schi YM. Neurilemmoma of the vagus nerve. A case report and brief literature review. Laryngoscope 1984;94:946-9.
14. Saydam L, Kizilay A, Kalcioglu T, Gurer I. Ancient cervical vagal neurilemmoma: a case report. Am J Otolaryngol 2000;21:
61-4.
15. Valentino J, Boggess MA, Ellis JL, Hester TO, Jones RO. Ex- pected neurologic outcomes for surgical treatment of cervical neurilemomas. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1009-13.
16. Charles D, Yingling CD. Intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerves in neurotologic surgery. In: Cummings CW, Fredrickson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE, editors. Otolaryngol- Head and Neck Surgery. St. Louis:Mosby year Book; 1996.
p.3331-55.
17. Pesavento G, Ferlito A, Recher G. Benign solitary schwannoma of the cervical vagus nerve. A case report with a review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol 1979;93:307-16.
18. Langner E, Del Negro A, Akashi HK, Araújo PP, Tincani AJ, Martins AS. Schwannomas in the head and neck: retrospective analysis of 21 patients and review of the literature. Sao Paulo Med J 2007;125:220-2.
19. Zbären P, Markwalder R. Schwannoma of the true vocal cord.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:837-9.