• 沒有找到結果。

(Fubini’s Theorem) Let R = [a, b

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "(Fubini’s Theorem) Let R = [a, b"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

1. The Proof of Green’s Theorem

Theorem 1.1. (Fubini’s Theorem) Let R = [a, b] × [c, d] be a closed rectangle and f : R → R be a continuous function. Then

Z Z

R

f (x, y)dA = Z b

a

Z d c

f (x, y)dy

! dx =

Z d c

Z b a

f (x, y)dx

! dy.

Let F = P i + Qj be a smooth vector field on a domain D containing R. Equip the boundary C = ∂R of R with the positive orientation. We write C = C1+ C2− C3− C4 where C1, C2, C3, C4

are line segments parametrized as follows:

C1: r1(x) = (x, c), a ≤ x ≤ b C2: r2(y) = (b, y), c ≤ y ≤ d C3: r3(x) = (x, d), a ≤ x ≤ b C4: r4(y) = (a, y), c ≤ y ≤ d.

We rewrite the line integral I

C

F · dr = I

C

P dx + Qdy as I

C

P dx + Qdy = Z

C1

P dx + Qdy − Z

C3

P dx + Qdy +

Z

C2

P dx + Qdy − Z

C4

P dx + Qdy.

We computeR

C1P dx + Qdy andR

C3P dx + Qdy : Z

C1

P dx + Qdy = Z b

a

P (x, c)dx Z

C3

P dx + Qdy = Z b

a

P (x, d)dx which give

Z

C1

P dx + Qdy − Z

C3

P dx + Qdy = Z b

a

[P (x, c) − P (x, d)]dx = − Z b

a

[P (x, d) − P (x, c)]dx.

By fundamental Theorem of calculus,

P (x, d) − P (x, c) = Z d

c

Py(x, y)dy.

We discover that Z

C1

P dx + Qdy − Z

C3

P dx + Qdy = Z b

a

Z d c

−Pydy

! dx =

Z Z

R

−PydA by Fubini’s Theorem. Similarly, one can show that

Z

C2

P dx + Qdy − Z

C4

P dx + Qdy = Z Z

R

QxdA.

Combining all the above results, we obtain the Green’s Theorem I

∂R

P dx + Qdy = Z Z

R

(Qx− Py)dA for rectangle.

1

(2)

2

Theorem 1.2. (Green’s Theorem) Let D be a simply connected domain in R2. Assume that the boundary ∂D of D is a piecewise smooth curve. Then

I

∂D

P dx + Qdy = Z Z

D

(Qx− Py)dA.

The notationH

means that we equip the curve ∂D with the positive orientation.

From here, we can derive the Stoke’s Theorem in the following non-rigorous way. We observe that

curl F = (Qx− Py)k

and hence Qx− Py= curl F · k. Since k is a unit normal vector of the xy-plane, we can rewrite the Green theorem as

I

∂D

F · dr = Z Z

D

curl F · ndA.

In fact, the region D can be replaced by an orientable surface S and k by the unit outer normal vector field n to the surface S. This leads to Stoke’s Theorem:

Theorem 1.3. (Stoke’s Theorem) Let S be an orientable surface with boundary C = ∂S. Let F be a vector field in R3 on a region containing S. Then

I

C

F · dr = Z Z

S

curl F · ndA where n is the unit outer normal vector field on S.

It is also common to denote ndA by dA. The Stoke’s Theorem can be rewritten as the following vector form:

I

C

F · dr = Z Z

S

curl F · dA By Green theorem, the flux

Z

C

F · nds can be calculated by the following double integral:

Z

C

−Qdx + P dy = Z Z

D

(Px+ Qy)dA

where n is the unit outernormal of the curve C and D is the simply connected region whose boundary is C. Note that Px+ Qy is exactly the divergence of the vector field F, i.e.

Px+ Qy= div F.

This observation leads to the Gauss Theorem.

Theorem 1.4. (Gauss divergence Theorem) Let D be a simply connected solid region in R3whose boundary S = ∂D is an orientable surface. Let F be a vector field on a region containing D. Then

Z Z

S

F · dA = Z Z Z

D

div FdV.

參考文獻

相關文件

Generalization Theorem Let f be integrable on K = [a, b] × [c, d] to R and suppose that for each y ∈ [c, d], the function x 7→ f (x, y) of [a, b] into R is continuous except

Let D(t/s) be a standard open subset in Spec(S −1 A)... Here h is the induced map of the

Remark: All the sequences are sequence of real numbers.. Formula that might be useful: Let θ

[r]

Stokes’ Theorem Let S be an oriented piecewise-smooth surface that is bounded by a simple, closed, piecewise-smooth boundary curve C with positive orientation.. (Orient C to

[r]

In order to use Green’s theorem we must make sure C satisfies all of the assumptions for the theorem, that is that C is a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, and simple

Surprisingly, a critical segment of the boundary of such a set is given by an essentially arbitrary convex curve, which leads to non-polygonal $L^p$ improving regions. An