1
valuation
) based -
preference (
absolute
) 2 (
valuation
) based -
arbitrage (
relative
) 1 (
valuation
security
5.
option
mkt
the enrich that
schemes
4.
. structures
mkt different
w.r.t.
CME
in comparison
) welfare (
untility
3.
PE and
structures mkt
e alternativ
2.
) PE (
efficiency
Pareto
and
) CME (
. equil mkt
e Competitiv
1.
: objective
Learning
mkt structure
welfare comparison
CME PE
1 2
33
n Informatio
Fixed under
Analysis m
Equilibriu
General
3 Ch
. t improvemen
Paret for
y possibilit
no mean t
doesn'
"
pei Fixed
"
mkt
issuing
no
problem
decision
structure
capital
no
supplies
securities
) exogenous (
fixed
: economy
exchange
pure
welfare
and
economy
exchange
Pure
.
一
3
. welfare s
everyone'
improve
and
) patterns n
consumptio or
(
securities
of allocation
sharing -
risk
efficient
more
make
y potentiall may
s individual
, securities
new
of supplies
no even
, ) omorrow pattern t
n consumptio
of exchange
means
implicitly
and
( securities
of exchange
pure By
設 S = 2
Z · A = ( W1 , W2 )
Z z z
Z z z
2 22
12
1 21
11
Pareto improved allocations of
Endowed allocation
二 . Competitive Market Equilibrium Model
vecter
I ) 1 S
( a is ) ,
, ,
( s
allocation
) w
, , w , w ( w
) z
, , z , z ( z
individual
th i of pattern
n consumptio
choice
R R
) w , c ( ) A z , c (
individual
. economy
the in exist
s individual
I , , 2 , 1 i
notations
) (
I 2
1
iS i2
i1 i
iJ i2
i1 i
S 1
i i
i i
i
一
5
patterns
and
n consumptio
ZA
of supplies
total
fixed
) W , C ( )
A z , c (
sccurities
and
n consumptio
endowment
of supplies
total
fixed
) Z , C ( )
z , c (
social
preference
) a z w
, c ( U )
A z , c ( V ) (
V
endowments
initial
) A z w
, c ( or
R R
) z , c ( attributes
individual
th i of belief
s
' individual
ties probabili
state
0 )
, , ,
(
I i
i i
I i
i i
S s
s i is
i is
is i
i i
i i
i i
i i
J 1
i i
iS i2
i1 i
=
one least
at exists
there
risk
social
is there
If : 2 question
? riskless
are securities
all
risk
social
No : 1 question
. risk
) aggregate or
( social
is there
that
say we , W W
t and
s some least
at exist
there
If
. tomorrow
states
across
GNP
as regarded
be can
W
C c
c
W w
w
C c
c
Z z z
) . cond
cleaning
mkts (
condition
on conservati
C c
, Z z
, I
A z w
: )
A G(
A
w.r.t set
s allocation
feasible
t s
I
i i I
i i I
i i I
i i
I
i i I
i i I
i i I
i i
I i
i I
i
i i
i i
7
(二) Competitive Market Equilibrium ( CME )
.
CME affect
will
} ) z , c ( {
allocation
endowments
also but
. ) Z , C ( total
social
only Not
: Note
: endogenous
: exogeneous
) Z , C ( ) z , c (
) 2 (
and
, I i SP s ' individual
th i the maximizes
) z , c ( ) 1 (
If . equil
exchange
pure
a is }
) z , c ( { allocation
and
P . }
) z , c ( {
endowments
and
} ) ( V { beliefs /
s preference
MISC
with
individual
I of set
a and
A structure mkt
given
economy
exchange
pure
in CME :
3.1 definition
I i i
i
I i
i i i i
I i i
I i i i
i
I i i
CME
of definition
e alternativ
: definition
) 3.6c (
)
Z , C ( ) z , c (
) ii (
3.6b) (
I
i
P z c
P z c
3.6a) (
I
i and J
j P
) c
A z , c ( V
) z
A z , c ( V
) i (
I i
i i
i i i
i
j i
i i i
j i i
i i
9
Law
s Walra'
. too , hold must
one last
the then
, hold
) 3.6c (
and ) 3.6b (
in equations J
I
of set
any if is That
. redundent
is ) 3.6c (
and
) 3.6b (
of One
number
I ) 1 J ( : )
Z , C (
number
J with
P :
variables
endogenous
? nce inconsiste
equations
) 1 J ( ) 1 I ( , totally
equations
1 J has ) 3.6c (
equations
I has
) 3.6b (
equations J
I has ) 3.6a (
) 3.6b (
and
) 3.6a (
3.1 def.
in ) i ( then ,
i MISC
is ) ( V If : Note
I i i
i i
C, W
) w , c (
) ii (
and
, I i , A
of span
the from
derived
being
B matrix
the
with
CCCP
s ' individual
th i the maximizes
) i (
if , CME
exchange
pure
a is
)
w , c (
allocation
and R
vector
price implicit
An .
)
w , c ( and
) ( V and
A given
CCCP
of terms
in CME
Exchange
Pure
: 3.2 definition
i I
i
i i
I i i
I i i
i
I i i
I i i
I i i i
11
statement
this about
careful
be
must
We
. principle
in , 3.2 . def CME
to ent
correspond
one -
to - one is 3.1 . def in CME
then
, hold
) 3 ( ~ ) 1 ( If
3.2 . def )
w , c ( , R
)
z , c ( , P 3.1
.
def i i iI i i iI
R A
P ) 2 (
I i w A
z ) 1
( i i
S rank(B) rank(A)
and
0 B
A ) 3
( J S S K
(
三 ) Constrained Pareto Efficiency ( CPE )
I , , 3 , 2 i
v
) (
V
) Z , C ( ) z , c ( ,
I i
w
: A)
G(
s.t
only
not
) ( V max
) v , A ( g
solves it
if w.r.t A
CPE
a is
CPE
: 3.3 definition
i i
i
I i
i i
i
1 1
A zi
13
. inquality strict
one least at
with
and
I i ) ( V ) ( V
G(A)
no exists
there
if w.r.t A
CPE
a is
: c - 3.3 def.
i k
) (
V v
) ( V
G(A)
s.t.
) ( V max
problems
I , , 2 , 1 i following
solves it
if w.r.t A
CPE
a is
: b - 3.3 def.
I , , 3 , 2 i
v )
( V
G(A)
s.t.
) ( V max
) v , A g(
solves it
if w.r.t A
CPE
a is
: a - 3.3 def.
i i
i i
k k
k k
k
1 1
i i
i
1 1
Four alternations of CPE w.r.t. A above are equivalent ( c.f. appendix )
decreasing
(1) : proof
. V in concave
strictly
and V
in decreasing
is
)
V
,
A
(
g
§.
15
sets
factors
G(A) G
*(A) CME
w.r.t. A ( C , Z )
V
i(
)
iI ( c
i, z
i)
iI< proposition 3.1> The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
: Proof
A w.r.t.
CPE
a is
A w.r.t.
C.E.
a is If
17
< proposition 3.2> The Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
I
i and J
j u
u V
V Z
solve must
, problem
) V , A ( g of F.O.Cs
By
) z
, c ( V
-
) Z -
Z ( u )
c (
) z , c ( V
) Z , C , V , A
; , u , u , z , c ( L Define
: Proof
) z , (c )
z , c ( or
when
A w.r.t.
CPE
a is A w.r.t.
C.E.
a is If
0
j i
ij i
I
2 i
i i
i i
i
ij j
J
1 j
j i
0 i
i i
0
I i
i i I
i
i
i i
i i
C
A V
C u
)
! yourself
by Derive (
and
A w.r.t.
C.E
a is
, ,
P with
associates
means
(3) ~ (1)
(3)
Z , C z
, c
and
(2)
I
i P
z , c P z c
I i
z
, c z , c But
(1)
I i
and J
j P
C
) (
V
Z )
( V
A w.r.t.
C.E
in vector
prices
securities
be to ,
, ,
P ,
, P , P P
put
0 J1 0
1 0
J1 0
2 0
1
i
i i
i i
i i
i i i
i
j i
i
j i i
J 2
1
i i
19
三﹑ Alternative Market Structure and Economic
Efficiency — Constrained v.s Full Pareto Efficiency
A , V
g
A , V
g ( A , V ) g ( A , V)
, OTBE .
g
if , A than efficient
) more (
loss
no is A
that
say
We .
V , A g
affect
, OTBE
, structure mkt
different
how
te investinga
to want
we , section
this
In
W , C or
Z , C and
V V
, A
V , A g
utility
maximizing
s planner' affect
to Factors
I i i
i