• 沒有找到結果。

Comparisons of oral propafenone and sotalol as an initial treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comparisons of oral propafenone and sotalol as an initial treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation."

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Comparisons of oral propafenone and

sotalol as an initial treatment in patients

with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial

fibrillation

陳亦仁

Lee SH;Chen SA;Tai CT;Chiang CE;Wen ZC;Chen YJ;Yu

WC;Huang JL;Feng AN;Cheng JJ and Chang MS

摘要

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of

propafenone versus sotalol as an initial choice of treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), according to a double-blind randomized system. In the oral propafenone group (n = 41), 2 patients (5%) discontinued therapy because of gastrointestinal discomfort in 1 and dizziness in the other. Thirty-one (79%) of the 39 patients who continued the treatment had effective response to oral propafenone (>75% reduction of symptomatic arrhythmic attacks) on a mean dose of 663 +/- 99 mg/day with a decrease in attack frequency from 10 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 1 times per week. In the oral sotalol group (n = 38), 4 patients (11%) discontinued treatment because of dizziness in 2 and symptomatic bradycardia in 2. Twenty-six of the 34 patients (76%) who continued the treatment had effective response to oral sotalol on a mean dose of 200 +/- 57 mg/day with a decrease in attack frequency from 11 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 1 times per week. Comparisons of the results between propafenone and sotalol groups showed a similar incidence of intolerable (2 of 41 vs 4 of 38, p = 0.42) and tolerable side effects (10 of 39 vs 8 of 34, p = 1.0). The attack

frequency at baseline (11 +/- 3 vs 10 +/- 4 times per week, p = 0.23) and after treatment (3 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 2 times per week, p = 0.85) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The incidence of effective response to drugs was also similar (31 of 39 vs 26 of 34, p = 0.78). Furthermore, the decrease of symptom scores (-32 +/- 8% vs -29 +/- 7%, p = 0.18) and percentage decrease of

(2)

ventricular rate (-15 +/- 4% vs -18 +/- 4%, p = 0.10) during AF were also similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, oral propafenone and sotalol are equally effective and safe in preventing attacks and alleviating symptoms of

參考文獻

相關文件

Figure 10 Orthopantomogram (7 years after decompression and 2 years following enucleation) revealing the recurrence lesion, distending the mandibular body area spanned from right

The dental hygienist has a key role in assisting patients with maintaining their oral wellness, identify- ing oral manifestations, providing self-care education as well as

A change in treatment was performed in the group of sites where the estimated diagnosis was not con firmed by CBCT (6 sites with a change in treatment), in the group of the

As seen in Table 1 every one of them occurred in male patients; with the exception of one case all large sized sialoliths were located in the submandibular duct (94.4%) and only

This retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study of patients under 21 years of age found that these young patients are susceptible to all stages of disk displacement and that

pylori in pathogenesis of oral mucosal lesions or ulcerations is still unclear, it seems that patients with oral lesions as leukoplakia and oral lichen planus, and concurrent

Our results suggested that generalized idiopathic dystonia leads to motor limita- tions that may cause difficulty with regard to plaque control, but adaptations of the methods

Therefore, the current research evaluated oral health condition, salivary flow, and halitosis across the different stages of leprosy treatment and compared the results with those