ABSTRACT
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150203
The presence of Helicobacter pylori in oral cavities of patients with leukoplakia and oral lichen planus
0DJGDOHQD.$=$12:6.$'<*'$à$,UHQD'8ĝ0DáJRU]DWD5$':$12&=.2
:URFODZ0HGLFDO8QLYHUVLW\'HSDUWPHQWRI3HULRGRQWRORJ\8QLWRI2UDO3DWKRORJ\:URFáDZ3RODQG
&RUUHVSRQGLQJDGGUHVV ,UHQD'XĞ'HSDUWPHQWRI3HULRGRQWRORJ\8QLWRI2UDO3DWKRORJ\:URFODZ0HGLFDO8QLYHUVLW\.UDNRZVNDVWUHHW
Wroclaw - Poland - Phone: +71-784-03-81 - Fax: +71-784-03-80 - e-mail: irena.dus@gmail.com 6XEPLWWHG 0D\0RGL¿FDWLRQ 6HSWHPEHU$FFHSWHG 6HSWHPEHU
O
bjective: Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common bacterial infections in men. This gastrointestinal pathogen is closely related to gastritis, peptic ulcers, and the increased risk of gastric cancer. Numerous studies have indicated oral cavities as possible Helicobacter pylori reservoirs. Helicobacter pylori has been detected both in supragingival and subgingival plaques, and also in saliva. In addition, the relationship between lesions of oral mucosa and the presence of H. pylori has been evaluated and described in some studies. The aim of this study was to assess the presence of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the oral cavity of patients with oral leukoplakia and oral lichen planus. Material and Methods:The study included 54 patients with oral leukoplakia, 72 with oral lichen planus lesions, and 40 healthy controls. The presence of Helicobacter pylori in oral cavity samples was analyzed using a single-step Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method. All patients underwent a periodontal examination and the following clinical parameters were collected: pocket depth, bleeding, and plaque indexes. The periodontal status was assessed using the Offenbacher FODVVL¿FDWLRQ5HVXOWV ,QPRVWSDWLHQWVSDWKRORJLFDOOHVLRQVZHUHLQW\SLFDOVLWHVRQWKH
buccal mucosa (leukoplakia in 88%, and oral lichen planus in 93% of patients). The DNA of the Helicobacter pylori was present in 20% of patients with leukoplakia and 23% of SDWLHQWVZLWKOLFKHQSODQXV:HGLGQRW¿QGWKH'1$RIH. pylori in healthy controls. The periodontal status described by periodontal indices was worse in the investigated group WKDQLQWKHFRQWUROJURXS&RQFOXVLRQ 7KHVH¿QGLQJVVXJJHVWWKDWWKHH. pylori presence in oral cavities may be related with leukoplakia and lichen planus oral lesions.
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori. Leukoplakia. Lichen planus.
INTRODUCTION
The Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is one of the most common and well-known bacterium in the world. It colonizes the human stomach and it is responsible for chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and, recently, has been recognized as a risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma. The H. pylori infection is considered a serious transmissible disease. The exact way of transmission of these bacteria is still debated, although some evidence suggests that it is most likely to happen during a direct person- to-person contact6. Apart from its presence in the stomach, the H. pylori has also been found in dental plaque and feces. Hence, it is thought that the route of infection can be oral-oral or fecal-oral6. The role of dental plaque as a reservoir of H. pylori and a
possible source of infection or reinfection of gastric mucosa has been discussed for a long time. Some studies indicate a relation between the infection of H.
pylori in oral cavities and stomachs, but observations concerning the role of oral cavity as another niche for H. pylori are controversial27. In about 40% of patients with gastritis, the bacterium is also present in the oral cavity, which may indicate the transient character of the infection. Nevertheless, it is also suggested that H. pylori may be present in the oral HQYLURQPHQWDVQRUPDOEDFWHULDOÀRUD22. H. pylori has been detected both in supragingival and subgingival plaques, and in saliva with and without a concomitant stomach infection11,14.
Oral Lichen Planus (OLP) is a common T-cell- PHGLDWHGFKURQLFLQÀDPPDWRU\RUDOPXFRVDGLVHDVH
of an unclear etiology, despite the hypothesis that
DQWLJHQVSHFL¿F DQG QRQVSHFL¿F PHFKDQLVPV DUH
involved19,23. Possible etiological factors are: viral infections, mental stress, mechanical trauma, and individual susceptibility probably related to genetic predispositions20,26. It has typical bilateral localization mainly on the posterior buccal mucosa and on the lateral margins of the tongue, and its clinical presentations range from a white reticular plaque to an atrophic, erosive and rarely of bullous form. In the reticular form, this lesion can often be asymptomatic. However, red forms are painful and spicy or acidic food and mechanical irritations exacerbate unpleasant sensations7,24.
Oral leukoplakia is a well-known potentially malignant lesion. Based on its etiopathogenesis, there are two different forms of this white lesion – one idiopathic and the other one associated with tobacco use. Clinically, two types are present:
homogeneous and non-homogeneous leukoplakia.
Although leukoplakia can vary histopathologically, its features include hyperkeratosis, orthokeratozis or parakeratozis, acanthosis of the epithelium, and FKURQLF LQÀDPPDWRU\ LQ¿OWUDWLRQV LQWR WKH ODPLQD
propria. Also, various degrees of epithelial dysplasia may be seen but only in the minority of lesions9,25
.
Leukoplakia and oral lichen planus are frequent oral mucous lesions. Although both pathologies have been deeply researched, there is a lack of unequivocal observations concerning the relation of these diseases with a Helicobacter pylori infection.
The aim of the present study was to assess the presence of the H. pylori DNA in the oral cavity of patients with mucosal pathologies, such as leukoplakia and oral lichen planus, and to examine the hypothesis of coexistence of bacteria in the investigated oral lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
All patients provided informed consents before taking part in the study. There were three groups:
with oral leukoplakia (group L), with oral lichen planus (group OLP), and the control group. About 54 subjects (30 females and 24 males) comprised the group L and 72 (55 females and 17 males) the OLP group without any gastrointestinal problems.
The control group consisted of 40 generally healthy patients without lesions in the oral cavity. All patients with leukoplakia were current smokers with no cell dysplasia in the histological examination. In the group with OLP, only the reticular or reticular- erosive forms were present. The diagnosis of oral OLFKHQSODQXVZDVPDGHDFFRUGLQJWRWKHPRGL¿HG
Word Health Organizations (WHO) diagnostic clinical criteria24.
Exclusion criteria for the study were: general antibiotic treatment within three months prior to the examination, patients with severe P3 periodontitis
3'PP%23H[WHQWVFRUH DFFRUGLQJWR
WKH2IIHQEDFKHUFODVVL¿FDWLRQ15.
The age, the number of teeth, smoking habit, and the site of the oral lesions were collected from all patients. A complete oral/periodontal examination was performed by a single dentist; Pocket Depth (PD) was measured with a periprobe at 4 sites per tooth; oral hygiene was evaluated according to the Approximal Plaque Index (API)12, and the bleeding was according to the Bleeding on Probing (BOP)2; the periodontal status was assessed according WR D VLPSOL¿HG SHULRGRQWDO GLVHDVH FODVVL¿FDWLRQ
of Offenbacher, et al.15 (2008). To evaluate the presence of H. pylori DNA, two samples were taken from the premolar/molar interdental spaces or from the periodontal pockets, depending on the stage of periodontium. The area around the chosen sites was dried and isolated from saliva. Then, a sterile microbrush was inserted into the space/pocket, transferred to a sterile Eppendorf tube, and frozen at -20°C.
DNA extraction protocol
Laboratory tests were carried out entirely at the 'HSDUWPHQWRI0ROHFXODU7HFKQLTXHVRIWKH:URFáDZ
Medical University. Each of the micro brushes with the collected material was placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. Four hundred milliliters of sterile water (Sigma Aldrich Reagent Water Molecular Biology) was then added to the tubes and vortexed. DNA was isolated XVLQJWKHPRGL¿HG+H[DGHF\O7U\PHW\ORDPPRQLXP
Bromide (CTAB) method.
PCR method
7RFRQ¿UPWKHDFFXUDF\RIWKHVDPSOHFROOHFWLRQ
and the effectiveness of the DNA isolation method, the internal control reaction for the presence of human beta-actin genes was carried out. The reaction was conducted with the use of a single- step PCR (GeneAmp® PCR System 9700, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).
The H. pylori '1$ DPSOL¿FDWLRQ WHFKQLTXH ZDV
performed properly with the use of located (nested) PCR. It consists in the carrying out of two, one after another, PCR reactions using two different pairs of VXLWDEOHDQGVSHFL¿FSULPHUVWRWKHJHQRPLF'1$RI
bacteria. The described type of nested PCR reaction is based on two stages. Next, we show the composition of the reaction mixture for two successive PCR for a '1$VDPSOH,QWKH¿UVWUHDFWLRQPL[WXUHWRPO
of H2O water (Gibco, Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland, UK) we added 1.0 ml of PCR developing buffer, 0.5 P/RIG173DWDFRQFHQWUDWLRQRINj0PORI
a mixture of primers EHC at a concentration of 10 Nj0DQGPORI7DTSRO\PHUDVH UHDFWLRQEXIIHU
for DSF-Taq-Taq pol.Top, Bioron, Ludwigshafen am 5KHLQ *HUPDQ\ ,Q WKLV UHDFWLRQ NjO RI '1$
extracted from oral cave was added. A set of primers
XVHG LQ WKH ¿UVW UHDFWLRQ (+&8/ ZDV FKRVHQ
for the 860 bp fragment of H. pylori genomic DNA (80 076-80 492 bp). In the second reaction, 7.65 ml of DNase-free water was added, 1.0 ml of PCR EXIIHUNjORI'73ZLWKDFRQFHQWUDWLRQRINj0
NjOVWDUWHUVWKDWZDVQDPHG(7DIWHUQRPLQDWLRQ
given by Song, et al.22 (2000) with a concentration RINj0DQGRI7DTSRO\PHUDVH 8PO
,QWKHVHFRQGUHDFWLRQZHDGGHGNjORIWKH'1$
DPSOL¿HG LQ WKH ¿UVW UHDFWLRQ 7KH VHFRQG VHW RI
primers (ET-5U/ET-5L) was internally directed tothe sequence of 860 bp fragment of H. pylori genomic DNA amplified by the previously used primers (EHC-U/EHC-L)22.
To visualize the PCR products, electrophoresis was carried out in a 1% agarose gel in the TAE mixture (Tris 242 g, 100 ml of 0.5 M EDTA pH 8;
57.2 ml CH3COOH per 1000 ml) in the presence of ethidium bromide (a concentration of 10 mg/
ml). For the number of base pairs, we used a DNA GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas, Thermo )LVKHU 6FLHQWL¿F :DOWKDP 86$ DV D '1$ VL]H
standard. Visualization of electrophoresis results was performed under UV light with the use of the Kodak Gel Logic 100 Imaging System (Eastman Kodak Company). Examples of both H. pylori and beta actin reactions are presented in Figures 1 and 2.
Statistical analysis
The results of the research were statistically analyzed. The following parameters were calculated for all groups: the number of cases (N), average values (X), the median (M), the range (min-max), the upper and lower quartile (25Q-75Q), and standard deviations (SD).
9HUL¿FDWLRQRIWKHK\SRWKHVLVRIWKHHTXDOLW\RI
each average trial was conducted using the ANOVA method (variance analysis). The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test for nonparametric data was carried out in the groups in which there was heterogeneous variance. We recognized Pd0.05 as statistically VLJQL¿FDQW 7KH DQDO\VLV ZDV FRQGXFWHG XVLQJ WKH
EPIINFO 7.1.1.14 statistical software (dated 2-07- 2013).
RESULTS
We summarized the clinical characteristics of the investigated and control groups in Table 1.
We found no differences about the average age and the number of teeth between the groups of patients with leukoplakia and lichen planus, and the control group. Fifty-four patients from the leukoplakia group, 29 patients from the OLP group, and 23 from the control group were smokers.
Pathological lesions were mainly present in the
Figure 1- Results of positive control reactions for the correct DNA isolation from oral caves - beta actin gene.
Description of results: 1- Gene Ruler 100 bp Ladder (Fermentas); 2- Probe n. 9; 3- Probe n. 10; 4- Probe n. 11;
5- Probe n. 12; 6- Probe n. 13; 7- Probe n. 14; 8- Negative control (H2O instead of DNA)
Figure 2- Detection of Helicobacter pylori with nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) of the second PCR reaction. Description of results: 1- Gene Ruler 100bp Ladder (Fermentas); 2- Probe n. 9; 3- Probe n. 10; 4- Probe n. 11; 5- Probe n. 12; 6- Probe n. 13; 7- Probe n.
14; 8/9: Negative control (H2O instead of DNA)
typical sites of the buccal mucosa (in 89% of patients with leukoplakia and in 93% of patients with oral lichen planus). There were no differences in the presence of H. pylori DNA between the investigated groups. We found this pathogen in 20% of patients with leukoplakia and in 23.6% of patients with lichen SODQXV:HIRXQGDVLJQL¿FDQWO\KLJKHULQFLGHQFHRI
H. pylori DNA in both groups with oral pathologies in comparison to the control group (p=0.002), in which we did not detect the DNA of such pathogen (Table 1).
The average value of the API index was statistically higher both in the leukoplakia group in comparison
to the lichen planus group (p=0.000) and the control group (p=0.000), and in the OLP group versus the control group (p=0.000).
Similarly, the average value of the BOP index was statistically higher both in the leukoplakia group in comparison to the control group (p=0.000) and the OLP group (p=0.001), and in the OLP group and the in comparison to control group (p=0.009).
The average pocket depth was statistically deeper in the leukoplakia group as well as in the OLP group in comparison to the control group.
By only comparing the two study groups according to the periodontal status, we found the
L group OLP group &RQWUROJURXS
Number of patients 54 72 40
Sex female/male 30/24 55/17 22/18
Age (years) 52.4 53.4 51.1
Number of teeth 21.9 21.6 22.2
Percentage of smokers 100% 40% 57%
Presence of H.pylori DNA 11 17 0
API % 32.4 26.4 21.1 BOP % 27.7 23.2 19.1 PD (mm) 2.54 2.38 1.78 Statistical differences between groups :
API% BOP% PD DNA H.p presence
L vs control : p=0.000 p=0.000 p=0.000* p=0.002F OLP vs control: p=0.000 p=0.009 p=0.001* p=0.002 L vs OLP: p=0.000 p=0.001 p=0.346* p=0.829 Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
F-Fisher exact test
* Chi-Square test (Yate's correction) Table 1- Characteristics of patients
H. pylori + H. pylori - Statistical importance
GROUP OLP N=17 N=55
API 26.4% 26.5% p=0.947
BOP 25.5% 22.5% p=0.139
PD 2.88 mm 2.22 mm p=0.003
GROUP L N=11 N=43
API 35.5% 31.7% p=0.030
BOP 32.4% 26.5% p=0.024
PD 3.36 mm 2.33 mm p=0.000
Non-parametrical Kruskal-Wallis test API=Approximal Plaque Index BOP=Bleeding on Probing PD=Pocket Depth
Table 2- Comparison of periodontal indices average values in OLP and L groups in patients with (+) and without (-) the presence of H. pylori DNA
oral hygiene was statistically worse and gingival bleeding was greater in patients with leukoplakia.
However, there was no difference in the depth of the periodontal pocket (p=0.346).
On the other hand, the periodontal status described by the API, BOP, and PD indexes, in both of the investigated groups, was statistically worse in comparison with the control group, in which we did not detect the DNA of H. pylori (Table 1).
Furthermore, in the group with leukoplakia, there were statistically higher values for the API, BOP, and periodontal PD indexes in these patients, in which we found the presence of H. pylori (Table 2).
Conversely, in the OLP group, whose percentage of bacterial DNA was the highest, the only statistically VLJQL¿FDQW GLIIHUHQFH EHWZHHQ SDWLHQWV ZLWK DQG
without the presence of H. pylori DNA was in the periodontal PD (2.88 mm and 2.22 mm respectively, p=0.003). Although the average PD was greater in patients harboring the DNA of such bacteria, it was not described as related with periodontitis (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
The relationship between lesions of the oral mucosa and the presence of H. pylori has been evaluated and described in a limited number of studies. An association between gastrointestinal diseases and aphthae (oral ulceration) has been demonstrated and the interest around this pathology and a H. pylori infection aroused. Albanidou-Farmaki, et al.3 (2005) stated that 34 out of 48 patients with recurrent minor aphthous ulcerations tested positive for H. pylori. He detected the assessed protein antibodies IgG, IgA and anti-CagA in the serum of 59 patients and in the saliva of 24 patients. The authors also found that the appropriate eradication of the bacteria led to the complete cure of the lesions or to remarkable improvements. In another investigation, we observed the presence of IgG antibodies against H. pylori in 52% of the investigated patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). However, the authors found H. pylori DNA in the ulcerations of only one case and concluded that this pathogen is not related with RAS13. Riggio, et al.18 (2000), using the PCR, found H. pylori DNA in 3 out of 28 biopsies from RAS18. Based on the results of 22 patients with various mucosal ulcerative disorders (including recurrent aphthous stomatitis, virus herpes simplex lesions, and erosive lichen planus lesions), Shimoyama, et al.21 (2000) suggested that there is no association between these pathologies and the presence of H. pylori. Only two out of seven patients with a herpes simplex infection tested positive for H. pylori – both for the culture test and for the H.
pylori antigen21. In an earlier investigation, Porter, et al.16 (1997) examined serum IgG antibodies and GLG QRW ¿QG D H. pylori infection as an essential
etiologic factor in the development of recurrent aphthous stomatitis and other oral mucosal lesions with ulcerations16.
The etiology of oral leukoplakia and oral lichen planus has not been fully explained. In this study, lesions were mainly in the buccal mucosa [leukoplakia in 48 (89%) patients and in 67 (93%) SDWLHQWVZLWK2/3@:HIRXQGDVLJQL¿FDQWO\KLJKHU
incidence of H. pylori DNA in the samples of the oral cavity of patients from both study groups -22.2%
in comparison to the control group, in which the bacteria was not present. However, there were no statistical differences between the presence of H.
pylori DNA in the group with leukoplakia -20% and with lichen planus -23.6%.
There are no studies on the presence of H. pylori DNA in oral cavity of patients with leukoplakia. In a recent study carried out in the Southwestern of Iran with 41 patients, researchers detected the IgG anti H. pylori in as many as 52% of oral lichen planus patients and 66% of control group patients.
7KHDXWKRUVGLGQRW¿QGDQDVVRFLDWLRQEHWZHHQD
H. pylori infection and OLP, regardless of the clinical presentation17.
There is ambiguous view as to whether or not the oral cavity may harbor H. pylori, particularly in periodontitis patients. By evaluating 30 adult patients positive to a urease test with diagnosed gingivitis or periodontitis, Gebara and coauthors10 (2004) found H. pylori in saliva, in the supragingival and subgingival plaque of 43.3% of subjects, and D ODFN RI VWDWLVWLFDOO\ VLJQL¿FDQW DVVRFLDWLRQ ZLWK
the patients’ periodontal status10. Other authors DOVRIDLOHGWR¿QGDVLJQL¿FDQWDVVRFLDWLRQEHWZHHQ
periodontal disease and poor oral hygiene and a H.
pylori infection4,5.
However, based on the study of a cross-sectional data analysis by Dye, et al.8 (2002), it was found that poor periodontal health related with advanced periodontitis chracterized by deep periodontal pockets may be associated with a H. pylori oral infection.
In this study, the oral hygiene and the periodontal status of the study groups with leukoplakia and OLP were statistically worse in comparison to the control group. This may indicate the association between the presence of H. pylori DNA and dental plaque, DQGDOVRWKHDVVRFLDWLRQEHWZHHQWKHLQÀDPPDWLRQ
of periodontal tissues and the presence of H. pylori could be taken into consideration. The worse periodontal status and oral hygiene were also present in H. pylori positive patients with leukoplakia. In H.
pylori SRVLWLYHSDWLHQWVZLWK2/3WKHRQO\VLJQL¿FDQW
difference was in the depth of the periodontal pocket.
Although the levels of oral hygiene and gingival bleeding were worse in the group with leukoplakia, we saw no statistical difference in the presence of H. pylori DNA between these groups. We should also
highlight the average periodontal pocket depth (3.36 mm in leukoplakia and 2.88 mm in OLP H. pylori positive patients) was not related to periodontitis.
Some studies underline the relationship between the presence of H. pylori and the occurrence of a periodontal pocket with a depth of 5 mm or more and advanced periodontitis1. Results of this study indicated the presence of H. pylori was not related with periodontitis.
In our study, we selected patients according to the periodontal status, which was characterized by mild periodontitis according to the Offenbacher FODVVL¿FDWLRQ:HH[FOXGHGSDWLHQWVZLWKSHULRGRQWDO
pockets deeper than 4 mm and with BOP greater than 50% from the study. The current study shows the association between the presence of H.
pylori DNA and pathological oral mucosa lesions such as leukoplakia and oral lichen planus. Since the evaluated state of periodontium and hygiene levels were worse in patients with H. pylori DNA, WKH LQÀXHQFH RI H. pylori on the development of these pathologies is debatable. On the other hand, the presence of H. pylori may have an additional LQÀXHQFHRQWKHORFDOHQYLURQPHQW&RQVLGHULQJWKH
role of H. pylori in pathogenesis of oral mucosal lesions or ulcerations is still unclear, it seems that patients with oral lesions as leukoplakia and oral lichen planus, and concurrent gastric problems, should be tested for the presence of a H. pylori infection.
It is important to take care of patients who need therapeutic interventions to improve their oral hygiene and periodontal status and eliminate any possible additional factors in the etiology of these lesions.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study show the higher H.
pylori presence in the oral cavity of subjects with leukoplakia and oral lichen planus when compared ZLWKFRQWUROJURXS7KHGHVFULEHG¿QGLQJVLQGLFDWH
that further research on this topic is necessary.
REFERENCES
1- Adler I, Muiño A, Aguas S, Harada L, Diaz M, Lence A, et al.
Helicobacter pylori and oral pathology: relationship with the gastric infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9922-35.
2- Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J. 1975;25:229-35.
3- Albanidou-Farmaki E, Giannoulis L, Markopoulos A, Fotiades S, Aggouridaki X, Farmakis K, et al. Outcome following treatment for Helicobacter pylori in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis.
Oral Dis. 2005;11:22-6.
4- Anand PS, Kamath KP, Anil S. Role of dental plaque, saliva and periodontal disease in Helicobater pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5639-53.
5- Berroteran A, Perrone M, Correnti M, Cavazza M, Tombazz C, Goncalvez R, et al. Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the oral cavity and gastroduodenal system of Venezuelan population. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:764-70.
6- Brown LM. Helicobacter pylori epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22:283-97.
7- Carrozzo M, Thorpe R. Oral lichen planus: a review. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58:519-37.
8- Dye BA, Kruszon-Moran D, McQuillan G. The relationship between periodontal disease attributes and Helicobacter pylori infection among adults in the United States. AM J Public Health. 2002;92:1809-15.
9- Freitas MD, Blanco-Carrión A, Gándara-Vila P, Antúnez-López J, García-García A, Gándara-Rey JM. Clinicopathologic aspects of oral leukoplakia in smokers and nonsmokers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:199-203.
10- Gebara EC, Pannuti C, Faria CM, Chehter L, Mayer MP, Lima LA.
Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori detected by polymerase chain of periodontitis patients. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004;19:277-80.
11- Krasteva A, Panov V, Krasteva A, Kisselova A. Oral cavity and systemic diseases – Helicobacter pylori and dentistry. Biotechnol Biotec EQ. 2011;25:2447-541.
12- Lange DE, Plagmann HC, Eenboom A, Promsberger A. Clinical methods for the objective evaluation of oral hygiene. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1997;32:44-7.
13- Mansour-Ghanaei F, Asmar M, Bagherzadeh AH, Ekbataninezhad S. Helicobacter pylori infection in oral lesions of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:576-9.
14- Momtaz H, Souod N, Dabiri H, Sarshar M. Study of Helicobacter pylori genotype status in saliva, dental plaques, stool and gastric biopsy samples. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:2105-11.
15- Offenbacher S, Barros S, Beck JD. Rethinking periodontal LQÀDPPDWLRQ-3HULRGRQWRO
16- Porter SR, Barker GR, Scully C, Macfarlane G, Bain L. Serum IgG antibodies to Helicobacter pylori in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis and other oral disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:325-8.
17- Pourshahidi S, Fakhri F, Ebrahimi H, Fakhraei B, Alipour A, Ghapanchi J, et al. Lack of association between Helicobacter pylori infection and oral lichen planus. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev.
2012;13:1745-7.
18- Riggio MP, Lennon A, Wray D. Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in recurrent aphthous stomatitis tissue by PCR. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000;29:507-13.
19- Roopashree MR, Gondhalekar RV, Shashikanth MC, George J, Thippeswamy SH, Shukla A. Pathogenesis of oral lichen planus – a review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2010;39:729-34.
20- Sand LP, Jalouli J, Larsson PA, Hirsch JM. Prevalence of Epstein- Barr virus in oral squamous cell carcinoma, oral lichen planus, and normal oral mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:586-92.
21- Shimoyama T, Horie N, Kato T, Kaneko T, Komiyama K.
Helicobacter pylori in oral ulcerations. J Oral Sci. 2000;42:225-9.
22- Song Q, Lange T, Spahr A, Adler G, Bode G. Characteristic distribution pattern of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and saliva detected with nested PCR. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:349-53.
23- Sugerman PB, Savage NW, Walsh LJ, Zhao ZZ, Zhou XJ, Khan A, et al. The pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13:350-65.
24- Van der Meij EH, van der Waal I. Lack of clinicopathological correlation in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus based on the SUHVHQWO\DYDLODEOHFULWHULDDQGVXJJHVWLRQVIRUPRGL¿FDWLRQV-2UDO
Pathol Med. 2003;32:507-12.
9DQ GHU :DDO , 6FKHSPDQ .3 YDQ GHU 0HLM (+ $ PRGL¿HG
FODVVL¿FDWLRQDQGVWDJLQJV\VWHPIRURUDOOHXNRSODNLD2UDO2QFRO
2000;36:264-6.
26- Zhou Y, Jiang L, Liu J, Zeng X, Chen QM. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in oral lichen planus in an ethnic Chinese cohort of 232 patients. Int J Oral Sci. 2010;2:90-7.
27- Zou QH, Li RQ. Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity and gastric mucosa: a meta-analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011;40:317-24.
