AppliedCatalysisB:Environmental108–109 (2011) 81–89
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Applied
Catalysis
B:
Environmental
j ou rna l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a p c a t b
Preparation
of
ordered
mesoporous
carbons
containing
well-dispersed
and
highly
alloying
Pt–Co
bimetallic
nanoparticles
toward
methanol-resistant
oxygen
reduction
reaction
Shou-Heng
Liu
∗,
Feng-Sheng
Zheng,
Jyun-Ren
Wu
DepartmentofChemicalandMaterialsEngineering,NationalKaohsiungUniversityofAppliedSciences,Kaohsiung80778,Taiwan
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:Received28February2011
Receivedinrevisedform9August2011 Accepted11August2011
Available online 19 August 2011 Keywords:
PtCoalloy
Orderedmesoporouscarbons Oxygenreductionreaction Methanoltolerance XANES/EXAFS
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Asimplerouteisdescribedforthesynthesisofwell-dispersedandhighlyalloyingPtCobifunctional nanoparticlessupportedonorderedmesoporouscarbons(Pt100−xCox/OMC)bythesimultaneous
pyrol-ysisofcarbonandmetalprecursorsinamesoporoussilicaasthehardtemplate.Avarietyofdifferent spectroscopicandanalyticaltechniqueswasusedtothoroughlycharacterizethePt100−xCox/OMC
sam-ples.ByX-raydiffraction,N2 adsorption/desorptionisothermsandtransmissionelectronmicroscopy,
itwasfoundthatPt100−xCox/OMCpossessedwell-dispersedPt/PtConanoparticles(2–3nm)supported
onhighsurfacearea(∼1000m2g−1)andregularporechannels(∼2.8nm).AmongPt100
−xCox/OMC
cata-lysts,thePt50Co50/OMCwasfoundtohavesuperiorelectrocatalyticactivityandthetolerancetomethanol
crossoverduringoxygenreductionreactionascomparedtotypicalcommercialelectrocatalysts.Thismay beattributedtothedispersionanduniquenanostructureofhighlyalloyedPtConanoparticlessupported onPt50Co50/OMCevidencedbyX-rayabsorptionspectroscopy.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) and polymer electrolyte membrane fuelcells (PEMFCs) have beenconsidered astwo of next-generationelectricalpower sourcesfor light-dutyvehicles and stationary or portable applications [1–3] as an alternative toconventionalpowersources,forexample,internalcombustion engines and secondary batteries [4–6].For thepast few years, much effortfromgovernment,industry, andacademy hasbeen devotedtodeveloping DMFCs/PEMFCsand greatadvanceshave beenachieved;however,theremainingbarrierstowidespreaduse areincluding(i)thehighcostsofPt-basedelectrocatalysts[7–9], (ii)thepoorkineticsofbothanodeandcathodereactions[10,11], (iii)durabilityofcarbonsupportedcatalysts[12–14]and(iv)the crossoverofmethanolfromtheanodetothecathodethroughthe protonexchange membranes[15–17].In terms ofthefirst two problems,progressive increase onpriceof Ptthat is theactive speciesinthemostofthepresentlyusedelectrocatalystsrequires adecreaseintheusageofPtand/oranincreaseinthemass spe-cificactivityoftheactivespecies.Thus,supportingmaterialswith highsurfaceareaconducivetoPtdispersion,propertextural prop-ertiesfavortokineticsofbothanodeandcathodereactions,and
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+88673814526x5152;fax:+88673830674. E-mailaddress:[email protected](S.-H.Liu).
highelectronicconductivityarehighlydesirable[18].Withrespect tothelasttwoones[19–22],structuralstabilityandsurface proper-tiesofthecatalystsupportsaswellasthemethodologiesinvokedin incorporatingPtcatalystontothesupportarecrucialforthe disper-sionandstabilityofthemetalnanoparticlesduringDMFCs/PEMFCs operations in terms of eliminating CO-poisoningand methanol crossover[23,24]atanodeandcathode,respectively.
Recently,alloyingofPtwithtransitionmetalssuchasFe[25,26], Co[27–29],Ni[30,31]andCr[32]catalystshasbeenintensively studiedand shown enhanced activitytoward oxygenreduction reaction(ORR)andhightolerancetowardmethanolcrossover.In general,alloyedcatalystsshouldbeperformedathigh tempera-turestoassisttheformationofalloymetalcomponents.PtCoalloy supportedelectrocatalystsforORRhavebeenalsopreparedviathe additionofCospeciesonto carbon-supportedPtmetalcatalysts andthenalloyingathightemperaturesmorethan973Kininertgas orhydrogen[33,34].However,thealloyedparticlessofabricated easilyaggregatetoformlargerparticlesduringtreatmentathigh temperatures.Tocircumventthisproblem,Pt-basedalloycatalysts fortheORRinDMFCs/PEMFCsarethenpreparedbythereduction ofmetalprecursorswithchemicalreductantssuchasNaBH4atlow temperaturesinplaceofcatalysttreatmentathightemperatures underhydrogenflow[35–37].Nevertheless,thealloyingdegreeof themetalcatalystspreparedinthiswayisgenerallyrelativelylow. Itiswell-knownthatthecatalyticperformanceofthealloyed cat-alystsstronglydependsontheirmetalparticlesizeandalloying 0926-3373/$–seefrontmatter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
82 S.-H.Liuetal./AppliedCatalysisB:Environmental108–109 (2011) 81–89
degree.Thus,therearestillhighdemandstoexplorenew prepara-tionmethodstoattainthealloyedparticleswithauniformlysmall sizeandahighalloyingdegree.
Here we report a novel procedure for the synthesis of an orderedmesoporouscarbonwithwell-dispersedandhighly alloy-ingPtConanoparticles(denotedasPt100−xCox/OMC,x=0,30and 50)based on thesimultaneous pyrolysis offurfuryl alcohol, Pt andCoprecursorswithdifferentPt/Coatomicratiosina meso-poroussilica,namelySBA-15.AmongPt100−xCox/OMCsamples,the Pt50Co50/OMCcatalystssofabricatedpossessnotonlyhigh activ-itybutalsodurability(tolerancetomethanolcrossover)favorable forORRandhenceshouldrenderfuturepracticalapplicationsas supportedcathodicelectrocatalystsforDMFCsandPEMFCs.
2. Experimentalmethod
2.1. Preparationofcatalysts
The template (SBA-15 mesoporous silica) was synthesized accordingtotheprocedurereportedintheliterature[38]. Subse-quentdirectreplicationofSBA-15templateintomono(Pt100/OMC) andbifunctional(Pt100−xCox/OMC)sampleswithvariousrelative metalloadingwasaccomplishedbythestepwisemethodasbelow. Typically,ca.0.5gofcalcinedSBA-15wasfirstdehydratedat673K for4hundervacuumwhilevariousamountsofplatinum acetylace-tonate(Pt(CH(COCH3)2)2),denotedasPt(acac)2(98%,Acros)and cobaltacetylacetonate(Co(CH(COCH3)2)2),denotedasCo(acac)2 (99%,Acros)wereco-dispersedinfurfurylalcohol(FA;98%,Acros) andtrimethylbenzene(TMB;98%,Acros)underultrasonication.In addition,theFAandTMBsolutionwerepolymerizedbythe addi-tionof oxalicacid(98%,Acros). Themixturesolution wasthen infiltratedinSBA-15atroomtemperature(298K)byanincipient wetnessimpregnationmethod,followedbypolymerizationfirstat 333Kthenat353Keachfor12hinair.Theresultantcompositewas increasedthetemperatureto1073Kwithaheatingrateof1K/min andeventuallymaintainedatthesametemperaturefor3hunder vacuum.Finally,theresultantblackpowderswereleachedwithHF (1wt.%)aqueoussolutionforatleast24htoremovethesilica tem-plate,washedwithdistilledwaterandalcohol,thendriedat373K toobtainthePt100/OMCandPt100−xCox/OMCsamples.
2.2. Characterizationmethods
X-raydiffraction(XRD)patternsofallsampleswererecorded ona PANalytical(X’PertPRO)instrumentusingCu-K␣radiation (=0.1541nm).Thecompositionsofcatalystsweremeasuredby energydispersiveX-rayanalysis(EDX,JEOLJEM-2100F).X-ray pho-toelectronspectra(XPS)wereacquiredthroughanenergyanalyzer witha constant pass energy of 20eV followed byirradiating a samplepellet(6mmin diameter)witha monochromatic Al-K␣ (1486.6eV)X-rayunderultra-highvacuumcondition(10−10Torr). Nitrogen adsorption isotherms were measured at 77K on a MicromeriticsASAP2020analyzer.Forthehigh-resolution trans-missionelectronmicroscopy(TEM),sampleswerefirstsuspended inacetone(99.9vol.%)byultrasonication,followedbydeposition ofthesuspensiononalacey carbongrid,then theTEMimages wereobtainedatroomtemperatureusinganelectronmicroscope (JEOLJEM-2100F)operatingatanelectronaccelerationvoltageof 200kV.ThePtLIII-edgeandCoK-edgeXANESandEXAFSspectraof thePt100−xCox/OMCsampleswerecollectedattheWiggler beam-lines17CoftheNationalSynchrotronRadiationResearchCenter (NSRRC)inTaiwan.ASi(111)double-crystalmonochromatorwas usedforselectionofenergywitharesolutionof2×10−4eV/eV. Twogas-filledionizationchamberswereusedinseriestomeasure theintensitiesoftheincidentbeam(Io)andthebeamtransmitted
throughthesample(It)onareferencefoil(Ir).Athirdion cham-berwasusedinconjunctionwithareferencesample(Ptfoilor Copowder forPtLIII-edge orCoK-edgemeasurements, respec-tively).Standardprocedureswereemployedtoanalyzethespectra acquiredbyX-rayabsorptionspectroscopy(XAS).EachEXAFS func-tion()wasobtainedbysubtractingthepost-edgebackground fromtheoverallabsorptionandthennormalizedwithrespectto theedgejumpstep.Subsequently,k2-weighted(k)spectrainthe k-space,rangingrespectivelyfrom3.6to13.8 ˚A−1forPtLIII-edge andfrom3.6to11.5 ˚A−1forCoK-edge,wereFouriertransformed (FT)tother-spacetoseparatetheEXAFScontributionsfrom differ-entcoordinationshells.Anonlinearleast-squaresalgorithmwas appliedtofit(withoutphasecorrection)theEXAFSspectrainthe r-spacebetween1.5and3.2 ˚AforPtandbetween1.3and3.1 ˚Afor Co,respectively.ThePt–Coreferencefilewasdeterminedby the-oreticalcalculation.Allcomputerprogramswereimplementedin anUWXAFS3.0package [39]withthebackscatteringamplitude andthephaseshiftforthespecificatompairsbeingtheoretically calculatedusingtheFEFF7code[40].
2.3. Electrochemicalmeasurements
Theelectrocatalyticmeasurementswereperformedinasingle compartmentglasscellwithastandardthree-electrode configu-ration. Aglassycarbon electrode witha diameterof 5mm was usedasaworkingelectrodeandasaturatedAg/AgClelectrodeand aplatinumwirewereusedasreferenceandcounterelectrodes, respectively.Theglassycarbonthin-filmelectrodewasprepared bythefollowingsteps:firstly,ca.5mgofPt/PtCo-loadedcarbon samplewasaddedinto2.5mLdeionizedwater,followedby ultra-sonictreatmentfor0.5h.Then,ca.20Loftheresultantsuspension mixturewaswithdrawnandinjectedontotheglassycarbon elec-trode,followedbydryinginairat333Kfor1h.Finally,20Lof5% Nafion®(DuPont)solutionwasaddedasabinderunderN
2 environ-ment.Electrocatalyticactivitymeasurementsofvarioussamples and a commercialJohnson-Matthey Pt/Csample (20wt.%Pt on VulcanXC-72,denotedasJM-Pt/C)wereperformedona galvanos-tat/potentiostat(CHIInstruments,727D).Cyclicvoltammetry(CV) experimentsweredonetocleanandactivatetheelectrode sur-face.PriortoeachCVmeasurement,theelectrolyticsolutionwas purgedwithhigh-purityN2 (99.9%)for atleast0.5htoremove thedissolvedoxygen,subsequentlytheexperimentwasconducted between−0.2and1.0Vvs.Ag/AgClunderpurgingN2 condition. ORRwasevaluatedbyalinearsweepvoltammetry(LSV)technique. The0.5MH2SO4electrolytewassaturatedwithultrahighpurity oxygenfor atleast0.5h.Thepolarizationcurves wereobtained between−0.1and0.8Vvs.Ag/AgClatascanningrateof5mV/s andarotatingspeedof1600rpmunderroomtemperature con-dition. Accelerated durability tests (ADT) of Pt50Co50/OMC and JM-Pt/Csampleswereperformedbycyclingtheelectrodepotential between−0.2and1.0Vvs.Ag/AgClatascanningrateof50mV/s for1000cyclesinanitrogen-saturatedatmosphereoveraperiod of13h.
Single celltests were carried out in a 5cm2 cross-sectional catalyst area(2.25cm×2.25cm). Variouscatalyst inks contain-ing Nafion ionomer (DuPont, 5wt.% solution), electrocatalysts, and isopropyl alcohol were applied oncarbon cloth substrates (APWOS1002).Ptloadingwas0.2and0.4mg/cm2 fortheanode andcathode,respectively.ANafion212membrane(DuPont)was insertedbetweentheanodeandcathodelayersbyhotpressingat 398Kunderapressureof50kg/cm2.Thehydrogenandairwere usedas thefuels withtheflow rates of 300and 2000mL/min, respectively.Thegaseswerehumidifiedatarelativehumidityof 100%.Thecellswereoperatedat353Kandtheoperatingpressure wasatmospheric.Priortothemeasurement,cellswereactivated
S.-H.Liuetal./AppliedCatalysisB:Environmental108–109 (2011) 81–89 83
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2θ (deg
ree)
(a)
Pt
100/OMC
Pt
50Co
50/OMC
Pt
70Co
30/OMC
OMC
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2θ (deg
ree)
(111) (200) (220) (311)(b)
Pt
100/OMC
Pt
70Co
30/OMC
Pt
50Co
50/OMC
OMC
(100) (110) (200)Fig.1. (a)Small-and(b)large-anglepowderedXRDpatternsofvarioussamples.
bypolarizationataconstantcurrentuntilstableperformancewas obtained.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
AsdisplayedinFig.1a,thesmall-angleXRDpatternofOMC sam-plesshowamain(100)diffractionpeakat2=∼1.0◦andtwoweak features (110)and (200)at 2=∼1.6◦ and ∼1.8◦,respectively, indicatingtheexistenceof amesoporousstructurewitha long-rangeorderandatwo-dimensionalhexagonalsymmetrysimilar tothatoftheorderedmesoporouscarbon(CMK-3)[41].However, upon incorporationof Ptand Pt/CointothepristineOMC sam-ple,lessresolvedhigherorder(110)and(200)diffractionpeaks wereobserved,implyingthatthepresenceofmetalshasresulted inlackingalong-rangestructuralorderingofmesopores.Also,it isnotedthatvariationsinPt/Coloadingindeedhavesome influ-enceontheoverallstructureand thephysicalpropertiesofthe catalystsinceadecreaseintheunitcellparameter(a)ofthe2-D hexagonallatticeofPt100−xCox/OMCsampleswasfound(Table1) comparedtothepristineOMC.Inaddition,thelarge-angleXRD patternof Pt100/OMC (seeFig.1b)showsdistinct (111),(200), (220),and(311)diffractionpeaksat2=39.8◦,46.2◦,67.8◦,and 81.3◦,respectively,indicatingthatthePtmetalparticlehasa
face-centeredcubic(fcc)structure.UponincreasingtheColoading,all thePt100−xCox/OMCsamplesexhibitdiffractionpatternsthatare similartothatofthePt100/OMCcatalyst,exceptthatthe2 val-uesoftheirmainpeakwasslightlyshiftedtowardahighervalue, suggestingareductionoftheirrespectivelatticeconstants(afcc; seeTable1)[42]andhenceanincreasingextentofthealloying ofthePtandCoparticlesintheOMCsupports[43].Theaverage metalparticlesizes(Dp)ofPt100−xCox/OMCsamplesdeducedfrom theScherrerformulaareshowninTable1.Increasingsubstitution ofPtbytheCoatomsinPt100−xCox/OMCsampleswasfoundto haveinsignificantimpactsonthePtCoalloyedparticlesize. More-over,theXRDpatternobservedforPt100−xCox/OMCsamplesdid notmatchwiththetypicalhexagonalclose-packed(hcp)structure ofpureCoandCooxide,indicatingthatsomecobaltoxidesmaybe presentasanamorphousstateinPt100−xCox/OMC.Nonetheless,the absenceofthehcpphaseofCoinPt100−xCox/OMCsamplesconfirms theformationofPtCoalloysinthesupportedcatalysts.
All the N2 adsorption/desorption curves of OMC and Pt100−xCox/OMC samples showed the typical type-IV isotherm withawell-definedhysteresisloop(seeFig.S1ainthe support-inginformation).Consequently,theBETsurfacearea,porevolume, andporesizedistribution(byBJHmethod)ofvarioussamplescan bederived.AscanbesummarizedinTable1,allsupportedcatalyst sampleswerefoundtopossessahighsurfacearea(∼1000m2/g) and auniformporesizedistribution(2.6–2.9nm; Fig.S1b).The averageporesizeobservedforvariousPt100−xCox/OMC samples iscomparabletothepristineOMCwhichisduetothefactthat they arise from the skeleton of the SBA-15 mesoporous silica template,whichwassubsequentlyremovedbyHFwashingafter carbonization.Nevertheless,thesurfaceareasandporevolumesof Pt100−xCox/OMCsamplesaresmallerthanthoseofpristineOMC, whichmaybeowingtopartialexposureofthePtConanoparticles (aftersilicatemplateremoval)andthehigherdensityofthealloyed metalthanOMC.
The structure and metal dispersionof Pt100−xCox/OMC sam-pleswerefurtherconfirmedbyTEMmeasurements.Fig.2presents theTEMimagesforthreePt100−xCox/OMCsamples,togetherwith theparticlesizedistributionhistograms.ThePt/PtCoparticlesize distributionwasestimatedbymeasuringthesizeofatleastone hundredrandomlychosenparticlesinthemagnifiedTEMimages. AsshowninFig.2,thePt100/OMC,Pt70Co30/OMCandPt50Co50/OMC samplesexhibitanorderedarrayofmesoporouscarbonnanorods dispersedwithuniformPtandPtConanoparticleswithaverage sizesof2.2,2.5and3.0nm,respectively.Theaverageparticlesizes calculatedbyTEMareinagreementwiththoseobtainedbyXRD,as showninTable1.Thehistogramsofmetalparticlesizedistribution shown in Fig.2alsoindicate a uniformand narrower distribu-tionofPtandPtCo particlemorphology.Thisindicatesthat the well-definedmesostructuresofPt100−xCox/OMCsamplesfacilitate aconfinedeffectforthePt/PtConanoparticles,mostlikelydueto therestrictedOstwaldripeningand/ormigration-coalescenceof Ptparticlesinthesestructures,asobservedforthesystemsofAu nanoparticlesincorporatedmesoporoussilicas[44,45].
The structuralfeatures and thechemical oxidation states of C, O, Pt and Co, in the Pt100−xCox/OMC samples with various Pt/Coatomic ratioswere characterizedbyXPS analysis.Ascan beseen inFig.S2a,alltheC 1sXPS spectraobtainedfromthe Pt100−xCox/OMC samples revealeda broad peak centered at ca. 284.5eV,whichcouldbeattributedtothesp2 graphiticcarbon species.Comparedtographitized carbonblack(0.82eV)[46,47], asimilarfull-widthhalf-maximum(FWHM)linewidthofca.1.3eV wasobservedinalltheC1sspectraforPt100−xCox/OMCsamples, suggesting thepresenceofless orderedgraphene layers.Again, thismaybeattributedtoperturbationoftheembeddedPtorPtCo alloysintheOMCframeworks.Similarly,alltheO1sspectra(see Fig.S2binthesupportinginformation)showingsinglebroadpeaks
S.-H.Liuetal./AppliedCatalysisB:Environmental108–109 (2011) 81–89 89 relatedareas,forexample,aselectrocatalystsforDMFCsand
PEM-FCs.
Acknowledgements
ThesupportofthisworkbytheNationalScienceCouncil,Taiwan (NSC 99-2221-E-151-044-MY2 and 99-2221-E-151-023-MY2) is gratefullyacknowledged.TheauthorswishtothankMr.Ding-Goa LiuandDr.Jyh-FuLee(NationalSynchrotronRadiationResearch Center,Taiwan)fortheirassistanceandhelpfuldiscussionsonthe X-rayabsorptionmeasurements.
AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,atdoi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.08.011.
References
[1] H.A.Gasteiger,S.S.Kocha,B.Sompalli,F.T.Wagner,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.56 (2005)9–35.
[2]R.F.Service,Science324(2009)1257–1259.
[3]H.Liu,W.Li,A.Manthiram,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.90(2009)184–194. [4] R.Borup,J.Meyers,B.Pivovar,Y.S.Kim,R.Mukundan,N.Garland,D.Myers,
M.Wilson,F.Garzon,D.Wood,P.Zelenay,K.More,K.Stroh,T.Zawodzinski,J. Boncella,J.E.McGrath,M.Inaba,K.Miyatake,M.Hori,K.Ota,Z.Ogumi,S.Miyata, A.Nishikata,Z.Siroma,Y.Uchimoto,K.Yasuda,K.I.Kimijima,N.Iwashita,Chem. Rev.107(2007)3904–3951.
[5]H.Chang,S.H.Joo,C.H.Pak,J.Mater.Chem.17(2007)3078–3088. [6]Y.Y.Shao,J.Lin,Y.Wang,Y.H.Lin,J.Mater.Chem.19(2009)46–59. [7]E.P.Ambrosio,C.Francia,M.Manzoli,N.Penazzi,P.Spinelli,Int.J.Hydrogen
Energy33(2008)3142–3145.
[8]G.Liu,X.Li,P.Ganesan,B.N.Popov,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.93(2009)156–165. [9]C.H.Choi,S.Y.Lee,S.H.Park,S.I.Woo,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.103(2011)
362–368.
[10] S.G.Ramos,M.S.Moreno,G.A.Andreasen,W.E.Triaca,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy 35(2010)5925–5929.
[11]E.B.Fox,H.R.Colon-Mercado,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy35(2010)3280–3286. [12]G.Gupta,D.A.Slanac,P.Kumar,J.D.Wiggins-Camacho,J.Kim,R.Ryoo,K.J.
Stevenson,K.P.Johnston,J.Phys.Chem.C114(2010)10796–10805. [13] R.Kobayashi,J.Ozaki,Catal.Lett.28(2009)396–397.
[14]C.G.Chung,L.Kim,Y.W.Sung,J.Lee,J.S.Chung,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy34(2009) 8974–8981.
[15] G.Perez,E.Pastor,C.F.Zinola,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy34(2009)9523–9530. [16] Y.K.Zhou,K.Neyerlin,T.S.Olson,S.Pylypenko,J.Bult,H.N.Dinh,T.Gennett,
Z.P.Shao,R.O’Hayre,EnergyEnviron.Sci.3(2010)1437–1446.
[17]P.Nekooi,M.Akbari,M.K.Amini,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy35(2010)6392–6398. [18] W.M.Wang,Q.H.Huang,J.Y.Liu,Z.Q.Zou,Z.L.Li,H.Yang,Electrochem.
Com-mun.10(2008)1396–1399.
[19]F.Wen,U.Simon,Chem.Mater.19(2007)3370–3372.
[20]J.Zhang,K.Sasaki,E.Sutter,R.R.Adzic,Science315(2007)220–222. [21]S.Kundu,T.C.Nagaiah,W.Xia,Y.Wang,S.V.Dommele,J.H.Bitter,M.Santa,G.
Grundmeier,M.Bron,W.Schuhmann,M.Muhler,J.Phys.Chem.C113(2009) 14302–14310.
[22]W.He,MeiChen,Z.Q.Zou,Z.L.Li,X.G.Zhang,S.-A.Jin,D.J.You,C.H.Pak,H.Yang, Appl.Catal.B:Environ.97(2010)347–353.
[23]W.C.Choi,S.I.Woo,M.K.Jeon,J.M.Sohn,M.R.Kim,H.J.Jeon,Adv.Mater.17 (2005)446–451.
[24]G.Selvarani,S.V.Selvaganesh,S.Krishnamurthy,G.V.M.Kiruthika,P.Sridhar, S.Pitchumani,A.K.Shukla,J.Phys.Chem.C113(2009)7461–7468.
[25]W.Chen,J.M.Kim,S.H.Sun,S.W.Chen,J.Phys.Chem.C112(2008)3891–3898. [26] J.Zhang,H.Z.Yang,K.K.Yang,J.Fang,S.Z.Zou,Z.P.Luo,H.Wang,I.T.Bae,D.Y.
Jung,Adv.Funct.Mater.20(2010)3727–3733.
[27]J.R.C.Salgado,E.Antolini,E.R.Gonzalez,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.57(2005) 283–290.
[28]P.Hernández-Fernández,S.Rojas,P.Ocón,J.L.G.delaFuente,P.Terreros,M.A. Pe ˜na,J.L.García-Fierro,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.77(2007)19–28.
[29] F.J.Lai,W.N.Su,L.S.Sarma,D.G.Liu,C.A.Hsieh,J.F.Lee,B.J.Hwang,Chem.Eur. J.16(2010)4602–4611.
[30] F.H.B.Lima,J.R.C.Salgado,E.R.Gonzalez,E.A.Ticianelli,J.Electrochem.Soc.154 (2007)A369–A375.
[31] J.Zhao,A.Manthiram,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.101(2011)660–668. [32]R.C.Koffi,C.Coutanceau,E.Garnier,J.-M.Léger,C.Lamy,Electrochim.Acta50
(2005)4117–4127.
[33]M.Min,J.Cho,K.Cho,H.Kim,Electrochim.Acta45(2000)4211–4217. [34] S.Takenaka,A.Hirata,E.Tanabe,H.Matsune,M.Kishida,J.Catal.274(2010)
228–238.
[35] N.Travitsky,T.Ripenbein,D.Golodnitsky,Y.Rosenberg,L.Burshtein,E.Peled, J.PowerSources161(2006)782–789.
[36] Y.Qian,W.Wen,P.A.Adcock,Z.Jiang,N.Hakim,M.S.Saha,S.Mukerjee,J.Phys. Chem.C112(2008)1146–1157.
[37]S.C.Zignani,E.Antolini,E.R.Gonzalez,J.PowerSources182(2008)83–90. [38]D.Zhao,J.Feng,Q.Huo,N.Melosh,G.H.Fredrickson,B.F.Chmelka,G.D.Stucky,
Science279(1998)548–552.
[39]F.A.Stern,M.Newville,B.Ravel,Y.Yacoby,D.Haskel,PhysicaB208(1995) 117–120.
[40]S.Zabinsky,J.J.Rehr,A.L.Ankudinov,R.C.Albers,M.Eller,J.Phys.Rev.B52 (1995)2995–3009.
[41]H.J.Shin,R.Ryoo,M.Kruk,M.Jaroniec,Chem.Commun.34(2001)9–350. [42]L.Vegard,Z.Phys.5(1921)17–26.
[43]F.H.B.Lima,W.H.Lizcano-Valbuena,E.Teixeira-Neto,F.C.Nart,E.R.Gonzalez, E.A.Ticianelli,Electrochim.Acta52(2006)385–393.
[44]M.T.Bore,H.N. Pham,T.L.Ward,A.K.Datye,Chem.Commun.262(2004) 0–2621.
[45]M.T.Bore,H.N.Pham,E.E.Switzer,T.L.Ward,A.Fukuoka,A.K.Datye,J.Phys. Chem.B109(2005)2873–2880.
[46]H.Darmstadt,C.Roy,S.Kaliaguine,T.-W.Kim,R.Ryoo,Chem.Mater.15(2003) 3300–3307.
[47]B.Sakintuna,Y.Yürüm,Ind.Eng.Chem.Res.44(2005)2893–2902.
[48] T.Toda,H.Igarashi,H.Uchida,M.Watanabe,J.Electrochem.Soc.146(1999) 3750–3756.
[49]X.Zhang,K.-Y.Chan,Chem.Mater.15(2003)451–459.
[50]Z.L.Liu,X.Y.Ling,B.Guo,L.Hong,J.Y.Lee,J.PowerSources167(2007)272–280. [51] J.Prabhuram, T.S. Zhao,Z.X.Liang,R. Chen,Electrochim. Acta52(2007)
2649–3656.
[52]D.R.Rolison,P.L.Hagans,K.E.Swider,J.W.Long,Langmuir15(1999)774–779. [53]S.Mukerjee,S.Srinivasan,M.P.Soriaga,J.McBreen,J.Electrochem.Soc.142
(1995)1409–1422.
[54] J.R.C.Salgado,E.Antolini,E.R.Gonzalez,J.PowerSources138(2004)56–60. [55]B.J.Hwang,S.M.S.Kumar,C.-H.Chen,Monalisa,M.-Y.Cheng,D.-G.Liu,J.-F.Lee,
J.Phys.Chem.C111(2007)15267–15276.
[56] F.J.Lai,L.S.Sarma,H.-L.Chou,D.-G.Liu,C.-A.Hsieh,J.-F.Lee,B.-J.Hwang,J.Phys. Chem.C113(2009)12674–12681.
[57]B.J.Hwang,L.S.Sarma,G.-R.Wang,C.-H.Chen,D.-G.Liu,H.-S.Sheu,J.-F.Lee, Chem.Eur.J.13(2007)6255–6264.
[58]B.J.Hwang,L.S.Sarma,J.-M.Chen,C.-H.Chen,S.-C.Shih,G.-R.Wang,D.-G.Liu, J.-F.Lee,M.-T.Tang,J.Am.Chem.Soc.127(2005)11140–11145.
[59]B.J.Hwang,C.-H.Chen,L.S.Sarma,J.-M.Chen,S.-C.Shih,G.-R.Wang,M.-T.Tang, D.-G.Liu,J.-F.Lee,J.Phys.Chem.B110(2006)6475–6482.
[60]S.Zhang,Y.Shao,G.Yin,Y.Lin,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.102(2011)372–377. [61]S.-H.Liu,J.-R.Wu,Int.J.HydrogenEnergy36(2011)87–93.
[62]S.-Y.Ang,D.A.Walsh,Appl.Catal.B:Environ.98(2010)49–56.
[63]H.A.Gasteiger,N.M.Markovic,P.N.RossJr.,E.J.Cairns,J.Phys.Chem.98(1994) 617–625.
[64]X.G.Li,I.-M.Hsing,Electrochim.Acta52(2007)5462–5469. [65]Z.H.Wen,J.Liu,J.H.Li,Adv.Mater.20(2008)743–747.