Chelation-Assisted Regioselective C?O Bond Cleavage Reactions of Acetals by Grignard Reagents. A General Procedure for the Regioselective Synthesis of Protected Polyols Having One Free Hydroxy Group

Chelation-Assisted Regioselective C-O Bond Cleavage Reactions

of Acetals by Grignard Reagents. A General Procedure for the

Regioselective Synthesis of Protected Polyols Having One Free

Hydroxy Group

Wen-Lung Cheng, Yeng-Jeng Shaw, Sue-Min Yeh, Puthuparampil P. Kanakamma,

Yu-Huey Chen, Chuo Chen, Jia-Cheng Shieu, Shaang-Jyh Yiin, Gene-Hsiang Lee,

Yu Wang, and Tien-Yau Luh*

Department of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106 Received August 4, 1998

Acetals containing a neighboring heteroatom react with the Grignard reagent in aromatic hydrocarbon solvents regioselectively. The auxiliary moiety can be hydroxy, alkoxy, or amino but not sulfur. Chelation plays a key role in directing the regioselectivity of this ring opening reaction. The reactions of acetonide derivatives of monosaccharides under these conditions afford the corresponding products having only one free hydroxy group at the specific position. Fully protected mannosamine derivative is prepared in good yield. The stereochemistry of the carbon center where auxiliary group is attached can be either syn or anti to the acetal oxygen moiety where cleavage of the C-O bond occurs. However, difference in reactivity has been found in the reaction of tris-acetonide of sorbitol with MeMgI. Regioselective ring opening of the acetal group at the anomeric carbon generates a hemiacetal which underwent further nucleophilic addition to furnish the corresponding alcohol stereoselectively.

Differentiation of a contiguous polyol by the regiose-lective protection leading to the product having only one or two free hydroxy group(s) at the selected position(s)

is valuable in synthesis.1 _{Acetal and ortho ester}

func-tionalities are widely used protective groups for such polyols. Direct transformation of a polyol into the corre-sponding acetal or ortho ester leaving certain hydroxy groups intact would be the ideal situation but successful

only in limited cases.2_{Multistep protection and}

depro-tection are occasionally required. Selective conversion of an acetal moiety with a nucleophile into a hydroxyalkyl

ether serves as a practical arsenal for this purpose.3-11

The reaction has been demonstrated to be particularly important for the diastereoselective ring opening of cyclic

chiral acetals.3_{Lewis acids are occasionally used to assist}

such reactions. Reductive cleavage of benzylidene acetals or the like has been used for the regioselective synthesis

of certain monosaccharide derivatives.8

Trimethylalumi-num has been employed to facilitate the alkylative ring

opening reaction.5_{However, a mixture of regioisomers}

is occasionally obtained. Although reactions of the Grig-nard reagent with acetals have been known for more than

three decades5_{and the mechanism for this}

transforma-tion has been extensively investigated,6_{not much}

syn-thetic use has been reported.5,7_{We recently uncovered a}

convenient synthesis of tunable C2-chiral diols 3 by the

regioselective ring opening of bisketals of threitol 1 with

a variety of Grignard reagents in benzene (eq 1).9

Applications of this strategy to the synthesis of myo-inositol derivatives having one or two free hydroxy group-(1) Greene, T. A.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic

Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1991. (b) Kocienski, P. J. Protective Groups; Thieme: New York, 1994.

(2) For a recent review, see: Hanessian, S., Ed.; Preparative Carbohydrate Chemistry; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1997. See also: Lee, H. W.; Kish, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4402.

(3) (a) Bartlett, P. A.; Johnson, W. S.; Elliott, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2088. (b) Mori, A.; Fujiwara, J.; Maruoka, K.; Yama-moto, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4581.

(4) (a) Takano, S.; Kurotaki, A.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Satoh, S.; Hirama, M.; Ogasawara, K. Synthesis 1986, 811. (b) Takano, S.; Akiyama, M.; Ogasawara, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1984, 32, 791. (c) Takano, S.; Akiyama, M.; Sato, S.; Ogasawara, K. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1593. (d) Takano, S.; Ohkawa, T.; Ogasawara, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 1823. (e) Gilbert, I. H.; Holmes, A. B.; Young, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett.

1990, 31, 2633. (f) Gilbert, I. H.; Holmes, A. B.; Pestchanker, N. J.;

Young, R. C. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 234, 117.

(5) (a) Mori, I.; Ishihara, L. A.; Flippin, L. A.; Nozaki, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Bartlett, P. A.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6107. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Almstead, N. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8089; J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6458, 6485. (c) Sammakia, T.; Smith, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2997; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10998.

(6) (a) Blomberg, C.; Vreugdenhil, A. D.; Homsma, T. Recl. Trav. Chim. 1963, 82, 355. (b) Mallory, R. A.; Rovinski, S.; Scheer, I. Proc. Chem. Soc. London 1964, 416.

(7) For reviews, see: (a) Trofimov, B. A.; Korostova, S. E. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1975, 44, 41. (b) Mukaiyama, T.; Murakami, M. Synthesis 1987, 1043. (c) Alexakis A.; Mangeney, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1, 477. (d) Luh, T.-Y. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 635. (e) Luh,

T.-Y. Synlett 1996, 201.

(8) Garegg, P. J. Pure Appl. Chem., 1984, 56, 845. Garegg, P. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 575. For chelative reductive cleavage of acetals, see: Evans, D. A.; Kaldor, S. W.; Jones, T. K.; Clardy, J.; Stout, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7001. Takano, S.; Kurotaki, A.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Satoh, S.; Hirama, M.; Ogazawara, K. Synthesis 1986, 811.

(9) Yuan, T.-M.; Hsieh, Y.-T.; Yeh, S.-M.; Shyue, J.-J.; Luh, T.-Y. Synlett 1996, 53.

(10) Yeh, S.-M.; Lee, G.-H.; Wang, Y.; Luh, T.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8315.

10.1021/jo981579a CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society Published on Web 12/31/1998

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

(s) have been executed (eq 2).10_{The Grignard reagent can} vary among primary, secondary, and arylmagnesium halides. It is believed that chelation has played a key role in directing the regioselectivity of this ring opening reaction. Accordingly, a possible chelation intermediate

2 has been postulated to rationalize the selectivity of this reaction. We felt that this reaction could be extended to the selective protection/deprotection of various polyhy-droxy-compounds having only one or two free hydroxyl group. Described herein is a full account which demon-strates a useful regioselective ring-opening reaction of

acetals with Grignard reagents.11

Results and Discussion

Prototype. On the basis of the chelation strategy depicted above (eq 1), acetonides can be cleaved regiose-lectively with Grignard reagents when a neighboring

het-eroatom is present.11 _{Accordingly, selective cleavage of}

one of the two C-O bonds in the acetal-protected mono-saccharides will offer a powerful arsenal for the selective synthesis of various monosaccharide derivatives having only one free hydroxy group at the specific position.

In the beginning of this investigation, we compared the selectivity of the ring opening reactions of unchelated acetonides to those of chelated ones. Thus, acetals 4 were treated with 4 equiv of MeMgI in refluxing benzene-ether (5:1) for 20 h. After the usual workup procedure, the corresponding hydroxyalkyl ethers 5 were obtained in

good yields (eq 3).4_{Both five- and six-membered}

aceto-nides behaved similarly and the C-O bond of the less-hindered site in 4 was cleaved regioselectively. Presum-ably, the oxygen atom on this site would coordinate to magnesium preferentially, resulting in the regioselective protection of the more-hindered hydroxy group of the diol. The presence of a neighboring oxygen or nitrogen moiety changed the selectivity of the ring-opening reac-tion. For example, the reaction of 6 with MeMgI afforded the corresponding diol 7 in 78% yield (eq 4). The neighboring amino group behaved similarly (eq 5). As

depicted in eq 1, the hydroxy group in 6 or the amino group in 8 apparently plays a pivotal role in determining

the regioselectivity of the ring opening reaction. The stereochemistry in 9 was unambiguously proved by X-ray diffraction (Figure 1, Supporting Information).

When bis-acetonide 10 was treated with MeMgI in benzene at 60 °C, mono-hydroxy compound 11 was obtained in 48% yield (eq 6). Mannitol derivative 12 was

transformed into the corresponding mono-hydroxy prod-uct 13 in refluxing benzene (eq 7). When more drastic conditions were employed, diol 14 was isolated in good yield (eq 7). When an unsymmetrical bis-acetonide 15

was employed, the less hindered heterocycle underwent alkylative ring opening (eq 8). This protocol serves as a powerful arsenal for the synthesis of various carbohy-drate derivatives having selectively one free hydroxy group at the specific position.

Stereochemistry of the Auxiliary. As can be seen from eqs 4-7, the stereochemistry of the carbon center where auxiliary group is attached can be either syn or anti to the acetal oxygen moiety where cleavage of the C-O bond occurs. In a similar manner, stereoisomers 17 (11) For preliminary communications, see: Cheng, W.-L.; Yeh, S.-M.; Luh, T.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5576. Chen, Y.-H.; Luh, T.-Y.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng, S.-M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2369.

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

and 19 were transformed into respective diols 18 and 20 smoothly upon treatment with MeMgI (eqs 9 and 10).

However, difference in the reactivity has been found in the reaction of tris-acetonide of sorbitol 21 with MeMgI (eq 11). The structure of product 22 was determined by X-ray crystallography of the corresponding benzyl ether 23 (Figure 2, Supporting Information). 5-Hydroxy deriva-tive 24 was not detected.

The regioselectivity of the reaction of 21 can be rationalized by considering the relative stability of the

chelation intermediates 25 and 26.12_{In 25, the}

magne-sium chelates with the oxygen atoms at C4and C5which

will lead to the formation of 24. The relative configuration

at C4and C5can be considered as meso form of a threitol

derivative. As can be seen from 25, severe steric interac-tion might be expected between the two endo-methyl groups and the endo-ligand on magnesium. Intermediate 26 on alkylative ring opening will furnish 22. Since only

one of the endo-methyl groups will interact with one of the ligands on magnesium in 26, the steric repulsion

might be expected to be less than that in 25. Accordingly, chelation intermediate 26 may be formed preferentially and determine the selectivity.

Monosaccharide Derivatives Having One Free Hydroxy Group. In our preliminary communication, we disclosed the usefulness of the chelation-controlled selec-tive alkylaselec-tive ring-opening of acetonides of methyl

glucosides 27 (eq 12).11 _{The reaction provides a useful}

entry toward a glucoside derivative 28 having a free

hydroxy group at C2. The chelation of the anomeric

methoxy group and the neighboring oxygen function at

C2in 27 with magnesium may explain the results. It is

noteworthy that the anomeric methoxy group can be

either R or β. Furthermore, the trans-fused

five-mem-bered acetonide moiety in 27 apparently is more reactive because the steric strain will be released upon alkylative ring-opening reaction.

The extension of this reaction to allyl glucoside 29 also afforded the corresponding mono-hydroxy derivative 30.

Further transformations13_{led to a convenient synthesis}

of fully protected mannosamine 31 (eq 13).

Upon treatment with with MeMgI, glucosides 32 and 34 afforded 33 and 35 in 58% and 55% yield, respectively.

The presence of aβ-methoxy group at C3in 34 seems to

be irrelevant for the selectivity of this ring-opening

process because the reaction of allose derivative 36, a C3

epimer of 34, also afforded 54% yield of the corresponding 5-OH product 37. These results suggested that chelation (12) Alternatively, the formation of complexes 25 and 26 may be

fast and reversible and the Curtin-Hammett principle may apply for the rationalization of the selectivity.

(13) Knouzi, N.; Vaultier, M.; Carrie´, R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1985, 5, 815.

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

with the oxygen atom on the five-membered furanose heterocycle may play a pivotal role in these reactions.

Galactose derivative 38 was converted into the 4-hy-droxy derivative 39 in 52% yield. Presumably, chelation

with the methoxy group at C6controls the

regioselectiv-ity. The conformational rigidity may prohibit chelate

formation with oxygen atoms attached at C2and C3in

38.

Treatment of mannose derivative 40 with MeMgI in refluxing benzene for 24 h afforded 41 in 51% yield. Intermediate 42 was isolated when the same reaction was carried out for 3 h.

Reactions at the Anomeric Center. Stereoselective displacement of one of the carbon-oxygen bonds by a carbon-carbon bond at the anomeric center paves the way for the synthesis of C-glycosides. The use of acetal protective group for the anomeric hydroxy group abounds. Accordingly, regioselective ring opening of the acetal group at the anomeric carbon will generate a hemiacetal which can further react with the nucleophile leading to an alcohol stereoselectively. This idea was executed with fructopyranose and arabinopyranose derivatives 43-45.

By considering the structure of fructopyranose 43 the

methoxy group at C1would assist the cleavage to occur

at C2. Thus, treatment of 43 with MeMgI under usual

conditions gave 46 selectively in 75% yield. Presumably, the reaction produces intermediate 47 which will further react with MeMgI stereoselectively to yield 46. In a

similar manner, the hydroxy group at C3in 44 can also

aid the regioselective ring opening of the acetonide at C2.

Accordingly, the reaction of 44 with MeMgI in refluxing benzene afforded alcohol 49 in 55% yield. Intermediate 48 may be involved and further transformed into 49 by excess MeMgI. The stereoselectivities in both reactions can readily be rationalized by means of chelation with the neighboring oxygen function.

Arabinose derivative 45 does not have a neighboring oxygen atom for chelate formation with magnesium. In addition, both acetonide rings are cis fused with the perhydropyran ring. In a manner similar to that de-scribed in eq 4, the least-hindered C-O bond in 45 was cleaved selectively and the hemiacetal 51 thus generated reacted with an additional mole of the Grignard reagent to yield 50 stereoselectively.

Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated a useful simple procedure using the Grignard reagent to partially depro-tect acetonides of vicinal diols leading to the correspond-ing tert-butyl hydroxyalkyl ethers regioselectively. Che-lation has played a pivotal role to direct the regioselectivity of this ring opening process. The reaction offers a powerful arsenal in selective protection-deprotection of hydroxy groups in carbohydrates leading to various monosaccharide derivatives having only one free hydroxy group at the specific position.

Experimental Section

General Procedure for Reactions of Acetonides with Grignard Reagent. To a solution of acetonide in benzene under N2was added, in one portion, the Grignard reagent (4 equiv). The mixture was stirred at 60 °C or heated under reflux, and the reaction was monitored by TLC. The cooled mixture was poured into water, and the organic layer was separated. The aqueous solution was extracted with Et2O, and the organic layers were washed with 10% aqueous NaOH, water, and brine and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was

evapo-Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

rated in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel to afford the product.

2-tert-Butoxy-2-phenylethanol (5a). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution of 4a (310 mg, 1.2 mmol) with MeMgI (2.4 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 4.8 mmol) was refluxed for 20 h to give 5a14_{(300 mg, 89%):} 1_{H NMR (CDCl} 3, 300 MHz)δ 1.14 (s, 9 H), 2.26 (dd, J ) 3.8, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.45-3.52 (m, 2H), 4.60 (dd, J ) 4.5, 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.21-7.45 (m, 5 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 50 MHz)δ 28.8, 67.8, 74.9, 75.4, 126.3, 127.3, 128.2, 142.2.

2-tert-Butoxyoctan-1-ol (5b). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, the reaction of 4b (438 mg, 2.4 mmol) with MeMgI (4.8 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 9.6 mmol) in refluxing benzene for 20 h afforded 5b15_{(343 mg,} 70%): bp 80 °C (1 mmHg);1_{H NMR (CDCl}

3, 200 MHz)δ 0.84 (t, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.31-1.46 (m, 10 H), 2.07 (br s, 1 H), 3.36-3.40 (m, 1 H), 3.48-3.56 (m, 2 H);13_{C NMR} (CDCl3, 50 MHz)δ 14.0, 22.6, 25.5, 28.7, 29.5, 31.8, 33.6, 65.2, 71.6, 73.9; HRMS calcd for C12H27O2(M + 1) 203.2011, found 203.2021.

3-tert-Butoxy-3-phenylpropan-1-ol (5c). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a mixture of 4c (93 mg, 0.5 mmol) and MeMgI (1.0 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 2.0 mmol) was converted to 5c (84 mg, 80%): 1_{H NMR (CDCl}

3, 200 MHz)δ 1.14 (s, 9H), 1.90 (br q, J ) 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.05 (br t, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.70 (br q, J ) 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 4.77 (br t, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.21-7.34 (m, 5H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 50 MHz) δ 28.6, 41.5, 60.9, 74.4, 75.1, 125.9, 126.8, 128.2, 145.4; HRMS calcd for C13H20O2208.1463, found 208.1468.

2-Deoxy-O5_{-tert-butyl-D-threo-pent-1-enose}

Trimeth-ylene Dithioacetal (7). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, 6 (134 mg, 0.51 mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was allowed to react with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) under refluxing conditions for 28 h to afford 7 (112 mg, 78%): [R]D32+7.7° (c 0.03, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3443 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.17 (s, 9 H), 2.09-2.16 (m, 2 H), 2.77-2.95 (m, 5 H), 3.04 (d, J ) 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.36 (dd, J ) 3.5, 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.44 (dd, J ) 3.5, 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.52-3.54 (m, 1 H), 4.59-4.64 (m, 1 H), 5.91 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 1 H);13_C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz)δ 24.5, 27.4, 29.1, 29.4, 63.4, 70.0, 72.9, 73.6, 129.7, 132.7; HRMS calcd for C12H22O3S2278.1010, found 278.1017.

O1_{-tert-Butyl-O}3_,O4_{-isopropylidene-L-threitol (11). A}

solution of 10 (4.0 g, 19.8 mmol) and MeMgI (2 M solution in ether, 4 equiv) in dry benzene (80 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 5 days. Saturated NH4Cl (50 mL) was introduced, and the mixture was extracted with ether (3× 100 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine and dried (MgSO4), and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue obtained was chromatographed on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc ) 9/1) to afford 11 (2.1 g, 48%) as a colorless liquid: [R]D26 +4.9° (c 2.9, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3450 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.11 (s, 9 H), 1.29 (s, 3 H), 1.35 (s, 3 H), 2.53 (br s, 1 H), 3.32 (dd, J ) 6.0, 8.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.38 (dd, J ) 6.0, 8.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.63 (q, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.78-3.83 (dd, J ) 6.0, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.97-4.01 (dd, J ) 6.0, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.11 (q, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 25.2, 26.2, 27.3, 62.8, 65.8, 71.2, 73.1, 76.9, 108.9; HRMS calcd for C10H19O4(M -CH3) 203.1283, found 203.1288. 2(R)-Amino-1-tert-butoxy-O3_,O4

-isopropylidene-3(S),4-butanediol (8). To an ice-cooled solution of 11 (1.84 g, 8.43 mmol) and Et3N (1.71 g, 16.9 mmol) in CH2Cl2(30 mL) was added a solution of MsCl (1.45 g, 12.6 mmol) in CH2Cl2(30 mL) dropwise over a period of 30 min. After the addition was over, the reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 24 h, and the reaction was then quenched with HCl (10%). CH2Cl2(50 mL) was introduced, and the organic layer was washed with NaOH (10%), water, and brine and dried (MgSO4), and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 9/1) to yield the corresponding mesylate as a colorless liquid (2.3 g, 92%): [R]D26-6.0° (c 2.0, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 1.16 (s, 9 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H), 1.41 (s, 3 H), 3.10 (s, 3 H), 3.53 (dd, J ) 4.8, 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (dd, J ) 6.6, 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.89 (dd, J ) 6.6, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.05 (dd, J ) 6.6, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.25 (q, J ) 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.61 (dt, J ) 4.8, 6.6 Hz, 1 H);13_C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz)δ 25.3, 26.1, 27.3, 38.6, 61.5, 65.5, 73.8, 75.2, 82.0, 109.6; HRMS calcd for C11H21O6S (M - CH3) 281.1058, found 281.1046.

A solution of the mesylate (2.3 g, 7.76 mmol) and sodium azide (1.0 g, 15.4 mmol) in dry DMF (60 mL) was stirred at 130 °C for 24 h, cooled to room temperature, diluted with water (300 mL), and extracted with ether (3× 200 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine and dried (MgSO4), and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give crude azide as a colorless liquid (1.23 g, 65%): IR (neat)ν 2097 cm-1;1_{H NMR} (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.13 (s, 9 H), 1.31 (s, 3 H), 1.40 (s, 3 H), 3.40-3.46 (m, 1 H), 3.53-3.63 (m, 2 H), 3.83-3.92 (m, 1 H), 3.97-4.06 (m, 2 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 25.2, 26.4, 27.3, 62.3, 63.2, 66.6, 73.6, 75.1, 109.5; HRMS calcd for C10H18O3N3(M - CH3) 228.1348, found 228.1340.

A suspension of the azide (2.0 g, 8.2 mmol) in absolute EtOH (70 mL) and Pd/C (10%, 200 mg) was stirred under an atmosphere of H2for 8 h. The reaction mixture was filtered over Celite and washed with EtOH. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (2% MeOH in CHCl3) to afford 8 as a colorless liquid (1.41 g, 79%): [R]D26-4.2° (c 5.0, CHCl3); IR (neat) v 3376, 3310 cm-1; 1_{H NMR (CDCl} 3, 300 MHz)δ 1.14 (s, 9 H), 1.31 (s, 3 H), 1.37 (s, 3 H), 1.62 (s, 2 H), 2.96-3.02 (m, 1 H), 3.23 (dd, J ) 6.6, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.46 (dd, J ) 6.6, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.80-3.87 (m, 1 H), 3.95-4.02 (m, 2 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 25.3, 26.6, 27.5, 53.3, 63.4, 66.1, 72.8, 77.5, 108.6; HRMS calcd for C11H24O3N (M++ 1) 218.1756, found 218.1727. 1,4-Bis-tert-butoxy-3(R)-amino-2(S)-butanol (9). To a solution of MeMgI in ether (1.8 mL, 2.0 M solution in ether) was added 8 (100 mg, 0.46 mmol) under N2atmosphere. The ether was removed under reduced pressure. To this was added dry benzene (5.0 mL), the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 48 h and cooled to room temperature, and MeOH was added to quench the excess Grignard reagent. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromato-graphed on silica gel (3% MeOH in CHCl3) to afford 9 as a white solid (58 mg, 54%). Further crystallized from hexane to yield colorless needles: mp 81-82 °C; [R]D25 +3.7° (c 1.5, CHCl3); IR (KBr)ν 3357, 3284, 3158 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.13 (s, 18 H), 2.48 (s, 3 H), 2.93-2.99 (m, 1 H), 3.31-3.48 (m, 4 H), 3.59 (q, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl}

3, 75 MHz)δ 27.4, 53.2, 63.2, 63.7, 72.6, 73.0; HRMS calcd for C12H28O3N (M+ + 1) 234.2069, found 234.2055. Anal. Calcd for C12H27O3N: C, 61.77; H, 11.66; N, 6.0. Found C, 61.28, H, 11.21, N, 5.38.

O1_{-tert-Butyl-O}3_,O4_-dimethyl-O5_,O6_{-isopropylidene-D}

-mannitol (13). Under N2atmosphere, to a benzene solution (40 mL) of 1216_{(0.87 g, 3.0 mmol) was added MeMgI (6 mL,} 2M in ether, 12 mmol). The mixture was refluxed for 22 h. Saturated NH4Cl (40 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with ether (40 mL × 3). The organic layer was washed with NaOH (10%, 40 mL) and brine and then dried (MgSO4). The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 4/1) to give 13 as a colorless liquid (0.75 g, 82%): [R]D27+12.5° (c 0.05, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.32 (s, 3 H), 1.38 (s, 3 H), 2.64 (d, J ) 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.28 (dd, J ) 1.8, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.41 (s, 3H), 3.45 (dd, J ) 5.2, 8.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.50 (s, 3 H), 3.55 (dd, J ) 3.6, 8.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (dd, J ) 1.8, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.73-3.82 (m, 1H), 3.94 (dd, J ) 6.3, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.06 (dd, J ) 6.3, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.15 (q, J ) 6.3 Hz, 1 H);13_C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz)δ 25.5, 26.6, 27.5, 60.1, 60.9, 62.1, 66.7, 69.3, 73.2, 75.9, 80.7, 80.8, 108.4. Anal. Calcd for C15H30O6: C, 58.80; H, 9.87. Found C, 58.65; H, 9.87.

O1_,O6_{-Bis-tert-butyl-O}3_,O4_{-dimethyl-D-mannitol (14).}

Un-der N2atmosphere, to a solution of MeMgI (30 mL, 1.7 M in

(14) Matsuda, M.; Sakatoku, S.; Higuchi, M.; Matsumura, H.; Yano, W. Suzuka Kogyo Koto Semmon Gakko Kiyo 1977, 10, 151; Chem. Abstr. 1978, 88, 104822.

(15) Lauterbach, G.; Posselt, G.; Schaefer, R.; Schnurpfeil, D. J. Prakt. Chem. 1981, 323, 101; Chem. Abstr. 1981, 95, 60913.

(16) Kuszmann, J. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 71, 123.

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

toluene, 51 mmol) was added 12 (1.49 g in 10 mL toluene, 5.13 mmol). The mixture was refluxed for 72 h and worked up in a similar manner as described above to give 14 as a colorless liquid (1.25 g, 76%): [R]D28+10.1° (c 0.07, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3,300 MHz)δ 1.19 (s, 18 H), 2.67 (d, J ) 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.46-3.53 (m, 10 H, embodied a singlet atδ 3.47 (6 H)), 3.58 (dd, J ) 3.6, 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.76-3.84 (m, 2 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 27.5, 60.1, 62.2, 69.4, 73.1, 80.1; HRMS calcd for C16H35O6(M + 1) 323.2433, found 323.2437.

O2_,O3_{-Isopropylidene-O}5_{-tert-butyl-D-xylose Diethyl}

Dithioacetal (16a). Following the general procedure, 15a (171 mg, 0.51 mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was allowed to react with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) under 60 °C for 14 h to afford 16a (142 mg, 79%) [R]D32-46.5° (c 0.05, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3479 cm-1_;1_{H NMR (CDCl}

3, 300 MHz)δ 1.12 (s, 9 H), 1.16-1.21 (two overlapping triplets, 6 H), 1.35 (s, 3 H), 1.38 (s, 3 H), 2.38 (d, J ) 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.59-2.71 (m, 4 H), 3.33-3.42 (m, 2 H), 3.76-3.79 (m, 1 H), 3.84 (d, J ) 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.08 (dd, J ) 2.7, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.33 (dd, J ) 5.4, 7.6 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR} (CDCl3, 50 MHz)δ 14.3, 14.4, 25.0, 25.4, 27.1, 27.2, 27.5, 53.0, 63.7, 70.0, 73.4, 79.6, 79.7, 109.8; HRMS calcd for C16H32O4S2 352.1742, found 352.1750.

O2_,O3_{-Isopropylidene-O}5_{-tert-butyl-D-xylose}

Trimeth-ylene Dithioacetal (16b). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, 15b (164 mg, 0.51 mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was allowed to react with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) under 60 °C for 18 h to afford 16b (128 mg, 75%): [R]D32-13.9° (c 0.05, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3479 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.41 (s, 3 H), 1.43 (s, 3 H), 1.97-2.04 (m, 2 H), 2.35 (d, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.72-2.80 (m, 2 H), 2.90-2.98 (m, 2 H), 3.38-3.47 (m, 2 H), 3.80-3.83 (m, 1 H), 4.04 (d, J ) 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.09 (dd, J ) 2.7, 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.41 (dd, J ) 5.4, 7.5 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 25.7, 27.0, 27.1, 27.5, 28.7, 29.0, 47.7, 63.7, 70.0, 73.4, 78.8, 79.3, 110.0; HRMS calcd for C15H28O4S2 336.1429, found 336.1417.

2-Deoxy-O3_,O6_{-bis-tert-butyl-D-arabino-hexose Diethyl}

Dithioacetal (18). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, 17 (178 mg, 0.51 mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was allowed to react with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) under refluxing conditions for 34 h to give 18 (127 mg, 65%): [R]D32-17.1° (c 0.05, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.20 (s, 9 H), 1.25 (s, 9 H), 1.21-1.32 (two overlapping triplets, 6 H), 1.93 (dt, J ) 7.2, 14.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.27 (ddd, J ) 6.2, 7.2, 14.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.52-2.74 (m, 4 H), 3.34 (d, J ) 5.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.48-3.58 (m, 3 H), 3.62-3.68 (m, 2 H), 3.88 (t, J ) 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.17 (dt, J ) 2.5, 6.2 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz) δ 14.3, 14.4, 23.4, 24.4, 27.4, 28.7, 38.2, 47.7, 65.2, 69.7, 69.9, 73.7, 73.8, 75.2; HRMS calcd for C18H38O4S2382.2212, found 382.2212.

2-Deoxy-O3_,O6_{-di-tert-butyl-D}

-lyxo-hexoseDiethylDithio-acetal (20). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, 19 (179 mg, 0.51 mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was allowed to react with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) under refluxing conditions for 18 h to give 20 (124 mg, 64%): [R]D32 -21.3° (c 0.02, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3447 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.16 (s, 9 H), 1.18-1.22 (two overlapping triplets, 6 H), 1.23 (s, 9 H), 1.93-2.11 (m, 2 H), 2.51-2.73 (m, 4 H), 2.96 (d, J ) 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.22 (d, J ) 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.43 (dd, J ) 4.8, 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.50 (dd, J ) 4.8, 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.67-3.70 (m, 1 H), 3.83-3.91 (m, 2 H), 3.95-4.02 (m, 1 H);13_{C NMR} (CDCl3, 75 MHz)δ 14.4, 24.0, 24.4, 27.4, 28.9, 39.8, 47.5, 63.7, 69.3, 72.2, 72.5, 73.4, 75.0; HRMS calcd for C18H38O4S2 382.2212, found 382.2209.

O3_,O4_;O5_,O6_{-Bis-isopropylidene-O}1_{-tert-butyl-D}

-sorbi-tol (22). A benzene solution (25 mL) of 2117_{(0.15 g, 0.48 mmol)} was treated with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 mmol) under reflux for 5 h. After cooling, the mixture was diluted with ether and quenched with saturated NH4Cl. The organic layer was washed with brine and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was chromatographed on

silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 4/1) to give 22 (0.13 g, 86%): [R]D23 +7.0° (c 14.8, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3,300 MHz)δ 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.31 (s, 3 H), 1.35 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 6 H), 2.14 (s, 1 H), 3.43 (d, J ) 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.80 (dt, J ) 2.6, 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.91-3.97 (m, 2 H), 3.99-4.05 (m, 2 H), 4.08-4.11 (m, 1 H);13_{C NMR} (CDCl3,75 MHz)δ 25.3, 26.6, 26.9, 27.2, 27.5, 63.7, 67.7, 69.7, 73.3, 77.1, 77.2, 80.3, 109.4, 109.7; HRMS calcd for C16H31O6 (M++ 1) 319.2120, found 319.2128.

O3_,O4_;O5_,O6_{-Bis-isopropylidene-O}2_-benzyl-O1

-tert-butyl-D-sorbitol (23). A THF solution (15 mL) of 22 (0.23 g, 0.72 mmol) was treated with NaH (0.07 g, 2.92 mmol) at room temperature for 15 min followed by benzyl bromide (0.11 mL, 0.86 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 16 h, and saturated NaHCO3 (15 mL) was introduced. The organic layer was washed with brine and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 20/1) to give 23 (0.24 g, 82%): [R]D24 +26.9 (c 12, CHCl3), mp 65-67 °C;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.32 (s, 3 H), 1.35 (s, 6 H), 1.38 (s, 3 H), 3.55-3.69 (m, 3 H), 3.82-3.86 (m, 1 H), 4.02-4.10 (m, 4 H), 4.60, 4.83 (AB q, J ) 11.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.21-7.36 (m, 5 H);13_{C NMR} (CDCl3,75 MHz)δ 25.3, 26.6, 26.8, 27.1, 27.5, 63.1, 67.6, 73.2, 73.4, 77.2, 80.5, 109.3, 109.5, 127.4, 127.6, 128.2, 128.4; HRMS calcd for C23H36O6408.2512, found 408.2522.

Allyl O2_,O3_;O4_,O6_{-Bis-isopropylidene-r-D}

-glucopyrano-side (29). To a solution of allyl R-D-glucopyranoside18(3.02 g,

13.7 mmol) in dry acetone (100 mL) was added TsOH (0.03 g, 0.16 mmol) and 2-methoxypropene (8 mL, 55 mmol), and the reaction was stirred for 2 h at 20 °C and quenched with Et3N (5 mL). The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (EtOAc/hexane 1/9) to afford 29 (3.15 g, 76.6%) as a colorless oil: [R]D27+86.6° (c 0.05, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)δ 1.38 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 3 H), 1.42 (s, 3 H), 1.49 (s, 3 H), 3.45-3.59 (m, 2 H), 3.71-3.88 (m, 3 H), 3.97-4.23 (m, 3 H), 5.11-5.18 (m, 2 H), 5.27 (d, J ) 17.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.89 (ddt, J ) 5.3, 10.9, 17.2 Hz, 1 H);13_C NMR (CDCl3,50 MHz)δ 19.0, 26.3, 26.7, 28.9, 62.2, 65.0, 68.7, 73.7, 73.9, 76.7, 96.9, 99.5, 111.3, 117.4, 133.4. Anal. Calcd for C15H24O6: C, 59.98; H, 8.05. Found C, 59.94; H, 8.12.

Allyl O3_{-tert-butyl-O}4_,O6_{-isopropylidene-R-D}

-glucopy-ranoside (30). The ethereal solution of MeMgI (2.4 mL, 2 M ether, 6.1 mmol) was evacuated to remove ether, and the residue was dissolved in benzene (175 mL). A solution of 29 (0.92 g, 3.06 mmol) in benzene (25 mL) was then added, the mixture was stirred at 50-60 °C for 1.5 h, and the reaction was quenched with NH4Cl solution (50 mL). Organic layer was separated, and the aqueous solution was extracted with ether (200 mL). The combined organic layers were washed succes-sively with water and brine and dried (MgSO4). Solvent was removed in vacuo to yield the residue which was chromato-graphed on silica gel (EtOAc/hexane 1/4) to afford 30 (0.83 g, 86%) as a colorless oil: [R]D27+110.8° (c 0.05, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3,200 MHz)δ 1.21 (s, 9 H), 1.37 (s, 3 H), 1.44 (s, 3 H), 2.06 (d, J ) 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.30-3.55 (m, 2 H), 3.55-3.88 (m, 4 H), 4.04 (dd, J ) 6.4, 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.22 (dd, J ) 5.4, 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.92 (d, J ) 3.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.21 (dd, J ) 1.5, 10.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.29 (dd, J ) 1.5, 17.3 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (ddt, J ) 5.7, 10.2, 17.3 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3,50 MHz)δ 19.0, 29.0, 29.3, 62.5, 64.3, 68.5, 72.2, 72.4, 73.3, 74.5, 98.3, 99.1, 118.0, 133.6; HRMS calcd for C16H28O6316.1886, found 316.1889.

Allyl 2-amino-2-deoxy-O4_,O6_{-isopropylidene-O}3

-tert-butyl-R-D-mannopyranoside (31). Pyridine (1.5 mL, 19.0 mmol) was added at -10 °C to a solution of 30 (3.0 g, 9.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2(60 mL). After brief stirring, Tf2O (1.2 mL, 11.4 mmol) was slowly added over a period of 30 min, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 0 °C. Cold water (20 mL) was then introduced. The aqueous layer was extracted with ether (50 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed in vacuo to yield the crude triflate (3.6 g, 8.8 mmol, 93%) which was dissolved in DMF (60 mL). NaN3(2.86 g, 44.0 mmol) was added, and the mixture was

(17) Pressman, B. C.; Anderson, L.; Lardy, H. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.

1950, 72, 2404.

(18) Talley, E. A.; Vale, M. D.; Yanovsky E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1945, 67, 2037.

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

stirred at 80 °C for 18 h. Then water was introduced, and the mixture was extracted with ether (60 mL). The organic layer was successively washed with water and brine and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed in vacuo to give the residue which was chromatographed on silica gel (EtOAc/hexane 1:4) to afford the corresponding azide (2.17 g, 72.3%) as a colorless oil: [R]D29 +72.4° (c 0.05, CHCl3); IR (KBr)ν 2107 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)δ 1.22 (s, 9 H), 1.36 (s, 3 H), 1.49 (s, 3 H), 3.50-4.05 (m, 7 H), 4.13 (ddt, J ) 1.2, 5.3, 12.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.50 (d, J ) 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.17-5.32 (m, 2 H), 5.88 (m, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 50 MHz)δ 19.3, 28.4, 29.2, 62.2, 65.3, 65.4, 68.1, 69.3, 70.2, 75.0, 98.4, 99.7, 117.9, 133.4. Anal. Calcd for C16H27N3O5: C, 56.29; H, 7.97; N, 12.31. Found C, 56.34; H, 8.32; N, 12.14.

Triphenylphosphine13_{(2.52 g, 9.60 mmol) was added to a} solution of the azide (3.27 g, 9.60 mmol) in THF (80 mL), and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. Water (0.25 mL) was then added, and the mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for an additional 12 h. Hexane (50 mL) was introduced, and the slurry was filtered. The filtrate was dried (MgSO4), and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give the residue which was chromatographed on silica gel (EtOAc/hexane 1/2) to afford 31 (2.34 g, 78%) as a colorless oil: [R]D29+57.4° (c 0.05, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)δ 1.17 (s, 9 H), 1.35 (s, 3 H), 1.46 (s, 3 H), 3.11 (br, 1 H), 3.60-3.85 (m, 7 H), 3.39 (ddt, J ) 1.2, 6.1, 13.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.13 (ddt, J ) 1.2, 5.2, 13.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.73 (br s, 1 H), 5.14-5.31 (m, 2 H), 5.89 (ddt, J ) 5.5, 10.4, 17.3 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 50 MHz)δ 19.2, 28.6, 29.2, 56.2, 62.5, 65.1, 67.9, 68.6, 69.8, 74.3, 99.5, 100.9, 117.3, 133.9. Anal. Calcd for C16H29NO5: C, 60.93; H, 9.27; N, 4.44. Found C, 60.92; H, 8.99; N, 3.95.

Methyl O2_-Methyl-cO3_,O6_{-di-tert-butyl-R-D}

-glucopyra-noside (33). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution of 32 (280 mg, 0.92 mmol) and MeMgI (4.0 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 8.0 mmol) was refluxed for 48 h. After usual workup and chromatographic separation (SiO2, hexane/EtOAc 3/1), 33 was obtained (170 mg, 58%): [R]D29+76.4° (c 0.01, CHCl3);1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 1.24 (s, 18 H), 1.79 (br, 1 H), 3.02 (dd, J ) 3.4, 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.26 (t, J ) 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.37 (s, 3 H), 3.45 (s, 3 H), 3.57 (m, 1 H), 3.60-3.80 (m, 3 H), 4.80 (d, J ) 3.4 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR} (CDCl3, 75 MHz)δ 29.2, 29.3, 54.8, 59.5, 62.4, 71.4, 72.6, 72.7, 75.3, 77.2, 82.1, 97.6; HRMS calcd for C16H32O6320.2199, found 320.2192.

O1_,O2_{-Isopropylidene-O}3_-methyl-O6_{-tert-butyl-r-D}

-glu-cofuranose (35). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution of 34 (274 mg, 1.0 mmol) was treated with MeMgI (3.0 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 6.0 mmol) under reflux for 12 h followed by usual workup to give 35 (140 mg, 55%): [R]D28-29.9° (c 0.09, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3507 cm-1_;1_{H NMR (CDCl} 3, 200 MHz)δ 1.16 (s, 9 H), 1.29 (s, 3 H), 1.45 (s, 3 H), 2.79 (d, J ) 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.39 (m, 1 H), 3.43 (s, 3 H), 3.58 (dd, J ) 3.2, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.84 (d, J ) 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.96 (m, 1 H), 4.05 (dd, J ) 2.9, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.53 (d, J ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.85 (d, J ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 26.1, 26.6, 27.4, 57.95, 63.3, 67.8, 73.2, 79.7, 81.6, 84.0, 104.9, 111.5. Anal. Calcd for C14H26O6: C, 57.91; H, 9.03. Found: C, 57.79; H, 9.13.

O1_,O2_{-Isopropylidene-O}6_{-tert-butyl-r-D-allofuranose (37).}

In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution of 3619_{(260 mg, 1.0 mmol) was treated with} MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 4.0 mmol) under reflux for 20 h followed by usual workup to give 3720_{(150 mg, 54%): [R]}

D32 +23.1° (c 0.04, CHCl3); mp 59-61 °C; IR (KBr)ν 3491, 3364 cm-1;1_{H NMR (CDCl} 3, 200 MHz)δ 1.20 (s, 9 H), 1.34 (s, 3 H), 1.56 (s, 3 H), 2.40 (d, J ) 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.48 (dd, J ) 4.8, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.64 (dd, J ) 3.4, 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (d, J ) 4.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.89 (dd, J ) 3.8, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.98 (m, 1 H), 4.08 (m, 1 H), 4.64 (t, J ) 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.75 (d, J ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H);13_C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz)δ 26.4, 26.7, 27.3, 62.7, 70.1, 70.9, 74.3,

79.6, 80.9, 103.8, 112.9. Anal. Calcd for C13H24O6: C, 56.49; H, 8.75. Found: C, 56.00; H, 8.80.

O3_{-tert-Butyl-O}6_-methyl-O1_,O2_{-isopropylidene-r-D}

-ga-lactopyranose (39). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a toluene solution of 3821_{(274 mg,} 1.0 mmol) was treated with MeMgI (2.0 mL, 2.0 M in Et2O, 4.0 mmol) at 60 °C for 40 h followed by usual workup to give 39 (150 mg, 52%): [R]D28+20.51° (c 0.4, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3443 cm-1_;1_{H NMR (CDCl} 3, 300 MHz)δ 1.23 (s, 9 H), 1.32 (s, 3 H), 1.48 (s, 3 H), 2.84 (d, J ) 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.37 (s, 3 H), 3.56 (dd, J ) 6.3, 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.64 (dd, J ) 5.8, 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.76 (t, J ) 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.80-3.84 (m, 1 H), 3.90-4.03 (m, 2 H), 5.54 (d, J ) 1.0 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 26.5, 27.6, 28.5, 59.3, 67.2, 70.3, 71.8, 75.4, 97.3, 108.0. Anal. Calcd for C14H26O6: C, 57.91; H, 9.03. Found: C, 57.86; H, 9.01.

Methyl O2_,O4_{-Bis-tert-butyl-r-D-mannopyranoside (41).}

In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, MeMgI (30 mmol, 30 mL in 1.0 M ether solution) was evacuated to remove ether. A benzene solution (30 mL) of 4022 (1.37 g, 5.0 mmol) was then introduced, and the reaction was refluxed for 24 h, quenched with NH4Cl, and extracted with ether. The organic layer was washed with water and brine and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 7/3) to yield 41 (0.78 g, 51%): mp 82-83 °C; [R]D27 +4.4°(c 2.5, CHCl3); IR (KBr) ν 3439, 3377 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)δ 1.22 (s, 9 H), 1.23 (s, 9 H), 2.03 (t, J ) 6.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.09 (d, J ) 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H), 3.48 (ddd, J ) 3.2, 5.2, 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.57 (dd, J ) 7.2, 8.8, Hz, 1 H), 3.65 (ddd, J ) 4.0, 7.6, 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.71 (ddd, J ) 5.6, 7.2, 11.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.77-3.83 (m, 2 H), 4.60 (d, J ) 2.0 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 28.5, 29.1, 54.8, 62.3, 69.5, 71.5, 71.6, 71.8, 74.8, 75.3, 101.1; HRMS calcd for C15H30O6306.2042, found 306.2047. Anal. Calcd: C, 58.78; H, 9.87. Found: C, 58.77; H, 9.76.

Methyl O2_{-tert-Butyl-O}4_,O6_{-isopropylidene-r-D}

-man-nopyranoside (42). In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution (50 mL) of MeMgI (32.8 mmol) and 40 (500 mg, 1.82 mmol) was stirred at 40 °C for 24 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the reaction was quenched with NH4Cl and extracted with ether (3× 50 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine and dried (MgSO4). The residue obtained was chromato-graphed over silica gel (hexane/EtOAc 4/1) to give, in addition to 41 (120 mg, 23%), 42 (200 mg, 38%) as a colorless oil: [R]D24 +2.3°(c 4.0, CHCl3); IR (neat)ν 3483 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.20 (s, 9 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H), 1.51 (s, 3 H), 3.37 (s, 3 H), 3.42 (d, J ) 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.52-3.61 (m, 2 H), 3.63-3.69 (m, 2 H), 4.07-4.12 (m, 2 H), 4.86 (s, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 26.1, 27.3, 27.9, 55.0, 63.9, 67.3, 72.7, 74.1, 75.1, 78.0, 98.2, 109.5; HRMS calcd for C14H26O6290.1729, found 290.1732.

Acetonide 46. In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution (50 mL) of MeMgI (8.0 mmol) and 43 (520 mg, 2.0 mmol) was refluxed for 18 h followed by usual workup to give 46 (460 mg, 75%): [R]D28 +47.07° (c 0.09, CHCl3); mp 90-92 °C; IR (KBr)ν 3391 cm-1; 1_{H NMR (CDCl} 3, 300 MHz)δ 1.14 (s, 3 H), 1.21 (s, 9 H), 1.34 (s, 3 H), 1.39 (s, 3 H), 2.62 (t, J ) 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.09 (d,J ) 9.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.18 (s, 1 H), 3.36 (s, 3 H), 3.51 (d, J ) 9.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.74 (m, 1 H), 4.00 (d, J ) 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.26 (m, 2 H);13_C NMR (75 MHz)δ 25.4, 28.1, 29.31, 58.9, 62.1, 69.8, 73.8, 75.7, 77.9, 78.3. Anal. Calcd for C15H30O6: C, 58.79; H, 9.87. Found: C, 58.52; H, 9.79.

Acetonide 49. In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution (50 mL) of MeMgI (4.0 mmol) and 44 (260 mg, 1.0 mmol) was refluxed for 18 h followed by usual workup to give 49 (160 mg, 55%): [R]D28 +1.85° (c 0.01, CHCl3); mp 125-126 °C; IR (KBr)ν 3353 cm-1; 1_{H NMR (CDCl}

3, 300 MHz)δ 1.15 (s, 3 H), 1.18 (s, 9 H), 1.37 (s, 3 H), 1.49 (s, 3 H), 2.97 (dd, J ) 5.1, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.07 (s,

(19) (a) Collins, P. M. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 1809. (b) Baker D. C.; Horton D.; Tindall, C. G., Jr. Carbohydr. Res. 1972, 24, 192.

(20) Kawana, M.; Emoto, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 53, 230.

(21) (a) Girard, P.; Kagan, H. Tetrahedron 1971, 27, 5911. (b) Rathbone, E. B.; Stephen, A. M.; Pachler, K. G. R. Carbohydr. Res.

1971, 20, 357.

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org

3 H), 3.22 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.39 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.57 (t, J ) 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.70 (m, 3 H), 4.22 (dt, J ) 4.9, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.42 (dd, J ) 1.5, 6.8 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl}

3,75 MHz) δ 20.2, 25.2, 27.2, 27.4, 61.6, 67.3, 72.1, 73.1, 73.6, 74.5, 78.1, 108.2. Anal. Calcd for C14H28O6: C, 57.50; H, 9.66. Found: C, 57.23; H, 9.63.

Acetonide 50. In a manner similar to that described in the general procedure, a benzene solution (20 mL) of MeMgI (20 mmol) and 4523 _{(1.15 g, 5.0 mmol) was refluxed for 24 h} followed by usual workup to give 50 (0.83 g, 63%): mp 62-63 °C; [R]D27+35.5°(c 4.5, CHCl3); IR (KBr)ν 3507 cm-1;1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz)δ 1.21 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.23 (s, 9 H), 1.33 (s, 3 H), 1.42 (s, 3 H), 2.63 (br s, 2 H), 3.64-3.67 (m, 2 H), 3.72-3.73 (m, 2 H), 4.25 (q, J ) 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.31 (dd, J ) 6.3, 7.8 Hz, 1 H);13_{C NMR (CDCl} 3, 75 MHz)δ 21.3, 25.0, 27.6, 28.8, 61.4, 66.6, 72.2, 75.5, 76.6, 77.7, 107.9; HRMS calcd for C13H27O5(M + 1) 263.1858, found 263.1857.

Acknowledgment. Support from the National

Sci-ence Council of the Republic of China is gratefully

acknowledged.

Supporting Information Available: NMR spectra for 5c, 7-9, 11, 14, 16a,b, 18, 20, 22, 23, 29-31, 33, 42, and 50 and the X-ray crystallographic data for 9 and 23 (36 pages). This material is contained in libraries on microfiche, immediately follows this article in the microfilm version of the journal, and can be ordered from the ACS; see any current masthead page for ordering information.

JO981579A

(22) Stevens, C. L.; Glinski, R. P.; Taylor, K. G.; Sirokman, F. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 592.

(23) (a) Heyns, K.; Neste, R.; Paal, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 42, 4011. (b) De Jongh, D. C.; Biemann, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 67.

Downloaded by NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIV on August 25, 2009 | http://pubs.acs.org