後常態科學爭議與媒體偏差 : 以非核家園新聞為例 - 政大學術集成

全文

(1)立. 政治大. ‧ 國. 學. Post Normal Science and Media Bias – A Case Study of Taiwan Nuclear-Free Homeland News. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(2) 立. 310. 政 2016治 5 大20. 2018. 9. 30. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. I. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(3) Abstract When the uncertainty of scientific issues is raised and the level of coverage is wide, it becomes a "Post-Normal Science" issue. The survey shows that news media provides the main source of scientific information for the public; while the media have media bias, there will be different ways of presenting the same event. This study takes Taiwan's "Nuclear-Free Homeland" dispute as an example to explore the media bias in the news related to Liberty Times, Taiwan Apple Daily, United Daily News and. 政治大. China Times. The intention is to reflect the multiple presentations of Taiwan's four. 立. major newspapers on post-normal scientific issues and to judge whether there are. ‧ 國. 學. political deviations in the "Nuclear-Free Homeland" issues of different newspapers.. ‧. This study collected a total of 310 "Nuclear-Free Homeland" related news from. sit. y. Nat. May 20, 2016, to September 30, 2018, by sampling. The content analysis method is. n. al. er. io. used to examine the similarities and differences between the media focus, frame, source, and media attitude.. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. Results of the analysis indicate that the newspapers with the most obvious media bias caused by political deviations are Liberty Times and China Times. The Liberty Times mostly describes the "Nuclear-Free Homeland" policy in a positive and progressive way, supporting the government to abolish nuclear power; China Times, on the contrary, the "Nuclear-Free Homeland" is often presented as a policy of lack of electricity and negative impact on the economy, and support the use of nuclear power.. Key Words: Post-Normal Science, Media Bias, Political Bias, Content Analysis. II. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(4) ...................................................................... 1 ................................................................................. 6 .......................................................... 6. ...................................................................... 8 ........................................................................ 18 ................................................................ 27 ................................................................ 36 ........................................................................... 40. 政治大 ............................................................................... 44 立. ‧ 國. 學. ................................................................ 44 ........................................................................... 45. ‧. ........................................................................... 50. sit. y. Nat. ............................................................................... 52. er. io. .................................................................... 52. n. al ........................................................................... 57 iv. n U engchi ........................................................................... 66. Ch. ........................................................................... 74 ........................................................................... 81 ............................................................................ 90 .................................................................... 90 ........................................................................ 99 ............................................................................................. 104 ...................................................................... 123. III. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(5) 1. ........................................................... 24. 2. ................................................... 26. 3. ................................................................... 32. 4. ....................................................................... 38. 5. ............................................................... 47. 6. .............................................................................. 51. 7-1. ......................... 55. 7-2. ......................... 56. 8-1. ..................... 57 治政 ............................................ 59 大. 8-2. 立. 8-3. 9-4. y. ..... 64. sit. ................................................ 66. al. n. 9-3. io. 9-2. ......... 63. ......................... 67. er. 9-1. Nat. 8-7. ............. 62. ‧. 8-6. ‧ 國. 8-5. ......... 61. 學. 8-4. ......... 60. Ch. i Un. v. ......... 70. i e n g c h............................................ 71. 9-5. ..................... 72. 9-6. ..................... 72. 9-7. ......................... 73. 9-8. ..................... 73. 10-1. ........... 74. 10-2. ................... 75. 10-3. 77. 10-4. 78. 10-5. ... 79 IV. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(6) 10-6. 80. 11-1. ........................... 81. 11-2. ................... 84. 11-3. ........................... 85. 11-4. ........................... 85. 11-5. ............................... 86. 11-6. ........................... 86. 11-7. ............... 87. 11-8. ................... 88. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. V. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(7) 1. ....................................................................... 17. 2. ....................................................................... 20. 3. .............................................................................. 37. 4-1. ..... 52. 4-2. ..... 53. 4-3. . 54. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. VI. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(8) 2015 」《. 2016. 」 2025. 50%. 30%. 20%. 2017. 》』. 」 2007. 」. 立 23. io. 」. al. n 《. y. 《. 2016. er. 《. Nat. 」. 3. ‧. ‧ 國. 2018. 學. 」. 20%. 政治大《 ——. sit. 」. Ch. 」. engchi. i Un. 」. v. 」」. 」」《. 」. 」. 」. Funtowicz & Ravetz, 1993 《. 」 stakeholders. Funtowicz & Ravetz, 1993. 」」. 」 1. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(9) León, 2008. 」 2006. Corbett & Durfee, 2004. 72%. general news outlets. Pew Research Center, 2017. 」」. 」」. 」. 」. 《. Gentzkow, Shapiro & Stone, 2015. 政治大」. Tan &. Weaver, 2010 Groseclose & Milyo, 2005. 立. 」. ‧ 國. 學. 1998 」. ‧. 1994. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」 slant. 」. 」. Gunther & Christen, 1999. 」. 」 Bateson, 1972. 」. Lippmann,. 1922 2. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(10) 2017 2003. 」. Brewer, 2002. Culley, Ogley-oliver, Carton, Street, 2010 」. Druckman & Lupia, 2017. 」. 」 Scheufele, 2006. 立. 」. 」. y. Creed, Langstraat & Scully,. n. al. 」. er. io. 」. 」 3. Brewer, 2002. sit. Nat. Van Gorp, 2007. 2002. 」. ‧. 」. Barthe 2007. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 」 sponsors. 政治大. i Un. v. Brossard & Shanahan, 2003. Ch. e n g c h」i. 31. 」. 2018. 」. Sniderman & Stiglitz, 2012 」. 」 2014 」. 」. Patterson & Donsbagh, 1996. 」. 」. 」. Elsasser & Dunlap, 2013 Doyle, 2011. 」. 3. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(11) 」. 」」. 」 Elsasser & Dunlap, 2013 Feldman, Maibach, Roser-Renouf &. Leiserowitz, 2012 Aday, 2010. 政」治大. 立. 1997. Gamson & Modigliani, 1989 Wang, Nan Li &. ‧. Culley, Ogley-oliver, Carton & Street, 2010. Elsasser & Dunlap, 2013 Feldman, Maibach, Roser-Renouf &. sit. y. Nat. Jingping Li, 2014. n. al. er. io. Leiserowitz, 2012 Doyle, 2011 Aday, 2010 」. Barth, 2007. 學. ‧ 國. Arul Aram, Prem Nivas & Ramya, 2014. i Un. v. Eberl, Boomgaarden & Wagner, 2017. Ch. e n」g c h i 」. 」. 、」」. 」」. 」. 」 2014 4. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(12) 」. 《」. 」. 」. 」. 立. 」. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 5. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(13) 」. 」 media reality constructivism 」」. 」. 政治大 1994. 」. 立. 」. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 」. 」. 」. 」. ‧. 」. sit. n. al. er. io. 1998. y. Nat. 」. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 24. 」. 」. Ravetz, 1999 1994. 」. 」. 」. 」」. 」. 6. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(14) 」」. 《 Tan & Weaver, 2010. 《. & Milyo, 2005. Groseclose. distortion. 」. filtering. 治政」大. 立. 學. ‧ 國. Gentzkow, Shapiro & Stone, 2015 slant. Gunther & Christen, 1999. ‧. 」. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 1999. io. ≧. 」. 」. Ch. engchi. Mullainathan & Shleifer, 2005. i」v n U Xiang. biased. 」 Sarvary. 2007. conscientious 」《. 」」. 」. 7. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(15) 」. 」《. 」. 《. 」」」」. 」. 立. ‧ 國. 學 y. Nat. io. 」. al. n. 」. 」. ‧. 《. 」. sit. 」. 政治」大. er. 」. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」《《 2015 2009. 2016. 」 1998. 2005. 2015 8. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(16) 2015 2015. 」. 21. 《. 」. 」. 」. 16 - 18% 」. 」 2015. 5. 」」」. 」. 立. 」. 政治大 2016. ‧ 國. 學. 6.25%. 《. 《. 《. a12% l C h. 2017. 45.4%. 《. 32.4%. er. 《. n. 4.1%. io. 《. 《. Nat. 97.95%. 」. y. 2.05%. 2016. ‧. 1.8%. sit. 91.95%. 《. 《. engchi. 」. i Un. 1.3%. v. 《. 4.8%. 」. 」 2016. 2012. 2013. COPD 2018. 3. 23. 9. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(17) 2015. 2015. 21. COP 21 2. C 2030. 20%」. 2.87. 政治大. 立. 2.3. 」. ‧ 國. 5,300 2016. ‧. 」. y. n. al. 2014. er. io. 《. Ch. 」《. engchi. i Un. v. 《. 《 ≧. 2030. 2014. Nat. 《. 2005. 學. 2.83. 2016. sit. 2005. 《《. 《」. 2017 2016. 9. 2013. 17. 2025 1.0% 10. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(18) 2018. 」. 2016. 2017. 2%. 97. 」. 《」. 」《. 《. 立」. 政治大. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 《「. 」. ‧. 2014. y. 」. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 2017. 《. Ch. e n g」c h i. i Un. v. 」」. 《《. 」. 2011. 《. 」. Shrader-Frechette. 」. 」」. 」 Chakravorty 」. Magne. Moreaux 2012 《. 11. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(19) 《 carbon free energy 」」 2025 50%. 30%. 20%. 」. 《. 《. 」《》』. 」《. 」. 2017. 2017. 治政 2025 大. 立 2015. 《. al. n. 96. 《 95-. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2018. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2025. Ch. engchi. 2009. i Un. v. 2011. 」 Arul Aram, Prem Nivas & Ramya,. 《 2014. 2015. 」. 」. 」. 」. 《. 」. 」. 12. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(20) 」. 」. 2007. 《《. 」. 」. 」 2013 」. 2017. 」 209,233. 2017. 19,722. 政治大. 「. 立. 3. 16. 」. 「. ‧ y. 」. io. sit. Nat. 」. n. al. er. 2016. 學. ‧ 國. 239. 9. i Un. 2018. Ch. v. e n g c h i」. 2017. 」. 」. 」. Beck. 」 Beck, 1986. 」 267. 」 Beck. 2004. 。. 」. 266」. 。」. 282 13. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(21) 」 1982. 《。 2002. 」. 1982. 2. 28. 1982. 1985. 《. 政治大. 學. 」. ‧ 1996. al. n. 24. 」 10 10. Ch. v. 」. 2000. 27. 《 2014. 4. 25 2011. 」. engchi. i Un. 18. 」. 2016. 21. er. io. 5. 5. sit. Nat. 」. y. 2013. ‧ 國. 立. 2000. 10. 27. 11. 」」」 14. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(22) 2011. 《 2011. 11. 3. 11. 4. 2012. 》』. 《」. 6. 2016. 2012. 」 2015. 」. 2017. 。 12. 10 2016 2025. 16. 3. 2016. 2018. al. 50%. 14. 7. 2025. n. 2. 7. er. io. 2017. 7. sit. y. Nat. 2018. 」《 20%. 3 2018. ‧. 3. 9. ‧ 國. 2018. 2016. 學. 12. 立. 治政」大. Ch. 2014. 30%」《. engchi. 2014. i Un. v. 」. 」. 2011. 」 28.3%. 56.0%. 38.2% 2014. 46.8%. 2012 2013. 5. 15. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(23) 31. 2014. 4. 28. 2015. 2013. 3. 13. 34.3%. 」「. 29.6%. 55%. 2015. 《. 42.4%. 2016. 6 50%. 42.9% 2016. 」. 15 2014. 40.2% 2013. 」. 2014. 4 30%. 」. 2015. 2017. ‧ 國. 28. 2017. 8. 28. 2018. 3. 33.9% 74.1% 4. n. al. sit. 2018. 54.7%. 36.8%. er. io. 31. 8. ‧. Nat. 3. 40%. 60.9%. 52.6%. 2018. 2016. 學. 8. 25. 政45.5% 治大. 立. 21.3%. 23. y. 37.3%. 2017. 45.5%. Ch. i Un. v. 57.9%. engchi 79.7%. 29.1% 45.3% 2025 2018. 4. 24. 16. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(24) 1 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2011. 2012. 2013. 立. 政治大 2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018*. *2018. al. sit. n. 」. 《. er. io 2030. 《. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 《. Nat. 」. Ch. i Un. 2005. e n g《c h i. v 20% 」. 」《」 ≧. 」. 2015 」」. 《. 17. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(25) 2025 」《」. 」. 」. 」. 立. 政治大. n. al. sit. 」. 」 2014. Funtowicz. 」. er. io. 《. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. 」. Ch. 1972. engchi. i Un. Ravetz 1993. v. post-normal science 」」. 」」 extended peer community 」. 18. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(26) 」」」」. 」. 」」. 《. 」」. Funtowicz & Ravetz, 2003. 」 Ravetz 1999. 立. 」. 」. 政治大」. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 」」. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 19. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(27) 2. 政治大. “What is post-normal science” by Ravetz, I. R. 1999,. 立. Futures-the Journal of Forecasting Planning and Policy, 31(7), p. 650.. ‧ 國. 學. Y. ‧. X. 」. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 《. stakeholders 」. Ch. 」. engchi. i Un. v. 」 2000. 」. 」 20. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(28) 」. 」 Ravetz, 1999. 」. 」. scientific consensus Druckman. 2015. 」. 」. 」. 」. 立. 《. 政治。 Bolsen 大. 、. 」. sit. 2025. n. er. 」. al. 」. ‧. 」. io. 」. 」. Nat. 」. Cook. 學. 」. Druckman. 」. ‧ 國. 」. 。. 」. 」 2014. 。. y. Bolsen. 」. Ch. engchi. i」v n U 」《. 《. 」. 2018. 。 2017. 7. 9. 2. 14 《. 21. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(29) 」《」. 《. 」. 」. 」、. 」. 」. 立. 政2014 治大. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 2014. 」. ‧. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 」. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」. 」. 」」. 」」. Dunwoody, 1986 」. 22. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(30) Conrad 1999. 」. 」. 」. 」. 」」. 」. 」 Brossard & Shanahan, 2003. 」」. 立. 政治大. 」. Corbett & Durfee, 2004. Stocking &. ‧. 2006. n. al. er. io. sit. y. 」. Nat. Scheufele 2014. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 」. 」. 2009. 」」. Holstein, 1993. Nisbet. 」. Ch 、. engchi. 」i n U. v. 」. 」」. Nisbet. Scheufele 2009. 」. 」 Ho et al., 2018 23. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(31) 」. 」. 」」. 」. 『. 」. 。. 」. 」」 Palfreman 2006. 」. 」 Wang, Nan Li & Jingping. 」. 政治大Palfreman, 2006. Culley, Ogley-oliver, Carton & Street, 2010. 立 1. 學. 」. ‧ y. Nat. 《」. n. al. er. io. 」. Ch 」《. sit. ‧ 國. Li, 2014. engchi. i Un. v. 《. 」」. 」 Culley 2010. Ogley-oliver. 」. Carton. Street. 」」. Jingping Li. Nan Li. Wang. 2014. 24. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(32) 《. 」. 1%. 」. 」. 」. 」. 」 2. 」 2017. 8. 12. 2015. 2007. 2014. 2016 2013. Chakravorty, Magne, Moreaux, 2012. Shrader-Frechette,. io. sit. y. Nat. 2011. 2016. 2017. ‧. 2013. 》』. 23. n. al. er. 16. 立2016. 政治2017 大. 3. 學. 3. ‧ 國. 2017. 2018. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 25. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(33) 2 1.. 1. 2.. 2.. 3. 4.. 3.. 《. 1.. 1.. 2. 2. 3.. 」政治大3. 4. 5.. 學 ‧. ‧ 國. 立. 《. 6.. Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. y. 《. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」. 26. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(34) Lippmann 1922. 」」 Bartlett. 1932 Bartlett. 」. pre-stored schemata. 」. 1972. 立. 」. 2010 治政大 frame Bateson. 3. 學. Bateson. 1932. ‧. Goffman 1975. 」. y. Nat. 」. io. sit. 」. n. al. er. keying. 」. Bartlett, 1932 」. 」. ‧ 國. Bateson. 」. footing. Ch. engchi. i Un 」. v. 2010. 」 Goffman. natural frameworks. frameworks. social 」. purely physical. 」. 」. 1999. 30-31. Goffman 27. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(35) representation. 」 discourse 《. 」」. 」. 」. 」. 」. 」. reproduce 」. 」. 立. 政治大」. ‧ 國. 學. 」. frames 」. 」. sit. al. n. 」. er. io 1993. y. Nat Entman. 」. ‧. 」. community. Ch. i Un. framing. engchi. v. 」. 」. 」 Entman. 52-53. 28. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(36) 」. 」. 」」 Druckman. 」」. 」. 」. 立. 」. 」. 政治大」 status quo bias. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 2009. 《. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. Nisbet. y. 2017. Lupia. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」」. 」」. 」. 」. 29. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(37) Lippmann 1922. truth. 」. 」 reality. 」. 」. 」 1994. 」. 174. 」. 」. 」. 政治大. 立. 」. Callaghan & Schnell, 2001. ‧. 」. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Brewer, 2002. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 2017. short-cuts. Ch. engchi. Brossard & Nisbet, 2007. i Un. v. information 」. 」. 」. 」. 」 2003. 」. 」 symbol-handlers 」 Gitlin, 1980. 」 Reese 2001. 」 30. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(38) 」. 」. 」. 」. 」. Gamson &. 」《. Modigliani, 1989. 」」. 」 Goffman. 」. 政治大. 」. 」. 」. ‧. Pan & Kosicki, 1993. 」. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 」. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 」. 」. 1975. Ch. engchi. Dei vVreese, 2005 n U. Van Gorp,. 」. 2007 Holton. Farrell. Fudge 2014. 」. 」. 」」 Davis & Russ, 2015. 2010. Bolsen, 2011. Dirikx & Gelders,. Nisbet, 2009 Nisbet & Scheufele, 2009 Nisbet & Lewenstein, 2002. Gamson & Modigliani, 1989 31. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(39) 3. 《《」」」」」. 政治大. 立. 學. ‧ 國. 」. 」」. ‧ sit 1989. n. al. Ch. 」. engchi. er. io. Modigliani. y. Nat Gamson. 」. i Un. v. 《. 」 Gamson. 《. Modigliani. 1989. Nisbet. 」. Lewenstein 2002 Modigliani. Gamson 」. 」 32. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(40) 」. 」 Gamson. 」. Modigliani. 」. 」. Davis & Russ, 2015. 」 Dirikx & Gelders, 2010 Nisbet, 2009. Bolsen, 2011. Nisbet & Scheufele, 2009 inductive. 」. deductive. 」. 」. 政治大. 立. Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000. 學. ‧ 國. 」. Davis & Russ, 2015 Bolsen, 2011 Nisbet & Scheufele, 2009. ‧. Dirikx & Gelders, 2010 Nisbet, 2009. Nisbet &. sit. n. al. 《. 」. er. io. 1989. y. Nat. Lewenstein, 2002 Semetko & Valkenburg, 2000 Gamson & Modigliani,. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」」」. 」 2018. 4. 」. 23. 《 33. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(41) 《. 」. 」」. 」 strength. 」. 」. 政治大sponsors. 立. Carragee & Roefs, 2004. 」. ‧ 國. 學. 」. ‧ Van Gorp, 2007 Brewer, 2002. y. al. Weber. sit. 」. n. 」. Geiß. er. 2016. io. Quiring. 《. Nat. 」. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. Nisbet, Hart,. Myers & Ellithorpe, 2013 Chong & Druckman, 2007 loudest. 」. 」. 」. 」. 」」. 」. 」」. 」. 34. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(42) 」」. Ross. 」. Bantimaroudin 2006 」. 《. 《」. 」. 」. 」《. Carragee & Roefs, 2004. 政治大. 立. frame. dominant 」. ‧ 國. 學. 」. al. n. Entman, 2003. sit. 」. Van Gorp,. er. io. 2007. 」. y. Nat. 」. ‧. Matthes, 2009 Entman, 1993. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」. 35. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(43) Gans, 1979. 」. Brown. Bybee Wearden. Straughan. 1987 」 Hänggli, 2012. 」. Hänggli & Kriesi, 2010. 」 Creed, Langstraat & Scully, 2002. 立. 」. 政治大」. 」. Dickson. 1994. 」. sit. n. al. Entman. 2007. 」. er. io. 」. y. Nat. 」. 」. ‧. ‧ 國. Callaghan & Schnell, 2001. 學. 」. iv Wolfsfeldn Sheafer, 2006 C h」 engchi U. 」. 」. Cross 2010. 」. 」」. 」」. 」. 36. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(44) 」. 」」」 Hänggli, 2012. 」 2004. Carragee Roefs,. 」. 」」. 」」. Scheufele 1999, 2000. Sheafer, 2006. 政治 frame 大 building. 學. ‧ 國. 立. Wolfsfeld. 3. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. “Framing as a theory of media effects” by Scheufele, D. A. 1999, Journal of communication, 49(1), p. 115.. Scheufele 」. 」. 」. 37. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(45) Scheufele 」. 」. 」 Brossard. 《. Shanahan. 2003. 」. 」」. Arul Aram. Prem Nivas. Ramya 2014. 」. 治 2010 Culley, Ogley-oliver, 政 Cross, 大. 立. Nisbet & Lewenstein, 2002. Schnell, 2001 Brown, Bybee, Wearden & Straughan, 1987. ‧ y. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 4. Ch. engchi. 《 Crawley. Callaghan &. 學. ‧ 國. Carton & Street, 2010 Crawley, 2007. i Un. v. 」. 2007. 《. Crawley. 」。. 」 38. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(46) Nisbet. 《. Lewenstein 2002. 《. Culley oliver. Carton. Street. 2010. Ogley-. 《. 」. 《. 立. 政治大《. 」. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. 」. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 39. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(47) Carragee &. 」 Roefs, 2004. Sniderman & Stiglitz, 2012. 」. 」 Callaghan & Schnell, 2001 」. Entman. 2007 Entman. 政治大立166. 」. ‧ 國. 學. distortion bias content bias. 」. ‧. 」. y. Nat. decision-making bias. sit. n. al. 」. er. io. 」 Hofstetter. Buss 1978. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 」. 」. 」 Hofstetter. 」. Buss. 」」. 40. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(48) 」」 Donsbagh. 1996. Patterson. 」. 」. 」. 」 partisan bias. 」. 」. 」 liberal bias bias. conservative. 」. 」」. 政」治大. 」. 立. 《 2014. 」. ‧ 國. 學. Elsasser &. 」. y. al. sit. 2005. NBC. Fox News. n. 」. Aday,. er. 2010. io. Aday. Nat. 2010. ‧. Dunlap, 2013 Feldman, Maibach, Roser-Renouf & Leiserowitz, 2012. Ch. engchi. i Un 《. v. Fox News. 」」」. 」 Maibach. Roser-Renouf. Feldman. Leiserowitz 2012 41. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(49) 」. 《. 」. 」」 Fox News. op-ed 2013. 」. 2010. 立. 。」. 」. io. 2008. n. 」」. y. Doyle 2011. al. 2008. ‧. 2025. Nat. 」. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 《. 政」治大. 」. sit. 2007. Elsasser. 」. er. Dunlap. 」. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 《」. Mail 」」」」. 」」. Wang, Nan Li & Jingping Li, 2014 」 42. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(50) 」 2010. 2007. 2000. 2004. 『. 」. 」. 」」. 立. 政」治大」. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 43. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(51) 」. 」. 1927. Harold Lasswell. propaganda. 」. 立. 」」治政」大 Macnamara, 2005. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 1989. 」. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 2017. Ch. engchi U. v ni. 2017. 」」」. 44. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(52) WiseNews 」. 2025 2016. 5. 20. 2018. 9. 30. or. or. 立. 政治大 28. ‧. 96. 88. 90. 310. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 36. 1. 7. 學. ‧ 國. constructed week …. WiseNews. y. or. Ch. engchi. 1.. i Un. v. 」. 2. 3. 4. 5. 45. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(53) A1, A2, B1……. 」. 《. sit. 7.. y. 4. 8.. n. al. 9.. er. 6.. 3.. ‧. 1.. io. 5.. 《. Nat. 2.. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. Ch. engchi. 」. i Un. v. 」. 」. 1.. (1). (2) (3). 《 46. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(54) 2.. (1) (3). (2). (4). 3.. (1) (3). 」. (2) 《. 4.. (1). (2) (3). 《. (4). (5). (6). 《. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. y. ‧. 5. n. al. er. io. sit. 」. Ch. 」. 」 en gchi. i Un. v. 」」」《. 」《. 47. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(55) 」. 」」. ◼. ╱. 2025 … ○. 立. 政治大. 2017-03-12 |. ‧. 2025. n. al. er. io 《. 」. y. 」. sit. Nat. 」. 《. 」. | A11. 學. ‧ 國. Ch. e n」g c h i. i Un. v. 《」. 」《. 《. 《《. 」. 48. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(56) 」. 1. 2. 3. 4.. ‧ 《. y. sit. n. al. 3.. 」. er. io. 2.. 」. Nat. 1.. 」. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大. Ch. engchi. 4.. i Un. v. 」. 49. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(57) 31. 」 Dartmouth College 」. 『. Krippendorff’s Alpha stability accuracy 『. reproducibility. Hayes & Krippendorff, 2007. Krippendorff’s Alpha. ReCal2: Reliability for 2 Coders. 立. 0.8. 『治政大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 50. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(58) 6 Krippendorff's Alpha. 《. 」. 90.3%. .84. 96.8%. .82. 95.7%. .89. 93.5%. .87. 100.0%. 1. 100.0%. 1. 100.0%. 1. 96.8%. .87. 100.0% 政治 100.0%大. 1 1. 96.8%. .84. 100.0%. 1. 96.8%. 《. ‧. 93.5%. y. io. 100.0% 96.8%. n. Ch. er. Nat. al. 93.5%. sit. 96.8%. 《. 《. 1. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 100.0%. i Un. 93.5%. v. .90 .87 .87 .82 1 .91 .82. e n g c 97.4% hi. .92. 93.5%. .92. (. ). 96.8%. .94. (. ). 100.0%. 1. 93.5%. .87. 96.8%. .92. 96.8%. .93. 90.3%. .86. 96.6%. .92. ( (. ) ). 51. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(59) 」 2016. 20. 6. 20. 2016. 5. 29. 2016. 政治大. 6. 立. 88. 4-1. ‧. 2025. 8. 2018. 7. y. Nat. 《. n. al. er. io 4-1. 學. 2017. 36. ‧ 國. 90. 96. sit. 5. 5. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 52. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(60) 4-2 2018. 9 2018. 8. 9. 4-2. 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. 2017. 《. C 27 h. engchi. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 815. i Un. v. 4-3 2018. 2018. 53. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(61) 4-3. 政治大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. 7-1. ‧. SPSS. y 」. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. χ² ₌ 62.680, p < .001. 4.6. 2.1. Ch. e n2.7g c h i. i Un. v. -. 3.7. 『. -2.7 4.1. 2.9. -2.9. -2.4. 54. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(62) 『. 」」. 7-1. % 1. 39.6. (2.1). (-2.7). (-1.7). (-1.4). 71.6. 12.5. 4.5. 11.4. (2.9). (-.9). (-1.0). (-.4). 61.1. 17.8. 5.6. 5.6. (-.5). (-.7). (-.5). (-2.4). 22.2 0.0. 100.0. (-2.9) 10.0. 100.0. (1.6). sit. al. er. 1.96. n. io. 2. 100.0. (4.1). χ² ₌ 62.680, p < .001 1. 100.0. (-1.6). ‧. ‧ 國. (1.8). Nat. 2. 3.1. 學. 2. 22.9. 政 (2.7)治 (3.7) 大 0.0 5.6 立0.0. (-4.6) 72.2. 2. 12.5. y. 2. 21.9. Ch. engchi 7-2. i Un. v. SPSS. χ² ₌ 15.491, p < .05. 」. A05 10.2%. 7.8%. 4.2%. 0.0%. 55. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(63) A02-A05 A05. -2.4. 3.0. A02-A05. A05. 7-2. % A01 4.2. (-1.7). (-.1). (1.0). 10.2. 59.1. (1.7). (1.2). (-2.0). 7.8. 60.0. 32.2. (.6). (1.4). (-1.7). 100.0 100.0 100.0. y. ‧ 國. 30.7. ‧. io 1.96. 47.2. 100.0. sit. 立. χ² ₌ 15.491, p < .05 1. 0.0. Nat. 1. (3.0). 學. 1. 51.0. 治政 (-2.4) 大 52.8. (-1.1). 1. 44.8. n. al. er. 1. A05. A02-A05. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 56. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(64) 16 《. 《. 8-1. 38.4%. 80. 25.8% 1. ‧. 97. 《. 31.3% 10.0%. y. Nat. 31 9. io. n. al. Ch. 43. e n g39c h i. 2.9%. sit. 」. 《. 119. er. 《. 41.3%. 1. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大 128. i Un. v. 1. 13.9% 12.6%. 21. 6.8%. 15. 4.8% 1. 《. 49. 15.8%. 28. 9.0%. 23. 7.4% 1. 《《 1. 310. 49. 15.8%. 20. 6.5%. 9. 2.9%. 」 57. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(65) 」. 」」」」. 《. 《. 《. 」《. 立. 政治大. 學. 」」. 《. y. 」. n. al. er. io. sit. Nat. 」. ‧. ‧ 國. 」. 《. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 8-2. 58. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(66) 1. 8-2. %. 《. 《. 25.0. 45.8. 28.1. 24.0. 14.6. 66.7. 27.8. 22.2. 5.6. 25.0. 53.4. 46.6. 18.2. 21.6. 19.3. 60.0. 33.3. 13.3. 25.6. 22.2. 1. 96, 36, 88, 90. 」. 《 45.8%. 政治」大. 」. 立. ‧ 國. 學. 53.4%. 60.0%. ‧. 66.7%. 46.6%. sit. y. Nat. al. n. 13.3%. Ch. 21.6%. 」. er. io. 24.0%. 25%. 28.1%. 22.2%. 18.2%. 『. engchi. i Un. v. 」. 25.6%. 5.6%. 《 25.0%. 『 22.2%. 19.3%. 14.6% 8-3. 8-6. 59. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(67) 8-3 1. 19. 19.8%. 17. 17.7%. 12. 12.5% 1. 《」. 《. 《. 37. 38.5%. 7. 7.3%. 4. 4.2% 1. 20. 10.4%. 7. 7.3%. ‧. 8.3%. n. Ch 96. 0. e n g6c h i. sit er. io. al. 4.2%. y. 4 9. 1. 15.6%. 8. Nat. 1. 10. 15. 《. 《. 16.7%. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 《. 20.8%. 政 16治大. i Un. v. 1. 9.4% 0.0% 6.3%. 」. 60. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.



(70) 8-6 1. 46. 51.1%. 46. 51.1%. 29. 32.2% 1. 《」. 《. 《. 19. 21.1%. 13. 14.4%. 1. 1.1% 1. 9 5. 5.6%. 1. 1.1%. 19. 《. ‧ y. 8.9%. n. Ch 90. 1. sit. 17. er. io. 1. 13.3%. 8. al. 1. 21.1%. 12. Nat 《. 7.8%. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 《. 10.0%. 政 7治大. 12. e n g1c h i. i Un. v. 18.9% 13.3% 1.1%. 」. SPSS χ² ₌ 31.379, p < .001 < .005. 《」. 《. χ² ₌ 14.817, p. χ² ₌ 11.244, p < .05. χ² ₌ 31.780, p < .001 χ² ₌ 13.452, p < .005. 63. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(71) 」 -5. 《 -3.1. 《 -5.1. -3.6 」. 」 2.5. -. 《. 」. 2.9. 2.2. 」. ‧ sit. n. al. er. io. 8-7. 3. y. 3.3. Nat. 」. 3.2. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大《. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. %. 1. 13.1. 24.1. 28.3. 34.6. 100.0. 22.3. 15.5. 12.6. 49.5. 100.0. 22.2. 9.0. 18.6. 50.2. 100.0. 28.6. 7.3. 10.2. 53.9. 100.0. 1. 8-7. 」. 」. 」 64. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(72) 」. 」. 」」. 」. 」. 」」. 《」. 」」. 」. 」. ‧ 國. 」. 學. 5.6%. ‧. 」. y. 38.5%. io. sit. Nat. 38.6%. 《. n. al. er. 」. 立. 政治大. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 65. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(73) 9-1. 19%. 14.8% 12.3%. 10%. 9.4%. 9.4%. 8.7%. 6.1%. 立. 學. 9-1. 「. ‧. io. 46. 14.8%. 43. 13.9%. a38l. 12.3%. y. 19.0%. sit. Nat. 59. n. er. ‧ 國. 6.5% 」治政大. 」. 《. 13.9%. 《. 29 29. Ch. engchi. iv 9.4% n U 9.4%. 27. 8.7%. 20. 6.5%. 19. 6.1%. 310. 100.0%. 66. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(74) 9-2. 《. 『. 」. 9-2. (-1.1). (.9). 4. 6. 4. (2.5). (.4). (-1.0). (-1.9). 11. 8. 23. 17. (-2.3). (.5). (2). (.0). 8. 6. 11. (1.9). (-1.8). (.0). 7. 9. 1. 1. 1. 《 1. a l2. n. 1 (-2.5). Ch. (-.2). iv. n(1.8) U e n g12c h i 5 (.8). 38. sit. io. (.5). 59. er. 1. Nat. 13. 29. ‧. 1. 15. 46. 學. 1. (.3). ‧ 國. 1. 5. 立(-.2). y. 15. 政 10治大16. 19. 12. 0. 29. (1.3). (-2.1). (1.6). (-1.5). 7. 5. 3. 12. (-.6). (1.2). (-2.1). (1.8). 16. 3. 18. 6. (1.0). (-1.0). (2.1). (-2.3). 6. 1. 3. 10. 20. 96. 36. 88. 90. 310. 27 43. χ² ₌ 52.101, p < .001 1. 1.96. 67. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(75) χ² ₌ 52.101,. SPSS p < .001 2.5 -2.3. -2.5. 2.1 《 2. 2.1. 立. 2.1. 政治大. -. 《. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. -2.3. 《. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 68. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(76) 」 χ² ₌ 203.248, p < .001. SPSS 9-3. 1.96. 2017 3. 《. 2025. 立. 2017. ‧. io. 《. Nat. 」. 3.9. y. 6.3. 政治大. 學. ‧ 國. 2017. 《. sit. 2.9. 2017. n. al. er. 2016. 《 2018. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. -2.7 2.7. 2.5. -2.0. 2018 9.9 」 2016. 」 12.4%. 2018. 」 2.3%. 2018. 4.2%. 69. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(77) 9-3. % 2016. 2. 2. 12.4. 17.2. 7.9. 27.3. 14.6. (-.6). (.7). (-2.4). (2.7). (.1). 16.5. 12.1. 4.8. 2.3. 4.2. (2.9). (.8). (-1.4). (-1.7). (-1.3). 17.5. 17.2. 41.3. 9.1. 4.2. (-.9). (-.7). (6.3). (-2.0). (-3.1). 12.4. 8.6. 4.8. 22.7. 16.7. (.3). (-.8). (-2.8). (2.5). (1.2). 0.0. 0.0. 1.6. 0.0. 37.5. (-1.8). (9.9). (-3.0). 13.6. 4.2. (-3.4). (.3). (3.9). (1.1). (-1.3). 10.3. 5.2. 6.3. 11.4. 10.4. (.7). (-1.1). (-.7). (.7). (.5). 18.6. 25.9. 4.8. 9.1. 6.3. (1.7). (3). (-2.7). (-.9). (-1.6). 11.3. 3.4. 6.3. 4.5. 2.1. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. Nat. 2. 22.2. ‧ 國. 《. 10.3. io. 100.0 1 2. 2018. al. n. χ² ₌ 203.248, p < .001 9. Ch. engchi. 學. 2. 政治(-1.7) 大 (-2.2). ‧. 立. 1.0 2. 2018. y. 2. 2018. sit. 2. 2017. er. 2. 2017. i Un. v. 1. 1.96. 70. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(78) 9-4 2016. 2017. 2017. 2018. 2018 9. 《. 《《《. 治政《大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. 2016. ‧ sit. n. al. er. io. 2017. y. Nat. 《. 《. 2017 」. Ch. 2018. n U engchi 2017. iv. 『. 『. 2017 2018 2018. 」. 71. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(79) 9-5. 9-8. 9-5 2016. 2017. 2017. 2018. 2018. 10.0. 22.2. 5.9. 30.8. 25.0. 22.5. 16.7. 11.8. 7.7. 0.0. 10.0. 5.6. 29.4. 7.7. 0.0. 17.5. 5.6. 5.9. 23.1. 12.5. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 12.5. 2.5. 11.1. 29.4. 15.4. 25.0. 12.5. 0.0. 5.9. 0.0. 12.5. 15.0. 33.3. 12.5. 10.0. 立100.0. 7.7 治政 11.8 大 7.7 0.0. 5.6. 100.0. 27.3 0.0. 《. *. 2018. 100.0. y. %. 2017. 2017. 2018. 33.3. 11.1. 12.5. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. a0.0 l C 33.3 h. n. 36.4. io. 18.2. Nat. 2016. ‧. 9-6. 0.0. 44.4 e n g11.1 chi U. sit. 9. ‧ 國. 2018. 100.0. 學. *. 100.0. *. 0.0. er. 《. %. 0.0. iv n 0.0. 2018. *. 0.0. 50.0. 60.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 40.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 9.1. 0.0. 22.2. 25.0. 0.0. 0.0. 33.3. 11.1. 12.5. 0.0. 9.1. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 9. 72. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(80) 9-7 2017. 2018. 2018. 3.6. 19.0. 13.3. 22.2. 6.7. 7.1. 14.3. 26.7. 0.0. 6.7. 35.7. 28.6. 0.0. 22.2. 6.7. 3.6. 9.5. 0.0. 0.0. 20.0. 0.0. 9.5. 0.0. 0.0. 46.7. 0.0. 0.0. 53.3. 22.2. 0.0. 7.1. 0.0. 0.0. 11.1. 0.0. 35.7. 19.0. 0.0. 22.2. 13.3. 7.1. 0.0. 6.7. 0.0. 0.0. 100.0. 100.0. 立. 9. 6.3. 4.5. 38.5. 6.3. 4.5. 0.0. 4.8. 12.5. 59.1. 7.7. 4.8. io. n. a12.5 l C 0.0 h. 4.5. e n g4.5c h i. y. 27.8. 0.0. 2018. ‧. 2018. Nat. 2017. 22.2. *. % 2017. 0.0. 《. 100.0. 2016. 5.6. *. 學. 9-8. 治政 100.0 大 100.0. sit. 2018. 2017. ‧ 國. *. 2016. er. 《. %. 15.4 iv n U. 2018. *. 19.0. 9.5. 0.0. 38.1. 4.5. 15.4. 0.0. 0.0. 12.5. 11.1. 18.8. 4.5. 15.4. 19.0. 11.1. 25.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 22.2. 6.3. 13.6. 7.7. 4.8. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 9. 73. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(81) 《. 」. 10-1. 10% 67.1% 95.2%. 立. 2.3. 67.1. 14.5. 5.8. y. n. 15.2. 1.3. 21.6. 9.7. 2.9. sit. io. 49.7. 13.9. 6.1. 5.5. C7.1h 0.6. 1.3. er. Nat. al. %. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 10-1. 政治大. n U e n g c 2.6 hi 3.2. iv. 2.3. 13.9. 0.3. 10.6. 1.9. 5.2. 2.6. 1.3. 0.0. 3.9. 2.9. 0.3. 0.3. 3.5. 2.3. 0.3. 0.0. 2.6. 0.3. 1.0. 0.0. 1.3. 0.6. 0.6. 0.0. 1.3. 74. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(82) 10-2 」」」. 」 14.6%. 」. 政10.4%治大. 立 33.3%. 」. 學 ‧. ‧ 國. 《. y. *. n. al. Ch 71.9. e n g c69.4 hi. er. io. sit. Nat 10-2. 1%. 」. i Un. v. %. 70.5. 57.8. 0.0. 0.0. 3.4. 1.1. 14.6. 11.1. 8.0. 10.0. 8.3. 25.0. 12.5. 16.7. 2.1. 8.3. 3.4. 3.3. 25.0. 30.6. 18.2. 17.8. 5.2. 8.3. 3.4. 5.6. 15.6. 25.0. 11.4. 10.0. 0.0. 0.0. 2.3. 2.2. 1.0. 2.8. 4.5. 6.7. 0.0. 2.8. 3.4. 4.4. * 75. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(83) 10-3. 」. 10-6. 《」. 50%. 『. 」 56.3%. 37.5%. 」. 」 33.3%. 」. 」. n. al. 」. er. io. sit. y. 」. 33.3% 」. ‧. 41.7%. 」. Nat. 40%. 政治大. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 33.3%. Ch. e n g c33.3% hi. i Un. v. 76. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(84) 10-3. % 100.0. 75.0. 85.7. 75.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 20.0. 立 9.1. 15.4. 0.0. 41.7. 28.6. 6.3. 13.3. 6.7. 9.1. 15.4. 0.0. 8.3. 0.0. 6.3. 0.0. 9.1. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 6.3. 46.7. 36.4. 23.1. 0.0. 8.3. 0.0. 0.0. 13.3. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 18.8. 20.0. 26.7. 9.1. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 37.5. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 14.3. 0.0. 0.0 33.3 0.0. Nat. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. y. 0.0. sit. 0.0. 69.2. er. 0.0. 63.6. ‧ 國. 73.3. ‧. 治 0.0政 0.0 大. 學. 73.3. i n U. v. 77. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(85) 10-4. % 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 25.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 80.0. 0.0. 25.0. 25.0. 50.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 25.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 75.0. 12.5. 50.0. 50.0. 0.0. 0.0. 25.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 20.0. 33.3. 40.0. 75.0. 0.0. 25.0. 50.0. 0.0. 33.3. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 12.5. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 20.0 20.0 0.0. 立 0.0. Nat. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. y. 40.0. sit. 0.0. 50.0. er. 0.0. 62.5. ‧ 國. 50.0. ‧. 治 0.0政 0.0 大. 學. 60.0. i n U. v. 78. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(86) 10-5. % 85.7. 50.0. 66.7. 72.2. 0.0. 8.3. 0.0. 11.1. 16.7. 0.0. 0.0. 8.3. 33.3. 11.1. 20.0. 0.0. 13.0. 50.0. 0.0. 16.7. 0.0. 5.6. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 11.1. 33.3. 17.4. 16.7. 14.3. 25.0. 0.0. 16.7. 16.7. 4.3. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 5.6. 10.0. 33.3. 8.7. 0.0. 0.0. 8.3. 33.3. 16.7. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 16.7. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 4.3. 0.0. 42.9. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 10.0 20.0 0.0. 立 4.3. Nat. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. y. 10.0. sit. 0.0. 66.7. er. 0.0. 69.6. ‧ 國. 100.0. ‧. 治 0.0政 0.0 大. 學. 70.0. i n U. v. 79. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(87) 10-6. % 66.7. 60.0. 58.3. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 25.0. 9.1. 33.3. 20.0. 0.0. 16.7. 56.3. 0.0. 17.6. 9.1. 0.0. 20.0. 0.0. 16.7. 0.0. 5.9. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 17.6. 36.4. 11.1. 0.0. 25.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 11.1. 20.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 50.0. 0.0. 0.0. 11.1. 20.0. 25.0. 16.7. 6.3. 0.0. 5.9. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 66.7. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 6.3 6.3 12.5. 立 5.9. Nat. io. n. al. Ch. engchi. y. 6.3. sit. 0.0. 63.6. er. 0.0. 35.3. ‧ 國. 75.0. ‧. 治 5.9政 0.0 大. 學. 37.5. i n U. v. 80. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(88) 11-1. % N=96 8.3. 18.8. 19.4. 25.0. 22.2. (-.8). (-.3). (.9). (.2). 62.5. 16.7. 35.2. 18.9. (6.3). (-2.7). (-.4). 10.4. 33.3. 18.2. (-1.7). (3.1). (.8). (-1.4). 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. 100.0. io. n. al. χ² ₌ 69.312, p < .001 1. 1.96. SPSS. Ch. (-4.2). y. 11.1. sit. Nat. 1. (5.5). ‧. 1. (-1.1). 學. 1. 47.8. (.6). ‧ 國. 1. N=90. er. (-4.8)立. 治 N=88 政N=36 大21.6 30.6. n U engchi. iv. 11-1 χ² ₌ 69.312, p < .001 47.8%. 18.9%. 5.5. -4.2 8.3%. 62.5%. 81. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(89) -4.8. 6.3 33.3%. 3.1 4. 2016. 2017. 2017. 2018. 立. 75%. 2018. 治政 0% 大 2018. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. 2018. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 82. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(90) 4. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 83. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(91) 11-2. 11-2. %. 45.7. 17.4. 立27.6. 6.9. 100.0. 18.6. 18.6. 100.0. 34.2. 18.4. 42.1. 5.3. 100.0. 42.1. 31.6. 5.3. 21.1. 100.0. 31.0. 31.0. 20.7. 17.2. 11.1. 11.1. 18.5. 59.3. 7.0. 90.7. 2.3. 55.0. 45.0. 0.0. n 11-6. Ch. engchi. y. sit. io. al. er. Nat. 0.0. ‧. ‧ 國. 20.3. 0.0. 11-3. 100.0. 學. 42.4. 治政 28.3 8.7 大 48.3 17.2. i Un. 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0. v. 84. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(92) 11-3. %. 13.3. 6.7. 66.7. 13.3. 100.0. 0.0. 26.7. 60.0. 13.3. 100.0. 9.1. 18.2. 72.7. 0.0. 100.0. 7.7. 23.1. 69.2. 0.0. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 100.0. 100.0. 25.0. 25.0. 14.3. 14.3. 立6.3. 0.0. ‧ 國. 50.0. 0.0. 100.0. 50.0. 0.0. 100.0. 20.0. 0.0. 75.0. 25.0. 100.0. 0.0. 25.0. iv n12.5. 100.0. 0.0. 100.0. a37.5 l C 12.5 h 100.0. 12.5 e n g0.0c h i U. sit. 0.0. er. y. ‧. 0.0. %. 20.0. n. 62.5. io. 37.5. Nat. 0.0. 100.0. 93.8. 11-4. 60.0. 100.0. 學. 0.0. 25.0 治政 25.0 大28.6 42.9. 100.0. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 20.0. 0.0. 80.0. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 66.7. 33.3. 100.0. 0.0. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 100.0. 85. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(93) 11-5. %. 40.0. 30.0. 20.0. 10.0. 100.0. 16.7. 50.0. 16.7. 16.7. 100.0. 21.7. 26.1. 13.0. 39.1. 100.0. 50.0. 16.7. 33.3. 0.0. 100.0. 42.9. 28.6. 14.3. 14.3. 100.0. 25.0. 41.7. 25.0. 8.3. 100.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 100.0. 100.0. 0.0. 5.6. 94.4. 0.0. 100.0. 0.0. 33.3. 66.7. 0.0. 100.0. 11-6. 立. 政治大. %. 6.3. 0.0. 100.0. 25.0. 25.0. 25.0. 25.0. 100.0. 93.8. 6.3. 0.0. 0.0. 100.0. 36.4. 18.2. 36.4. 9.1. 55.6. 44.4. 0.0. 0.0. 20.0. 0.0. 20.0. 100.0. 8.3. 16.7. 58.3. 100.0. 0.0. 83.3. e n g40.0 chi. y. sit. er. a16.7 l C 60.0 h. n. 0.0. io. 16.7. Nat. 60.0. ‧. ‧ 國. 18.8. 學. 75.0. 0.0 iv n U. 100.0 100.0. 100.0. 0.0. 100.0. 11-7 2017 2016. 2017 2017. 2017. 86. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(94) 11-7. %. 2016 |. |. 2017 |. 0 | 22.2 | 77.8 | 0. |. |. |. 0 | 0 | 100 | 0. |. 2018 |. |. 20 | 0 | 80 | 0. 立. 0 | 0 | 0 | 100. |. 9 |. |. 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 0 | 0 | 50 | 50. 50 | 25 | 0 | 25. 75 | 0 | 0 | 25. 50 | 25 | 25 | 0. 50 | 0 | 50 | 0. 42.9 | 28.6 | 14.3 | 14.3. 學 ‧. 0 | 0 | 100 | 0. io. n. al. 25 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.5. er. 16.7 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 50. sit. y. Nat. 0 | 10 | 90 | 0. |. 40 | 20 | 0 | 40 政治大. 0 | 0 | 0 | 100. 10 | 40 | 10 | 40. |. 2018. 25 | 0 | 50 | 25. ‧ 國. 0 | 0 | 75 | 25. |. 2017. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 0 | 0 | 100 | 0. 40 | 60 | 0 | 0. 0 | 25 | 75 | 0. 100 | 0 | 0 | 0. 100 | 0 | 0 | 0. 50 | 50 | 0 | 0. 87. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(95) 9-2. 9-4. 2016. 2017. 】. 2018 11-7. 2017. 】 80% 20% 100%. 立. 0%. 治政 2017 大學. 】. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat 11-8. 50%. 】. ‧ 國. 0%. 】. C】h. i Un. v. e n g c h i 66.4. 56.9. %. —. 50.4. 63.8. —. 9.2. 7.8. 1.9. 7.6. —. 31.1. 27.5. 23.4. 18.1. 9.2. 7.8. 8.4. 10.5. 11-8 2025. 》 —. — —. 88. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(96) 2025. 》. —. —. —. 立. 】. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 89. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(97) 2025. 》 2016. 5. 20. 2018. 9. 30. 310. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. v ni C h41.3% 38.4% U25.8% engchi. 2016 2017. 》. 2018. 》. 90. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(98) 31.3% ─. 10.0%. 2.9%. 立. 政治大 13.9%. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 12.6%. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 15.8%. ◼ … 〔. Ch. engchi. i Un. ！. 。. v. 。. …. 、 …. 2017-11-11 |. | A14G. 91. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(99) 7.4%. ◼. 〔 … 2050. 2050. 〔. 、〔. 〔. 〔. 〔 2017-01-12 |. 立. 政治大. ‧ 國. ‧ y. sit. n. al. er. io 】. | B2Y. 學. Nat. 15.8%. 】. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ─. 92. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(100) 2025. —. ─. 立. 政治大. 】】. ‧ 國. 學. 」. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 》. 93. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(101) 90. 】. 立. 政治大. 36 2018. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. 】. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. A05. 】. 51%. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 】 47.2%. A05. 】. A05. 69.3%. 67.8%. 94. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(102) 政治大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 93.8% 62.5%. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 】. 】 37.5%. 0%. 21.7. 95. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(103) 13%. 93.8%. 8.3%. 47.8%. 】. 18.9%. 立. 政治大. 8. 〕. 〕. n. al. er. io. ◼. sit. y. Nat. 8. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2017. 62.5%. 〕. …. Ch. e n g c。h i. ╱i n U. v「. …. 2017-08-08 |. | A04. 96. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(104) ◼. ╱. …. ，. 」. 1. 2 4.6. 。. …. 立. 。. 政治大. 2017-08-08 |. | A1. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 」. ！. …. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 2010 2007. 2004. 〈. 2000. 】. — — 97. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(105) 2018. —. 】 1.9%. —. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 98. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(106) Funtowicz. Ravetz 1993. ─ Nisbet, 2009 Groseclose & Milyo, 2005 政治大. Tan & Weaver, 2010. 】. ‧ y. Nat. n. al. er. sit. Culley, Ogley-oliver, Carton & Street,. io. 2010. 學. ‧ 國. 立. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ─. — Culley, Ogley-oliver, Carton & Street, 2010. 99. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(107) Crawley, 2007. Nisbet & Lewenstein, 2002 Callaghan & Schnell, 2001. 5.2% 67.1%. 立. 政治大】. ‧ 國. 學 ‧. Arul Aram, Prem Nivas & Ramya, 2014. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat Hofstetter. Buss 1978. Ch. engchi. 2010. i Un 2007. v. 2004. 2000. 〈】. 100. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(108) 2017 2018 2016. 2017 2017. 】. Feldman, Maibach, Roser-Renouf & Leiserowitz, 2012 Doyle, 2011. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 政治大】. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 101. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(109) 】】. 立. 政治大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 102. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(110) 2018 11. —. 立. —. 政治大. 310. 學 ‧. ‧ 國 io. sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. 2018. 9. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 103. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(111) 1982. 2. 28. 2. https://www.aec.gov.t w/%E6%A0%B8%E8%83%BD%E7%AE%A1%E5%88%B6--3.html. 政治大. https://www.aec.gov.tw/%E6%A0%B8%E7%89%A9%E6%96%99%E7%. 立. AE%A1%E5%88%B6/%E7%AE%A1%E5%88%B6%E5%8B%95%E6%8. ‧ 國. 學. 5%8B/%E6%94%BE%E5%BB%A2%E8%A8%AD%E6%96%BD%E7%. ‧. AE%A1%E5%88%B6/%E6%A0%B8%E9%9B%BB%E5%BB%A0%E6% 94%BE%E5%B0%84%E6%80%A7%E5%BB%A2%E6%A3%84%E7%89. y. Nat. er. io. 20% a2025 v2017 2 14 i l C hengchi Un https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20170214/10. n. 》. sit. %A9--6_48_3837_169.html. 】 56051/ 2016. 3. 12. 2025. 》. http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/2016031200 2771-260407 2017. 、. 2017. ——. 、 …. 2017. 7. 17. 3. 1200. 104. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(112) A4 2016. COP21 163. 69-78 2017. 「. 53. 225-259. 2013. 2017. 8. 8 A1. 2013. 5. 立31. 政治大. 學. ‧ 國. http://www.tisr.com.tw/w. ‧. p-content/uploads/2012/06/TISR_TMBS_201305_2.pdf. y. 2017. sit. Nat. 2017. io. https://maataipei.org/download/2017%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E7%9. n. al. er. 。. 2. 9%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8/ 2014. 4. Ch. 28. engchi. i Un. v. http://www.tisr.com.tw/ wp-content/uploads/2012/06/TISR_TMBS_201404_21.pdf 2015. 3. 13 http://www.tisr.com.tw/w. p-content/uploads/2012/06/TISR_TMBS_201503_1.pdf 2016. 6. 15. 105. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(113) http://www.tisr.com.tw/ wp-content/uploads/2016/06/TISR_TMBS_201606_1.pdf 2010. 2000. 04 2000. 12. 141-163. Applied Science. http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314865/ 2016. 9. 17. 2025 https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F7. 政治大. 59E41CCD91/c094fb4e-6c07-4a87-9435-fb97f11dde10#. 立2016. 2016. http://unfccc.saveoursky.org.tw/2016nir/tw_nir.php 23. sit. 56.3%. n. al. er. io. 28. …. y. A6. Nat. 8. 3. ‧. 2018. 2017. 、. 學. ‧ 國. 、. 11. 20. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. http://www.my-formosa.com/DOC_122373.htm 2018. 3. 31. 44.9% http://www.my-formosa.com/DOC. _132584.htm 2002. 2014. 106. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(114) 52 2017. 【. 4. 111-159. 3. 12. 2025. 》. A11 、. 2017. 2009 32. 、 2004. 2016. 45-90. :. Beck, U. [1986]. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. 2017. 立. ‧ 國 8. 66-70. 2014. :. 28. al. B2Y 2017. 8. 23-61. n. 12. sit. io 1. y. Nat. 〉. 2017. ‧. 30. A14G. er. 2007. 11. 學. 。. 政治大. 11. Ch. engchi. 28. i Un. v. 56% https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2017-08-28/9620. 1 2016. 9. 3 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news. /life/paper/1028379 〉. 2013. 40. 16-21. 107. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(115) 2016 3. 16. 40-44. 2018. 4. 23. …. A13 2016 363. 12-14. 2013. 2. 54-63. 政2017 治大. 立. ‧ 國. ‧ y. 45-. sit. 12. 》. al. n 2. 58. er. 8. io. 2018. 111-116. Nat. 86 2017. 172. 學. 2014. 6. 14. Ch. A2. engchi. i Un. v. https://www.storm.mg/article/398657 》. 2011. 11. 3. 2016. A1 2014. 2000. 10. 27. 1 108. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(116) 2014. 4. 25 http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/0285437f-88c5-. 483c-bf83-ba5e298b3f55 2017 4. 2. 109-150. 2014 26. 、 23-265. 4. 24. 11. 247-258 70.5. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=43. y. sit. al. n. 16. 61. er. io 3. PanSci 2011. A8. Nat. 945 2016. 立. 政治大2025. ‧. 2018. 9. 學. 1999. 7. ‧ 國. 2017. 2. Ch. i Un. v. e n g chttp://pansci.asia/archives/95368 hi. 4 A04. 2004. 2004 54. 2017. 8. 277-290. 8 A04. 109. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(117) 2014 19. 73-116. 2006 86. 135-170. 2015 38 2017. COP21 39. 22. sit. y. al. 43-70 》 iv n U. n. 11. 3. er. io 2017. 67-105. ‧. 77. Nat. 2015. 57-64. ‧ 國. 2003. 政治大. 學. 。. 立6. 18-26. 105. 、. 2016. 6. Ch. en gchi http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakin. gnews/2261223 2018. 7. 7 https://money.udn.com/money/story/5628/3239195. 2012 《. 2012 1997. 110. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(118) 141-183. 1998 3. 1-102. 1999. 2017. — 43. 127-150. 學. 106. 、. ‧. 2018. 立. 2012. ‧ 國. …. 政130 治 141-186 大. 3. 16. n. al. Ch. y/5648/3034076 2017. 1,744. er. io. 2018. sit. y. Nat. https://www.audit.gov.tw/p/405-1000-4658,c97.php?Lang=zh-tw. i Un. v. https://money.udn.com/money/stor. engchi. 2017 http://www.xkm.com.tw/HTML/tw/main03-2.htm. 2017. 》. 12. 10 http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstne. ws/201712100209-1.aspx 2004 、. 6. 195-239 111. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(119) 2015 38 、. 6. 27-35. 2014 30. 227-264. 1994. — 48. 169-192. 2014 2015. 政 47治61-161大. 立. 1989. ‧ 國. 學. 41. 2000 1-20. io. 2007. n. al. y. 1. 2004. er. Nat. 7. —. sit. 2000. 9-24. ‧. 〈. …. 》. 14. Ch. 2. 95-120. engchi. i Un. v. Aday, S. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News Channel. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 144-164. Arul Aram, I., Prem Nivas, G. C., Ramya, G. P. (2014). Newspaper framing of the kudakulam nuclear power project in tamil, nadu. Media Asia, 41(1), 3142. 112. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(120) Barthe, Y. (2009). Framing nuclear waste as a political issue in France. Journal of Risk Research, 12, 941-954 Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology, 26(1), 611-639.. 政治大. Bolsen, T. (2011). The construction of news: Energy crises, advocacy messages, and. 立. frames toward conservation. The International Journal of Press/Politics,. ‧ 國. 學. 16(2), 143-162.. ‧. Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). How frames can undermine. sit. y. Nat. support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status-quo bias.. n. al. er. io. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 1-26.. i Un. v. Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science.. Ch. engchi. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745-769.. Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens' explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303-316. Brossard, D., & Shanahan, J. (2003). Do citizens want to have their say? Media, agricultural biotechnology, and authoritarian views of democratic processes in science. Mass Communication and Society, 6(3), 291-312. Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding US opinion on agricultural 113. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(121) biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24-52. Brown, J. D., Bybee, C. R., Wearden, S. T., & Straughan, D. M. (1987). Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1), 45-54. Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of communication, 54(2), 214-233. Chakravorty, U., Magne, B., & Moreaux, M. (2012). Resource Use under Climate. 政治大. Stabilization: Can Nuclear Power Provide Clean Energy?. Journal of Public. 立. Economic Theory, 14(2), 349-389.. ‧ 國. 學. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in. ‧. competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.. sit. y. Nat. Conrad, P. (1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of. n. al. er. io. genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8(4), 285-302.. i Un. v. Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un) certainty of science: Media. Ch. engchi. representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129151. Crawley, C. E. (2007). Localized debates of agricultural biotechnology in community newspapers: A quantitative content analysis of media frames and sources. Science Communication, 28(3), 314-346. Creed, W. D., Langstraat, J. A., & Scully, M. A. (2002). A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational research methods, 5(1), 34-55. 114. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(122) Cross, K. A. (2010). Experts in the news: The differential use of sources in election television news. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35(3), 413-430. Culley, M. R., Ogley-oliver, E., Carton, A. D., Street, J. C. (2010). Media framing of proposed nuclear reactors: an analysis of print media. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(6), 497-512. Davis, P. R., & Russ, R. S. (2015). Dynamic framing in the communication of scientific research: Texts and interactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 221-252.. 政治大. De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design. 立. Journal & Document Design, 13(1).. ‧ 國. 學. Dickson, S. H. (1994). Understanding media bias: The press and the US invasion of. ‧. Panama. Journalism Quarterly, 71(4), 809-819.. sit. y. Nat. Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2002). The socio-epistemic constitution of science. n. al. er. io. and technology in the Greek press: an analysis of its presentation. Public Understanding of Science.. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. Dirikx, A., & Gelders, D. (2010). To frame is to explain: A deductive frame-analysis of Dutch and French climate change coverage during the annual UN Conferences of the Parties. Public understanding of science, 19(6), 732742. Doyle, J. (2011). Acclimatizing nuclear? climate change, nuclear power and the reframing of risk in the uk news media. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 107-125. Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2017). Using frames to make scientific communication 115. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(123) effective. Handbook of the science of science communication, 13-31. Dunwoody, S. (1986). When science writers cover the social sciences. Reporting science: The case of aggression, 67-81. Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (2016). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public understanding of science. Eberl, J. M., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Wagner, M. (2017). One bias fits all? Three types of media bias and their effects on party preferences. Communication. 政治大. Research, 44(8), 1125-1148.. 立. Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Leading voices in the denier choir:. ‧ 國. 學. Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of. ‧. climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 754-776.. sit. y. Nat. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.. n. al. er. io. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51-58.. i Un. v. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame. Ch. engchi. after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415-432. Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of communication, 57(1), 163-173. Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 331. Funtowicz, S. O., Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 116. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(124) 25(7), 739-755. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American journal of sociology, 95(1), 1-37. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what news: a study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Pantheon Books. Geiß, S., Weber, M., & Quiring, O. (2016). Frame competition after key events: A longitudinal study of media framing of economic policy after the Lehman. 政治大. Brothers bankruptcy 2008–2009. International Journal of Public Opinion. 立. Research, 29(3), 471-496.. ‧ 國. 學. Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Stone, D. F. (2015). Media bias in the marketplace:. sit. y. Nat. Holland.. ‧. Theory. In Handbook of media economics (Vol. 1, pp. 623-645). North-. n. al. er. io. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley.. i Un. v. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.. Ch. Harvard University Press.. engchi. Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1191-1237. Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (1999). Effects of news slant and base rate information on perceived public opinion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 277-292. Hänggli, R. (2012). Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news media coverage. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 300117. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(125) 317. Hänggli, R., & Kriesi, H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27(2), 141-157. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication methods and measures, 1(1), 7789. Ho, S. S., Leong, A. D., Looi, J., Chen, L., Pang, N., & Tandoc Jr, E. (2018). Science. 政治大. literacy or value predisposition? A meta-analysis of factors predicting. 立. public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy.. ‧ 國. 學. Environmental Communication, 1-15.. ‧. Hofstetter, C. R., & Buss, T. F. (1978). Bias in television news coverage of political. sit. y. Nat. events: A methodological analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic. n. al. er. io. Media, 22(4), 517-530.. i Un. v. Holton, A. E., Farrell, L. C., & Fudge, J. L. (2014). A threatening space?:. Ch. engchi. Stigmatization and the framing of autism in the news. Communication Studies, 65(2), 189-207. Kepplinger, H. M., & Habermeier, J. (1995). The impact of key events on the presentation of reality. European journal of communication, 10(3), 371390. Kepplinger, H. M., Geiss, S., & Siebert, S. (2012). Framing scandals: Cognitive and emotional media effects. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 659-681. Kühne, R., Schemer, C., Matthes, J., & Wirth, W. (2011). Affective priming in 118. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(126) political campaigns: How campaign-induced emotions prime political opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(4), 485507. León, B. (2008). Science related information in European television: a study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science, 17(4), 443-460. Lippmann, W. (1946). Public opinion (Vol. 1). Transaction Publishers. Macnamara, J. R. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1-34.. 政治大. Matthes, J. (2009). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in. 立. the world's leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism &. ‧ 國. 學. Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349-367.. ‧. Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005). The market for news. American Economic. sit. y. Nat. Review, 95(4), 1031-1053.. n. al. er. io. Nisbet, M. C., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American media:. i Un. v. The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science. Ch. engchi. communication, 23(4), 359-391.. Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American journal of botany, 96(10), 1767-1778. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and policy for sustainable development, 51(2), 12-23. Nisbet, E. C., Hart, P. S., Myers, T., & Ellithorpe, M. (2013). Attitude change in 119. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(127) competitive framing environments? Open-/closed-mindedness, framing effects, and climate change. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 766-785. Palfreman, J. (2006). A tale of two fears: Exploring media depictions of nuclear power and global warming. Review of Policy Research, 23(1), 23-43. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political communication, 10(1), 55-75. Patterson, T. E., & Donsbagh, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political communication, 13(4), 455-468.. 政治大. Pew Research Center (2017, September 20). Science News and Information Today.. 立. Journalism & Media - Pew Research Center. Retrieved from. ‧ 國. 學. http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/20/science-news-and-information-. ‧. today/. sit. y. Nat. Ravetz, I. R. (1999). What is post-normal science. Futures-the Journal of Forecasting. n. al. er. io. Planning and Policy, 31(7), 647-654.. i Un. v. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 7–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.. Ch. engchi. Ross, S. D., & Bantimaroudis, P. (2006). Frame shifts and catastrophic events: The attacks of September 11, 2001, and New York Times's portrayals of Arafat and Sharon. Mass Communication & Society, 9(1), 85-101. Reese, S. D., Gandy Jr, O. H., & Grant, A. E. (2001). Prologue—Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In Framing public life (pp. 23-48). Routledge. Scheufele, B. (2006). Frames, schemata, and news reporting. Communications, 31(1), 120. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(128) 65-83. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication, 49(1), 103-122. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2-3), 297-316. Scheufele, D. A. (2014). Science communication as political communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13585-13592.. 立. 政治大. Schnell, K. C. F. (2001). Assessing the democratic debate: How the news media. ‧ 國. 學. frame elite policy discourse. Political communication, 18(2), 183-213.. ‧. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content. y. sit. n. al. er. io. 109.. Nat. analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication, 50(2), 93-. i Un. v. Shrader-Frechette, K. (2011). Climate change, nuclear economics, and conflicts of. Ch. engchi. interest. Science and engineering ethics, 17(1), 75-107. Sniderman, P. M., & Stiglitz, E. H. (2012). The reputational premium: A theory of party identification and policy reasoning. Princeton University Press. Stocking, S. H., & Holstein, L. W. (1993). Constructing and reconstructing scientific ignorance: Ignorance claims in science and journalism. Knowledge, 15(2), 186-210. Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2010). Media bias, public opinion, and policy liberalism from 1956 to 2004: A second-level agenda-setting study. Mass 121. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(129) Communication and Society, 13(4), 412-434. Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of communication, 57(1), 60-78. Wang, Y., Li, N., Li, J. (2014). Media coverage and government policy of nuclear power in the people's republic of china. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 77, 214-223. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.. 政治大. Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of. 立. political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication,. ‧ 國. 學. 23(3), 333-354.. ‧. Xiang, Y., & Sarvary, M. (2007). News consumption and media bias. Marketing. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Science, 26(5), 611-628.. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 122. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(130) 01-02. 1-310. (1). (2). (3). 】. (4). __________ (1). (2) (. (1). (4). 政治大. ─. ‧ 國. 學. (2). ……. ‧. ……. sit. al. n. (4). er. io. ……. y. Nat. (3). 、 (5). (5). A1, A2, A3……). 立. ─. (3). Ch. engchi. i Un. v. ……. …… (6). — ……. (7) …… (8) …… (9) …… (10) …… 123. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(131) (11) _____. _____. _____. 1. (1). □. (2). □. □. (3). □. □. □. 2. (1). □ □. (3). □. (4). 立. (2). (5) (6). □ □ □. □. al. □. n. (4). □. □. □. io. (3). □. Nat. (1). □. Ch. ‧. 4.. □. engchi. sit. (3). □. 學. (2). 政治□ 大. □. ‧ 國. (1). □. □. er. 3.. □. y. (2). □. i □U n □. v□. □ □. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5). 124. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(132) (6) (7) (8) (9) _____ ____ 1.. — □. □. 2.. — □. □. 3.. — □. □. □. 立. io. sit. y. Nat. (4). ‧. (3). ‧ 國. (2). 學. (1). 政治大. n. al. er. 4.. □. Ch. engchi. i Un. v. 125. DOI:10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.003.2019.F05.

(133)