A swelling of the floor of the mouth
Eleni Parara, MD, DDS, MSc, MSc,aPanos Christopoulos, DDS, PhD,b Konstantinos Tosios, DDS, PhD,cIrini Paravalou, DDS, MSc,d
Christina Vourlakou, DDS, MD, PhD,eKonstantinos Alexandridis, DDS, PhD,fAthens, Greece
“EVANGELISMOS” GENERAL HOSPITAL AND UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:12-16)
A 69-year-old man was referred to the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery by an ear, nose, and throat surgeon for diagnosis and management of a painless “lump” on the floor of the mouth, which ex- tended to the submandibular region. The intraoral le- sion had been noticed 3 months before consultation.
According to the patient, the growth had recently en- larged, interfering with his mastication, but caused no difficulty in swallowing or speech. No changes of size or development of intraoral swelling during meal times were reported. The patient was in apparent good health and his medical history was noncontributory.
Clinical examination showed a 3⫻ 2 cm swelling of the left submandibular area (Fig. 1). It was covered by skin that was normal in both texture and color. In- traorally, elevation of the floor of the mouth was noted,
which was covered by normal mucosa (Fig. 2). On pal- pation, the nontender mass was soft to rubbery in consis- tency. Although tongue movement was marginally re- stricted by the physical presence of the swelling, the mass per se was freely movable anteroposteriorly and medially in relation to the tongue and the bone of the mandible. The patient was totally edentulous and wearing complete acrylic dentures. Normal saliva could be expressed from the left submandibular salivary gland and there was no sign of hypoesthesia or paresthesia of the area correspond- ing to the ipsilateral lingual nerve.
A computerized tomography scan (CT) with en- hancement, which had been carried out before consul- tation, confirmed the existence of a well demarcated dense lesion lying between the mylohyoid and genio- glossus muscles (Fig. 3). The lesion was solid, without relation to the mandibular bone. Intravenous contrast medium enhanced the image of the lesion. The remain- der of the head and neck scan did not reveal any other pathology or lymph node enlargement. Although it was thought that magnetic resonance imaging could give more precise and accurate information for the diagnosis and management of the lesion, the patient refused any further imaging studies.
The floor of the mouth and submandibular area may be affected by numerous pathologic conditions, which can be broadly classified as developmental, inflamma- tory-obstructive, or neoplastic in origin. Lesions in this area may be present for a prolonged period of time before the patient seeks medical advice, usually as a result of interference with swallowing or speech.
The floor of the mouth is the most common intraoral location for developmental lesions of the oral soft tis-
aHospital Specialist, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Oral and Max- illofacial Department, “Evangelismos” General Hospital.
bLecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Surgery, Dental School, University of Athens; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, “Evangelismos” General Hospital.
cAssistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Surgery, Dental School, University of Athens.
dHospital Specialist, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, “Evangelismos” General Hospital.
eSenior Hospital Specialist, Pathologist, Department of Pathology,
“Evangelismos” General Hospital.
fProfessor, Department of Oral Pathology and Surgery, Dental School, University of Athens; Oral and Maxillofacial Department,
“Evangelismos” General Hospital.
Received for publication Feb 4, 2009; returned for revision Sep 12, 2009; accepted for publication Sep 14, 2009.
1079-2104/$ - see front matter
© 2010 Published by Mosby, Inc.
Vol. 109 No. 1 January 2010
CLINICOPATHOLOGIC CONFERENCE Editor: Paul C. Edwards
sues, particularly dermoid cysts, branchial cleft cysts, heterotopic gastrointestinal cysts, and thyroglossal duct cysts.1-3Dermoid cysts are considered to be a variation of teratomas and are thought to arise from entrapment of epithelial remnants during closure of the branchial arches or as a result of trauma.4,5Almost one-fifth of the dermoid cysts that occur in the head and neck area are located on the floor of the mouth,1,4where they may cause tongue elevation, submental protrusion, or both.4,5They are predominantly seen in young persons, presenting as soft to rubbery swellings in the midline or laterally.1 Branchial cleft cysts are developmental anomalies which arise from incomplete closure of branchial arches.1,2,4They usually appear in relatively young patients as fluctuant swellings located anteriorly
to the sternocleidomastoid muscle.1,6,7Heterotopic gas- trointestinal cysts are choristomas of head and neck and mostly affect the sublingual area or the floor of the mouth. They appear to have a male preponderance and are usually lined with gastric mucosa.3 Thyroglossal duct cysts arise from remnants of the embryonic thy- roid.1,2,4They typically present in the midline in close contact to the hyoid bone, often producing a character- istic movement during swallowing,3 which was not seen in the present patient. In most cases, a fluctuant or soft swelling is evident in the neck region, although some lesions may appear intraorally1,2 and cause dys- phagia.4Half of the patients are younger than 20 years at the time of diagnosis.1 Developmental lesions present a relatively silent course before causing any symptoms, as with the present patient. However, this patient’s age made the probability of such an entity less likely. Additionally, the CT findings were suggestive of a solid rather than a cystic lesion.
Congenital lesions, such as vascular malformation or lymphangioma (cystic hygroma), are generally in- cluded in the differential diagnosis of neck masses extending to the floor of the mouth. Both lesions are most commonly seen in childhood, with ⬃90% of lymphangiomas of the head and neck diagnosed by the age of 2 years.5They demonstrate a variety of clinical Fig. 1. Extraoral examination revealed a left submandibular
swelling with a diameter of 3 cm. The soft to rubbery swelling was nontender and not firmly attached to overlying skin, the lower jaw, or the tongue.
Fig. 2. Intraoral photograph showing ipsilateral elevation of the floor of the mouth. The swelling was covered by normal mucosa and was freely movable anteroposteriorly and medially.
Fig. 3. Transversal computerized tomography scan with con- trast enhancement depicting a well delineated dense lesion of the submandibular triangle.
features, ranging from small varicosities to large bluish or red masses that may reach large dimensions and cause disfigurement.1,2 Nevertheless, such lesions are not likely to initially present in an older patient and were not compatible with the CT images of our case.
Infections and inflammatory lesions of perioral tis- sues may also present as a swelling of the submandib- ular area extending to the floor of the mouth.1,2Acute infections, such as Ludwig angina, cellulitis, subman- dibular, or sublingual space infections, which may de- rive from an odontogenic focus of infection, osteomy- elitis, or trauma, were not considered in the differential diagnosis, because of the chronic nature of the condition.
In addition, fever, malaise, and pain would normally ac- company the clinical presentation of an acute infection, and tenderness to palpation and fixed or fluctuant overly- ing skin would be apparent in the clinical examination.
Another entity which should be considered is lymphade- nitis of different causes. Submandibular lymph nodes may commonly be affected by cat-scratch disease, tuberculosis (scrofula), or actinomycosis.1,8The present patient’s non- contributory past medical history, the CT findings, and the absence of any skin sinuses, precluded these entities from our clinical differential diagnosis. Additionally, lymphad- enitis typically does not produce this degree of intraoral swelling.
Salivary gland lesions are commonly seen intraorally and in the submandibular triangle.2 The ranula is lo- cated exclusively on the floor of the mouth. It is con- sidered to be a mucus retention cyst of the sublingual gland4,5 or a mucous extravasation phenomenon of either the major salivary glands or the minor sublingual salivary glands.1It appears as an enlargement of nor- mal to bluish color, varying from a fluctuant process to a lesion of soft consistency, depending on the thickness of the overlying tissues. Children and young adults are more frequently affected, and a history of repetitive rupture and recurrence is a common finding. Plunging ranula is a variation of the ranula, produced by dissec- tion of extravasated mucin through the mylohyoid mus- cle.1,5It appears as a lump in the submandibular neck area, with or without intraoral signs.1,5Although ranu- las appear well defined and unilocular on CT imaging,9 they are characteristically hypodense.
Inflammatory disorders of the salivary glands mer- ited consideration in the differential diagnosis of the present lesion. Acute sialadenitis of the submandibular gland usually presents with swelling associated with meals and pain and purulent discharge from the Whar- ton duct,1,2,4and chronic sialadenitis runs a prolonged course of remissions and exacerbations. Both condi- tions are more frequent in the sixth decade of life and present no gender predilection.4Moreover, both condi- tions usually involve a number of predisposing factors,
such as sialolithiasis, chronic illness, hospitalization, or medications, all of which may be associated with xero- stomia. Especially regarding drug-induced xerostomia, it is worth mentioning that the geriatric population is more susceptible, because the risk increases with the number of drugs taken.1,2,10Although in most cases of sialadenitis the infection is bacterial, viral causes, i.e., cytomegalovi- rus or paramyxovirus, are also not uncommon. The present patient presented no such risk factors and reported no previous episodes of swelling in the area. The size and asymptomatic nature of the swelling would argue against an inflammatory salivary gland origin. However, a Kutt- ner tumor, a subset of chronic sclerosing sialadenitis, can achieve considerable size and was included in the clinical differential diagnosis.11
Sialosis is often related to disorders such as diabetes, acromegaly, hypothyroidism, alcoholism, or general un- dernourishment.1 Medications affecting the autonomous nervous system, such as antihypertensive or psychotropic drugs, are also associated with sialosis.1Benign lympho- epithelial lesions commonly occur as part of Sjögren syn- drome.1 Although the lesion affects mostly the parotid glands, involvement of the submandibular glands may be seen.
Pleomorphic adenoma and monomorphic adenoma are usually included in the differential diagnosis of painless and slowly growing intraoral masses. However, salivary gland neoplasms of the floor of the mouth are more often malignant than benign.4 The present patient’s age con- forms to the higher incidence of salivary gland neo- plasms.1,4,12However, the posterior hard palate/soft palate is the site of predilection for minor salivary gland tu- mors.2,4The most common malignant neoplasms of sali- vary glands are the mucoepidermoid carcinoma and the adenoid cystic carcinoma.1Acinic cell carcinoma is also seen, especially in older patients.2 Nevertheless, in the case of a malignant neoplasm, the growth is often fixed to adjacent structures. Adenoid cystic carcinoma also fre- quently invades neighboring nerves, resulting in hypoes- thesia of the lingual nerve.
Another possible cause of a cervical swelling is lymphoma, both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin.13,14 Al- though more common in children and young adults, lymphoma may present in older patients as well.13,15
The 3-month course of asymptomatic growth, the lack of neurologic signs or evidence of attachment to surrounding structures, and the soft consistency di- rected the differential diagnosis toward a benign tumor.
Furthermore, the normal appearance of the overlying mucosa is suggestive of a benign tumor of mesenchy- mal origin, such as lipoma, neurilemmoma, or leiomy- oma, or of salivary gland origin.1,2Lipoma is quite rare in the oral cavity. The buccal mucosa is the site of predilection, with 50% of the cases, but the floor of the OOOOE
14 Parara et al. January 2010
mouth may also be involved. It typically presents as a slowly enlarging mass covered by normal appearing mucosa of yellowish hue. Middle-aged persons are more prone to develop lipomas, and no gender predi- lection has been reported.1,2 The CT imaging of a lipoma is that of a hypodense nonenhancing lesion, in contrast to the present case.
Malignant soft tissue tumors were considered to be a remote possibility. Rapid growth, lack of circumscrip- tion, fixation to adjacent structures, and ulceration of the overlying mucosa1,12are common features of ma- lignancy that were not noted in the present patient.
MANAGEMENT AND DIAGNOSIS
With the provisional diagnosis of a benign soft tissue tumor, an incisional biopsy under local anesthesia was planned. During the initial incision and identification of Wharton duct, it became apparent that the growth was encapsulated and clearly separated from nearby struc- tures, allowing for the excision of the lesion in toto.
The surgical specimen, consisting of a brown encap- sulated lobulated tumor measuring 3.0⫻ 1.5 cm, was fixed in 10% buffered formalin and processed for rou- tine histopathologic examination. Hematoxylin and eo- sin–stained sections showed a benign lesion encapsu- lated by fibrous connective tissue. The lesion consisted of large polygonal cells with eosinophilic to clear cy- toplasm (Fig. 4), several presenting with discrete cross- striations (Fig. 5). No nuclear or cellular pleomorphism or mitoses were seen. The cells stained red with Mas- son trichrome, and were immunohistochemically reac- tive for desmin and myoglobin.
The final diagnosis was adult rhabdomyoma.
The patient’s postsurgical recovery was uneventful, without salivary gland obstruction or lingual hypoes-
thesia. Further management included endoscopy of the larynx and pharynx to exclude multifocal type of rhab- domyoma.16The patient’s stomach, prostate, and heart were investigated with ultrasonography. Moreover, the patient had no features associated with tuberous scle- rosis, such as childhood seizures, hypomelanotic mac- ules, facial angiofibromas, or bone cysts.17
At the time of writing, the patient had been under regular follow-up for 2 years and remained free of recurrence or new lesion.
Rhabdomyomas are rare benign tumors originating from striated muscle18,19 and classified as cardiac and extracardiac.18Cardiac rhabdomyomas affect the myo- cardial fibers and produce a diffuse distortion of the heart muscle. They are generally considered hamarto- mas rather than true neoplastic lesions and are usually associated with tuberous sclerosis.17,18
The number of extracardiac rhabdomyomas reported in the literature exceeds 160 cases, since the first report in 1897.16,19,20 Extracardiac rhabdomyomas are of 3 types: adult, fetal, and genital. The majority of extra- cardiac rhabdomyomas are of the adult type and occur in the head and neck.5,16,19The fetal type, also occur- ring more commonly in the head and neck region, is considered to be a developmental abnormality.19,21The adult type usually presents at a mean age of 50 years with a male preponderance of 4:1.16,20The genital type, in contrast, is a solitary lesion that occurs more com- monly in women.20,22
On microscopic examination, the fetal rhabdomyoma is composed of slightly differentiated polygonal cells admixed with spindle-shaped cells.23This type is typ- Fig. 4. Histologic examination revealed a lesion consisting of
large polygonal cells with eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm (hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification⫻200).
Fig. 5. Higher power histologic examination shows cross- striations (arrow) in lesional cells (hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification⫻400).
ically more cellular than the adult type and often has a myxoid stroma. Lesions with pleomorphic characteris- tics and increased mitotic activity can rarely be mis- taken for rhabdomyosarcomas.23 The adult type pre- sents a simpler structure compared with the fetal subtype, with large ovoid or polygonal cells with gran- ular eosinophilic cytoplasm. Some cells present a vac- uolated cytoplasm due to the accumulation of glyco- gen.16,23,24 There are usually a large number of blood vessels, scant stroma, and a well defined capsule.18 Routine hematoxylin and eosin histologic features are usually sufficiently characteristic. Immunohistochemi- cal markers of skeletal muscle differentiation, such as desmin, myoglobin, and muscle-specific actin, may oc- casionally be of value in confirming the diagnosis.16,25 The treatment of choice for rhabdomyoma is surgical excision. Multifocal presentation26,27 and local recur- rence16,28are possible, mandating long-term follow-up, especially for lobulated tumors or tumors showing in- vasive growths.16,20 Recurrence is usually associated with inadequate resection and not locally aggressive biologic behavior.16,24,28
The authors express their gratitude to Dr. D. Rontogianni, Head of the Pathology Department of “Evangelismos” General Hospital, Athens, Greece, for permission to take pictures of the tissue specimen.
1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders;
2. Regezi JA, Sciubba J. Oral pathology, clinical-pathologic corre- lations. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993.
3. Smith JE, Wren MK, Richardson MS, White DR. Colonic du- plication in the submandibular region of the neck. Int J Pediat Otorhinolaryngol Extra 2009;4:17-20.
4. Lian TS. Benign tumors and tumor-like lesions of the oral cavity.
In: Flint P, Haughey B, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, editors Cum- mings’ otolaryngology: head and neck surgery. 4th ed. Philadel- phia: Mosby; 2005. p. 1574-7.
5. Beil CM, Keberle M. Oral and oropharyngeal tumors. Eur J Radiol 2008;66:448-59.
6. Glosser JW, Pires CA, Feinberg SE. Branchial cleft or cervical lymphoepithelial cysts. Etiology and management. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:81-6.
7. Tosios K, Rallis G, Vallianatou D, Vlachodimitropoulos D.
Yellow-white tumor on the floor of the mouth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:701-4.
8. Philbert RF, Kim AK, Chung DP. Cervical tuberculosis (scrof- ula): a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:94-7.
9. Mosier KM. Nononcologic imaging of the oral cavity and jaws.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008;41:103-37.
10. Scully C. Drug effects on salivary glands: dry mouth. Oral Dis 2003;9:165-76.
11. Huang C, Damrose E, Bhuta S, Abemayor E. Kuttner tumor (chronic sclerosing sialadenitis). Am J Otolaryngol 2002;23:
12. Munir N, Bradley PJ. Diagnosis and management of neoplastic lesions of the submandibular triangle. Oral Oncol 2008;44:
13. Rockacy J, Viozzi CF, Zent CS. Mantle cell lymphoma present- ing as a slowly enlarging lesion of the floor of the mouth in a healthy 72-year-old female: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2007;65:333-7.
14. Vaughan ED. Primary tumors of the neck. In: Booth PW, Schen- del SA, Hausamen, JE, editors. Maxillofacial surgery. 2nd ed.
Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p. 461-74.
15. Epstein JB, Epstein JD, Le ND, Gorsky M. Characteristics of oral and paraoral malignant lymphoma: a population-based re- view of 361 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:519-25.
16. Kapadia SB, Meis JM, Frisman DM, Ellis GL, Heffner DK, Hyams VJ. Adult rhabdomyoma of the head and neck: a clini- copathologic and immunophenotypic study. Hum Pathol 1993;
17. Curatolo P, Bombardieri R, Jozwiak S. Tuberous sclerosis. Lan- cet 2008;372:657-68.
18. Cleveland DB, Chen S, Allen CM, Ahing SI, Svirsky JA. Adult rhabdomyoma—a light microscopic, ultrastructural, virologic, and immunologic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1994;77:147-53.
19. Liess BD, Zitsch RP, III Lane R, Bickel JT. Multifocal adult rhabdomyoma: a case report and literature review. Am J Otol 2005;26:214-7.
20. Veziroglu F, Uckan S, Senguven B. Adult type rhabdomyoma in a child. Oral Oncol Extra 2006;42:213-6.
21. Reid CO, Smith CJ. Rhabdomyoma of the floor of the mouth: a new case and review of recently reported intra-oral rhabdomyo- mas. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;23:284-91.
22. Davies B, Noha P, Smaldone MC, Ranganathan S, Docimoa SG.
Paratesticular rhabdomyoma in a young adult: case study and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:E5-E7.
23. Kapadia SB, Meis JM, Frisman DM, Ellis GL, Heffner DK. Fetal rhabdomyoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 24 cases. Human Pathol 1993;24:
24. Favia G, Lo Muzio L, Serpico R, Maiorano E. Rhabdomyoma of the head and neck: clinicopathologic features of two cases. Head Neck 2003;23:700-4.
25. Garcia-Ruiz JA, Sanchez-Aniceto G, De La Mata-Pages R, Gonzalez-Rex JA, Ballestin Carcavilla C. Submandibular rhab- domyoma: a case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;
26. Koutsimpelas D, Weber A, Lippert BM, Mann WJ. Multifocal adult rhabdomyoma of the head and neck: a case report and literature review. Auris Nasus Larynx 2008;35:313-7.
27. Neville BW, McConnel FM. Multifocal adult rhabdomyoma:
report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:175-8.
28. Valdez TA, Desai U, Volk MS. Recurrent fetal rhabdomyoma of the head and neck. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:
16, Koimiseos Theotokou st 151 24 Athens
16 Parara et al. January 2010