• 沒有找到結果。

Let K be any real valued field, i.e., K is a field together with | | : K → R + such that |xy| = |x||y| and |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y| for all x and y in K, and

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Let K be any real valued field, i.e., K is a field together with | | : K → R + such that |xy| = |x||y| and |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y| for all x and y in K, and"

Copied!
1
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

1. Introduction

Let K be any real valued field, i.e., K is a field together with | | : K → R + such that |xy| = |x||y| and |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y| for all x and y in K, and

|z| = 0 ⇔ z = 0.

Let F (X 1 , X 2 , · · · , X n ) = P f i

1

i

2

···i

n

X 1 i

1

X 2 i

2

· · · X n i

n

be a formal power series in n indeterminates X 1 , X 2 , · · · , X n (n ≥ 2) with coefficients f i

1

i

2

···i

n

in K, where (K, | |) is a real valued field.

A formal power series F is convergent if there exists a positive real number C such that |f i

1

i

2

···i

n

| ≤ C i

1

+i

2

+···+i

n

for all i 1 ≥ 0, i 2 ≥ 0, · · · , i n ≥ 0 and

i 1 + i 2 + · · · + i n 6= 0. If a formal power series F is not convergent, then we say it is divergent.

In [1], S.S. Abhyankar and T.T. M oh proved that the convergent set defined as Conv(F ) = {c ∈ K : F (cX 2 , X 2 , · · · , X n ) is convergent in X 2 , · · · , X n } is a set of measure zero if F is divergent in X 1 , X 2 , · · · , X n , where K = R or C.

In [4], A.Sathaye established that the converse of the Abhyankar-Moh’s theorem is also true. i.e., given any small set S, there exists a divergent power series F (X 1 , X 2 , · · · , X n ) with Conv(F ) = S.

In [2],Y.C.Hung generalized the above results to nonlinear restrictions. Given a divergent power series F (X 1 , X 2 , · · · , X n ) in X 1 , X 2 , · · · , X n over K, where K is the field of real or complex numbers, then the convergence sets defined as Conv(F ) = {(c 1 , c 2 , · · · , c m ) ∈ K m : F (c 1 X 2 + c 2 X 2 2 + · · · + c m X 2 m , X 2 , · · · , X n ) is convergent in X 2 , · · · , X n } is a measure zero F σ set.

In this thesis, we shall prove that if F (X 1 , X 2 , X 3 ) is divergent in X 1 , X 2 , X 3 over K where K = R or C, then F (a 1 X 3 , a 2 X 3 , X 3 ) is divergent for almost all (a 1 , a 2 ) ∈ K 2 . i.e.,the set

{(a 1 , a 2 ) ∈ K 2 : F (a 1 X 3 , a 2 X 3 , X 3 ) is convergent in X 3 } is a set of measure zero and is a union of countable number of closed sets.

2

參考文獻

相關文件

Figure 6 shows the relationship between the increment ∆y and the differential dy: ∆y represents the change in height of the curve y = f(x) and dy represents the change in height

The following theorem states that (1 + x) k is equal to the sum of its Maclaurin

The sample point can be chosen to be any point in the subrectangle R ij , but if we choose it to be the upper right-hand corner of R ij [namely (x i , y j ), see Figure 3],

Suppose that E is bounded, open interval and that each f k.. is differentiable

the larger dataset: 90 samples (libraries) x i , each with 27679 features (counts of SAGE tags) (x i ) d.. labels y i : 59 cancerous samples, and 31

Proof: For every positive integer n, there are finitely many neighbor- hood of radius 1/n whose union covers K (since K is compact). Collect all of them, say {V α }, and it forms

The best way to picture a vector field is to draw the arrow representing the vector F(x, y) starting at the point (x, y).. Of course, it’s impossible to do this for all points (x, y),

The proof is based on Hida’s ideas in [Hid04a], where Hida provided a general strategy to study the problem of the non-vanishing of Hecke L-values modulo p via a study on the