• 沒有找到結果。

We say that r is bounded on I if there exists M &gt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "We say that r is bounded on I if there exists M &gt"

Copied!
4
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

1. Homework 6

Let r : I → R3be a function with r(t) = (f (t), g(t), h(t)) for all t ∈ I. Let t0∈ R and d > 0. Let i = (1, 0, 0) and j = (0, 1, 0) and k = (0, 0, 1). We denote r by r(t) = f (t)i + g(t)j + h(t)k.

We say that r is bounded on I if there exists M > 0 such that kr(t)k ≤ M for all t ∈ I.

(1) Assume that I = {t ∈ R : 0 < |t − t0| < d}. Let L = (L1, L2, L3) ∈ R3. We say that limt→t0r(t) = L if for any  > 0, there exists δ = δ,t0 > 0 such that

kr(t) − Lk <  whenever 0 < |t − t0| < δ.

Similarly, we can also define lim

t→±∞γ(t). This will be left to the reader.

(a) Show that

t→tlim0r(t) = L if and only if lim

t→t0f (t) = L1, lim

t→t0g(t) = L2, lim

t→t0h(t) = L3. Proof. This can be proved by the following inequality:

|f (t) − L1|, |g(t) − L2|, |h(t) − L3| ≤ kr(t) − Lk ≤ |f (t) − L1| + |g(t) − L2| + |h(t) − L3|.

Suppose that lim

t→t0

r(t) = L. For every  > 0, there exists δ > 0 so that kr(t) − Lk <  whenever 0 < |t − t0| < δ. Thus

|f (t) − L1|, |g(t) − L2|, |h(t) − L3| < 

whenever 0 < |t − t0| < δ. This implies that limt→t0f (t) = L1 and limt→t0g(t) = L2

and limt→t0h(t) = L3.

Conversely, suppose limt→t0f (t) = L1 and limt→t0g(t) = L2 and limt→t0h(t) = L3. For every  > 0, choose δ > 0 so that

|f (t) − L1|, |g(t) − L2|, |h(t) − L3| <  3 whenever 0 < |t − t0| < δ. Thus

kr(t) − Lk ≤ |f (t) − L1| + |g(t) − L2| + |h(t) − L3| < 3 · 3 =  whenever 0 < |t − t0| < δ. This implies that lim

t→t0r(t) = L. 

(b) Evaluate (i) lim

t→0

 t sin1

ti + etj + cos√3 tk

 . Solution: j + k

(ii) lim

t→1

 t2− 1 t − 1i +√

t + 8j +sin πt ln t k

 . Solution: 2i + 3j − πk.

(iii) lim

t→∞



te−ti + t3+ t

2t3− 1j + cos1 tk



Solution: 1 2j + k.

(2) Assume that I = (t0− d.t0+ d). We say that r(t) is differentiable at t0 if lim

h→0

1 t − t0

(r(h + t0) − r(t0)) exists.

In this case, the above limit is denoted by r0(t0) or ˙r(t0) or d

dtr(t)|t=t0.

1

(2)

2

(a) Show that r is differentiable at t0 if and only if f (t), g(t), h(t) are differentiable at t0

with r0(t0) = f0(t0)i + g0(t0)j + h0(t0)k.

Proof. This can be proved by the result of exercise (1) and by the following identity 1

t − t0

(r(h + t0) − r(t0)) = f (t) − f (t0) t − t0

i +g(t) − g(t0) t − t0

j + h(t) − h(t0) t − t0

k.

 (b) Evaluate r0(t). Here

(i) r(t) = a cos ti + a sin tj + btk for t ∈ R for some a, b ∈ R.

r0(t) = −a sin ti + a cos tj + bk.

(ii) r(t) = et2i − j + ln(1 + 3t)k for t > 0.

r0(t) = 2tet2i + 3 1 + 3tk.

(iii) r(t) = 1

1 + ti + t

1 + tj + tan−11 − t2

1 + t2k, t 6= 1.

r0(t) = −(1 + t)−2i + (1 + t)−2j − 2t t4+ 1k.

(3) Let I = [a, b]. Suppose that γ : [a, b] → R3 is bounded.

(a) Show that f, g, h are also bounded on [a, b].

Proof. This can be proved by the inequality

|f (t)|, |g(t)|, |h(t)| ≤ kγ(t)k.

 (b) Let P = {a = t0< t1< · · · < tn= b} be a partition of [a, b] and C = {ci} be a mark of P, i.e. ci∈ [ti−1, ti]. The Riemann sum of r with respect to P and C is defined to be

S(r, C, P ) =

n

X

i=1

(ti− ti−1)r(ci).

We say that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b] if there exists I ∈ R3 such that for any

 > 0, there exists δ = δ> 0

kS(r, C, P ) − Ik <  whenever kP k < δ.

Show that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b] if and only if f, g, h are Riemann integrable over [a, b] with

Z b a

r(t)dt = Z b

a

f (t)dti + Z b

a

g(t)dtj + Z b

a

h(t)dtk.

Similarly, we can define the improper integral of a vector valued function. The definition is left to the reader.

Proof. This can be proved by the inequality

|S(f, C, P ) − I1|,|S(g, C, P ) − I2|, |S(h, C, P ) − I3| ≤ kS(r, C, P ) − Ik

≤ |S(f, C, P ) − I1| + |S(g, C, P ) − I2| + |S(h, C, P ) − I3|.

Suppose r is Riemann integrable over [a, b]. For every  > 0, there exists δ > 0 so that kS(r, C, P ) − Ik <  whenever kP k < δ. By

|S(f, C, P ) − I1|, |S(g, C, P ) − I2|, |S(h, C, P ) − I3| ≤ kS(r, C, P ) − Ik,

(3)

3

we find

|S(f, C, P ) − I1|, |S(g, C, P ) − I2|, |S(h, C, P ) − I3| < 

whenever kP k < δ. Thus f, g, h are Riemann integrable over [a, b]. Conversely, if f, g, h are Riemann integrable over [a, b], then every  > 0, there exists δ > 0 so that

|S(f, C, P ) − I1|, |S(g, C, P ) − I2|, |S(h, C, P ) − I3| <  3. Let I =Rb

af (t)dti +Rb

a g(t)dtj +Rb

a h(t)dtk. Then

kS(r, C, P ) − Ik ≤ |S(f, C, P ) − I1| + |S(g, C, P ) − I2| + |S(h, C, P ) − I3| < 3 ·  3 =  whenever kP k < δ. This shows that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b].  (c) Suppose that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b]. Let u ∈ R3 be any unit vector, i.e.

kuk = 1. Show that

*Z b a

r(t)dt, u +

= Z b

a

hr(t), uidt.

Here hu, vi is the inner product of u, v in R3. Proof. Let u = (u, v, w). Then

*Z b a

r(t)dt, u +

= u Z b

a

f (t)dt + v Z b

a

g(t)dt + w Z b

a

h(t)dt

= Z b

a

(f (t)u + g(t)v + h(t)w)dt

= Z b

a

hr, uidt.

 (d) Use (c) to show that

Z b a

r(t)dt

≤ Z b

a

kr(t)kdt.

Proof. IfRb

a r(t)dt = 0, then the above equation is obvious true: the right hand side is always a nonnegative number.

We assume thatRb

a r(t)dt 6= 0. Write u =Rb

a r(t)dt/kRb

a r(t)dtk. Then u is a unit vector and

*Z b a

r(t)dt, u +

= 1

kRb ar(t)dtk

*Z b a

r(t)dt, Z b

a

r(t)dt +

= kRb

ar(t)dtk2 kRb

a r(t)dtk

= k Z b

a

r(t)dtk.

By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and kuk = 1, hr(t), ui ≤ kr(t)k. Thus Z b

a

hr(t), uidt ≤ Z b

a

kr(t)kdt.

We conclude that

Z b a

r(t)dt

≤ Z b

a

kr(t)kdt.



(4)

4

(e) Suppose that r : [a, b] → R3 is a C1-function, i.e. r0 exists and continuous on [a, b].

Show that

kr(b) − r(a)k ≤ Z b

a

kr0(t)kdt.

Proof. By fundamental theorem of Calculus, r(b) − r(a) =

Z b a

r0(t)dt.

Using the above inequality, we prove our assertion. 

(f) Evaluate (i)

Z 1 0

t3ln ti + 1

1 + tj + 1 1 + t2k

 dt.

Solution: − 1

16i + ln 2j +π 4k.

(ii) Z 1

0

 4

1 + t2j + 2t 1 + t2k

 dt.

Solution: πj + ln 2k.

(iii) Z

0

e−st(cos ti + sin tj + tk) dt.

Solution: s

1 + s2i + 1

1 + s2j + 1 s2k.

參考文獻

相關文件

The definition is left to the

Furthermore, if sup S 6∈ S, then sup S is an accu- mulation point of

We know s(x) is Riemann integrable on [a, b]... Then c is Riemann integrable on

Furthermore, if sup S 6∈ S, then sup S is an accu- mulation point of

By the Lebesgue’s theorem we know that if f is (Riemann) integrable on A, then the discontinuities of f

(Use the property of

This shows that q is an interior point

Here is