• 沒有找到結果。

We say that r is bounded on I if there exists M &gt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "We say that r is bounded on I if there exists M &gt"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

1. Homework 6

Let r : I → R3be a function with r(t) = (f (t), g(t), h(t)) for all t ∈ I. Let t0∈ R and d > 0. Let i = (1, 0, 0) and j = (0, 1, 0) and k = (0, 0, 1). We denote r by r(t) = f (t)i + g(t)j + h(t)k.

We say that r is bounded on I if there exists M > 0 such that kr(t)k ≤ M for all t ∈ I.

(1) Assume that I = {t ∈ R : 0 < |t − t0| < d}. Let L = (L1, L2, L3) ∈ R3. We say that limt→t0r(t) = L if for any  > 0, there exists δ = δ,t0 > 0 such that

kr(t) − Lk <  whenever 0 < |t − t0| < δ.

Similarly, we can also define lim

t→±∞γ(t). This will be left to the reader.

(a) Show that

t→tlim0r(t) = L if and only if lim

t→t0f (t) = L1, lim

t→t0g(t) = L2, lim

t→t0h(t) = L3. (b) Evaluate

(i) lim

t→0

 t sin1

ti + etj + cos√3 tk

 . (ii) lim

t→1

 t2− 1 t − 1i +√

t + 8j +sin πt ln t k

 . (iii) lim

t→∞



te−ti + t3+ t

2t3− 1j + cos1 tk



(2) Assume that I = (t0− d.t0+ d). We say that r(t) is differentiable at t0 if lim

h→0

1 t − t0

(r(h + t0) − r(t0)) exists.

In this case, the above limit is denoted by r0(t0) or ˙r(t0) or d

dtr(t)|t=t0.

(a) Show that r is differentiable at t0 if and only if f (t), g(t), h(t) are differentiable at t0

with r0(t0) = f0(t0)i + g0(t0)j + h0(t0)k.

(b) Evaluate r0(t). Here

(i) r(t) = a cos ti + a sin tj + btk for t ∈ R for some a, b ∈ R.

(ii) r(t) = et2i − j + ln(1 + 3t)k for t > 0.

(iii) r(t) = 1

1 + ti + t

1 + tj + tan−11 − t2

1 + t2k, t 6= 1.

(3) Let I = [a, b]. Suppose that γ : [a, b] → R3 is bounded.

(a) Show that f, g, h are also bounded on [a, b].

(b) Let P = {a = t0< t1< · · · < tn= b} be a partition of [a, b] and C = {ci} be a mark of P, i.e. ci∈ [ti−1, ti]. The Riemann sum of r with respect to P and C is defined to be

S(r, C, P ) =

n

X

i=1

(ti− ti−1)r(ci).

We say that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b] if there exists I ∈ R3 such that for any

 > 0, there exists δ = δ> 0

kS(r, C, P ) − Ik <  whenever kP k < δ.

Show that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b] if and only if f, g, h are Riemann integrable over [a, b] with

Z b a

r(t)dt = Z b

a

f (t)dti + Z b

a

g(t)dtj + Z b

a

h(t)dtk.

Similarly, we can define the improper integral of a vector valued function. The definition is left to the reader.

1

(2)

2

(c) Suppose that r is Riemann integrable over [a, b]. Let u ∈ R3 be any unit vector, i.e.

kuk = 1. Show that

*Z b a

r(t)dt, u +

= Z b

a

hr(t), uidt.

Here hu, vi is the inner product of u, v in R3. (d) Use (c) to show that

Z b a

r(t)dt

≤ Z b

a

kr(t)kdt.

(e) Suppose that r : [a, b] → R3 is a C1-function, i.e. r0 exists and continuous on [a, b].

Show that

kr(b) − r(a)k ≤ Z b

a

kr0(t)kdt.

(f) Evaluate (i)

Z 1 0

t3ln ti + 1

1 + tj + 1 1 + t2k

 dt.

(ii) Z 1

0

 4

1 + t2j + 2t 1 + t2k

 dt.

(iii) Z

0

e−st(cos ti + sin tj + tk) dt.

參考文獻

相關文件

This shows that r is Riemann integrable over

Furthermore, if sup S 6∈ S, then sup S is an accu- mulation point of

Furthermore, if sup S 6∈ S, then sup S is an accu- mulation point of

Remark: In class, we discuss the contraction mapping on a metric space X into X and prove that there exists a unique fixed point if X

That the sequence is increasing can be shown by induction... If not,

(In this case we shall say that E has an infimum t and shall write t=inf E.).. (iv) E is said to be bounded if and only if it is bounded above

The proof is left to the reader as an exercise.. If f is differentiable at x 0 , its derivative

To do (9), you need to recall the exercise from hw 1 and hw 2 in Calculus I: (you do not need to turn in the following exercises) If you are not familiar with the exercises below,