1
M. K. Wu
Na$onal Dong-‐Hwa University
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
Lecture at the Center for Condensed Ma4er Sciences NTU, 15 October 2013
What have we learned from Nanosciences—
Study of FeSe Superconductor as an example
FeSe0.9 nanowire
500 nm
[100]
2
3
What we have advanced in
Sciences, and how?
Establishment of Core Facili$es
p
Academic centers are located at the Academia Sinica, Na,onal Taiwan University, Na,onal Tsing Hua University, Na,onal Chiao Tung University, Na,onal Chung Cheng University, Na,onal Cheng Kung University, Na,onal Sun Yet-‐Sen University, and Na,onal Dung Hua University.
p
A biomedical nano-‐imaging center was also set up in 2007.
p
These core-‐facility centers provide professional
services that significantly enhance efforts to sa$sfy
needs of academic and industrial R&D.
NTHU
Core Facilities for Southern Taiwan Nanotechnology Research Center, NCKU
Center for Microscopy and Nano-analysis, NTU
Core Facility for Nano Lithography and Nano Biotechnology, NTHU
Nano-laboratory for Kaohsiung and Ping-Tung Area , NSYSU
NDHU Nano-science and Technology
Center in Central Taiwan, NCCU /NCHU
Core Facility for Nano Fabrication and Nano Characterization, NCTU
Nano Common Laboratories, ITRI
Interdisciplinary Bio-medical Imaging Research Center, NSRRC
Core Facilities Center for Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology, AS
NSRRC
Nano-science and Technology
Research Center in Eastern Formosa, NDHU
ITRI
Core Facili$es Progrm
NTHU
Core Facilities for Southern Taiwan Nanotechnology Research Center, NCKU
Center for Microscopy and Nano-analysis, NTU
Core Facility for Nano Lithography and Nano Biotechnology, NTHU
Nano-laboratory for Kaohsiung and Ping-Tung Area , NSYSU
NDHU Nano-science and Technology
Center in Central Taiwan, NCCU /NCHU
Core Facility for Nano Fabrication and Nano Characterization, NCTU
Nano Common Laboratories, ITRI
Interdisciplinary Bio-medical Imaging Research Center, NSRRC
Core Facilities Center for Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology, AS
NSRRC
Nano-science and Technology
Research Center in Eastern Formosa, NDHU
ITRI
6 Core-shell
Nanotip Wire/Rod
Tube
Belt
Peapod
Adv. Mater. 14, 1847 (2002) Nature Mater. 5, 102 (2006) Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 22 (2002)
JACS 123, 2791 (2001) JACS 127, 2820 (2005)
APL .79, 3179 (2001)
Adv. Func. Mate. 12, 687, (2002) APL 81, 4189 (2002)
APL 86, 203119 (2005) JACS 128, 8368 (2006)
APL. 81, 1312 (2002) Nano. Lett. 3, 537 (2003)
Z.L. Wang Ed., Chapter 9, pp.259-309, Kluwer
(2004)
Adv. Fun. Mat. 16, 537 (2006)
APL. 83, 1420 (2003) Nano. Lett. 4, 471 (2004) Chem. Mater. 17, 553 (2005) Adv. Func. Mat. 15, 783 (2005) APL 86, 203119 (2005)
US Patent 6,960,528,B2 APL (2006)
Brush
Adv. Func. Mater. 14, 233 (2004) Other Thin Films:
DRM 14, 1010 (2005) APL 86, 21911 (2005) APL 86, 83104 (2005) APL 86, 161901 (2005) APL 87, 261915 (2005) JVST B 24, 87 (2006) APL 88, 73515 (2006)
1-D Functionalized Integrated Systems
The violation of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water
B
y confining water in nanopores, so narrow that the liquid cannot freeze, it is possible to explore its properties well below its homogeneous nucleation temperature TH 235 K. Inparticular, the dynamical parameters of water can be measured down to 180 K, approaching the suggested glass transition temperature Tg 165 K. Here we present experimental evidence, obtained from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Quasi-Elastic Neutron Scattering
spectroscopies, of a well defined decoupling of transport properties (the self-diffusion
coefficient and the average translational relaxation time), which implies the breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein relation.
Abstract
Sow-Hsin Chen, Francesco Mallamace, Chung-Yuan Mou, Matteo Broccio, Carmelo Corsaro, Antonio Faraone, and Li Liu
I
n 2005, PNAS established an annual award that recognizes recently publishedPNAS papers of outstanding scientific excellence and originality. The lab motto of Nick Cozzarelli, our late Editor-in-Chief, was “Blast ahead,” as he encouraged researchers to push the envelope of discovery. This year the award is renamed the Cozzarelli Prize, and the Editorial Board has reorganized the above article, “The violation of the Stokes-Einstein Relation in supercooled water”, as an excellent example of these same qualities.
Mesoporous silica as Nanocarriers
S.H. Wu, Y. Hung, C.Y. Mou, Chem Comm (Feature Article, 2011, In Press)
8.5m m 7mm
Photodynamic therapy Magnetic Resonance Angiography Oral drug delivery
GaN Nanorod Array for White-‐light LED
• Good quality of GaN nanorod arrays have been demonstrated.
– Strain free, defect suppression, low refrac,ve index
• Nanorods-‐on-‐
Si growth templates can serve as a good system for InGaN-‐
nanodisk-‐based full-‐color light-‐emiXng devices.
• A new approach is shown for genera$ng high-‐
quality white light LED with high color rendering capability and high efficiency.
Appl. Phys. LeH. 97, 073101 (2010)
Creating Monodispersed Ordered Arrays of Surface-Magic- Clusters and Anodic Alumia Nanochannels by Constrained
Self-organization
Prof. Yuh-Lin Wang 王玉麟 IAMS Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Cover Story
Appl. Phys. LeH., 92, 063101 (2008)
Electrical and thermal transport in single nickel nanowire Ins,tute of Physics, Academia Sinica
Cover Story
Appl. Phys. LeH., 94, 062105 (2009)
Self-‐assembled GaN hexagonal micropyramid and microdisk Department of Physics, Na,onal Sun Yat-‐Sen University
Cover Story
Proteomics 7, 3038-‐3050 (2007)
Targeted protein quan,ta,on and profiling using PVDF affinity probe and MALDI-‐TOF MS
Ins,tute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica
NanoCore Research Highlights
NanoCore Research Highlights (cont’d)
Invited Review Ar$cle
Materials Today, 14(12), 526 (2011) Developments in nanocrystal memory
Department of Physics, Na,onal Sun Yat-‐Sen University
Cover Story
Dalton Transac,ons, 41, 723 (2012)
A 3D α-‐Fe2O3 nanoflake urchin-‐like structure for electro-‐magne,c wave absorp,on
Department of Chemical Engineering, Na,onal Chung Cheng University
Science ,334, 629 (2011)
Porphyrin-‐Sensi,zed Solar Cells with Cobalt (II/III)–Based Redox Electrolyte Exceed 12 Percent Efficiency
Department of Chemistry and Center of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Na,onal Chung Hsing University
Department of Applied Chemistry and Ins,tute of Molecular Scinece, Na,onal Chiao Tung University
u What has Nanotechnology done for Sciences and Society ?
Ø For Sciences
² New Insights into: Quantum phenomena;
Atomic assembly; Interactions among biology and physical sciences; New
tools—Atomic manipulation, bioimaging...
Ø For Society
² New Technology for: Biomedical
applications; Daily life applications;
Agriculture; Energy; Water;
Environment; New industries….
14
An Example: Development in High Temperature
Superconductivity—My
Personal Journey
15/45
75 yrs
16
Discovery of Tc > 77K SC
Schematic phase diagram of high-Tc superconductors showing hole doping right side and electron doping left side. From
Damascelli et al., 2003.
The Best Accomplishments
" Triumph of Physicists, Chemists and Material Scien,sts
MgB2
Rb Dopded C60 NaxCoO2‧.yH2O
FeSe system
• Structure type: B10, anti-PbO
• Pearson symbol: tP4
• Space group: P4/nmm, No. 129
• a= 3.783, C= 5.534
• Fe 2a x=0 y=0 z=0
• Se 2c x=0 y=1/2 z=0.26
1st Fe-based SC Found in Japan
2nd Fe-based SC Found in
Germany 3rd Fe-based SC
Found in Taiwan
4th Fe-based SC Found in China
Fe-based superconductors all discovered in 2008
The common Features in Fe-based superconductors
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0
2 4 6 8 10 12
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
F eS e0.88 crys tal
Resistance (10−2 Ω)
T (K )
Resistance(10−2Ω)
T(K )
0T 1T 3T 5T 7T 9T
!;"
"
A':F"B"
"
"
"
" "
(CaPr)FeAs 122
From B. Lv et al.
The common Features in Fe-based superconductors?
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 -40
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20
S ee be ck Co ef ficie nt ( µ V /K )
Temperature (K)
Thermopower of FeSe
The common Features in Fe-based superconductors
Thermopower of PnicIdes
F-‐ doped 1111 , LaFeAsO1-‐xFx, x=0, 0.1
From Prof. Z.A.
Xu
!f"
"
A':F";"
"
"
"
" "
From Prof. C.W. Chu
Electron‐Doped CaFe2As2
Thermoepower of K 1-x Fe 2-y Se 2 in three regimes
From Prof. X. H. Chen
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0.0
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5
1.8 FeSe
0.82ρ (m Ω− cm)
T(K)
3 6 9 12
0.0 0.1 0.2
ρ(mΩ−cm)
T(K)
H=0,1, 3, 5, 7, 9T
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0
4 8 12
Hc2(0)~17.9T ξ0(0)~43 ang.
Hc2(T)
[T/Tc(H=0)]2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
90.0 90.1 90.2 90.3
3.766 3.768 3.770 3.772 3.774 3.776 3.778
5.506 5.508 5.510 5.512 5.514 5.516
γ (degree)
T (K )
a c
M.K. Wu et al., Physica C., 2009 RT
6K Simulation
McQueen et al., PRL 2009
The Structural Phase Transition in Fe
1+xSe
(001) (221) 70.4170
LT HT
No LT Distortion,
No Superconductivity!
Femtosecond optical pump-probe spectroscopy
Optical pump
Optical probe
Optical Reflectivity Change ΔR/R (t)
Photon
E(k)
Ef Free carrier
absorption Interband
transition
FeSe Substrate Pump/probe = 400/800 nm
(corresponding to probe of Fe 3-d orbital) Pump fluence = 5.3 µJ/cm
2(measurement was done under the perturbation regime)
0 100 200 300 4
6 8 10 12 14 16
Temperature (K) τ slow(ps)
10 100
1 2 3 4 5
Astep
Temperature (K) 106 A fast , A step
Afast
300
0 50 100 150 200
0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0.0 0.5 1.0
fnorm
Temperature (K) Ap, norm
Correlation between different dynamics at T = 80~130 K
80 K 130 K
Indication of spin fluctuation Indication of optical absorption
Afast:
gap-like feature
τslow:
carrier-phonon thermalization
130 K
130 K 80 K
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
90.0 90.1 90.2 90.3
3.766 3.768 3.770 3.772 3.774 3.776 3.778
5.506 5.508 5.510 5.512 5.514 5.516
Gamma value (degree)
Temperature (K) a c
Wen, et al., PRL 108, 267002 (2012)
Relation between all clues obtained by optical pump-probe
Change of shear stiffness
Nematic
spin fluctuation
Reduction of
Optical absorption
Reduction of DOS near EF
Prolongation of ps c-p thermalization
Emersion of sub-ps quasiparticle relaxation
Gap opening near E
FT ~(80)-130 K T ~80-130 K T ~80 K, T ~130 K T ~130 K
Spin fluctuation and modification of electronic band structure develop at/near the temperature of structural phase transition.
Wen, et al., PRL 108, 267002 (2012)
31
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
T C (K)
Pressure (GPa)
Present Tonset) Tanaka
Cava(Tonset) Guidline Guidline Guidline
Mizuguchi Y et al., APL, 2008; Medvedev, S et al., NAT. MATER., 2009
Pressure Effect on FeSe
C.Q. Jin et al., unpublished
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
R(om)
T (K )
0.3G P a 0.5G P a 1.3G P a 2.3G P a 3.4G P a 3.9G P a 4.4G P a
in ab plane
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0
2 4 6 8 10 12
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
F eS e0.88 crys tal
Resistance (10−2 Ω)
T (K )
Resistance(10−2Ω)
T(K )
0T 1T 3T 5T 7T 9T
!;"
"
A':F"B"
"
"
"
" "
(CaPr)FeAs 122
From B. Lv et al.
Resistivity of FeSe & (CaPr)FeAs
Electrical Resistivity of FeSe—Suggest the existence of higher Tc phase?
Tm
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
F eS e0.88 crys tal
Resistance (10−2 Ω)
T (K )
Resistance(10−2 Ω)
T(K )
0T 1T 3T 5T 7T 9T
McQueen et al., PRL 2009
What is the Exact Stoichiometry of Fe
1+xSe ?
35
Y. Mizuguchi and Y. Takano, A Review, 2013
What is the Phase Diagram of Fe
1+xSe ?
Three kinds of Fe selenide superconductors
Tc ~ 33K
~ 48 K at 11 GPa K1-x Fe2-ySe2 (2011) Alkali intercalated FeSe
Tc ~ 9K
~ 36.7 K at 8.9GPa
Bulk FeSe (2008) FeSe monolayer (2012)
on SrTiO3 substrate
Tc > 30K ~ 65K ? decreasing dimensionality
Fe vacancy order in K
1-xFe
2-ySe
2Yan, et al., PRL 106, 087005 (2011)
KFe
1.5Se
2rhombus-order
K
0.8Fe
1.6Se
2√5 × √5 order
Fe Fe vacancy
Study of FeSe Nano-‐Structure
• The unanswered ques$ons led us to speculate that the presence of defects in FeSe is cri$cal to its superconduc$vity
• Nanostructures provide important insight into the beaer understanding of defects in
materials of interest
• Techniques to fabricate FeSe nanostructure are well-‐developed and simple
38
39
Fe was mixed with Se/(SeTe) powder and introduced into a 2 ml stainless steel Swagelok union reactor at room temperature in a N2-filled glove box.
The filled reactor was closed tightly with another plug and placed at the center of the tube’s furnace.
The temperature of the furnace was raised to 700℃ at a rate of 20℃/min, and the temperature was keep at 700 ℃ for 30 min.
The reactor, heated to 700 ℃ , was gradually cooled (5h) to room temperature and open.
40
!
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 1.9x10-4
2.0x10-4 2.1x10-4 2.2x10-4 2.3x10-4 2.4x10-4 2.5x10-4 2.6x10-4
ZFC 30 Oe FC 30 Oe
FeTe 0.8 S 0.2 - Nanoparticle
T (K)
χ (emu/g*Oe)
Fe-Te-S Nanoparticle
C.C. Chang et al., unpublished
42
!
!
21-1 20-1 020
ZA=[102]
growth direction [010]
FeSe-tetragonal a = 3.729 Å
c =5.730 Å 21-1 20-1
020 ZA=[102]
21-1 20-1 020
ZA=[102]
growth direction [010]
growth direction [010]
FeSe-tetragonal a = 3.729 Å c =5.730 Å
Fe-Se-(Te) (tetragonal) Nanowire
Nanowires, Fe(Te-S/Se)
after electrode patterning
44
!
Electrical Resistance of Fe-Se-(Te) Nanowires
H.H. Chang et al., submitted
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 0
100 200 300 400
500 na nowires
F eT e0.8S 0.2-‐20111115
Resistance (ohm)
T empera ture (K )
FeSe
0.9nanowire
500 nm
200
020
⊗[001]
[100]
1 nm
(100)
3.77Å
FeSe 0.9 nanowire
For all nanowires
the average Se/Fe
ratio is about 1.26
(~ 4/5)
(a) (b)
(c)
FeSe FeSeTe
FeTeS
0 0.2 0.4n(1,3,0)0.6 0.8 1(d)
FeSe FeSeTeFeTeS 1(1,3,0)
q = 5
200 020
000
FeSe Nanowire_20120827-8F_no.2
FeTeS Nanowire_20120202_no.3
200 020
000
130
FeSeTe Nanowire_20120207_no.3
200 020
000
130
200 020
Refs: Nature Physics 8(2012)709.
Electron diffraction of FeSe NPS
⊗[001]
Superlattice structure
Yan, Gao, Lu, Xiang, PRL 106, 087005 (2011) KFe
1.5Se
2rhombus-order
K
0.8Fe
1.6Se
2√5 × √5 order Fe Fe vacancy
Fe vacancy order in K 1-x Fe 2-y Se 2
K is not necessary!!
Wire 97nm Wire 125nm
20130626_FeSe_Nanowires
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 0
50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Resistance (Ω)
Temperatur (K)
20130626_Fe0.8Se_2-probes_125nm_2nA
20130626_FeSe NW_125nm
d-‐spacing
(Å) degree to
spot#1 (h k l) d-‐spacing (Å)
Refs. degree to spot#1 refs.
1 1.988 0.00 (2, 0, 0) 1.885 0
2 2.773 45.43 (1, 1, 0) 2.666 45
3 1.955 89.34 (0, 2, 0) 1.885 90
4 2.791 134.47 (-‐1, 1, 0) 2.666 135
1 2
3 4
⊗[001]
tet.(Ref: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 71(2010)495)
Fe
4Se
520 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 1800
1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500
Resistance (Ω)
Temperature (K)
20130626_Fe0.8Se_2-probes_97nm_2nA
20130626_FeSe NW_97nm
d-‐spacing
(Å) degree to
spot#1 (h k l) d-‐spacing (Å)
Refs. degree to spot#1 refs.
1 1.265 0.00 (0, -‐3, 1) 1.225 0
2 1.054 33.31 (2, -‐3, 1) 1.027 33.02
3 1.946 88.83 (2, 0, 0) 1.885 90
4 1.066 146.60 (2, 3, -‐1) 1.027 146.98
5 1.200 18.12 (1, -‐3, 1) 1.165 18
1
2
3
4
⊗[013]
tet.5
(Ref: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 71(2010)495)
~Fe
24Se
2520130321_Fe
1.05Se_700 ℃-50 h-quenching
Se
Amprphous Iron oxide nanoparticle
Se Se
Fe Fe
Se
0 5 10 15
keV
Full Scale 627 cts Cursor: 4.779 (8 cts) Spectrum 1
Fe:Se : 52:48
MT of FeSe nano-particle
S2, H perpendicular to c
T
m~ 50 - 100 K
S1, H along c
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 20
30 40 50
ZFC FC
Moment (10-5 emu/g.Oe)
Temperature (K)
~ 55K
FeSe nanosheet
H // C
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0
20 40 60 80
ZFC FC
Moment (10-5 emu/g.Oe)
Temperature (K)
~ 105 K
FeSe nanosheet
H ⊥ C
The stoichiometry is Fe 4 Se 5
Resistivity of FeSe nanosheet
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3
Ln Resistance (a.u.)
Temperature (T -1/3) FeSe nanosheet
~ 80 K
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0
10000 20000 30000 40000
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3
Resistance (Ω)
Temperature (K) FeSe nanosheet
10 Ω
T
σ~ T
m!
Structure/magnetic transition around 80 K?
Fe vacancy scattering induced VRH?
β-Fe4Se5(square: √5×√5) Fe
Se
with twinned superstructure with forbidden reflections at h00, 0k0, h odd, k odd.
?
β-Fe
4Se
5→ √5×√5
ZA = [001] ZA = [001] ZA = [001]
q1 = (1/5, 3/5, 0) q2= (3/5, 1/5, 0)
β-Fe
3Se
4→ √2×√2 with d
100shift every other plane
ZA = [-131] ZA = [-121] ZA = [-111] ZA = [010]
simulated kinematical electron diffraction patterns
q
3= (1/2, 1/2, 1/2)
β-Fe9Se10 → √10×√10 with twin and with ½d310 shift every other plane
ZA = [-101] ZA = [-212] ZA = [-111] ZA = [-121]
simulated kinematical electron diffraction patterns
q4= (2/5, 1/5, 0) q5= (1/5, 2/5, 0)
Fe-vacancy I-cell
β-Fe
9Se
10→ √10×√10 with twin and with
½d
310shift every other plane
Fe Se
β-Fe9Se10 with twinned superstructure d310
a b c
β-Fe
1-xSe
4(x = ?) unknown superstructure ZA=[1-13]
ZA=[1-12] ZA=[001]
β-Fe1Se2 β-Fe2Se3 β-Fe3Se4 (stripe)
β-Fe✔ 3Se4 (rhombus: √2×2√2) β-Fe✔ 3Se4 (square: √2×√2) β-Fe✔ 4Se5(square: √5×√5) Fe Fe vacancy ✔ have been observed experimentally
β-Fe5Se6 β-Fe5Se6 β-Fe6Se7
β-Fe7Se8 (square: 2×2) β-Fe7✔ Se8 (parallelogram: √8×√10) β-Fe✔ 9Se10 (square: √10×√10)
Fe Fe vacancy ✔ have been observed experimentally
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 -‐2
-‐1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
20130415_F e1.05S e_5.1mg _700ºC
Z F C @ 20O e F C @ 20O e
χ(10-‐4 emu/g*Oe)
T empera ture (K )
0 10 20
0.0000 0.0002 0.0004
χ(10-‐4 emu/g*Oe)
T emperature (K )
700 ℃-7 h-quenching
SC. Ratio: 3.5%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
20130226_#-22-1_K2Fe4.1Se5_7.5mg
χ (10-4 emu/g*Oe)
T (K)
ZFC@30 Oe FC@30 Oe
T
c~ 30K
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
3 4 5 6
7 #22-5_K2Fe4.1Se5-400oC quench_15mg
χ (10-4 emu/g*Oe)
T (K)
ZFC@30 Oe FC@30 Oe
400
oC quench 750
oC quench
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-6 -4 -2 0
20130307_#22-8_K2Fe4.1Se5_7mg
χ (10-4 emu/g*Oe)
T (K)
ZFC@30 Oe FC@30 Oe
750
oC quench
14 16 18 20 22
2.8 3.0 3.2
Intensity (a.u.)
2θ (degree)
#22-1 #14-2
14 16 18 20 22 24
2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
Intensity (a.u.)
2θ (degree)
#22-5 #14-2
14 16 18 20 22
2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
Intensity (a.u.)
2θ (degree)
#22-8 #14-2
* * FeSe(t) *
K-Fe-Se
• Possible types of Fe-vacancy order
• Samples:
– β-Fe1-xSe from potassium removal of K1-xFe2-ySe2 bulk/crystal – β-Fe1-xSe nanosheets via an aqueous chemical route
– β-Fe1-xSe small crystal from a high-pressure route
• β-Fe
3Se
4(x = 0.25) → √2×√2
• β-Fe
4Se
5(x = 0.2) → √5×√5
• β-Fe
9Se
10(x = 0.1) → √10×√10
Summary of Fe-vacancy
70
Fe-vacancy order
AFM regime Tetragonal Fe-Se
Orthorhombic Fe-Se
Superconducting Fe
a’Se
b’t-Fe
aSe
bProposed Phase Diagram of Fe-Se
Schematic phase diagram of high-Tc superconductors showing hole doping right side and electron doping left side. From
Damascelli et al., 2003.
Summary
• A new phase diagram for Fe-chalcogenides is proposed—Needs further confirmation
—detailed studies by annealing nanowires (or nanoparticles) of different compositions
• All observed anomalies from transport, magnetic, and optical measurements can
possibly associate with orbital modification and gap opening—needs theoretical support
72
73