SHARING ON AUDIT FINDINGS - MANAGEMENT ASPECTS
2020/21
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION 3 SECTION
8 October 2021
MFA - FOUR SPECIFIC ASPECTS
General Administration of the School Management Committee (SMC)/ Incorporated Management Committee (IMC)
Human Resources and Personnel Matters
Financial Management Matters
Fee Remission/ Scholarship Schemes
2
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC (1)
Declaration of Conflict of Interest
Major observations:
School-based policy/procedures for school personnel, including managers and staff, were not in place and/or not endorsed by SMC/IMC
Records of declarations not properly documented
No proper records of the resolution regarding the declaration made by staff and necessary actions taken
No withdrawal of remunerated managers over discussion of relevant school matters which incurred conflict of interest e.g.
remuneration
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC (2)
Declaration of Conflict of Interest Recommendations:
Draw up school-based policies/procedures to require SMC/IMC members and/or staff to declare conflict of interest, which should be deliberated and endorsed by SMC/IMC
Keep proper records of all declarations made verbally or in writing (using a standard form)
Properly record the necessary actions taken together with considerations to all the declared conflicts, such as refraining from handling the duties, reasons for the declarant to continue to discharge the duties, etc
Observe the relevant article of the SMC/IMC Constitution/
Memorandum and Articles of Association which stipulates that ‘a remunerated director shall not be entitled to attend and vote at all meetings and discussions concerning his own appointment, conditions of service and remuneration’
Reference: EDBC No. 17/2012 (Para 4 and Annex 1)
4
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC (3)
Quality Assessment and Compliance – School
Development and Accountability (SDA) Framework
Major observations:
No records of SMC/IMC’s endorsement on the School Development Plan, Annual School Plan or School Report
No records of SMC/IMC’s discussion on the management/
advisory/ warning letter(s) issued by the EDB Recommendation:
Put up self-evaluation under the SDA Framework to their SMC/IMC for discussion and approval
Reference: EDBC No. 7/2012 (para 15) “Essential items to
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC (4)
Quality Assessment and Compliance – SMC/IMC composition
Major observations:
SMC/ IMC did not comprise all the stakeholders as managers as required in the Service Agreement/ Education Ordinance
SMC/IMC composition did not fulfil the requirements in the Memorandum and Articles of Association/ the Education Ordinance
SMC/IMC meetings mostly attended by a few mangers
Managers not registered in accordance with the EDB’s requirements
Did not inform the EDB within one month after cessation of school manager
Recommendation:
Fulfil the requirement in accordance with the SMC/IMC’s Memorandum & Article of Association, Constitution and/or Service Agreement, Education Ordinance
Reference: Section 27 of the Education Ordinance, Cap. 279 “No person shall act as a manager of a school unless he is registered as a manager
of the school under section 29(1)” 6
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC (5)
Quality Assessment and Compliance – Additions, alterations or
improvement works
Major observation:
No records of prior EDB’s approval for additions,
alterations or improvement works at the school premises Recommendation:
To obtain prior EDB’s approval
Reference
SSB/IMC/SMC Service Agreement - Conditions for Admission to the DSS:
“Any application for additions, alterations or improvements to the school premises for which approval by the Government is required shall be submitted in duplicate to the Government for approval, and copied to the Director of Architectural Services/Director of Housing.”
Regulation 10 of the Education Regulations, Cap. 279A: “Except with the consent in writing of the Permanent Secretary there shall not
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC (6)
Advice on the Operation of Governance Review Sub-committee (GRSC):
Self-evaluation Checklist (ALL four parts) should be completed by schools by end-November and forwarded to GRSC annually
GRSC should review the completed checklist and submit its findings together with recommendations to the SMC/IMC for consideration
SMC/IMC’s endorsement on GRSC review schedule, review reports including findings on the checklist
Restricted sessions should be arranged to finalize reports/
findings
Example:
Complete the 2021/22
Checklist by November 2022
8
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS (1) HR Policies
Major observations:
Not endorsed by SMC/IMC
Not cover non-teaching staff
Not cover major aspects such as recruitment, promotion, appraisal, remuneration packages
Policies not in place
Implementation not in place
Not promulgated to all staff
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS (2)
HR Policies
Recommendations:
School-based HR policies, including staff recruitment, remuneration, appraisal, promotion, disciplinary procedures and staff complaint, should:
cover all paid staff
have the procedures laid out as clearly as possible for staff to follow
be properly documented and endorsed by SMC/IMC
be implemented accordingly
be reviewed regularly, if necessary, and made known to all staff for transparency
Reference:
• EDBC No. 17/2012 (paras 2 and 5)
• ICAC’s “Best Practice Checklist:
Governance and Internal Control in Schools"
10
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS (3)
Staff Recruitment Major observations:
No open recruitment
No proper records throughout different stages of staff selection process (e.g. first interview, final interview, trial teaching, etc.)
No records showing the use of pre-set assessment criteria at different stages of staff selection (e.g.
screening applications, first interview, final interview,
trial teaching/ other test, etc.)
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS (4)
Staff Recruitment
Recommendations:
Conduct staff recruitment in a transparent, fair and open manner
Draw up policies and procedures on staff recruitment, which include pre-set criteria for shortlisting and assessing candidates
Keep proper records throughout the selection process
Check if there is/ are school-based policy/ procedures on handling of staff grievances/ complaints
Reference:
• “Recommendations on Administration of Teaching Staff in Schools under DSS”
from ICAC in the EDB’s circular letter dated 21.5.2007
• ICAC’s “Best Practice Checklist: Governance and Internal Control in Schools”
• Guidelines for Handling School Complaints (Revised on 30.5.2018)
• Item 6.3.9 of ICAC’s “Best Practice Checklist:
Governance and Internal Control in Schools”
• Item 4.4.1 of School Administration Guide
12
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS (5)
Staff Complaint
Major observations:
No school-based policy
No endorsement of SMC/IMC on the policy
Recommendation:
Draw up school-based policies/procedures on
staff complaint, which should be deliberated and
endorsed by SMC/IMC
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (1)
Criteria for Awarding Fee Remission
Major observations:
Adopted eligibility benchmarks less favorable than those of the government financial assistance schemes owing to:
more levels of assistance (e.g. 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) with disposable family income falling into ranges which lead to a lower granting
AFI thresholds for full level of assistance adjusted for 3 and 4-member families not being included
30% of annual income of unmarried child(ren) residing with family not being included or percentage increased
Composition of income including items outside the list set out by SFO e.g. Provident Fund/ MPF, gratuity, retraining allowance
14
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (2)
Criteria for Awarding Fee Remission (con’t)
Major observations:
Students not granted fee remission or granted fee remission less favorable than government financial assistance scheme owing to
miscalculation
student applicants’ attendance performance
inclusion of MPF/Provident Fund
Strict requirement of the submission of SFO’s eligibility certificates upon application for school-based fee remission scheme
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (3)
Criteria for Awarding Fee Remission (cont’d)
Major observations:
No endorsement of SMC/IMC on the school-based fee remission policies/ schemes or the summary of operation/ application of the scheme
Adopting less favourable eligibility criteria without applying from the EDB for exemption
Recommendations:
The set of eligibility criteria should be no less favorable than the government financial assistance schemes across all levels of remission
Establish a check and balance mechanism to ensure that fee remission is offered in accordance with the school-based eligibility criteria
Link to SFO’s website: http://www.wfsfaa.gov.hk/sfo/en/primarysecondary/tt/general/assessment.htm 16
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (4)
Advice on adoption of eligibility criteria
Review school-based eligibility criteria regularly
Consult and seek endorsement from SMC/IMC for any revisions of eligibility criteria
Set up a mechanism to check against the results of school-based assessment with students’ eligibility for CSSA and SFO result – to uphold the no less favorable principle
Apply to EDB for exemption from the requirement to
adopt eligibility criteria for fee remission scheme no less
favorable than those of government financial assistance
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (5)
Publicity
Major observations:
No records of consultation with the SMC/ IMC or PTA on the publicity of the fee remission scheme
No sufficient transparency as required under paragraph 5 of EDBC No. 10/2012 Recommendations:
Application form for admission, letter offering admission, school website, school profile and prospectus (along with their attachments) should include where appropriate:
Details - school fee, eligibility criteria and levels of remission
Clear statement - needy students including those receiving assistance under CSSA and SFO could apply & be eligible for fee remission
Contact information – designated telephone number for enquiry 18
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (6)
Advice on publicity
If for environmental reasons, the SMC/IMC and Parent-teacher Association (PTA) find it will suffice to provide on the application form for admission, letter of offer, prospectus, etc. a hyperlink through which details of the schemes can be obtained from the school website,
state clearly on the above admission documents that information sheet containing details of the schemes is available upon request
attach the information sheet to the application form for admission and letter of offer on a need basis
If general enquiry telephone number is provided,
Points to note:
Consult parents on how the related information should be presented to ensure that it can be easily
understood by parents/
prospective parents
FEE REMISSION/SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES (7)
Advice on publicity (con’t):
When being notified of students’ application results for financial assistance from SFO,
ensure eligible students are provided with an application form for fee remission
To review school’s publicity of the schemes regularly,
refer to the updated Checklist on the Operation of the Fee Remission/ Scholarship Schemes in the Management Toolkit
20
SHARING OF GOOD PRACTICES
& CASE STUDIES
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/ IMC
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS:
RECRUITMENT
HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS:
PROMOTION
FEE REMISSION/ SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES
SHARING OF GOOD PRACTICES ON GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF SMC/IMC
Good practices observed from schools in the 2020/21 s.y.:
Operation of the SMC/ IMC
In compliance with the requirements as stated in Service Agreement (SA) / Memorandum and Articles of Association (M &
AA)
Formulation of school-based policies
Compiling all guidelines to a comprehensive set of school administration guide for easy reference which was endorsed by the SMC/ IMC
Wide coverage of various staff administrative matters such as staff recruitment, remuneration, appraisal, promotion and disciplinary procedures
Ensuring all staff would acknowledge the receipt of the guidelines via internal emails / signature
22
SHARING OF GOOD PRACTICES ON DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Good practices observed from schools in the 2020/21 s.y.:
Establishing a sound mechanism on declaration of conflict of interest which covered the following:
general annual declaration
procurement
staff recruitment
promotion
textbook selection
student admission
outside services/ part-time jobs
Requiring any participants in attendance of the SMC/ IMC meetings
SHARING OF GOOD PRACTICES ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS:
RECRUITMENT
Good practices observed from schools in the 2020/21 s.y.:
Job postings were uploaded onto the school’s website
Recruitment procedures and designated staff serving as interviewers for different posts were clearly laid down in school administration guide
Objective assessment methods with pre-set criteria devised at different stages of staff selection
24
SHARING OF GOOD PRACTICES ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS:
PROMOTION
Good practices observed from schools in the 2020/21 s.y.:
Announcing the promotional exercise to all staff for application via emails/ notices
Describing clearly the eligibility criteria of the promotional posts
Appointing promotion board with the use of standard assessment forms with justifiable pre-set criteria
Announcing the promotion results to all staff via emails/ notices
Setting up of an appeal board for unsuccessful candidates
SHARING OF GOOD PRACTICES ON FEE REMISSION/ SCHOLARSHIP SCHEMES
Good practices observed from schools in the 2020/21 s.y.:
Providing income certificate forms for applicants without income proof (e.g. self-employment and income with cash)
Providing online income simulator for prospective parents to estimate the level of fee remission to be granted before they could make an informed choice of schools
Offering bilingual versions on the school website regarding details of fee remission to cater for the different language needs of parents
26
Extract of Staff Handbook of ABC’s College on Recruitment Policy
All panel members in the recruitment selection board are required to:
“(a) declare conflict of interest if there are any private interests with the applicant including the financial and other interests of the panel member himself; his/ her family or close relatives; his/ her personal friends; or any person to whom he/ she owes a favour or is obligated in any way; and (b) refrain from participating in the selection assessment if there is any conflict of interest, subject to the resolution of the School.”
CASE STUDY A ON DECLARATION OF
CONFLICT OF INTEREST (1)
CASE STUDY A ON DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST (2)
Situation
Applicant A for the post of Virtual Arts (VA) teacher in ABC College for 2020/21
• Worked as a teaching assistant (TA) in the VA Department of ABC College under the supervision of the Panel Head in 2019/20
Composition of recruitment board
• Principal
• Deputy Principal
• Panel Head
All of them ticked in the box stating ‘I declare that there is
no conflict of interest between me as the interview assessor and the applicant’ in the interview assessmentform
28
CASE STUDY A ON DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST (3)
Observation and Recommendations
Members of the selection panel should be required to report any situations where they or their immediate family or personal friends have an interest, financial or otherwise, in any matter under consideration by their school or in any company or organisation which has or is likely to have business dealings with the school
The school should properly record any declarations or disclosures made and necessary action taken to avoid any actual or perceived conflict of interest
1. The staff member had been a student teacher in the previous year and was offered a full-time position in the current year
2. It was too difficult to hire a person for the post e.g. janitor due to a high turnover rate/ temporary short contract offered
3. There was only one candidate left after shortlisting as all other applicants did not fit the job requirements. The school found the candidate suitable for the job after interview without keeping any assessment records
CASE STUDY B ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS: RECRUITMENT (1)
30
CASE STUDY B ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS : RECRUITMENT (2)
Recommendations Schools should
ensure that staff recruitment is conducted in a transparent, fair and open manner, and there should be proper staff recruitment procedures in place with SMC/IMC’s endorsement
advertise job vacancies publicly
properly document assessment of even one candidate throughout the whole selection
process
CASE STUDY C ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS : PROMOTION (1)
Scenarios regarding the absence of promotion records
32
1. Only a short brief for the recommendation of promotion of a teacher was recorded as a result of the sudden change of manpower of the school
2. Applicants for promotion did not receive any written notification from the management regarding their application result
3. Allowance was granted for the teaching staff who were appointed to take up a functional post without records of selection criteria and procedures
CASE STUDY C ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS : PROMOTION (2)
Recommendations Schools should
review and/ or revise the school-based policy as appropriate to handle similar emergency situations
design and prepare a standard promotion assessment form with objective selection criteria to select the suitable candidate(s) for promotion
formally inform the applicants of their
application result, regardless of whether
their application is successful or not
CASE STUDY C ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL MATTERS : PROMOTION (3)
Recommendation (Cont’d)
devise a school-based mechanism / policy specifying the selection criteria and procedures for granting allowance to a/ the teaching staff who is/ are appointed to take up a functional post
Reference: ICAC Best Practice Checklist Chapter 6.3.7
34
CASE STUDY D ON FEE REMISSION (1)
Fee Remission Scheme of ABC College
Salary (including salary of applicant, applicant’s spouse and student-applicant’s unmarried sibling(s) residing with the applicant for full-time, part-time or temporary jobs, contributions to Provident Fund/ MPF)
SFO
CASE STUDY D ON FEE REMISSION (2)
Reference and Recommendation
EDB Circular No. 10/2012
To ensure that the school-based eligibility benchmarks are no less favourable than the government financial assistance schemes across all levels of remission
36