• 沒有找到結果。

An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Information Transparency of Corporate Governance and Loan Policy 張壁蘭、江向才 賴文魁

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Information Transparency of Corporate Governance and Loan Policy 張壁蘭、江向才 賴文魁"

Copied!
4
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Information Transparency of Corporate Governance and Loan Policy

張壁蘭、江向才 賴文魁

E-mail: 9315869@mail.dyu.edu.tw

ABSTRACT

This study based on disclosure and transparency of Corporate Governance that released by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. We excerpt: the items by corporate information disclosure and transparence ranking system that issued by Securities Futures Institute in Taiwan in 2003 and Standard and Poor what issued in 2002. The empirical study focuses on the relationship between information transparency and loan policy of 167 public electronics companies in Taiwan 2002. The data of samples comes from the annals report, web site of enterprise, Taiwan Economic Journal and information released by Securities and Futures Commission. This study take three parts:first, we rate the items by corporate information disclosure and transparence ranking system by Securities Futures Institute in Taiwan and Standard and Poor. Then we put each variable of corporate into each regression, analysis the relationship between information transparency of corporate and loan policy. The empirical results suggest that banks put great emphasis on the financial transparency while deal with the short-loan case and put great emphasis on the enterprise governance structure and the company scale when he deals with the long-loan case. If the corporate want to improve the loan of total load ratio, it has to reduce information transparency. It needs to follow assize transparency, financial transparency, prognostic transparency, and internet transparency, if the corporate want to reduce the interest rate.

Keywords : Corporate Governance, Information Transparency, Loan Policy Table of Contents

封面內頁 簽名頁授權書... iii 中文摘要... v 英文 摘要... vi 誌謝... vii 目

錄... viii 圖目錄... xi 表目

錄... xii 第一章 緒論... 1 1.1 研究背景與動 機... 1 1.2 研究目的... 2 1.3 研究範圍與限 制... 3 1.3.1 研究範圍... 3 1.3.2 研究限 制... 3 1.4 研究流程... 4 第二章 文獻探 討... 7 2.1 代理理論... 7 2.1.1 代理理論的發 展... 7 2.1.2 代理問題...11 2.2 公司治理與資訊透明 度... 13 2.2.1 公司治理... 13 2.2.2 資訊透明

度...21 2.3 融資順位理論... 25 2.4 銀行授信決 策... 27 2.4.1 授信的定義... 27 2.4.2 授信的基本原 則... 28 第三章 研究方法... 33 3.1 研究範圍與資料來 源... 33 3.1.1 研究範圍... 33 3.1.2 資料來

源... 33 3.2 研究方法與研究架構... 34 3.2.1 研究方 法... 34 3.2.2 研究架構... 35 3.3 變數定義與研究假 設... 36 3.3.1 變數定義... 36 3.3.2 研究假

設... 39 3.4 實證模型與分析方法... 42 第四章 實證結果與 分析... 45 4.1 敘述性統計分析... 45 4.2 迴歸分

析... 51 4.2.1 共線性分析... 51 4.2.2 殘差分

析... 56 4.2.3 資訊透明度及其他公司治理指標與銀行授信決策關聯性分析... 57 第五章 結論與建議... 67 5.1 結論... 67 5.2 建 議... 69 參考文獻... 71 中文參考文 獻... 71 英文參考文獻... 76

REFERENCES

(2)

1. Conger,Jay A.等著,林宜賢,蔡慧菁譯(2001)。「公司治理」,天 下遠見出版股份有限公司。 2. DiPiazza & Eccles(2003),馬嘉應譯。

「財務報表革命─公司治 理的徹底解決方案」,商周出版。 3. 尹志龍(2003)。「公司治理對企業重整影響之研究」,輔仁大學 金融研 究所碩士論文。 4. 王泰昌、鄭博文(1993)。「代理問題與代理成本(下)」,會計研 究月刊,第94 期,頁123-126。 5. 王泰昌、鄭博 文(1993)。「代理問題與代理成本(上)」,會計研 究月刊,第93 期,頁155-160。 6. 王惠昕(2000)。「代理問題對公司股權結構與財務 決策之影 響」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士。 7. 伍忠賢(2003)。「公司治理的第一本書」,商智文化。 8. 字佩芬(2003)。「資訊 揭露程度、外資法人持股率與股價報酬率 間之關係研究」,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。 9. 何里仁(2003)。「公司治理 之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之實 證研究」,私立逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。 10. 吳迎春(2002)。「公司治理」,天下雜 誌3月號。 11. 呂莠蓉(2003)。「資訊不對稱程度、公司特性、股價波動與銀行 借款關係之研究」,開南管理學院企業管理研究所碩士論 文。 12. 我國公司治理制度簡介(2003)。證券基金會。 13. 李孟芳(2003)。「股權結構對企業財務資訊揭露品質之影響─以 上市電子業公 司為例」,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。 14. 李亭誼(2002)。「董事身份特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度 關係之研究」,國立 政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 15. 李啟賢(2002)。「我國公司治理政策發展與現況─以政府角度觀 察」,實用稅務出版社股份有限公 司,實用月刊1及2月。 16. 杜淑玲(2002)。「科技公司之代理問題與公司監理之探討─以台 灣個案公司為例」,國立臺灣大學財務金融 學研究所碩士論文。 17. 沈宜慶(2002)。「企業資訊透明度與債券發行資金成本關係之實 證研究」,淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。 18.

沈碧秀(2003)。「國內企業財務危機與公司治理之探討─以金融 業之央票事件為例」,銘傳大學管理學院高階經理碩士論文。 19. 汪台 中(2000)。「銀行對企業貸款之實證分析─以中國農民銀行 為例」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士。 20. 汪淑媛(1997)。「銀行授信 業務之道德危機與逆選擇行為」,國 立中央大學財務管理學系碩士論文。 21. 亞洲公司治理白皮書(2003)。OECD,東京,日本。 22. 柯 承恩(2000)。「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議」,會計 研究月刊第173期、174期,頁75-81 與頁79-83。 23. 洪文玲(2002)。「法令 規範、產業景氣對公司治理的影響─以台 灣電路板廠商為例」,國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士 論文。 24. 張文毅譯(2000)。

「OECD公司管控原則」,證交資料月刊第462 期。 25. 張廖年任(2003)。「上市公司股權結構與即時性資訊揭露品質對 公司發生財務危 機之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論 文。 26. 莊尚志(2003)。「資訊揭露程度與資金成本關係之實證研究」, 東吳大學會計學 系碩士論文。 27. 莊明憲(1992)。「臺灣企業融資決策決定因素之實證研究」,私 立淡江大學金融研究所碩士論文。 28. 莊琨閔(2003)。

「企業線上報導資訊屬性之因素分析」,中國文 化大學會計研究所碩士論文。 29. 郭素菱(2002)。「機構投資人與財務報表攸關性之研 究」,國立 成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 30. 郭逸真(1995)。「融資順位理論於成長性企業之實證研究」,國 立中央大學企業管理 學系碩士論文。 31. 陳文彬(2002)。「公司治理與上市上櫃公司內部控制之探討」, 實用稅務出版社股份有限公司,實用月刊2及3月。

32. 陳台霖(1993)。「代理理論觀點下銀行授信之群體決策輔助系 統」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 33. 陳松興、阮淑 祥(2003)。「一兆元黑洞?為台灣金融重建工程把 脈」,天下雜誌出版。 34. 陳冠宇(2002)。「台灣上市公司負債成本與財務結構之關聯 性研 究」,淡江大學管理科學學系碩士論文。 35. 陳建弘譯(2000),「OECD公司管控體系的整合」,證交資料月刊 第463期。 36. 陳柏 蒼(1998)。「當前銀行授信品質問題之探討」,華信金融季 刊,第4期,頁53-64。 37. 陳柏蒼(1999)。「企業授信評等與授信風險管理」

,華信金融季 刊,第8期,頁127-135。 38. 陳萬清(1998)。「往來關係、監督結構與授信行為之研究」,朝 陽大學財務金融研究所碩士 論文。 39. 陳慧慧(2003)。「公司治理、總經理更換與公司績效關聯性之研 究」,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。 40. 彭玉怡(2003)

。「股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究-價格模 式與報酬模式之應用」,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。 41. 黃英陶(1988)。「代理 問題對公司資本結構影響之研究」,成功 大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。 42. 黃重菁(1999)。「銀行對中小企業授信因素之研究」,國 立政治 大學企業管理學系。 43. 楊明璋(2002)。「繼續經營不確定性企業的資訊揭露行為」,國 防管理學院國防財務資源研究所碩士論 文。 44. 經濟部中小企業處(2001)。「中小企業融資指南」,經濟部中小 企業處。 45. 葉英俊,紀榮年譯(1998)。「企業評等與銀行授信

」,金融研訓 中心。 46. 葉銀華(2002)。「從台灣上市公司網站資訊揭露看透明度」,會 計研究月刊第200期,頁70-77。 47. 葉銀華,

李存修,柯承恩(2002)。「公司治理與評等系統」,商 智文化。 48. 劉紹樑(2002)。「從莊子到安隆─A+公司治理」,天下雜誌。 49. 劉 連煜(1995)。「公司監控與公司社會責任」,五南圖書出版。 50. 蔡其諭(2002)。「揭露程度與負債資金成本之關係」,國立政治 大學會 計學系碩士論文。 51. 蔡舜智(2003)。「企業資訊透明度與股票本益比關係之實證研 究」,義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 52. 蔡 麗玲(2000)。「亞洲金融風暴與企業管控問題」,證券暨期貨 管理第18卷第3期。 53. 蔡寶美(2003)。「公司治理與自由裁量費用關係之 實證」,國立 高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文。 54. 盧玫君(2002)。「企業網站揭露財務資訊對股價的影響」,國立 成功大學會 計學系碩士論文。 55. 謝國男(2003)。「台灣IC產業財務危機預警隻研究─企業內部治 理機制觀點」,大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士 論文。 56. 簡安泰(1994)。「銀行信用評估準則」,財團法人金融聯合徵信 中心。 57. 羅際棠(1997)。「銀行授信與經營」,三民出版社

。 58. 蘇裕惠(2001)。「由公司監理之角度思考企業價值報導體系之強 化」,會計研究月刊,第193 期,頁68-72。 59. 蘇裕惠、葉銀 華(1999)。「強化公司管治機制之探討」,主計月 報第521期。 1. Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. N. (1990), “Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Anti-takeover Charter Amendments,” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, Vol.25, No.2,

pp.143-161. 2. Akerlof, G. (1970), “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp.488-500. 3. Asamow, Elliot. (1995), “Measuring the Hidden Risk in Corporate,” Commercial Leanding Review,Vol.10, pp.24-32. 4. Baiman, Stanley (1990), “Agency Research In Managerial Accounting: A Second Look,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.15, No.4, pp.341-371. 5. Barnea, A., Haugen, R., Q.,& Senbet, L.W. (1985), “Agency Problems and Financial Contracting,” Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 6. Bergen, Mark & Dutta, Shantanu & Orville C. Walker, Jr. (1992), “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories,” Journal of Marketing, July, Vol. 56, pp.3. 7. Berle, A., and G. Means (1932),

“The Modern Corporation and Private Property,” MacMillan, New York. 8. Black, B. (2001), “The Corporate Governance Behavior and Market Value of Russian Firms,” Emerging Markets Review, Vol.2, pp.89-108. 9. Blackwell, David W. and Drew B. Winters (1997), “Banking

(3)

Relationships and The Effect of Monitoring on Loan Pricing, Journal of Financial Research , Vol.20, pp.275-289. 10. Booth (1992), “Contract Costs, bank loans, and the cross-monitoring hypothesis,” Journal of Financial Economics 31, pp.25-41. 11. Cadbury A. (1999), “What are the trends in corporate governance? How will they impact your company?” Long Range Planning Journal, Vol.32, pp.12-19. 12. CG Watch (2001),

“Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets,” Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia, April. 13. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang (2000), “The Separation of Ownership and control in East Asian Corporation,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.58, pp.81-112. 14. D Auria, C., Foglia A., and Reedtz, P.M. (1999), “Bank Interest Rates and Credit Relationship in Italy,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23,

pp.1067-1093. 15. Donaldson, G. (1961), “Corporate Debt Capacity,” Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University. 16. Durnev, Art and E. Han Kim (2002), “To Steal or Not to Steal: Firm Attributes, Legal Environment, and Valuation,”

Working Paper. 17. Eisenhardt K.M. (1989), “Agency Theory: An assessment and review”, Academy of Management Revies, Vol.14, pp.57-74.

18. Elliot, R. K. and P. D. Jacobson (1994), “Costs and benefits of business information disclosure,” Accounting Horizon, December, pp.80-96.

19. Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen (1983), “Separation of Ownership and Control,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp.301-325. 20.

Fama, E. (1980), “Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political 109 Economy 88, pp.288-307. 21. Fan, P. H., and T. J. Wong (2002), “Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, pp.401-425. 22. Frankel, R., M. McNichols, and P. G. Wilson (1995), “Discretionary disclosure and external financing,” The Accounting Review, Vol.70, No.1, pp.35-151. 23. Goodwin, J. & Seow, J. L. (2002), “The influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the quality of financial reporting and auditing: Perceptions of auditors and directors in Singapore,” Accounting and Finance, Vol.42, No.3, pp.195-224. 24.

Graydon J Hoskin (1968), “Some Aids To Estabtishing A Grading System For Commercial Loans,” Commercial Bank Lending, RMA, May. 25.

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G (1993), “The effect of firm’s financial disclosure strategies on stock prices,” Accounting Horizon, Vol.7, No.1, pp.1-12. 26. Jensen and Smith (1985), “Stockholder, Manager and Creditor Interest: Application of Agency Theory,” Recent Advances in Corporate Finance. 27. Jensen, M. and R. (1983), “Ruback, The market for corporate control: The scientific 110 evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.11, pp.5-50. 28. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling (1976), “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, pp.305-360. 29. Jensen, M. (1986), Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeover, American Economic Review, Vol.76, pp.323-329. 30. Jensen, M.C. (1993), “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control System,” Journal of Finance, Vol.48, pp.831-880. 31. Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Bresch, and E. Friedman(2000), “Corporate Governance in the Asia Financial Crisis,” Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.58, pp.141-186. 32. Joseph W M (1993), “How to Maintain Asset Quality Periods of Asset Growth,” Commercial Lending RMA, NOV, pp.6-9. 33. Kirsch, L. J. and Beath, C. M. (1989), “A Review of Agency Theory for IS Scholar,” Working Paper, MISRC-WP-90-03, MIS Research Center, University of Minnesota, U. S. A., October. 34. Ko, C., K.

Ding, C. Liu, and Y. (1999), “The Corporate Governance in Chinese Taipei” in the Proceeding of the Conference on Corporate Governance in Asia; A Comparative Perspective, Organized by The Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Seoul, Korea, March 3-5. 35.

Krasker, William S. (1986), “Stock Price Movements in Response to Stock Issue under Asymmetric Imformation,” Journal of Finance, pp.93-105, Mar. 36. Lang, M. H. & R. J. Lundholm (1996), “Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior,” The Accounting Review, Vol.17, No. 4, pp.467-492. 37. Levine, R. (1997), “Financial development and economic growth: views andagenda,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.35, No.2, pp.688-726. 38. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. (1992), “A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance.” Business Lawyer, Vol.48, No.1, pp.59-77. 39. Millstein, Ira and Paul MacAvoy (1998), “Active Board of Directors and Performance of the Large Publicly Traded Corporations,” Columbia Law Review, Vol.98. 40. Myers, S. C., and N. S. Majluf (1984), “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have, ” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.13, pp.187-221. 41. Myers, S.C.

(1977), “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Financial Ecomomics, pp.147-175. 42. Myers, S.C. (1993), “Still Searching for Optimal Capital Structure,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 43. Myers, S.C. (1984), “The Capital Structure Puzzle ,” Journal of Finance, pp.575-592. 44. Myers, S.C., and N. S. Majluf (1984), “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investor Do Not Have,” Journal of Financial Economics, pp.187-221. 45. Narayanan, M. P. (1988), “Debt versus Equity under

Asymmetric Information,” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, Mar. pp.39-51. 46. Noe, T. H. (1988), “Capital Structure and Signaling Game Equilibria,” Review of Financial Studies, pp.331-355. 47. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1999), OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD, Paris. 48. Patton, A., & Baker, J. C. (1987), “Why won’t directors rock the boat.” Harvard Business Review, Vol.65, No.6, pp.10-18. 49. Peter S. Rose (1983), “Loans in Trouble in a Troubled Economy” Canadian Banker & ICB Review, Vol.90, No.3, pp.55. 50. Petersen, M.A., and Rajan, R.G. (1994), “The Benefits of Lending Relationships,” Evidence from Small Business Data, Journal of Finance, Vol.49, pp.3-37. 51. Pound, J. (1998), “Proxy contents and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, No.1/2, pp.237- 265. 52. Rechner ,P.L. (1989), “Corporate Governance: Fact or Governance Ficition? ”, Business Horizons , Jul/Aug, pp.11-15. 53. Reinhard H. Schmidt (1987), “Agency Costs are not a Flop Agency Theory, Information, and Incentives,” Gunter Bamberg and Klaus Spremann (Eds.), pp.495-509. 54. Richard Castanias (1983), “Bankruptcy Risk and Optimal Capital Structure,” The Jouenal of Finance, Vol.38, No.5, pp.1617-1635, December. 55. Sandeep A. Patel, Amra Balic, and Liliane Bwakira (2002),

“Measuring Transparency and Disclosure at Firm-level in Emerging Markets,” Standard & Poor’s, May. 56. Sengupta, P. (1998), “Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review ,” October, Vol.73, pp.459-474. 57. Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W.

(1997), “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” The Journal of Finance, June, pp.737-783. 58. Standard & Poor (2002), “Corporate Governance

(4)

Scores:Criteria, Methodology and Definitions,” January. 59. Stearns, L. B., & Mizruchi, M.S. (1993), “”Board Composition and Corporate Financing: the Impact of Financial Institution Representation on Borrowing.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36, No.3, pp.603-618. 60.

World Bank (1999), “Corporate Governance:A Framework for Implementation – Overview,” The World Bank, Washington D.C.

參考文獻

相關文件

- Informants: Principal, Vice-principals, curriculum leaders, English teachers, content subject teachers, students, parents.. - 12 cases could be categorised into 3 types, based

Process:  Design  of  the  method  and  sequence  of  actions  in  service  creation and  delivery. Physical  environment: The  appearance  of  buildings, 

Wang, Solving pseudomonotone variational inequalities and pseudocon- vex optimization problems using the projection neural network, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17

Define instead the imaginary.. potential, magnetic field, lattice…) Dirac-BdG Hamiltonian:. with small, and matrix

Disclosure and Transparency: The corporate governance framework should ensure that timely and accurate disclosure is made on all material matters regarding the corporation,

The study explore the relation between ownership structure, board characteristics and financial distress by Logistic regression analysis.. Overall, this paper

Financial Reporting),及英國研究企業管治財務範 疇的委員會(Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance),又稱「坎特伯里委員

Briefing Session on the Initial Recommendations for the Ultimate Way Forward of the Business, Accounting and Financial Studies (BAFS) Curriculum and Assessment Event Date &