• 沒有找到結果。

Weighted Equation and Rules - A Novel Concept for Evaluating Protein-Ligand Interaction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Weighted Equation and Rules - A Novel Concept for Evaluating Protein-Ligand Interaction"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Author(s): Chen, CYC (Chen, Calvin Yu-Chian)

Title: Weighted Equation and Rules - A Novel Concept for Evaluating Protein-Ligand Interaction

Source: JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 27 (3): 271-282 DEC 2009

Language: English Document Type: Article

Author Keywords: Weighted rules; Yin-Yang; Weighted score (WS); Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2); Scoring function; Consensus score (CS)

KeyWords Plus: PYRROLOTRIAZINE DUAL INHIBITORS; HER2 TYROSINE KINASE; DE- NOVO DESIGN; PHARMACOPHORE ANALYSIS; DRUG DISCOVERY;

PHARMACOINFORMATICS APPROACH; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; FLEXIBLE DOCKING;

SCORING FUNCTION; EGFR

Abstract: In this study, a novel methodology for evaluating protein-ligand interaction and quantitated the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) by Yin-Yang theory are proposed and investigated by a case report of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-ligand.

Inhibitors (n = 176) of HER2 from references with a broad range of activities (IC50) were employed to the docking program to calculate the binding affinities. The docking score of twelve scoring functions versus actual pIC(50) plot were regressed. According to the weighted rules, the coefficient of determinations (R-2) from the regression analysis of each scoring function and pIC(50) were chosen as the weights in the weighted equation. The R-2 (0.5858) of weighted score (WS) versus actual pIC(50), was statistically higher than that of the

consensus score (CS) (R-2 = 0.2441). The WS method lies in combining the scoring functions from different algorithms to evaluate the sum of binding affinities that is more comprehensive than any single scoring function can achieve. The WS calculated by equation successfully shows a statically significant correlation with good predictability. Thus, this methodology might provide a persuasive virtual screening criterion to evaluate the protein-ligand interaction and quantitative analysis of the functions for Chinese medicine in the future.

Addresses: [Chen, Calvin Yu-Chian] China Med Univ Hosp, Terry Fox Canc Res Lab, Taichung 40402, Taiwan; [Chen, Calvin Yu-Chian] Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat, Taichung 41354, Taiwan; [Chen, Calvin Yu-Chian] China Med Univ, Lab Pharmacoinformat &

Nanotechnol, Sch Chinese Med, Taichung 40402, Taiwan

Reprint Address: Chen, CYC, MIT, Dept Computat & Syst Biol, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.

E-mail Address: [email protected] Funding Acknowledgement:

Funding Agency Grant Number

(2)

National Science Council of China NSC 98-2221-E-039-007-

China Medical University CMU97-CMC-014 CMU97-276

The research was supported by grants from the National Science Council of China (NSC 98- 2221-E-039-007-) and China Medical University (CMU97-CMC-014, CMU97-276). I am grateful to the National Center for High-performance Computing for computer time and facilities and professional suggestion by Drs. Chung Y. Hsu and Sarina Hui-Lin Chien of China Medical University. I also thanks to Dr. Ying-shiung Lee for the inspiration of Yin- Yang's concept for me to build this computational algorithm of protein-ligand interaction.

Cited References: ADRIANSCOTTO M, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V25, P697.

ANDRIANOV AM, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V26, P49.

BARTA TE, 2008, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V18, P3517, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.023.

BHONSLE JB, 2007, J MOL MODEL, V13, P179, DOI 10.1007/s00894-006-0132-0.

BLAIR JA, 2007, NAT CHEM BIOL, V3, P229.

BOHM HJ, 1998, J COMPUT AID MOL DES, V12, P309.

BRAUN GH, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V25, P347.

CATANA C, 2007, J CHEM INF MODEL, V47, P85, DOI 10.1021/ci600357t.

CHARIFSON PS, 1999, J MED CHEM, V42, P5100.

CHEN CY, 2009, ACTA PHARMACOL SIN, V30, P1186, DOI 10.1038/aps.2009.100.

CHEN CY, 2009, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V27, P171.

CHEN CYC, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V26, P57.

CHEN CYC, 2008, J CHIN INST CHEM ENG, V39, P291, DOI 10.1016/j.jcice.2008.02.003.

CHEN CYC, 2008, J CHIN INST CHEM ENG, V39, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.jcice.2008.05.009.

CHEN CYC, 2008, J CHIN INST CHEM ENG, V39, P663, DOI 10.1016/j.jcice.2008.03.013.

CHEN CYC, 2009, J MOL GRAPH MODEL, V28, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.08.004.

CHEN CYC, 2009, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E, V40, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.07.010.

CHEN CYC, 2009, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E, V40, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.07.011.

CHEN CYC, 2009, J TAIWAN INST CHEM E, V40, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.06.001.

CHEN YC, 2007, ACTA PHARMACOL SIN, V28, P2027, DOI 10.1111/j.1745- 7254.2007.00663.x.

CHIOSIS G, 2002, BIOORGAN MED CHEM, V10, P3555.

CLARK RD, 2002, J MOL GRAPH MODEL, V20, P281.

CORDOMI A, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V25, P573.

FEHER M, 2006, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V11, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.03.009.

FINK BE, 2005, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V15, P4774, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.07.027.

(3)

GEHLHAAR DK, 1995, CHEM BIOL, V2, P317.

HUGHES TV, 2008, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V18, P4896, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.07.057.

JAIN AN, 2007, J COMPUT AID MOL DES, V21, P281, DOI 10.1007/s10822-007-9114-2.

JOHN BT, 2007, COMPREHENSIVE MED CH, P255.

JORGENSEN WL, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P1813.

KITCHEN DB, 2004, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V3, P935, DOI 10.1038/nrd1549.

KRAMMER A, 2005, J MOL GRAPH MODEL, V23, P395.

KROVAT EM, 2005, CURR COMPUT-AID DRUG, V1, P93.

KUDUK SD, 1999, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V9, P1233.

LYNE PD, 2002, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V7, P1047.

MADDRY JA, 1997, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V7, P2109.

MASTALERZ H, 2007, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V17, P2036, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.002.

MASTALERZ H, 2007, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V17, P2828, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.02.050.

MASTALERZ H, 2007, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V17, P4947, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.06.019.

MOHAN V, 2005, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V11, P323.

MUEGGE I, 1999, J MED CHEM, V42, P791.

RAJAKRISHNAN V, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V25, P535.

RAMESH KV, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V25, P481.

SALI A, 1995, PROTEINS, V23, P318.

SCHULZGASCH T, 2004, DRUG DISCOV TODAY, V1, P231.

SUBBIAH U, 2008, J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN, V25, P425.

THOMPSON JD, 1994, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V22, P4673.

VENKATACHALAM CM, 2003, J MOL GRAPH MODEL, V21, P289.

WANG RX, 2001, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V41, P1422.

YUN CH, 2007, CANCER CELL, V11, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.017.

Cited Reference Count: 50 Times Cited: 1

Publisher: ADENINE PRESS

Publisher Address: 2066 CENTRAL AVE, SCHENECTADY, NY 12304 USA ISSN: 0739-1102

29-char Source Abbrev.: J BIOMOL STRUCT DYN ISO Source Abbrev.: J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.

Source Item Page Count: 12

Subject Category: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Biophysics

(4)

ISI Document Delivery No.: 513EX

參考文獻

相關文件

These include so-called SOC means, SOC weighted means, and a few SOC trace versions of Young, H¨ older, Minkowski inequalities, and Powers-Størmer’s inequality.. All these materials

Table 3 Numerical results for Cadzow, FIHT, PGD, DRI and our proposed pMAP on the noisy signal recovery experiment, including iterations (Iter), CPU time in seconds (Time), root of

We will give a quasi-spectral characterization of a connected bipartite weighted 2-punctually distance-regular graph whose halved graphs are distance-regular.. In the case the

We give a quasi- spectral characterization of a connected bipartite weighted 2-punctually distance- regular graph whose halved graphs are distance-regular.. In the case the

Inspired by the concept that the firing pattern of the post-synaptic neuron is generally a weighted result of the effects of several pre-synaptic neurons with possibly

– Lower of cost/NRV, sales or return and weighted average cost of inventory costing

[19] considered a weighted sum of multiple objectives, including minimizing the makespan, mean flow time, and machine idle time as a performance measurement, and proposed

(1988), “An Improved Branching Sheme for the Branch Bound Procedure of Scheduling n Jobs on m Parallel Machines to Minimize Total Weighted Flowtime,” International Journal of