• 沒有找到結果。

Giant in-plane anisotropy in manganite thin films driven by strain-engineered double exchange interaction and electronic phase separation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Giant in-plane anisotropy in manganite thin films driven by strain-engineered double exchange interaction and electronic phase separation"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

Giant in-plane anisotropy in manganite thin films driven by strain-engineered double exchange interaction and electronic phase separation

C. L. Lu,1,2,a)Y. Y. Wu,3Z. C. Xia,3S. L. Yuan,1L. Chen,1Z. M. Tian,1J.-M. Liu,4,5 and T. Wu2,a)

1School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

2Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore

3Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

4Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

5International Center for Materials Physics, Chinese Academy Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

(Received 31 July 2011; accepted 4 September 2011; published online 23 September 2011) We investigate epitaxial Pr0.65(Ca0.7Sr0.3)0.35MnO3 thin film grown on orthorhombic (110) NdGaO3substrate which breaks the lattice symmetry and affects the phase separated ground state.

As a result of the anisotropic substrate strain, giant in-plane magnetic and magnetotransport anisotropy are observed, which is related to the anisotropic coupling and competition between the double-exchange interaction and the Jahn-Teller distortion. Furthermore, the in-plane anisotropy shows a distinct enhancement near the metal-insulator transition, implying a significant contribution from the phase separation to the anisotropic transport behaviors.VC 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3643442]

Since the discovery of “colossal magnetoresistance”

(CMR),1–3 perovskite manganites have drawn significant attention due to both the fundamental science and the poten- tial applications. In these materials, the complex and strong coupling between spin, charge, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom gives rise to multiple competing phases with essen- tially distinct physical properties. Moreover, these phases are quite “soft” in the sense that their free energies are close to each another, thus forming a delicate balance which is very sensitive to internal/external perturbations, such as electric field (current),4,5 light,6phonon,7and strain,8–13 in addition to magnetic field. Among these tuning parameters, strain stands out as it is ubiquitous in thin films and devices, and it has been shown that strain also can significantly affect the charge, spin, and orbital orders in manganite thin films.14–18

The physical properties of manganite thin films can be modulated over a wide range by strain from the underlying substrates,8–14 and one of the most cited mechanisms is the strain mediated orbital-ordering of theegstate, which couples with the Jahn-Teller (JT) distortion of the MnO6octahedra.19 Recently, substrate strain has been engineered to give rise to in-plane (IP) anisotropic magnetism and transport behaviors.20 Furthermore, the effects of anisotropic strain in manganite thin films have been discussed from both experimental21,22 and theoretical23perspectives. A significant IP uniaxial mag- netic anisotropy was reported in ferromagnetic (FM) metallic La2/3Sr1/3MnO3(LSMO) thin films, suggesting that phase sep- aration (PS) is not a prerequisite for observing anisotropic properties.21,22Recently, Donget al.23theoretically revealed that the anisotropic double-exchange (DE) interaction and JT distortions were the most important ingredients for the highly IP anisotropic behaviors in strained manganite thin films.

Clearly, the complex physics involving anisotropy in manga- nite thin films warrants further in-depth investigations.

In this letter, we address this issue by studying in details the structure, magnetism, and magnetotransport behaviors of Pr0.65(Ca0.7Sr0.3)0.35MnO3 (PCSMO) thin film epitaxially grown on (110) NdGaO3(NGO) substrate. PCSMO is a typi- cal PS manganite with coexisting and competing charge- ordered (CO) and FM phases. Our results reveal giant IP magnetic and transport anisotropy in the film, which can be associated with the anisotropic coupling and competition between the DE interaction and the JT distortion. Impor- tantly, the observation of strain effects which are amplified by the electronic phase separation puts constraints on the potential theoretical models that can be used to elucidate the physics of competing energetics in complex oxides.

PCSMO thin films with a thickness of 80 nm were epitax- ially deposited on (110) NGO substrates using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) at 750C in 150 mTorr oxygen. A KrF exci- mer laser (k¼248 nm) was used with an energy density of 1.3 J/cm2 and a repetition rate of 3 Hz. The topographic imaging measurement was carried out on an atomic force microscope (AFM) (Asylum Research, MFP-3D). The crystal- line structure of the film was examined using a high-resolution x-ray diffraction (HRXRD) system. Magnetic properties as a function of temperature (T) and magnetic field (H) were meas- ured using a quantum design magnetic properties measure- ment system (MPMS). The magnetotransport behaviors were measured using a standard four-probe method in a quantum design physical property measurement system (PPMS).

Fig.1(a)presents the HRXRD pattern of PCSMO/NGO thin film. The purec-axis orientation indicates the good crys- tallinity and epitaxy of the film. The pseudocubic PCSMO has lattice parameters a¼3.851 A˚ , b¼3.840 A˚ , and c¼3.848 A˚ ,12 while NGO substrate has an orthorhombic crystalline structure with lattice parameters a¼5.43 A˚ ,

a)Authors to whom the correspondence should be addressed. Electronic addresses: [email protected] and [email protected].

0003-6951/2011/99(12)/122510/3/$30.00 99, 122510-1 VC2011 American Institute of Physics

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS99, 122510 (2011)

Downloaded 23 Sep 2011 to 218.199.86.36. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

(2)

b¼5.50 A˚ , andc¼7.71 A˚ . The out-of-plane (OOP) lattice parameter of the film was found to be3.837 A˚ , which is smaller than the bulk value, indicating a biaxial tensile strain (0.4%). (110) NGO has IP parameters of 7.73 and 7.71 A˚ , thus an “cubic-on-cubic” stacking is favored for the PCSMO growth,21which is schematically shown in the inset of Fig.

1(b). To understand the IP crystalline structure of the film, the asymmetric line-scans along (100) and (010) of the sub- strate are presented in Fig.1(b), and the presence of multiple internal interference peaks further confirms the uniformity and epitaxy of the film. The IP lattice parameters of the film can be estimated to be 3.871 and 3.853 A˚ along [100] and [010] directions, respectively. The anisotropic strain is 0.5% along [100] and0.3% along [010]. In addition, the topographic imaging reveals a very smooth surface of the film without any morphological anisotropy (inset of Fig.

1(a)), and the root mean square roughness (RRMS) is about 0.5 nm, confirming the high quality of the film.

To investigate the effects of anisotropic strain on the physical properties of the PCSMO thin film, detailed mag- netic and magnetotransport data were measured. The H-de- pendence of magnetization (M) measured along the two IP directions ([100] and [010]) atT¼80 K is shown in Fig.2(a).

A clear IP uniaxial magnetic anisotropy can be observed with the larger remnant magnetization and coercive field lying in the [100] direction, which can be taken as the easy axis. This uniaxial anisotropy was further confirmed in the M-T data, which were measured under both the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and the field-cooled (FC) conditions with an applied field of 100 Oe. As shown in Fig.2(b), along the [100] direction, the FC curve shows a sudden increase atTC126 K as a result of the onset of the FM phase. The large discrepancy between the FC and ZFC curves belowTC is a signature of the low

temperature PS in the PCSMO film.24In contrast, along the [010] direction, the FC and ZFC curves overlap with each other and no abrupt magnetic transition can be observed down to 5 K. As shown in Fig.2(b), theT-dependent resistiv- ity of the PCSMO film exhibits a very sharp metal-insulator transition (MIT) atTMI. The transport data exhibit a clear ani- sotropy, i.e., TMI is higher and resistivity is smaller in the [100] direction compared with those in the [010] direction, indicating that the hopping of theegelectrons is much easier along [100]. The difference ofTMIunder zero magnetic field between the two IP directions is about 3 K.

In order to understand the role of PS in the transport ani- sotropy in strained manganite films, we used magnetic fields to tune PS. As shown in Fig.3(a), the zero fieldq(T)curve exhibits a distinct hysteresis, which is often identified in manganites with PS.24 The thermal hysteresis in the q(T) curves is reduced as the applied field increases, and the val- ues of TMI during cooling and warming are very close to each other as H > 1.6 T, indicating the weakening of the quenched-disorder-induced macroscopic PS. TheH-depend- ence ofTMI, for both the cooling and warming processes, is plotted in Fig. 3(b). With increasing H,TMImonotonously shifts toward higher T, while the difference between the cooling and warming data starts to shrink asH>0.5 T and eventually overlap with each other atH>1.6 T, which sug- gests a strong suppression of the PS state at high magnetic fields. However, the gap between the values ofTMImeasured along the two IP directions does not shrink at all up to H¼2.5 T (Fig.3(c)), which implies that the transport anisot- ropy is retained even when PS is substantially suppressed.

Therefore, other factors besides PS contribute to the observed giant anisotropy in strained manganite films.

The schematic drawing in Fig. 4 illustrates the emer- gence of uniaxialy elongated FM-metallic (FMM) clusters randomly distributed in the CO insulating (COI) matrix (left part of the figure), where the anisotropic strain promotes the growth of FMM phase along the [100] direction. Thus, in the PCSMO film with PS, an anisotropic percolation at the MIT as well as the consequent response to external fields would be expected. On the other hand, to understand the physics underlying these observed anisotropic behaviors, we have to consider the strain mediated orbital properties which have been shown to play important roles in strained mangnaites films.19,23 For the unstrained pseudocubic case with a high crystalline symmetry, equal weights of different orbitals (such as j3y2r2>andj3x2r2>) and uniform overlaps between electronic clouds in different directions are

FIG. 1. (Color online) (a) Symmetric x-rayh-2hscan of the PCSMO/NGO thin film, and the inset shows the 55lm2topographic AFM image of the film (the height of the scale is 3 nm). (b) Asymmetric scans along the (100) and (010) of the NGO substrate, and the inset shows the schematic drawing of the epitaxial growth of PCSMO on (110) NGO.

FIG. 2. (Color online) (a) Hysteresis loops of the PCSMO film measured along the two in-plane directions at80 K. (b) Temperature dependence of magnetization (left axis, for both the field-cooled and the zero-field- cooled conditions) and resistivity (right axis) measured along the two in- plane directions of the PCSMO film.

122510-2 Luet al. Appl. Phys. Lett.99, 122510 (2011)

Downloaded 23 Sep 2011 to 218.199.86.36. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

(3)

expected, which lead to the isotropic DE interaction and JT distortions. Thus, identical transport and magnetic properties in different crystalline directions are expected. However, in the current case of PCSMO films grown on (110) NGO sub- strates, the IP anisotropic tensile strain causes different bend- ing conditions of Mn-O-Mn bonds along two IP directions, i.e., compared to the [010] direction, the larger tensile strain along [100] gives rise to a stronger overlap of the electronic clouds (Fig.4(right)). Thus, the reduced bending of Mn-O- Mn bond in the [100] direction will promote theegelectron hopping, strengthen the FM-DE interaction, and alleviate the JT distortions,2,25 which contribute to the observed giant IP anisotropy in PCSMO/NGO thin films.

In the theoretical study by Donget al.,23the anisotropic double-exchange and John-Teller distortions were found to be responsible for the anisotropic transport in strained man- ganites. Our results on PCSMO films on (110) NGO sub- strates indeed reveal giant in-plane anisotropic magnetism and resistivity, giving support to the theory. Furthermore, it is clear that PS significantly contributes to the strain-induced anisotropy, and the anisotropy of physical properties is

“amplified” at the phase boundary. Thus, the long range strain field is effective to not only influence the competition between separated phases, but also couple to the spin and or- bital degrees of freedoms in manganite thin films.

This work was partly supported by the Singapore National Research Foundation, NSFC (Grant No. 11104090), and the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 309020). J.M.L.

was supported by NSFC (Grant Nos. 50832002 and 11074113).

1S. Jin, T. H. Tiefel, M. McCormack, R. A. Fastnacht, R. Ramesh, and L.

H. Chen,Science264, 413 (1994).

2E. Dagotto, T. Hotta, and A. Moreo,Science309, 257 (2005).

3Y. Tokura,Rep. Prog. Phys.69, 797 (2006).

4H. Sakai and Y. Tokura,Appl. Phys. Lett.92, 102514 (2008).

5B. T. Xie, Y. G. Zhao, and C. M. Xiong,Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 072112 (2008).

6M. Rini, R. Tobey, N. Dean, J. Itatani, Y. Tomioka, Y. Yokura, R. W.

Schoenlein, and A. Cavalleri,Nature449, 72 (2007).

7F. Macia´, A. H. Mı´nguez, G. Abril, J. M. Hernandez, A. G. Santiago, J.

Tejada, F. Parisi, and P. V. Santos,Phys. Rev. B76, 174424 (2007).

8S. W. Jin, G. Y. Gao, Z. Z. Yin, Z. Huang, X. Y. Zhou, and W. B. Wu, Phys. Rev. B75, 212401 (2007).

9F. H. Zhang, Z. Huang, G. Y. Gao, P. F. Chen, L. F. Wang, X. L. Tan, and W. B. Wu,Appl. Phys. Lett.96, 062507 (2010).

10T. Wu, S. B. Ogale, S. Shinde, A. Biswas, T. Polletto, R. L. Greene, T.

Venkatesan, and A. J. Millis,J. Appl. Phys.93, 5507 (2003).

11T. Wu and J. F. Mitchell,Appl. Phys. Lett.86, 062502 (2005); Phys. Rev.

B74, 214423 (2006).

12T. Wu and J. F. Mitchell,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.292, 25 (2005).

13Y. H. Sun, Y. G. Zhao, H. F. Tian, C. M. Xiong, B. T. Xie, M. H. Zhu, S.

Park, W. Wu, J. Q. Li, and Q. Li,Phys. Rev. B78, 024412 (2008).

14Y. Q. Zhang, Z. D. Zhang, and J. Aarts,Phys. Rev. B79, 224422 (2009).

15J. Dho, Y. N. Kim, Y. S. Hwang, J. C. Kim, and N. H. Hur,Appl. Phys.

Lett.82, 1434 (2003).

16A. Sadoc, B. Mercey, C. Simon, D. Grebille, W. Prellier, and M.-B. Lepe- tit,Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 046804 (2010).

17M. Nakamura, Y. Ogimoto, H. Tamaru, M. Izumi, and K. Miyano,Appl.

Phys. Lett.86, 182504 (2005); Y. Ogimoto, M. Nakamura, N. Takubo, H.

Tamaru, M. Izumi, and K. Miyano,Phys. Rev. B71, 060403(R) (2005).

18I. C. Infante, F. Sa´nchez, J. Fontcuberta, M. Wojcik, E. Jedryka, S.

Estrade´, F. Peiro´, J. Arbiol, V. Laukhin, and J. P. Espino´s,Phys. Rev. B 76, 224415 (2007).

19Z. Fang, I. V. Solovyev, and K. Terakura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3169 (2000).

20T. Z. Ward, J. D. Budai, Z. Gai, J. Z. Tischler, L. F. Yin, and J. Shen,Nat.

Phys.5, 885 (2009).

21H. Boschker, M. Mathews, E. P. Houwman, H. Nishikawa, A. Vailionis, G. Koster, G. Rijinders, and D. H. A. Blank,Phys. Rev. B 79, 214425 (2009).

22A. Vailionis, H. Boschker, E. Houwman, G. Koster, G. Rijinders, and D.

H. A. Blank,Appl. Phys. Lett.95, 152508 (2009).

23S. Dong, S. Yunoki, X. Zhang, C. Sen, J.-M. Liu, and E. Dagotto,Phys.

Rev. B82, 035118 (2010).

24C. L. Lu, X. Chen, S. Dong, K. F. Wang, H. L. Cai, J.-M. Liu, D. Li, and Z. D. Zhang,Phys. Rev. B79, 245105 (2009).

25R. W. Li, H. B. Wang, X. W. Wang, X. Y. Yu, Y. Matsui, Z. H. Cheng, B.

G. Shen, E. W. Plummer, and J. D. Zhang,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

34, 14224 (2009).

FIG. 4. (Color online) Schematic illustrating the effect of anisotropic sub- strate strain on the manganite films with phase separation. Left: the uniax- ially elongated FMM phase within the COI matrix contributes to the observed anisotropic transport. Right: the anisotropic strain causes a stronger overlap of the Mn orbitals along the [100] direction compared to the [010]

direction, which gives rise to anisotropic double-exchange and Jahn-Teller distortions.

FIG. 3. (Color online) (a)T-dependence of resistivity measured along [010]

direction under different magnetic field (H¼0, 0.6, 1.0, 1.6, 2.5, 5.0, 9.0 T).

The cooling processes are indicated by arrows except for cases of5.0 and 9.0 T, in whichq(T) curves measured during cooling and warming over- lap with each other. (b)H-dependence of the metal-insulator transition tem- peratureTMIin the PCSMO film measured along the [010] direction during both cooling and warming.TMImeasured in a wider range ofHis shown in the inset. (c)H-dependence ofTMImeasured in both in-plane directions dur- ing warming.

122510-3 Luet al. Appl. Phys. Lett.99, 122510 (2011)

Downloaded 23 Sep 2011 to 218.199.86.36. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

參考文獻

相關文件

1a and 1b for a guide of eyes where a charge-ordered spin chain is chosen for illustration, although other mechanisms for individuals were proposed.15–17 Details for discovering these