American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061. Science for all American. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Allum, N. (2010). Science literacy. In S. H. Priest (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science and technology communication (pp. 724-727). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bauer, M. W. (2009). The evolution of public understanding of science − Discourse and comparative evidence. Science, Technology and Society, 14(2), 221-240. doi:10.1177/097172180901400202 Beck, U. (2012). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). London, UK: Sage.
(Original work published 1992)
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook 1: Cognitive domain.
New York, NY: David McKay.
Brossard, D., & Shanahan, J. (2006). Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy measurement instrument based on science media coverage. Science Communication, 28(1), 47-63. doi:10.1177/1075547006291345
Bucchi, M., & Saracino, B. (2016). “Visual science literacy”: Images and public understanding of science in the digital age. Science Communication, 38(6), 812-819. doi:10.1177/10755470166 77833
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 37-68). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford.
Deboer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature, 340(6228), 11-14. doi:10.1038/340011a0
Eivers, E., & Kennedy, D. (2006). The PISA assessment of scientific literacy. The Irish Journal of Education, 37, 101-119.
林蓓伶、潘昌志、蘇少祖、陳柏熹 國中科學素養試題研發 327
Eshach, H., Hwang, F.-K., Wu, H.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2013). Introducing Taiwanese undergraduate students to the nature of science through Nobel Prize stories. Physical Review Special Topics − Physics Education Research, 9(1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010116
Fang, S.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, W.-H., Wu, H.-K., & Chen, C.-M. (2016).
Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: A case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1945-1971. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688
Hsin, M.-C., Chien, S., Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, C.-Y., & Yore, L.-D. (2016). Development and validation of a Taiwanese communication progression in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 125-143. doi:10.1007/sl0763-014-9589-y
Hsu, Y.-S., Chang, H.-Y., Fang, S.-C., & Wu, H.-K. (2014). Developing technology-infused inquiry learning modules to promote science learning in Taiwan. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science education in East Asia pedagogical innovations and research-informed practices (pp. 373-403).
Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_15
Huang, H.-Y., Wang, W.-C., Chen, P.-H., & Su, C.-M. (2013). Higher-order item response models for hierarchical latent traits. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(8), 619-637. doi:10.1177/
0146621613488819
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
Jones, L. R., Wheeler, G., & Centurino, V. A. S. (2015). TIMSS 2015 − Science framework. In I. V.
S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks (pp. 29-58). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. doi:10.1002/sce.1011 Kuo, C.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Development and validation of a
multimedia-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2326-2357. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1078521
Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Construction of a paper-and-pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the american association for the advancement of science. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331-359. doi:10.1088/0963- 6625/5/4/003
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
328 國中科學素養試題研發 林蓓伶、潘昌志、蘇少祖、陳柏熹
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.
Lin, H., Hong, Z.-R, & Huang, T.-C. (2012). The role of emotional factors in building public scientific literacy and engagement with science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 25-42. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551430
Lin, P.-L., Tseng, Y.-H., Liu, H.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2012, April). What the media wants us to believe: Investigating Taiwan media attitudes towards nanotechnology. Paper presented at 12th International Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference, Florence, Italy.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203-223. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/4962
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2015 item submission guidelines: Scientific literacy. Retreived from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Submission- Guidelines-Science.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2015 draft science framework. Retreived from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%
20Science%20Framework%20.pdf
Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigné, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S.
(2008). Science-media interface: It’s time to reconsider. Science Communication, 30(2), 266-276. doi:10.1177/1075547008324809
Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 35-41. doi:10.1038/nclimate1080
Rasch, G. (1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
Rundgren, C.-J., Rundgren, S.-N. C., Tseng, Y.-H., Lin, P.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (2010). Are you SLiM? Developing an instrument for civic scientific literacy measurement (SLiM) based on media coverage. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 759-773. doi:10.1177/0963662510 377562
Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Shih, T.-J., & Lin, C.-Y. (2017). Developing communication strategies for mitigating actions against global warming: Linking framing and a dual processing model. Environmental Communication,
林蓓伶、潘昌志、蘇少祖、陳柏熹 國中科學素養試題研發 329
11(6), 840-858. doi:10.1080/17524032.2016.1154886
Stewart, C. O., McConnell, J. R., & Dickerson, D. L. (2017). Socioscientific and epistemic dimensions of support for science: Associations with science education and religiosity.
International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(1), 1-13. doi:10.1080/21548455.2016.
1157644
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55-74. doi:10.1177/0963662504042690 Wu, H.-K., Kuo, C.-Y., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). What makes an item more difficult? Effects
of modality and type of visual information in a computer-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. Computers & Education, 85, 35-48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.007
Wu, H.-L., Weng, H.-L., & She, H.-C. (2016). Effects of scaffolds and scientific reasoning ability on web-based scientific inquiry. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 3(1), 12-24.
Yang, F.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., & Tsai, M.-J. (2013). How university students evaluate online information about a socio-scientific issue and the relationship with their epistemic beliefs. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 385-399.
Yang, F.-Y., Chang, C.-C., Chen, L.-L., & Chen, Y.-C. (2016). Exploring learners’ beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1591-1606. doi:10.1080/
09500693.2016.1200763
Yang, F.-Y., Liu, S.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Chiou, G.-L., Wu, H.-K., Wu, Y.-T., …Tsai, C.-C. (2018).
High-school students’ epistemic knowledge of science and its relation to learner factors in science learning. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 325-344. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9570-6 Yang, W.-T., Lin, Y.-R., She, H.-C., & Huang, K.-Y. (2015). The effects of prior-knowledge and online learning approaches on students’ inquiry and argumentation abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1564-1589. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1045957
330 國中科學素養試題研發 林蓓伶、潘昌志、蘇少祖、陳柏熹