Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171 Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning
science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. doi:10.1080/03057260701828101
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cuccio-Schirripa, S., & Steiner, H. E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 210-224. doi:10.
1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<210::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-I
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
Dimopoulos, K., & Koulaidis, V. (2003). Science and technology education for citizenship: The potential role of the press. Science Education, 87(2), 241-256. doi:10.1002/sce.10054
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. doi:10.1002/(CICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3
186 科學新聞閱讀策略研究 鄭可萱、李松濤
<287::AID-SCE1>3.3.CO;2-1
Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 177-181. doi:10.1598/RT.59.2.7
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: Research findings and recommendations. Fullerton, CA: Peter A.
Facione.
Glaser, R. E., & Carson, K. M. (2005). Chemistry is in the news: Taxonomy of authentic news media based learning activities. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1083-1098.
doi:10.1080/09500690500069434
Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Osborne, J., & Wild, A. (2015). Beyond construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1668-1697. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1043598
Hobbs, R. (1998). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 16-32. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02734.x
Jang, J.-Y., & Hand, B. (2017). Examining the value of a scaffolded critique framework to promote argumentative and explanatory writings within an argument-based inquiry approach. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1213-1231.
Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2002). A survey of the use of newspapers in science instruction by secondary teachers in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 997-1020. doi:10.1080/09500690210095311
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Federico-Agraso, M. (2009). Justification and persuasion about cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s paper and journalistic reported versions. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 331-347. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9113-x
Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer argumentation in the school science laboratory − Exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2527-2558. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.550952
Kind, P. M., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education? Science Education, 101(1), 8-31. doi:10.1002/sce.21251
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. doi:10.1002/sce.1011 Mauldin, R. F. (2012). A novel approach to teaching scientific reasoning to future journalists: An
intellectual framework for evaluating press reports about scientific research. Science Communication, 34(2) 283-291. doi:10.1177/1075547011427976
鄭可萱、李松濤 科學新聞閱讀策略研究 187
McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2010). Critical reading of science-based news reports: Establishing a knowledge, skills and attitudes framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 727-752. doi:10.1080/09500690902777402
McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2012). Encouraging and equipping students to engage critically with science in the news: What can we learn from the literature? Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 1-49. doi:10.1080/03057267.2012.655036
McDonald, L. (2004). Moving from reader response to critical reading: Developing 10-11 year olds’
ability as analytical readers of literary texts. Literacy, 38(1), 17-25. doi:10.1111/j.0034-0472.
2004.03801004.x
National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 947-967. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310909 Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific
literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240. doi:10.1002/sce.10066
Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Korpan, C. A. (2003). University students’ interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty.
Public Understanding of Science, 12, 123-145. doi:10.1177/09636625030122001
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). PISA 2015 draft reading literacy framework. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%20 2015%20Reading%20Framework%20.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). PISA 2015 draft science framework. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20 Science%20Framework%20.pdf
Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning.
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265-279. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035 Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the
other. Science, 328(5977), 459-463. doi:10.1126/science.1182595
Polman, J. L., Newman, A., Saul, E. W., & Farrar, C. (2014). Adapting practices of science
188 科學新聞閱讀策略研究 鄭可萱、李松濤
journalism to foster science literacy. Science Education, 98(5), 766-791. doi:10.1002/sec.21114 Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of
research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009 Tomasek, T. (2009). Critical reading: Using reading prompts to promote active engagement with text.
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 127-132.
Tompkins, G. E. (2005). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Webb, P. (2010). Science education and literacy: Imperatives for the developed and developing world. Science, 328(5977), 448-450. doi:10.1126/science.1182596
Yarden, A. (2009). Reading scientific texts: Adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 307-311. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9124-2
鄭可萱、李松濤 科學新聞閱讀策略研究 189