國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心. (1987). 中學科學師資人力結構研究報告.
鄭湧涅. (1987). 生物教師必備教學能力研究. 中華民國方年度科學教育學備研討會 論文彙緝，第 1-25 頁，國科會.
鄭湧溼. (1994). 職前與在職生物教師科學態度之研究. 國立臺灣師範大學學報， 39, 381-407.
鄭湧涅'黃壁祈. (1992). 職前和在職生物教師的生物教材有關能力研究. 國立薑灣師
範大學學報， 3咒 483-504.
鄭湧溼，周雪美. (199的.職前生物教師科學態度的研究. 固立臺灣師範大學學報， 35, 249-270.
鄭湧潭，周雪美. (1991). 職前生物教師的生物探討技能. 圓立臺灣師範大學學報， 36, 239-265.
鄭湧涅，傅慧鳳，周雪美. (1988a). 生物教學能力測驗的發展與效化. 中華民國第三 屆科學教育學衛研討會論文彙緝，第 391-424 頁，國科會.
鄭湧潭，周雪美，傅慧鳳. (1988b). 生物教材能力測驗的發展與效化. 中華民國第三 屆科學教育學衛研討會論文彙續，第 425-454 頁，國科會.
鄭湧潭，周雪美，張麗珠. (1989). 職前與在職生物教師對科學的本質的了解. 中華民 國第四屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙績，第 257-283 頁，國科會.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (1969). Recom-mended Standards for Teacher Education: The Accreditation of Basic and Advanced
F寺院paration Programs for Professional School Personel. AAC血， Washington, D.C..
Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener,
c.
P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D.L. Gabel, Ed. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Leami略 pp. 3-44.MacMillan Publishing Company, NY.
Babikian, Y. (1971). An empirical investigätion to determine the relative e旺ectiveness of discovery, laboratory, and expository methods of teaching science concepts. JRST, 8 (3), 201-2個.
B訂r， A. S. (1961). Wisconsin studies of the measurement and prediction of teacher ef-fectiveness: A summa可 ofinvestigations. Joumal o[ Experimental Education, 30 (1), 1-155.
Benderson, A. (1982). Teacher Competence: Focus 10. Princeton, NJ: Educational Test-ing Service.
Bethel, L. J. (1985). Science teacher preparation and professional development. In D.
Holdzkom & P. B. Lutz, Eds., Research Wìthin Reach: Science Education. pp. 143-157. NSTA. Washington, D.C..
Biddle, B. J., & Ellena, N.J. 由s. (1964). Contempora砂 R卸的叫 on Teacher Effectivenω.
NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Blank, R. K. (1988). Improving research on teacher quality in scien臼 and mathemati臼:
Report of a symposium of scientists, educators, and researchers. JRST, 25 (3), 217-224.
Broudy, H. S. (1969). Can we define good teaching? Teacher古 CollegeRecord, 70 (7), 583-592.
Campbell, J. R. (1977). Science teachers' flexibility. JRST, 14 (6), 525-532.
Champagne, A.且， & Hornig, L.E. (1987). Issues of science teacher quality, supply, and demand. Science Education， 力 (1)， 57-76.
Cher嚕， Y. J. (1986). The evaluation of biology teaching competen可.中華民國 74 年度 科學教育學備研討會論文彙績，第 151-183 頁，國科會 O
Cheng, Y. J. (1991). Biology cognitive preferences of preservice biology teachers.
Pro-中等學校生物教師教學能力之研究 鄭湧涅 469
ceedings of National Science Council, Part D. 1 (1), 32-40.
Coffman, W. E. (1971). Essay examinations. In R.L. Thorndike, Ed., Educational Mea-surement, 2nd ed. American Council on Education, Washington, D.C..
Coffman, W. E., & Kurfman, D. (1968). A comparison of two methods of reading ess可
examinations. American Educational Research Joumal, 5 (1), 99-107.
Collins, A. (1993). Performance-based assessment of biology teachers: Promises and pit-fal1s. JRST, 30 (9), 1103-1120.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
Psychome-tri.旬1， 16, 297-334.
Davis, M. D., & Zaret, E. (1984). Needed in teacher education: A developmental model for evaluation of teachers, preservice to inservice. Joumal of Teacher Education, 35 (5). 18-22.
DeRose, J. V., Lockard, J.D., & Paddy, L.G. (1979). The teacher is the key: A report on three NSF studies.ηle Science Teacher， 而 (4) ， 31-37.
Feldt, L. S. (1975). Estimation of the reliability of a test divided into two parts of un-equallength. Psychometrika, 40, 557-61.
Haertel, E. H. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Educa-tion, 1 咒 3-29.
Isaac, S., & Michael, W.B. (1983). Handbook in Research and Evaluation for Education and Behavioral Scienc白 2nd ed., SanDiego, California: EdITS Publishers.
Johnson, D. W. (1969). Influences on teachers' ac∞ptan臼 ofchange. Elementary School Joumal, 70 (3), 142-153.
Keη， D. H. (1983). Teaching competence and teacher education in the United States.
Teacher古 Co/lege Record, 84 (3), 525-552.
McDaniel, T. R. (1977). The NTE and teacher certification. Phi Delta Kappan, 59 (3),
186-188.
Martin, J. (1979). Effects of teacher high-order questions on student pr。但ss and prod-uct variables in a single-classroom study. Joumal of Educational Research, 72 (4), 183 - 187.
Mechling, K. R. (1975). The preparation of junior high science teachers: By defauIt or by design? Schoo/ Science & Math, 75, 395-398.
Mechling, K. R., Stedman, C.H., & Donnell旭an吭1， K
science teachers: An NSTA report吼• Science & Child砂ren凡~， 20 (2勾)， 9-14.
Medley, D. M. (1979). The effectiveness of teachers. In P.L. Peterson & H.J. Walbe唔，
Eds. R臼earch on Teaching: Concepts, Findings and Implications. CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp..
MeNeil, J. D., & Popham, W.J. (1973). 甘le assessment of teacher competen臼. In R.M.W. Trave時， Ed., The Second Handbook of R臼earch in Teaching. Chica阱， ßli-nois: Rnad McNally.
Millman, J. (1991). Teacher H臼nsing and the new assessment methodologies. Applied
Measurement 的 Education， 4 (4)
,
363-370.Mitchell, J. V. Jr. (1978). National Teacher Examination. In O.K. Buros, Ed., The Eight Mental Measurements Y切的00丸 v.I, pp.516- 518. Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
National Commission for Excellence in Teacher Education. (1985). A Call for Change 的 Teacher Education. Washingtion, D.C. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
National Science Board, Commission on Pre-college Education in Math, Science and Technology, (1983). Educating American for the 21st c側的ry: A plan of action for improving math, science and technology education for all American elementary and
中等學校生物教師教學能力之研究 鄭湧涅 47 可
secondary students so that their achievements is the b臼tin the world 卸 1995. A Re-port to the American People and the National Science Board. Washington, D.C.
Penick, J. E., Shymans旬， J.A., Matthews, CC, & Good, R.G. (1976). Studying the ef-fects of two quantitative defined teaching strategies on student behavior in
elemen-ta可 school science using macroanalytical techniques. JRST, 13 (4), 289-296.
Popham, W. J. (1975). Performance test of teaching proficiency: Rationale, development, validation. In M. Mohan & R.E. Hull, Eds., Teaching Effectiveness: Its Meaning, Assessment, and Improvement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technol-ogy Publications.
Quirk, T. J., Witten, B.J. & Weinberg, S.F. (1973). Review of studies of the National Teacher Examinations. Review of Educational Researc九 43 (1), 89-113.
Ramsey, G. A., & Howe, R.W. (1969). 旭 analysis of research on instructional pro臼﹒
dures in secondary school science. Part 1: Out∞mes of instruction. The Science Teacher, 36 (3), 62-70.
Robinson, J. T. (1969). Philosophy of science: Implication for teacher education. JRST, 6, 99-104.
Rosenshine，且， & Furst, N. (1971). ResearCh on teacher performan臼. In B.O. Smith, Ed., Research in Teacher Education: A Symposium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,Inc..
Rosenshine，底， & Furst, N. (1973). 百le use of direct observation to study teaching. In R.M.W. Travers, Editor, The Second Handbook of Rιsearch in Teaching. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally Company.
Sede時， M. U.,
&
Feldt, L.S. (1976). The sampling distributions of the Kristof reliability coefficient, the Feldt coefficient, and Guttman's lambda-2. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14 (1)，白-62.Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educa-tional Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Har-vard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Shymans旬， J. A. (1978). Assessing teacher performan臼 in the classroom: Pattern ana1 y-sis applied to interaction data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 4 (2), 99-106.
Shymansky, J. A. & Penick, J.E. (1981). Teacher behavior does make a difference in hands-on science c1assrooms. Schoo/ Science & Math, 81 (5), 412-422.
Strawi缸， B. M., & Malone, M.R. (1987). Preservice teachers' acquisition and retention of integrated science proc臼s skills: A ∞mp缸ison of teacher-directed and self-instructional strategies. JRST, 24 (1), 53-60.
Sunal, D. W. (1978). Relationship of science skill performan臼 to preservice teaching behavior. Science Education, 62 (2), 187-194.
Tamir, P. (1977). The relationship between cognitive preferences of students and their teachers. Jouma/ 01 Cur吋culum S.的dies， 9 (1), 67-74.
Yager, R. E., Hidayat, E. M., & Penick, J. E. (1988). Features which separate least ef-fective from most e旺ective science teachers. JRST, 25 (3), 165-177.
中等學校生物教師教學能力之研究 鄭湧裡 473