• 沒有找到結果。

于瑞珍(1999)。博物館與評量。科技博物,3(3),49-63。

吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育 部委託專案報告(F0036349)。臺北市:學術交流基金會。

周建和(2002)。街頭物理-彈奏物理的民歌手。物理雙月刊,24(1),10-14。

周淑惠(1997)。幼兒自然科學經驗-教材教法。臺北市:心理。

幸曼玲(1999)。皮亞傑的建構論與幼兒教育的課程模式。載於簡楚瑛(主編),幼教課程模 式(pp. 547-573)。臺北市:心理。

邱連煌(1999)。多元智能學校模式:關鍵學校。創造思考教育,9,1-13。

倪鳴香(1981)。幼兒創造力發展及相關因素之研究。文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文,未出 版,臺北市。

倪鳴香、吳靜吉(2005)。幼兒創造力發展及其相關因素之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題 研究計畫成果報告(NSC93-2413-H-004-012)。臺北市:國立政治大學。

馬景賢(譯)(2004)。敲門人瑪麗‧史密斯(A. U’Ren 著,Mary Smith)。臺北市:三之三。(原 著出版於 2003 年)

張世彗(2006)。行動和動作創造思考測驗(修訂版)。臺北市:心理。

張美珍(2000)。從認知心理學派觀點探析博物館內的學習。科技博物,4(4),30-43。

陳怡芬(譯)(2004)。走上世界最高的鋼索(M. Gerstein 著,The man who walked between the towers)。臺北市:格林。(原著出版於 2003 年)

陳淑芳、簡淑真(2006)。創造力在幼兒階段的特質、實踐、和傳遞歷程之跨文化研究。行政 院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC93-2511-S-143-003)。臺東市:國立臺東大學。

陳燕珍(譯)(1999)。幼兒物理知識活動-皮亞傑理論在幼兒園的應用(C. Kamii & R. DeVries 著,Physical knowledge in preschool education)。臺北縣:光佑。(原著出版於 1993 年)

陳龍安(1986)。陶倫思圖形創造思考測驗(乙式)。臺北市:臺北市立師範學院。

陳瓊森、汪益(譯)(1995)。超越教化的心靈(H. Gardner 著,The unschooled mind)。臺北市:

遠流。(原著出版於 1991 年)

黃意舒(1995)。由幼兒科學教學中培養科學學習基本素養。科學教育研究與發展季刊,5,

17-28。

葉玉珠、李梅齡、葉玉環、林志哲、彭月茵(2006)。幼兒創造力測驗之發展。測驗學刊,53

(1),129-153。

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations models. Academic of

140 幼兒科學創造力評量方法之發展 侯雅齡

Maketing Science, 16, 76-94.

Brooke, H., & Solomon, J. (1998). From playing to investigating: Research in an Interactive Science Centre for Primary Pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 959-971.

Brown, J. H. & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Assessing hands on science. Thousand Oaks: Cacorwin.

Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education: A lifewide foundation. NY: Continuum.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. NY: Harper & Row.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY:

Harper Col.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. NY:

Basic Books.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536.

Custodero, L. A. (1997). An observational study of flow experience in young children’s music learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

De Boo, M. (1999). Enquiring children, challenging teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Feasey, R. (2005). Creative science: Achieving the WOW factor with 5-11 year olds. Landon: David Fulton.

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. NY: Basic Books.

Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.) Perspectives in creativity (pp. 35-39). Chicago: Aldine.

Harlen, W. (2000). The teaching of science in primary school. London: David Fulton.

Holt, B. (1989). Science with young children. Washington, DC: National Association for Education of Young Children.

Moran, J. D., Sawyers, J. K., Fu, V. R., & Milgram, R. M. (1982). Measuring creativity in the preschool children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 22(4), 254-263.

National Advisory Committee on Creativity and Culture in Education (1999). All our futures:

Creativity, culture and education. London: DfES.

Runco, M. A. (2006). The Development of children’s creativity. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 121-131). NJ: Mahwah.

Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schmukler, D. (1985). Foundations of creativity: The facilitating environment. In J. Freeman (Ed.), The psychology of gifted children (pp. 75-97). NY: Wiley.

侯雅齡 幼兒科學創造力評量方法之發展 141

Smolucha, F. (1992). The relevance of Vygotsky’s theory of creative imagination for contemporary research on play. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 69-76.

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. NY: Cambridge University Press.

Stone, A. A., Kessler, R. C., & Haythornthwatte, J. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for researchers. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 578-607.

142 幼兒科學創造力評量方法之發展 侯雅齡

Journal of Research in Education Sciences 2009, 54(1), 113-142

The Technique Development of Assessing Preschool Children’s Creativity in Science:

An Embedded Assessment Design

Ya-Ling Hou*

Department of Special Education National Pingtung University of Education

Assistant Professor

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop preschool children’s creativity assessment in science, including The Preschool Children’s Science Creativity Scale (PCSCS) and The Preschool Children’s Science Flow Experience Scale (PCSFES). The researcher designed 5 hands-on Physics activities and 3 periods instruction designed under the framework of exploration, scaffolding and show as creative curriculum. 308 children sampled from 8 kindergartens participated in this study. The results have shown: (1) The PCSCS and The PCSFES have reached satisfactory level of internal consistency reliability and inter-rater reliability. In two scales Cronbach α coefficients were .955 and .905. (2) By using confirmatory factor analysis to examine the model, the researcher found the model fit indices indicated that PCSCS and PCSFES fitted the observed data. The construct-related validity was found satisfactory.

Keywords: flow experience, preschool children’s science creativity, hands-on science, embedded assessment.

* Corresponding Author: Ya-Ling Hou, E-mail: yalingho@mail.npue.edu.tw

相關文件