林靜雯（2006）。由概念演化觀點探究不同教科書教－學序列對不同心智模式學生電學學習之 影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林靜雯、邱美虹（2006，12 月）。探究以學生心智模式為設計基礎之教－學序列對學生電學概 念學習之影響。論文發表於國立臺灣師範大學舉辦之「中華民國第二十二屆科學教育」
學術研討會，臺北市。
林靜雯、邱美虹（2008，12 月）。以概念演化樹探究學生電學心智模式演化之歷程。論文發表 於國立彰化師範大學舉辦之「中華民國第二十四屆科學教育」學術研討會，彰化市。
邱美虹、林靜雯（2002）。以多重類比探究兒童電流心智模式之改變。科學教育學刊，10（2），
109-134。
教育部（2000）。國民中小學九年一貫暫行綱要。臺北市：作者。
黃達三（2004）。學生動物分類及脊椎動物概念的發展：跨年齡研究。科學教育學刊，12（3），
289-310。
葉俊豪、陳瓊森（1995）。利用定性與定量測驗來探究高二學生對直流電路的知識結構。科學 教育，6，156-178。
Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1987). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 553-563.
Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 98-117.
Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (vol. 14, 1 & 11). The library of living philosophers (pp. 413-463). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Carlton, K. (1999). Teaching electric current and electrical potential. Physical Education, 34(6), 341-345.
Chiu, M. H., Guo, C. J., & Treagust, D. (2007). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education [special issue], 29(4), 379-390.
Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2005). Promoting fourth graders’ conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 424-468.
Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2008). Research on learning and teaching of students’ conception in
166 串聯電路之跨年級研究 林靜雯、邱美虹
science: A cognitive approach review. In I. V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science education in the 21st century (pp. 291-316). New York: Nova Science.
Closset, J. L. (1983, June-July). Sequential reasoning in electricity. Paper presented at the Research on Physics Education, La Londe les Maures, Paris, France.
Cohen, R. (1984). Cauual relations in electric circuits: Students. In R. Duit, W. Jung, & C. von Rhoneck (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop: Aspects of understanding electricity (pp. 107-113). Ludwigsburg, Germany: IPN-Arbeitsbericht.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1994). Young people’s understanding of science concepts: Implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning. Studies in Science Education, 24, 75-100.
Duit R. (1984). The meaning of current and voltage in everyday language and its consequences for the physical cocepts of the electric circuit. In. R. Duit, W. Jung, & C. von Rhoneck (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop: Apects of understanding electricity (pp. 205-245).
Ludwigsburg, Germany: IPN-Arbeitsbericht.
Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1987). Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits:
Structure and evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(9), 791-806.
Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211.
Heller, P. M., & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 259-275.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lee, S. J. (2007). Exploring pupils’ understanding concerning batteries: Theories and practices.
International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 497-516.
Lin, J. W., & Chiu, M. H. (2006, April). Students’ conceptual evolution in electricity: The cladistical perspective. Paper presented at the NARST 2006, San Francisco, U.S.A.
Lin, J. W., & Chiu, M. H. (2008, March-April). Investigating the influences of mental model based teaching-learning sequences on students learning in electricity. Paper presented at the NARST 2008, Baltimore, U.S.A.
Lin, J. W., & Chiu, M. H. (2009, August-September). Why are mental model based teaching-learning sequences in electricity effective? Perspective from students’ affection attitude. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association 2009,
林靜雯、邱美虹 串聯電路之跨年級研究 167
Istanbul, Turkey.
Lin, J. W., Chiu, M. H., & Hsu, Y. F. (2006, September). A novel approach to analyze pupils’
conceptual evolutionary pathway in electricity from systematic perspective. Paper presented at the Symposium and Workshop of Bioinformatics in Taiwan 2006, Taichung, Taiwan.
Magnusson, S. J., Boyle, R. A., & Templin, M. (1997). Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Science, 6(1), 91-142.
Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515-535.
Niedderer, H. (1997). Learning process studies in physics: A review of concepts and results. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, U.S.A.
Osborne, R. (1983). Children’s ideas meet scientists’ science. Lab Talk, 28(1), 2-7.
Osborne, R., & Freyberg, R. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science.
Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F., & Garnett, P. J. (1989). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 and 12 students’ concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 301-314.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2004). Bibliography-Students alternative frameworks and science education.
Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel Institute for Science Education.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2007). Bibliography-Students alternative frameworks and science education.
Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel Institute for Science Education.
Psillos, D., Koumaras, P., & Tiberghien, A. (1988). Voltage presented as a primary concept on DC circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 29-43.
Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1994). The nature of fourth graders’ understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 78(5), 489-514.
Shipstone, D. M. (1984). A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits.
European Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 185-188.
Shipstone, D. M. (1985). Electricity in simple circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 33-51). Milton, MA: Open University Press.
Tasker, R., & Osborne, R. (1985). Science teaching and science learning. In R. Osborne & P.
Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of children’s science (pp. 15-27). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Tiberghien, A. (1983). Critical review of research concerning the meaning of electric circuits for
168 串聯電路之跨年級研究 林靜雯、邱美虹
students aged 8 to 20 years. In G. Delacôte, A. Tiberghien, & J. Schwartz (Eds.), Proceeding of the first international workshop: In research on physics eduation (pp. 109-123). Paris: Éditions du CNRS.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tsai, C. H., Chen, H. Y., Chou, C. Y., & Lain, K. D. (2007). Current as the key concept of Taiwanese students’ understandings of electric circuit. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 483-496.
von Rhoneck, C. (1984). The instruction of voltage as an independent variable-the importance of preconceptions, cognitive conflict and operating rules. In R. Duit, W. Jung, & C. von Rhoneck (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop: Aspects of understanding electricity (pp.
275-286). Ludwigsburg, Germany: IPN-Arbeitsbericht.
Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D. R., & Funk, V. A. (1993). The compleat cladist: Primer of phylogenetic procedures (Vol. 19, Special publication, 2nd ed.). Lawrence, MA: Museum of Natural History.
林靜雯、邱美虹 串聯電路之跨年級研究 169