• 沒有找到結果。

王雅玄 (2005 )。社會續域教科書的批判論述分析一一方法論的重建。教育研究集刊,

51 (2) •67-97 。

[Wang,Y.-H. (2005). Critical discourse analysis for social studies textbooks: A methodological reconstruction.Bulletin ofEducationalRωearch, 51(2),67-97.]

王雅玄 (2008) 0 CDA 方法論的教科書應用一一兼論其解構與重建角色。教育學刊,

30 •61-100 。

[Wang,Y.-H. (2008). Critical discourse analysis for textbook research: On its deconstruction and reconstruction.Educational Review, 30,61-100.]

王麗雲、甄曉蘭 (2009 )。社會學取向的教科書政策分析。教科書研究. 2 (1) . 1-28 。

[Wang, L.-Y., &Chen,Hι. (2009). Sociology-oriented textbook policy analysis. Journal of

是'xtbookResearch,2(1),1-28.]

朱益賢 (2003 )。新修訂高中生活科技科課程綱要草案的規劃理念與特色。生活科技教 育月刊. 36 (7) . 11-15 。

[Chu,Y.-H. (2003). Newly revised High School Living Technology curriculum guideline: Its

王雅玄 透視官方知識之生成一一一高中「生活科技 I 教科書政治脈絡分析 143

ideas and characteristics.Journal ofLiving Technology Education,36(7),11-15.]

李坤崇、林堂馨 (2003 )。高中新課程發展及其與舊課程總綱之比較。教育研究月刊,

115 •40-57 。

[Lee,K.-仁, & Lin,T.-S. (2003). The development of high school new curriculum and its comparison with old curriculum guideline.Journal ofEducationResea陀h, 115,40-57.]

李陸盛、林坤誼、莊善媛 (2006 )。高中生活科技新課程的工程趨向。課程與教學季刊,

9 (1) .51-60 。

[Lee,L.-S.,Lin,K.-玄, & Chuang,S.-Y. (2006). Engineering-oriented features in senior high school new living technology curriculum. Curriculum and InstructionQuarter秒\ 9(1), 51-60.]

胡哲生、毛禮星 (2005 )。產業網路觀點下的教科書出版業經營策略分析。國立編譯館刊,

33 (4) •2-17 。

[Hu,1.-S.,& Mao,L.-S. (2005). Business strategy of textbook publishing industry from industrial network perspective. Journal of the National Institute for Compilation and Translation,33(4),2-17.]

張佳琳 (2003 )。教育改革的潛在課程分析一一政治社會學觀點論述。課程與教學季刊,

6 (4) •19-35 。

[Cba嗯,c.-L.(2003). A hidden curriculum view analysis on educational reform. Curriculum and InstructionQuarter,秒\6(4),19-35.]

教育部高中課程發展委員會 (2007 )。高中新課程修訂理念。教育部高中課程發展委員 會討論附件。臺北市:作者。

[Ministry of Education High School Curriculum Development Committee (2007). The ideas of revising high school new curriculum. Ministry of Education High School Curriculum Development Committee Appendix. Taipei,Taiwan: Author.]

教育部高級中學生活科技學科中心 (2005 )。高中生活科技 Q&A 手冊。 2007 年 12 月 26 日,取自 http://203.64.161.12/1d.htm

[Ministry of Education High School Life Science and Technology Centers (2005). High School Living Technology Q&A manual. Retrieved December 26, 2007, from

ht呻φ://20的3.64.叫.l 6 1.12/l d.htm.]

陳幸仁 (2007 )。微觀政治學:一個學校行政的新興研究頓域。教育行政與評鑑學刊·3·

67-86 。

[Chen,H.-1. (2007). Micropolitics: A new field of research on school administration.Journal of

Educational Administration and Evaluation,3,67-86.]

陳幸仁 (2008 )。學校組織行為之微觀政治探究。教育理論與實踐學刊,口, 1-鈞。

[Ch凹,H.-J. (2008). Micropolitical inquiry of organizational behavior in schools. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice,17,1-25.]

曾國鴻、現炎順 (2003 )。回應文化現象的科技教育新思維。生活科技教育月刊 -36(5) ,

2-16 。

[Tseng,K.-旺, & Wei,Y.-S. (2003). On the new thought of technology education responding to culture phenomenon. Journal ofLiving Technology Education,36(5),2-16.]

黃乃榮、張炳煌 (2007 )。高中教師對於高中課程學科中心推動新課程策略之意見的調 查研究。師大學報:教育類,但(3) -19-24 。

[Huang,N.-玄, & Chang,P.-H. (2007). ERCs' strategies for promoting the Senior High New Curriculum: A study of teachers' opinions. Journal ofNational Taiwan Normal University:

Education,52(3),19-24.]

譚光鼎、康瀚文 (2006 )。論九五高中課程綱要改革一一意識型態與課程的辯證關係。

課程與教學季刊- 9 ( I) '19-31 0

[Tang,K.-T.,& Ka嗯, H.-W. (2006). Study of 95 senior high school curriculum reform: The dialectic between ideology and curriculum. Curriculum & Instruction Quarter,秒\ 9(1), 19-31.]

Apple,M.W.(1979).Ideology and curriculum. London,UK: Routledge.

Apple,M. W. (1991). Regulating the text: The socio-historical roots of state control.In P. G.

Altbach(Ed扎 Textbooksin American society: Politics,policy, and pedagogy(pp. 7-26).

Albany,MA: State University ofNew York Press.

Apple,M.W.(1996). Power,meaning and identity: Critical sociology of education in the United States. British Journal ofSociology ofEducation,I7(2),125-144.

Apple,M.W.(2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservation age (2nd ed.).

New York: Routledge.

Apple,M. w.,& Christian-Smith, L. K. (Eds.).(1991). The politics ofthe textbook. New York:

Routledge.

Biemer,L. B. (1992). 百Ietextbookcon仕oversy:The role of content.In J. G. Herlihy & M. T.

Herlihy (Eds.), The textbookcon的versy:Issues,aspects,and perspectives (pp. 17-26).

Norwood,NJ: Ablex.

Bo1m曲,L.缸,

&

Deal, T. E.(1997). Reframing organizations:Artist!手\ choice,and leadership

王雅玄 透視官方知識之生成一一一高中「生活科技 l 教科書政治脈絡分析 145

(2nd ed.). San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass

Delfattore,J.(1992). What Johnny shouldn't read: 'flιxtbookcensorship in America.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dow,P. B. (1992). Taming the textbook tyranny: Reflections of a would-be school reformer.

In J. G. Herlihy & M. T. Herlihy (Eds.),The textbook controversy: Issues,aspects,and perspectives(pp. 33-42). Norwood,NJ: Ablex.

Eggleston,J.(1977). The sociology ofthe school curriculum. London,UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Fairclough,N.(1995).Media discourse.London,UK: EdwardArnold.

Fowler,R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press.London,UK:

Routledge.

Giddens,A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.

Cambridge,UK: Polity Press.

Harvey,L.(1990). Critical social research.London,UK: Unwin Hyman.

Johnsen,E.B.(1993).'flιxtbooksin the Kaleidoscope: A critical survey ofliterature and research on education texts.New York: Oxford University Press.

Kahr泊,J. (1995). Revisiting the eight-year study and rethinking the focus of educational policy analysis.Educational Policy,9(1),4-23.

Sewall,G. T. (1992). Textbook organization and writing: Today and tomorrow. In J. G. Herlihy

& M. T. Herlihy (Eds.),The t凹tbookcontroversy: Issues,aspects,andperspectiv的(pp.

27-32). Norwood,NJ: Ablex.

Spring,J. (1998). Conflict of interests: The politics of American education(3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Tanner,D. (1999). The texbook controversies. In M. J. Early & K. J. Rehage (Eds.),Issues in curriculum: A selection of chapters from past NSSE yearbook,part II(pp. 115-140).

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

The President and Fellows of Harvard College (2007). Report of the task force on general education.Cambridge,MA: Faculty ofArts and Sciences,Harvard University.

WiTt, F. 眺, & Kirst,M. W. (1992). The politics of education: Schools in conflict(3rd ed.).

Berkeley,CA: McCutchan.

Wong, K. K.,& Loveless, T.(1991). The politics oftextbook policy: Proposing a framework. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.),Textbooks in Americansocie取 Politics,policy,and pedagogy(pp. 27-42). Albany,MA: State University ofNew York Press

相關文件