一、中文部分
周台傑（民81）：國民小學國語文成就測驗
（五年級）。彰化市：精華印刷企業社。
俞筱鈞（民81）：瑞文氏彩色圖形推理測驗。
臺北：中國行為科學社。
楊憲明（民86）：中文閱讀時的有效視覺界限 研究。臺南師院學報，30，289-313。
二、英文部分
Amirkhiabani, G., & Lovegrove, W. J. (1996).
Role of eccentricity and size in the global precedence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per-ception and Performance, 22, 1434-1447.
Beauvillain, C., & Dore, K. (1998).
Orthographic codes are used in integrat-ing information from the parafovea by the saccadic computation system. Vi-sion Research, 38, 115-123.
Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782.
Bouma, H. (1978). Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field: A tutorial review. In Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 115-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosciates.
Bouma, H., & Legein, C. P. (1977). Fo-veal and parafoFo-veal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia, 15, 69-80.
Brannan, J. R., & Williams, M. C. (1987).
Allocation of visaul attention in good and poor readers. Perception &
Psy-chophysics, 41, 23-28.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1988). Reality and relevance of sustained and transient channels in reading and reading disabil-ity. Paper presented to the 24th Inter-national Congress of Psychology, Syd-ney.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1993b). The roles of sustained and transient channels in reading and reading disability. In S. F.
Wright and R. Groner (Eds.), Studies in visual information processing: Facets of dyslexia and its remediation (pp. 13-31). Ams terdam: Elsevier North Hol-land.
Cheng, C. M. (1982). Analysis of present-day Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 10, 281-358.
Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987).
Movement of attention across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.
Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 299-305.
Farmer, M. E., & Klein, R. M. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing defi-cit linked to dyslexia: A review.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 460-493.
Findlay, J. M. (1982). Global visual proc-essing for saccadic eye movements.
Vision Research, 22, 1033-1045.
Fischer, B. & Weber, H. (1990). Saccadic reaction times of dyslexic and age-matched normal subjects. Perception, 19, 805-818.
Geiger, G., & Lettvin, J. Y. (1987).
Peripheral vision in persons with dys-lexia. The New England Journal of
Medicine, 316, 1238-1243.
Geiger, G., & Lettvin, J. Y. (1989).
Dyslexcia and reading as examples of alternative visual strategies. In C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, & G.Lennerstrand (Eds.)., Brain and Reading. London:
Macmillan Press Ltd. pp.331-343.
Geiger, G., Lettvin, J. Y., & Zegarra-Moran, O. (1992). Task-determined strategies of visual processing in readers and dys-lexics. Cognitive Brain Research, 1(1), 39-52.
Gross-Glenn, K., Skottun, B. C., Glenn, W., Kushch, A., Lingua, R., Dunbar, M., Jallad, B., Lubs, H. A., Levin, B., Rabin, M., Parke, L., & Duara, R. (1995).
Contrast sensitivity in dyslexia. Visual Neuroscience, 12, 153-163.
Henderson, J. M., Dixon, P., Peterson, A., Twilley, L. C., & Ferreira, F. (1995).
Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. Jorunal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 82-98.
Hulme, C. (1988). The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children’s reading difficulties. Cogni-tive Neuropsychology, 5, 369-374.
Humphreys, G. W., & Bruce, V. (1989).
Visual Cognition: Computational, ex-perimental, and Neuropsychological perspectives. London: Lawrence Erl-baum.
Inhoff, A. W. (1987). Lexical access during eye fixations in sentence reading: Effect of word structure. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The
psychology of reading (pp. 403-418).
London: Erlbaum.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafo-veal word processing during eye fixa-tions in reading. Perception & Psycho-physics, 40, 431-439.
Inhoff, A. W. (1989b). Parafoveal process-ing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Jour-nal of Experimental Psychology: Hu-man Perception and PerforHu-mance, 15, 544-555.
Jacobs, R. J. (1979). Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery. Vision Research, 19, 1187-1195.
Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. (1979). The order of visual processing: “top down”,
“bottom-up”, or “ middle out”. Percep-tion and Psychophysics, 25, 225-231.
Klein, R., Berry, G., Briand, K., D‘Entremont, B. & Farmer, M. (1990). Letter identi-fication declines with increasing eccen-tricity at the same rate for normal and dyslexic readers. Perception and Psy-chophysics, 47(6), 601-606.
LaBerge, D, & Brown, V. (1986). Varia-tions in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect. Perception and Psycho-physics, 40, 188-200.
Lamb, M. R., & Robertson, L. C. (1990).
The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 489-496.
Lehmkuhle, S., Garzia, R., Turner, L., Hash, T., & Baro, J. A. (1993). A defective
visual pathway in Children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 989-996.
Lima, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 84-99.
Lima, S. D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1985).
Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter se-quence. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human and Perception and Performance, 11, 272-285.
Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F.
W., & Galaburda, A. M. (1991).
Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in devel-opmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sceience USA, 88, 7943-7947.
Loomis, J. M. (1978). Lateral masking in foveal and eccentric vision. Vision Re-search, 18, 335-338.
Lovegrove, W. J., Martin, F., & Slaghuis, W.
(1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuro-psychology, 3, 225-267.
Martin, F. & Lovegrove, W. (1987). Flicker contrast sensitivity in normal and spe-cifically disabled readers. Perception, 16, 215-221.
McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across suc-cessive fixations in reading? Percep-tion and Psychophysics, 25, 221-224.
Murphy, T. D., & Eriksen, C. W. (1987).
Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to
precues. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 576-586.
Navon, D., & Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 955-965.
Nazir, T. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M.
(1991). On words and their letters.
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 171-174.
O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In Kowler, E.(Ed), Eye move-ment and their role is visual and cogni-tive processes (pp. 395-453). Amster-dam: Elsevier.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability.
New York: Oxford University. Press.
Perry, A. R., Dember, W. N., Warm, J. S., Sacks, J. G. (1989). Letter identifica-tion in normal and dyslexic readers: A verification. Bulletin of the Psy-chonomic Society, 27, 445-448.
Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., &
Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.
Quarterly Journal of experimental Psy-chology, 32, 3-25.
Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span: Evidence for dyslexic topology. In G. T. Pavlidis & D. F.
Fisher (Eds.), Dyslexia: Its Neuropsy-chology and Treatment. New York:
Wiley.
Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1989).
Parafoveal preview and lexical access during eye fixations in reading. In W.
Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical presenta-tion and process (pp. 261-290). Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D.
(1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Jour-nal of Experimental psychology: Hu-man Perception and PerforHu-mance, 18, 163-172.
Rayner, K., Murphy, L. A., Henderson, J. M.,
& Pollatsek, A. (1989). Selective atten-tional dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsy-chology, 6, 357-378.
Samuels, S. J. (1987). Information-process-ing abilities and readInformation-process-ing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 18-22.
Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1977).
The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 15, 31-41.
Smith, A. T., Early, F., & Grogan, S. C.
(1986). Flicker masking and devel-opmental dyslexia. Perception, 15, 473-482.
Solman, R. T., & May, J. G. (1990). Spatial localization discrepancies: A visual deficiency in poor readers. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 243-263.
Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in
developmental theories of reading skill:
Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
Taylor, S. E. (1965). Eye movements while reading: Facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 187-202.
Torgesen, J. K., & Morgan, S. (1990).
Phonological synthesis tasks: A develop-mental , functional , and componential analysis. In H. L. S wanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning Disabilities: Theoreti-cal and Research issues (pp. 263-276).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Human Percep-tion and Performance, 9, 523-530.
Underwood, G., Clews, S., & Everatt, J.
(1990). How do readers know where to look next? Local information distribu-tions influence eye fixadistribu-tions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental psychology, 42A, 39-65.
Van der Leij, A., & Van Daal, V. H. P.
(1999). Automatization aspects of dys-lexia: speed limitations in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compen-sation. Journal of Learning Disabili-ties, 32, 417-429.
Vellutino, F. R. (1979a). The validity of perceptual deficit explanations of read-ing disability: A reply to Fletcher and Satz. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 160-167.
Bulletin of Special Education 2001, 21, 189－213
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.