一、中文部分
周台傑（民 88）：學習障礙學生鑑定原則鑑定 基準說明。載於張蓓莉編，身心障礙及資 賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準說明手冊。
教育部特殊教育工作小組。75-91。
洪儷瑜（民 89）：臺北市國民中學學情障學生 鑑定工作手冊，臺北市：芳和國中。
洪儷瑜（民 90）：如何發現與鑑定學習障礙學 生。載於臺灣區九十學年度學習障礙學生 鑑定模式研習手冊，臺北市教育局。
洪儷瑜（民 84）：學習障礙者教育。臺北市：
心理出版社。
洪儷瑜，李瑩玓（2000）：被忽略的學習障礙
－從一個非語文型的學障個案談起。學習 障礙資訊站，15，15-27。
徐麗球（民 88）：國語文低成就學童閱讀能力 亞型探討。臺東，臺灣：國立臺東師範學 院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
陳心怡、楊宗仁（民 89）：WISC-III 分測驗特 殊組型基本率研究：臺灣常模、學習障礙 及注意力缺陷過動症兒童之比較。中國測 驗學會測驗年刊，47(2)，頁 91-110。
陳心怡（民 90）：語文與作業能力差異之基本 率研究－「魏氏兒童智力量表」臺灣常模 分析。花蓮師院學報，12，頁 51-73。
教育部（民 87）：身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑 定原則鑑定基準。教育部。
陳榮華（民 86）：魏氏兒童智力量表第三版
（中文版）指導手冊。臺北，臺灣：中國 行為科學社。
黃秀霜（民 88）：中文年級認字量表之編製報 告及不同國語文成就兒童錯字組型分析。
行政院國家科學委員會專案研究報告。
曾世杰（民 88）：國語文低成就學童之工作記 憶、聲韻處理能力與叫名速度之研究。國 立中正大學，學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷 研討會。
溫詩麗（民 85）：北市國小閱讀障礙資源班學 生認知能力組型之研究。臺北，臺灣：國 立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論 文。
學習障礙研究小組（民 79）：學習障礙學生鑑 定標準及就學輔導規畫之研究報告。彰化 師範大學特教系。
二、英文部分
Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabili-ties be diagnosed without using intelli-gence tests? Journal of Learning Dis-abilities, 24, 178-186.
Badian, N. A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listen-ing and readlisten-ing comprehension: A lon-gitudinal study of stability, gender differ-ences, and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 138-148.
Bateman, B. (1992). Learning disabilities:
The changing landscape. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 29-36.
Bloom, A.S., Topinka, C. W., Goulet, M., Reese, A., & Podruch, P. E. (1986).
Implications of large WISC/WISC-R ver-bal-performance IQ discrepancies. Jour-nal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 353-356.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Cate-gorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
Carver, R. P. (1990). Intelligence and read-ing ability in grades 2-12. Intelligence, 1, 449-455.
Cone, T. E. & Wilson, L R. (1981). Quan-tifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis. Learning Disability Quar-terly, 4, 359-371.
Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I., Tola, G., & Katz, L. (1981). Aware-ness of phonological segments and read-ing ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1-16.
Feagans, L. V., & McKinney, J. D. (1981).
Subtypes of learning disabilities: A re-view. In L. V. Feagans, E. J. Shorts, &
L. J. Meltzer (Eds.) Subtypes of learning disabilities: Theorical perspectives and research, (pp.3-31), Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrance Erlbaum Association.
Federal Register (1977). Procedures of evaluating specific learning disabilities.
Washington DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Forness, S. R., Sinclair, E., & Guthrie, D.
(1983). Learning disability discrepancy formulas: Their use in actual practice.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 107-114.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Mathes, P., Lipsey, M., Roberts, H. P. (2000). Is learning dis-abilities just a fancy term for low achieve-ment? A meta-analysis of reading differ-ences between low achievers with and without the labels. Learning Disabili-ties Summit.
Frankenberger, W. & Fronzaglio, K. (1991).
A review of states criteria and proce-dures for identifying children with
learn-ing disabilities. Journal of Learnlearn-ing Disabilities, 24, 495-506.
Hammill, D. D. (1990). On defining learn-ing disabilities: An emerglearn-ing consensus.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74-84.
Kavale, K. A. & Forness, S. R. (1995). The nature of Learning Disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciation.
Kavale, K. A. & Forness, S. R. (2000).
What definitions of learning disability say and dont say. Journal of Learn-ing Disabilities, 33(3), 239-256.
Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B.(2000).
Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabili-ties, 33(4), 334-358.
McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. L. (1991).
Identifying students with learning dis-abilities: The effect of implementing state-wide guidelines. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(8), 501-506.
National Joint Committee on Learning Dis-abilities. (1988). Letter to NJCLD mem-ber organizations.
Revers, D., & Smith, T. (1988). Traditional eligibility criteria for identifying students as specific learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 642-643.
Rourke, B. P. (1998). Significance of verbal- perception discrepancies for subtypes of children with learning disabilities: Op-portunities for the WISC-III. In Prifit-era, A. & Saklofske, D. Eds. WISC-III clinical use and interpretation:
Scien-tist-practitioner perspectives. San Diego, CA:
Schuerholz, L. J., & Harris, E. L. (1995).
An analysis of two discrepancy-based models and a processing-deficit approach in identifying learning disabilities. Jour-nal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 18-29.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2002).
On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quar-terly, 25, 155-168.
Siegel, L. S. (1989). I. Q. is irrelevant to definition of learning disabilities. Jour-nal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618-629.
Shaw, S. F., Cullen, J. P., McGuire, J. M., &
Brinckerhoff, L. C. (1995). Opera-tionalizing a definition of learning dis-abilities. Journal of Learning Dis-abilities, 28(9), 586-597.
Sofie, C. A., & Riccio, C. A. (2002). A comparison of multiple methods for the identification of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Dis-abilities, 35(3), 234-244.
Spring, C., & French, L. (1990). Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores. Journal of Learning Disabili-ties, 23, 53-58.
Stanovich, K. E. (1993). The construct va-lidity of discrepancy definitions of reading disabilities. In R. Lyon, D. B.
Gray, Kavanagh, J. F. & N. A. Krasne-gor Eds. Better understanding
learn-ing disabilities: New views from re-search and their implications for educa-tion and public policies. pp. 273-307.
Baltimorm, MD: Paulh Brookes.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phono-logical core-variable difference model.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.
The Board of Trustees of the Council for Learning disabilities (1987). The CLD position statement. Journal of Learn-ing Disabilities, 20, 349.
Torgesen , J. K., Wanger, R. K., & Rashotte C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonogical Processing and reading. Jour-nal of Learning Disabilites, 27(5), 276-286.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G.
R. (2000). Differentiating between dif-ficultto-remediate and readily remedi-ated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy defini-tion of reading disability. Journal of Learnig Disabilities, 33(3), 223-238.
Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: To-wards a new conceptualization of de-velopmental dyslexia. Annals of Dys-lexia, 49, 3-28.
Yessedyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., Shinn, M. R.,
& Mcgue, M. (1982). Similarities and difference between low achievers and students classified learning disabled.
Journal of Special Education, 16(1), 73-85.
Bulletin of Special Education 2003, 24, 85－111 National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.