• 沒有找到結果。

有毒的大氣、凶暴的太陽、枯竭的大地、接連產生的新疾病、無 窮無盡的死亡……

各種的宗教、各種的正義、各種的利害關係……

為了調停,甚至連神都製造得出來。(宮崎駿,1996: 199)

必須回答此問題,可能是我們身處在「後神權時代」的宿命,沒有正神,

也就沒有異端,然而共同體的政治生活仍要繼續。如果透過公民宗教的當代 理解,我們能瞭解到彼此的信仰衝突結構,或許更能夠基於包容的心情,理 解他人的堅持,也適時修正自己的信仰。行文至此,我得承認,比起陳思賢

(1997)的自由主義包容論,公民宗教的當代理解作為一個分析架構,也沒 能對於如何解決信仰衝突提出較好的解方,但至少,此理解能幫助我們走下 規範理論宗教中立或道德優越性的高地(若我們在那裡的話),真誠面對自 己身處的社會。

參考資料

A. 中文部分 司法院大法官

1999 〈大法官釋字第 490 號解釋〉。2017 年 7 月 10 日,取自 http://www.judicial.gov.tw/

constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=490 (Justice of the Constitutional Court, Judicial

Yuan, 1999, “Interpretation No. 490,” Retrieved July 10, 2017, from http://www.judicial.

gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=490)

2017 〈大法官釋字第 748 號解釋〉。2017 年 7 月 10 日,取自 http://www.judicial.gov.tw/

constitutionalcourt/p03_01_1.asp?expno=748 (Justice of the Constitutional Court, Judi-cial Yuan, 2017, “Interpretation No. 748,” Retrieved July 10, 2017, from http://www.

judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01_1.asp?expno=748) 吳 庚、陳淳文

2015 《憲法理論與政府體制》,增訂三版。作者出版。(Wu, Keng and Chwen-wen Chen, 2015, Constitutional Theory and Government Institution, 3rd ed. Published by the authors.) 李永然、高嘉甫

2016 〈我國有訂定《宗教團體法》的必要性嗎?〉,《人權會訊》119: 15–18。(Li, Yung-jan and Chia-fu Kao, 2016, “Is It Necessary to Enact a Religion Associations Act in Tai-wan?” Human Rights Quarterly 119: 15–18.)

宮崎駿

1996 《風之谷》,第 7 卷,J. T. comix(譯)。臺北:台灣東販。(Miyazaki, Hayao, 1996, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, Vol. 7, J. T. comix (trans.). Taipei: Taiwan Tohan.) 梁裕康

2014 〈「既可怕又謬誤」卻「公正且真確」—論盧梭對霍布斯宗教理論的評斷〉,《人文 及社會科學集刊》26(2): 219–245。(Liang, Yu-kang, 2014, “‘Horrible and False’ Yet

‘Just and True’: On Rousseau’s Conception of Hobbes’ Religious Theory,” Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy 26(2): 219–245.)

許育典、周敬凡

2006a 〈從宗教自由檢討「宗教團體法草案」(上)〉,《政大法學評論》89: 55–108。(Hsu, Yue-dian and Jing-fan Chou, 2006a, “The Evaluation of Bills Regulating the Religious Freedom of Religious Groups (1),” Chengchi Law Review 89: 55–108.)

2006b 〈從宗教自由檢討「宗教團體法草案」(下)〉,《政大法學評論》90: 69–118。(Hsu, Yue-dian and Jing-fan Chou, 2006b, “The Evaluation of Bills Regulating the Religious Freedom of Religious Groups (2),” Chengchi Law Review 90: 69–118.)

許育典、蔡汶含

2013 〈從宗教團體自治檢討宗教團體財務公開的合憲性〉,《東海大學法學研究》39: 1–

38。(Hsu, Yue-dian and Wen-han Tsai, 2013, “The Review of Constitutionality of the Financial Disclosure of Religious Groups from the Religious Group Autonomy,” Tunghai University Law Review 39: 1–38.)

郭承天

2005 〈宗教容忍:政治哲學與神學的對話〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》17(1): 125–157。

(Kuo, Cheng-tian, 2005, “Religious Tolerance: A Dialogue between Political Philosophy and Theology,” Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy 17(1): 125–157.)

陳思賢

1997 〈選擇信仰的空間—奧古斯丁異端導正論與洛克寬容論〉,《政治科學論叢》8: 147–

165。(Chen, Sy-shyan, 1997, “This World or Beyond?—Augustinian Political Theology or Lockean Toleration,” Taiwanese Journal of Political Science 8: 147–165.)

2003 〈多元、寬容與道德學習:憲法與群育教育的美學關聯〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》

5: 1–34。(Chen, Sy-shyan, 2003, “Pluralism, Tolerance and Moral Learning: Constitution as Civic Education,” SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs 5:

1–34.) 陳嘉銘

2014 〈「創造出公民,要什麼就都有了」?論盧梭的自由、愛國主義和實現共和的弔詭〉,

《人文及社會科學集刊》26(2): 175–218。(Chen, Chia-ming, 2014, “‘Create Citizens, and You Have Everything You Need’? On Rousseau’s Freedom, Patriotism and the Para-dox of Actualizing Republic,” Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy 26(2): 175–218.) B. 外文部分

Asad, Talal

2009 Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Beiner, Ronald

1993 “Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau on Civil Religion,” The Review of Politics 55(4): 617–638.

2010 Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

Bellah, Robert N.

1967 “Civil Religion in America,” Daedalus 96(1): 1–21.

Bellah, Robert N. and Phillip E. Hammond

1980 Varieties of Civil Religion. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton 1985 Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley:

University of California Press.

Brubaker, Rogers

2015 Grounds for Difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cole, Wade M.

2012 “A Civil Religion for World Society: The Direct and Diffuse Effects of Human Rights Treaties, 1981–2007,” Sociological Forum 27(4): 937–960.

Demerath III, Nicholas J. and Rhys H. Williams

1985 “Civil Religion in an Uncivil Society,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 480: 154–166.

Hertzberg, Benjamin R.

2015 “Chains of Persuasion in the Deliberative System: Addressing the Pragmatics of Religious Inclusion,” The Journal of Politics 77(4): 889–900.

2019 Chains of Persuasion: A Framework for Religion in Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kymlicka, Will

2007 Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity.

Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Machiavelli, Niccolò

1997 Discourses on Livy, Julia Conaway Bondanella and Peter Bondanella (trans.).

Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

2008 The Prince, Peter Constantine (trans.). New York: The Modern Library.

Madsen, Richard

2007 Democracy’s Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Development in Taiwan.

Berkeley: University of California Press.

Mahmood, Saba

2016 Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton: Princeton Uni-versity Press.

Marvin, Carolyn and David W. Ingle

1996 “Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Revisiting Civil Religion,” Journal of the Ameri-can Academy of Religion 64(4): 767–780.

Müller, Jan-Werner

2007 Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rawls, John

1996 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

1997 “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” The University of Chicago Law Review 64(3): 765–807.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques

1997a The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, Victor Gourevitch (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

1997b The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Victor Gourevitch (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Santiago, Jose

2009 “From ‘Civil Religion’ to Nationalism as the Religion of Modern Times: Rethink-ing a Complex Relationship,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48(2):

394–401.

Sen, Amartya

2009 The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers

2007 The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wallace, Ruth A.

1977 “Emile Durkheim and the Civil Religion Concept,” Review of Religious Research 18(3): 287–290.

How Could Rousseau’s Civil Religion

相關文件