第五章 結論與建議
第三節 後續研究建議
下,是否會有不同的結論產生。
四、擴增實境系統的修正
在本次研究過程中,原先預期只要維持固定的角度,便可讓擴增實境系統運 行,但實際到實驗場地之後發現因為環境陽光、窗戶折射、地板花紋……等未預 期之狀況,而讓擴增實境系統無法順利運行,因此將教學實驗從原本的一組搭配 一個擴增實境系統與教材,改為僅使用一組系統,由教學人員負責操作,學生透 過投影幕學習,並於教學流程結束後依照組別讓學生輪流操作擴增實境系統。同 時也是因為和各班班導師討論後,考量到學習者的年紀過小,遇到新鮮及有趣的 事物時會過於亢奮,若各組安排一組擴增實境系統,可能反而造成學生無法專心 於教學實驗上。但本研究依然建議後續研究者,透過新進技術改善擴增實境系統 中的辨識問題,並在學生情況允許之下安排各組學生一套擴增實境系統,讓學習 者在學習過程中親自操作,探討是否與本研究有不同的結論產生。
參考文獻
中文參考文獻
王美芬(1991)。自然科錯誤之研究。台北市立師範學院學報, 22, 367-400。
王美芬(1992)。我國五, 六年級學生有關月亮錯誤概念的診斷及補救教學策略 的應用.臺北市立師範學院學報,
23
,357-380。王維洸(2015)。連動式多影像擴增實境之潮汐模擬教學系統開發(未出版之碩 士論文),國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
余芳如(2004)。不同教學策略對國小高年級學生學習「月相盈虧」概念的影響
(未出版碩士論文),國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮縣。
宋曜廷(2000)。先前知識文章結構和多媒體呈現對文章學習的影響(未出版之 博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
凃金堂(2012)。應用認知負荷理論的數學解題教學實驗。屏東教育大學學報- 教育類,38,227-256。
張春興(1997)。教育心理學。臺北:五南圖書。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技領域。
梁勇能(2000)動態幾何環境下,國二學生空間能力學習之研究(未出版之碩士 論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
莊孟軒(2015)。以同步多影像顯示擴增實境運用於潮汐教學對認知負荷之影響
(未出版之碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
郭重吉(2001)。浸談建構主義在數理教學上的應用。建構與教學,
16。
陳英嫻、邱美虹(1995)。月相盈虧之概念改變。師大學報。
英文參考文獻
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the
literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
Baxter, J. (1989). Children's understanding of familiar astronomical events.International Journal of Science Education,
11(5), 502-513.
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. (2004).Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for primary schools. Becta.
Cheng, T. S., Lu, Y. C., & Yang, C. S. (2015). Using the multi-display teaching system to lower cognitive load.
Journal of Educational Technology & Society,18(4),
128-140.Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Educational Technology &
Society, 17(4), 352-365.
Eder, D. (1981). Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher-student interaction. Sociology of Education, 54(3), 151-162.
doi:10.2307/2112327
Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 33-41.
Hays, T. A. (1996). Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short-term and long-term comprehension.
Journal of educational computing research, 14(2), 139-155.
Hegarty, M., & Kriz, S. (2008). Effects of knowledge and spatial ability on learning
from animation.
Learning with animation: Research implications for design,
3-29Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of
students.
Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching.
Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 267-286.
Klausmeier, H. J., Ghatala, E. S., & Frayer, D. A. (1974).
Conceptual learning and development: A cognitive view. Academic Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962).
The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago
press.Lanir, J., Booth, K. S., & Tang, A. (2008). MultiPresenter: A Presentation system for (very) large display surfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international
conference on MultiMedia (pp. 519-528). New York, NY: ACM.
Lee, E. A. L., & Wong, K. W. (2014). Learning with desktop virtual reality: Low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Computers & Education,79, 49-58.
Lee, I. J., Chen, C. H., & Chang, K. P. (2016). Augmented reality technology combined with three-dimensional holography to train the mental rotation ability of older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 488-500.
Lord, T. R. (1985). Enchancing the visual-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 22, 395-406.
Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance
children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education
Research, 21(4), 525-541.
Macnab, W., & Johnstone, A.H. (1990). Spatial skill which contribute to competence in the biological sciences. Journal of Biological Education, 24(1), 37-41.
MaGee, M. G. (1978). Effect of two problem solving strategies on mental rotation test scores. Journal of Psychology, 100, 83-85.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge university press.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words?
Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning.
Journal of educational psychology, 86(3), 389.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4),
256.Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P., & Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game.
Journal of Educational
Psychology, 94(1), 171.
Merrill, M. D., Tennyson, R. D., & Posey, L. O. (1992).
Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Educational Technology.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
National Research Council (U.S.). (1996). National Science Education Standards:
Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351-371.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., & Tabbers, H. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Kali, R. (1982). Process analysis of spatial aptitude. Advances in
the psychology of human intelligence, 1, 311-365.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science
education, 66(2), 211-227.
Roth, K. (1991). Reading science texts for conceptual change.
Science learning:
Processes and applications, 48-63.
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional
Science, 33(2), 105-119. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-6405-z
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2004). Exploring a cognitive basis for learning spatial relationships with augmented reality. Technology, Instruction, Cognition
and Learning, 1(4), 323.
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., and Hay, K E.(1994). Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century. ACM Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22(2), 123-138.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educatioanl Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., & Mou, W. (2003). Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 5(1), 73-80.
Thurstone L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University press.
Webb, N. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 642-655.
doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.642
Wierwille, W. W., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1993). Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors: The Journal
of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35(2), 263-281.
附錄
附錄1空間能力量表
班級: 座號: 姓名:
這是一份用來了解你空間想像能力的試卷,請你動動腦來測試一下自己!
───時間限制:10 分鐘───
一、右邊的四個圖形,哪一個和最左邊的圖形是相同的,只是轉了個方向呢?
( )1.
題 A B C D
( )2.
題 A B C D
( )3.
題 A B C D
( )4.
題 A B C D
二、最左邊的圖摺疊起來會是右邊四個圖形的哪一個呢?
( )5.
題 A B C D
三、最左邊的圖是右邊哪一個圖形的展開呢?
( )6.
題 A B C D
四、右邊的哪一個圖形,是不可能從最左邊的積木觀察到的呢?
( )7.
題 A B C D
( )8.
題 A B C D
試題結束!請稍等老師指示
附錄2認知負荷自評表
11. 本單元的學習內容,使我獲得
比以前更多的相關知識。 □ □ □ □ 12. 跟以前比起來,我喜歡這次的學習方式。 □ □ □ □ 13. 我對月相的學習內容覺得沮喪。 □ □ □ □ 14. 了解潮汐的學習內容讓我覺得是輕鬆的。 □ □ □ □ 15. 了解月相與潮汐之間的關係對我來說是困難的。 □ □ □ □
附錄3月相與潮汐模擬測驗卷(前測) 班級: 座號: 姓名:
這是一份用來了解你對月亮和潮汐想法的試卷,和在校成績無關,請按照你自己的想法作答!
一、請看下面的圖片,並回答以下的問題(提示:日期為農曆):
( )1.請問你今天應該會觀察到什麼月相呢?
(1)上弦月 (2)下弦月 (3)滿月 (4)看不到月亮 ( )2.當天會觀察到什麼樣的潮汐現象呢?
(1)大潮 (2)小潮 (3)中潮 (4)不一定 三、請觀察下面四個選項,回答問題 1~3
(1) (2) (3) (4)
( )1.若上圖中黑色的部分代表月亮沒有照射到陽光;白色的部分代表月亮有陽光照射,
中間白色的圓形代表地球,周圍的四個月亮代表月亮繞地球公轉一周的四個位置,
哪一種畫法才是正確的?
( )2.你覺得太陽應該在正確答案的:
( )八、從這次的大潮到下次的大潮大約相隔多少天?
(1) 不一定
(2) 每隔一個月都會見到大潮 (3) 每隔半個月就會見到大潮 (4) 每隔一個星期就會見到大潮
( )九、月亮形狀的變化是什麼原因造成的?
(1) 月亮被地球的影子遮住 (2) 太陽照射到月亮的面積不同 (3) 我捫由不同的角度看月亮 (4) 月亮有一部分被雲遮住了
十、下方圖片是你今天觀察到的月相,回答問題 1-2
( )1.今天應該是農曆幾號?
(1)十五 (2)初一 (3)初七 (4)二十一
( )2.今天觀察潮汐的話應該會觀察到什麼現象?
(1)今天能夠觀察到的潮差,是一個月內最大的 (2)今天看不到潮汐變化
(3)今天能夠觀察到的潮差,是一個月內最小的 (4)不一定,要看今天有沒有下雨
試題結束!請稍等老師指示
附錄4月相與潮汐模擬測驗卷(後測) 班級: 學號: 姓名:
這是一份用來了解你對月亮和潮汐想法的試卷,和在校成績無關,請按照你自己的想法作答!
一、請看下面的圖片,並回答以下的問題(提示:日期為農曆)
( )1.請問你今天應該會觀察到什麼月相呢?
(1)上弦月 (2)下弦月 (3)滿月 (4)看不到月亮 ( )2.當天會觀察到什麼樣的潮汐現象呢?
(1)大潮 (2)小潮 (3)中潮 (4)不一定
三、請觀察下面四個選項,回答問題 1~3
(1) (2) (3) (4)
( )1.若上圖中黑色的部分代表月亮沒有照射到陽光;白色的部分代表月亮有陽光照射,
中間白色的圓形代表地球,周圍的四個月亮代表月亮繞地球公轉一周的四個位置,
哪一種畫法才是正確的?
( )2.你覺得太陽應該在正確答案的:
(3) 每隔半個月就會見到大潮 (4) 每隔一個星期就會見到大潮
( )九、月亮形狀的變化是什麼原因造成的?
(1) 月亮被地球的影子遮住 (2) 太陽照射到月亮的面積不同 (3) 我捫由不同的角度看月亮 (4) 月亮有一部分被雲遮住了
十、下方圖片是你今天觀察到的月相,回答問題 1-2
( )1.今天應該是農曆幾號?
(1)十五 (2)初一 (3)初七 (4)二十一
( )2.今天觀察潮汐的話應該會觀察到什麼現象?
(1)今天能夠觀察到的潮差,是一個月內最大的 (2)今天看不到潮汐變化
(3)今天能夠觀察到的潮差,是一個月內最小的 (4)不一定,要看今天有沒有下雨
試題結束!請稍等老師指示
附錄5月相與潮汐學習單
附錄6教學使用之投影片
附錄7傳統教具教學流程表
附錄8單影像擴增實境教學流程表
附錄9同步多影像擴增實境教學流程表