第五章 結論與未來方向
5.3 未來研究方向
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
5.2 研究限制
研究 Flickr Tags 並非沒有缺點，例如非英語系國家，並沒有完整收集到所有的城 市照片的 TAG，只能透過使用者下英文關鍵字時同時在同一張照片中發現同樣非英語系 一樣的 TAG；另外只探討 41 個城市作為基礎，並且只收集前 100 個 TAG 當做實驗研究 的資料，而要解釋研究主題所界定的範圍，雖然有一些問題，但這些問題對於研究本身 並無絕對的影響，並且去避免可能會發生的問題。另外 Mexico、Singapore 與 Mexico city、
Singapore city 無法分析是否是指城市又或者國家，因此統一定義為城市名。
5.3 未來研究方向
在 Flickr API 本身提供 182 個，合計共 34 大類 API method 來分析相簿資訊，因此 Flickr 中，仍有許多 API 資料可以探討，例如：當旅遊回來之後，上傳照片到 Flickr 相 簿上，然後透過一個介面依照一定的順序來編輯這本相簿，這樣以後在維護各種旅遊資 訊，之後利用 Flickr 開發一些功能，能夠放上了一些 Tag 或者其他使用者一些回應資訊，
然後透過 Flickr API 把這個資訊抓下來，然後再利用 API 去收集相關資訊作為依據。針 對 Flickr API 探索使用者想表達照片的精神，除了透過 T ag 收集之外，還可以運用一些 回應方式，就能探討使用者表達照片背後的意義，若能 Flickr Tags 加上回應資訊之後，
相信照片的分析就能更加準確。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y 參考文獻
Ames, M. and Naaman, M. (2007). Why we Tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Anthonisse, J.M. （1971）. The rush in a directed graph （Mathematische Besliskunde, No. BN 9/71）. Amsterdam: Stichting Mathematisch Centrum.
Barnes, J.A. （1954）. Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish .Hum Relations,7
（1）:39-54.
Bastian, M. （2009）, Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks, AAAI Publications.
Chou, C.Y. and Mei, H. （2008）. Analyzing Tag-based Mashups with Fuzzy FCA.
IEEE Int.Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering.
Cox, A.M., Clough, P.D. & Marlow, J. (2008). Flickr: a first look at user behaviour in the context of photography as serious leisure Information Research,13(1) paper 336.
Derudder, B. and Taylor, P.J. （2005）. The cliquishness of world cities, Global Networks, 5
（1） 71-91.
Feinberg, J. (2009). Wordle word clouds. Abstract retrieved August 16, 2013, from http://www.wordle.net/
Flickr API. Abstract retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://www.flickr.com/services/api/
Flickr-Wikipedia,the free encyclopedia. Abstract retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flickr
Freeman, L.C. （1979）. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
Golder, S.A. and Huberman, B.A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative Tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci., 32(2), 198-208.
Hull, D.A. （1998）.Stemming algorithms： A case study for detailed evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 70-84, Dec.
Jenkins, O.H. (2003), Photography and travel brochures: the circle of reoresentation. Tourism Geographies, 5(3), 305-328.
Lonely Planet. Abstract retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://www.lonelyplanet.com/
Lovins, J.B. (1968a).Development of a stemming algorithm. Mechanical Translation and Computational Linguistics, II, 22-3 1
Lovins, J.B. (1968b).The Lovins stemming algorithm. Abstract retrieved September 12, 2013, from
http://snowball.tartarus.org/algorithms/lovins/stemmer.html
Marcus, M., Santorini, B.and Marcinkiewicz , M. （1993）. Architecture a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, Vol.19.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Mika, P. (2007). Ontologies are us: A unified Model of social networks and semantics. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(1), 5-15.
National Geographic. Abstract retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://www.nationalgeographic.com/
O’Reilly, T. （2005）. Tim O’Reilly and Web 2.0: the economics of memetic liberty and control.
Porter, M. F. （1980a）. An algorithm for suffix stripping, Program, 14（3）:130.
Porter, M. F.（1980b）.Martin Porter's Home Page：The Porter Stemming Algorithm.Abstract retrieved September 21,2013,from
http://tartarus.org/martin/index.html
Scott, J. （2000）. Social network analysis: A handbook （2nd ed.）. London: Sage.
Sigurbjörnsson, B. and Zwol, R.V. （2008）. Flickr Tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, ser.WWW '08. New York, NY, USA： ACM, pp. 327-336.
TF*IDF.Abstract retrieved September 21, 2013, from：TF*IDF：
http://morris.lis.ntu.edu.tw/wikimedia/index.php/TF*IDF/
Top 15 Most Popular Travel Websites. Abstract retrieved August 2, 2013, from http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/travel-websites/
Toutanova, K. and Christopher, D.M. （2000）. Enriching the Knowledge Sources Used in a Maximum Entropy Part-of-Speech Tagger. In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora （EMNLP/VLC-2000）, 63-70.
Travel+ Leisure. Abstract retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://www.travelandleisure.com Travel.Yahoo. Abstract retrieved August 5, 2013, from http://travel.yahoo.com/
Tripadvisor. Abstract retrieved August 3, 2013, from http://www.tripadvisor.com/tripadvisor/
Valitutti, R. （2004）.WordNet-affect：an affective extension of WordNet. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, vol.
pp.1083-1086.
Wasserman, S. （1994）. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge university press, Vol. 8.
吳筱玟與周芷伊（民 98）。 Tagging 的分類與知識意涵：以 Flickr 首頁圖片為例。新聞 學研究，未出版，台北市。
林岡隆（民 98）。政府官員異動之社會網路分析。 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文，
未出版，台北市。
彭聲揚（民 100）。透過圖片 Tags 觀察情緒字詞與事物概念之關聯。 國立政治大學資訊 科學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
溫文喆（民 98）。詞義相似度的社會網路分析研究。 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文，
未出版，台北市。
蔡卲章（民 98）。英文文法關係之型態探勘。 國立政治大學資訊科學系碩士論文，未出 版，台北市。
‧
Amsterdam Porter(weight) Amsterdam Lovins(weight)
Tag Count Rank weight count Rank Tag Count Rank weight count Rank
Atlanta Porter(weight) Atlanta Lovins(weight)
architecture 1188 1 0.14 1354 1 architecture 1188 1 0.14 1354 1
Bangkok Porter(weight) Bangkok Lovins(weight)
woman 3495 1 0.44 5047 1 woman 3763 1 0.16 4362 1
Barcelona Porter(weight) Barcelona Lovins(weight)
art 1201 1 0.31 1574 1 art 1224 1 0.31 1604 1
Beijing Porter(weight) Beijing Lovins(weight)
travel 1541 1 1541 1 travel 1512 1 1512 1
‧
Bruxelles Porter(weight) Bruxelles Lovins(weight)
art 1477 1 0.56 2303 1 street 1603 1 0.16 1858 1
Budapest Porter(weight) Budapest Lovins(weight)
bridge 1120 1 0.14 1277 1 bridge 1203 1 0.14 1371 1 Chicago Porter(weight) Chicago Lovins(weight)
night 1650 1 0.14 1881 1 night 1664 1 0.14 1897 1
Copenhagen Porter(weight) Copenhagen Lovins(weight)
bike 8844 1 0.28 11317 1 bike 8243 1 0.28 10548 1
Dublin Porter(weight) Dublin Lovins(weight)
nature 1477 1 1477 1 nature 1482 1 1482 1
Frankfurt Porter(weight) Frankfurt Lovins(weight)
flower 2733 1 2733 1 airplane 2941 1 2941 1
‧
Hamburg Porter(weight) Hamburg Lovins(weight)
dock 2555 1 0.14 2912 1 dock 2556 1 0.14 2913 1 Hong Kong Porter(weight) Hong Kong Lovins(weight)
night 2044 1 2044 1 night 2051 1 2051 1
Istanbul Porter(weight) Istanbul Lovins(weight)
man 1484 1 1484 1 man 1343 1 1343 3
Kuala Lumpur Porter(weight) Kuala Lumpur Lovins(weight) travel 1256 1 1256 3 travel 1264 1 1264 3
London Porter(weight) London Lovins(weight)
car 3363 1 0.16 3898 1 car 3385 1 0.16 3924 2
Los Angeles Porter(weight) Los Angeles Lovins(weight) art 1008 1 0.56 1572 1 art 1028 1 0.56 1603 1
‧
Madrid Porter(weight) Madrid Lovins(weight)
street 1237 1 0.18 1457 1 street 1339 1 0.18 1577 1
Melbourne Porter(weight) Melbourne Lovins(weight)
night 1527 1 0.14 1740 1 night 1533 1 0.14 1747 1
Mexico Porter(weight) Mexico Lovins(weight)
people 982 1 0.16 1138 1 people 1069 1 0.16 1239 1
Miami Porter(weight) Miami Lovins(weight)
beach 2779 1 0.21 3372 1 beach 2780 1 0.21 3373 1
Milan Porter(weight) Milan Lovins(weight)
church 1695 1 0.24 2100 1 church 1722 1 0.24 2133 1
Montreal Porter(weight) Montreal Lovins(weight)
airplane 1165 1 1165 2 airplane 1173 1 1173 2
‧
Moscow Porter(weight) Moscow Lovins(weiht)
girl 1516 1 1516 1 girl 1516 1 1516 1
Munich Porter(weight) Munich Lovins(weight)
car 2760 1 2760 1 car 2556 1 2556 1
New York Porter(weight) New York Lovins(weight)
night 2146 1 2146 3 sky 1895 1 0.14 2160 2
Paris Porter(weight) Paris Lovins(weight)
travel 1853 1 1853 2 car 1874 1 0.14 2136 1
Prague Porter(weight) Prague Lovins(weight)
travel 1690 1 1690 1 travel 1742 1 1742 1 San Francisco Porter(weight) San Francisco Lovins(weight) night 2211 1 0.14 2520 4 night 2240 1 0.14 2553 3
‧
Sao Paulo Porter(weight) Sao Paulo Lovins(weight)
people 2330 1 0.42 3307 1 city 3030 1 0.39 4206 1
Seoul Porter(weight) Seoul Lovins(weight)
street 1583 1 0.72 2717 1 street 1588 1 0.72 2726 1
Shanghai Porter(weight) Shanghai Lovins(weight)
night 1839 1 0.42 2610 1 night 1840 1 0.42 2612 1
Singapore Porter(weight) Singapore Lovins(weight)
night 1366 1 0.14 1557 1 travel 1291 1 1291 2
Stockholm Porter(weight) Stockholm Lovins(weight)
street 1072 1 0.18 1262 1 street 1270 1 0.18 1496 1
Sydney Porter(weight) Sydney Lovins(weight)
sea 2707 1 0.14 3085 1 sea 1899 1 0.14 2164 1
‧
Taipei Porter(weight) Taipei Lovins(weight)
fun 1487 1 0.14 1695 2 play 1326 1 0.28 1697 1
Tokyo Porter(weight) Tokyo Lovins(weight)
people 2056 1 0.12 2295 2 people 2064 1 0.12 2304 2
Toronto Porter(weight) Toronto Lovins(weight)
sky 1181 1 1181 2 sky 1181 1 1181 2 Vienna Porter(weight) Vienna Lovins(weight)
art 1020 1 0.28 1305 1 art 1027 1 0.28 1314 1
Washington Porter(weight) Washington Lovins(weight)
landscape 1349 1 1349 1 sunset 1435 1 1435 1
Zurich Porter(weight) Zurich Lovins(weight)
street 1484 1 0.28 1899 1 street 1956 1 0.28 2503 1