的效能，由模擬實驗結果得知，路況交通覺知路由協定(RTARP)與 Epidemic Routing 及 Spray and Wait Routing 相比下有較佳的效能。
在訊息送達率中，當網路的節點愈多規模愈大以及傳輸距離越長時，雖然訊息送達 率有所上升，但路況交通覺知路由協定(RTARP)相較於 Epidemic routing 及 Spray and Wait Routing 仍有較佳的訊息送達率；針對網路的傳輸負載，我們提出的方法因使用單 節點間管控廣播傳輸方式(One-Hop Controlled Flooding)進行路況交通資訊的交換，因此 所得數值較低；在路況交通資訊(RTI)平均交換數量方面，雖然本研究所提出之路況交通 覺知路由協定(RTARP)均較低，但與 Epidemic routing 及 Spray and Wait Routing 相差不 到 5%；最後在路況交通資訊(RTI)正確率部分，本研究就所提出之路況交通覺知路由協
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
45
(RTI)正確率等方面，會與區塊大小的增加成正比，可見路況交通覺知路由協定(RTARP) 在進行路況資料收整時，仍保有相當的正確率。
5.2 未來展望
我們提出的路況交通覺知路由協定(RTARP)，目前僅能針對所有車輛已行駛過的路 段之交通資訊進行整合，倘若能以其它無線網路傳輸方式(例如 3G、WiMAX 或 4G LTE 等)結合交通管理中心(Traffic Management Center-TMC)或其他第三方所提供的路況資 訊，進而將所有路況資訊進一步彙整，取得節點自身所缺少的道路路況資訊，必定對行 車路徑的最短旅途時程規畫有相當大的助益，因此後續該如何整合不同系統的路況資 訊，可以作為未來進一步研究的方向；另外本研究的路況交通覺知路由協定(RTARP)是 以接收者為基礎(Receiver based)的路由協定，透過接收路況資訊的節點來選擇所需的路 況交通資訊，未來也可針對以傳送者為基礎(Sender based)的路由協定，作進一步的研究 與比較。
‧
[1] D. Schrank, B. Eisele and T. Lomax, "TTI’s 2012 Urban Mobility Report." Texas Transportation Institute, 2012.
[2] B. Tsai, "The Application of Real Time Traffic Information broadcasting via RDS-TMC."
in Geographic Information System Vol.2 No.4, 2008, pp. 20-25.
[3] T. Fujiki, M. Kirimura, T. Umedu and T. Higashino, "Efficient Acquisition of Local Traffic Information Using Inter-Vehicle Communication with Queries." in Proceedings of
Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC 2007) , 2007, pp.241-246.
[4] T. Nadeem, S. Dashtinezhad, C. Liao, and L. Iftode, "TrafficView: A Scalable Traffic Monitoring System." in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data
Management, 2004, pp.13-26.
[5] N. Shibata, T. Terauchi, T. Kitani, K. Yasumoto, M. Ito, and T. Higashino, "A Method for Sharing Traffic Jam Information Using Inter-Vehicle Communication." in Proceedings of
Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, 2006, pp. 1-7.
[6] V. Cerf, S. Burleigh, A. Hooke, L. Torgerson, R. Durst, K. Scott, K.Fall, and H. Weiss,
"Delay-Tolerant Networking Architecture," RFC4838, April 2007, [Online]. Available:
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/innotes/rfc4838.txt.
[7] S. Burleigh, A. Hooke, L. Torgerson, K. Fall, V. Cerf, B. Durst, K. Scott, and H.Weiss,
"Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary internet," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 128-136, Jun. 2003.
[8] S. Farrell, et al. "InterPlanetary Internet." Internet: http://www.ipnsig.org/, Retrievedon Apr. 20, 2011.
[9] Z. Lu and J. Fan, "Delay/Disruption tolerant network and its application in military
‧
communications," in Proc. of the 2010 International Conference on Computer Design and
Applications (ICCDA), 2010, pp. 231-234.
[10] Y. Sasaki and Y. Shibata, "Distributed disaster information system in DTN based mobile communication environment," in Proc. of the 2010 International Conference on Broadband,
Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications, 2010, pp. 274-277.
[11] E. Brewer, et al. "Technology and Infrastructure for Emerging Regions (TIER)."Internet:
http://tier.cs.berkeley.edu/drupal/about, Retrieved on Apr. 20, 2011.
[12] P.Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. S. Peh, and D. Rubenstein,"Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and earlyexperiences with ZebraNet," in
Proc. of the 10th International Conference onArchitectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2002,pp. 96-107.
[13] M. Martonosi, S. Lyon, L.-S. Peh, V. Poor, and D. Rubenstein. "The ZebraNet Wildlife Tracker." Internet: http://www.princeton.edu/~mrm/zebranet.html, Retrieved on Apr. 20,
2011.
[14] Vahdat A, Becker D (2000) "Epidemic routing for partially connected ad hoc networks."
Technical report, Duke University.
[15] Spyropoulos T, Psounis K, Raghavendra CS (2007) "Spray and focus: efficient mobility-assisted routing for heterogeneous and correlated mobility." In: PERCOMW ’07.
Washington, DC, USA, pp 79–85.
[16] Lindgren A, Doria A, Schelen O (2003) "Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks." In: SIGMOBILE mobile computing communications review. July, pp
7:19–20.
[17] I. Leontiadis and C. Mascolo, “GeOpps: geographical opportunistic routing for vehicular networks.” in IEEE international symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
48
multimedia networks (WoWMoM), June 2007, pp. 1–6.
[18] Zhao W, Ammar M, Zegura E (2004) “A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks.” In: MobiHoc.
[19] Y. Lin, J. Sheu and G. Chang, “Vehicle Density Detection Scheme in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks.”, September 2008.